Connect with us

Business

‘Intelligence too cheap to meter’ is AI’s next frontier, Sam Altman says

Published

on



In a high-profile fireside chat at the Federal Reserve in Washington, DC, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman sat down with Fed Vice Chair Michelle Bowman to sketch a sweeping vision of artificial intelligence and its implications for finance, employment, and society at large. The conversation, at the Fed’s Integrated Review of the Capital Framework for Large Banks Conference, covered the acceleration of AI adoption, productivity booms, looming risks, and why Altman thinks banks—and regulators—must rethink their approach to innovation.

Altman recounted the astonishing velocity of AI development and acceptance. “Only five years ago, AI was still thought of as something that was in the distant future,” he remarked, highlighting the dramatic changes since ChatGPT’s launch in November 2022. Since then, AI has leaped from niche to necessity, with new models achieving “gold-level performance” in tasks once reserved for elite human experts.

Productivity stories are pouring in from scientists and engineers: “We’re now hearing from scientists saying they’re two, three times more productive. We’re hearing from computer programmers that say they’re 10 times more productive. That’s completely changed what it means to write software.”

Altman captured the phenomena with a striking phrase: “It does in fact look like we’re about to deliver on ‘intelligence too cheap to meter.’ We’ve been able to drive down the cost of each unit of intelligence by more than a factor of 10 each year for the last five years.” He described a personal anecdote where a coding task, once days of work for an expert, was now solved by AI in five minutes for “less than a dollar’s worth of compute tokens.”

AI will make the phrase ‘AI company’ obsolete

Bowman, addressing a room of industry leaders, pressed Altman on the potential for AI to remake productivity in finance and beyond. Altman compared AI’s societal impact to the invention of the transistor: “The value sort of diffused throughout all of society as a massive productivity win.” He predicted the phrase “AI company” would soon sound outmoded, as every product and service would be expected to integrate intelligence by default.

Early adopters in finance are already deep in experimentation. Despite initial skepticism, institutions like Morgan Stanley and Bank of New York have embraced AI for critical functions. “Some of our biggest early enterprise partners turned out to be financial institutions,” Altman said, noting that they’ve figured out how to use the technology for critical processes.

On job disruption, Altman was candid about the uncertainty: “No one knows what happens next.” While predicting that some classes of jobs will vanish and others will emerge, he insisted that increased productivity historically leads to more, not less, human aspiration and creativity.

“There are cases where entire classes of jobs will go away. There are entirely new classes of jobs that will come.” He said he thinks that process will look like “most of history,” where humans and economies have adapted to the tools that technology creates.

“It turns out people seem to want unlimited stuff. Have a huge desire to express their creativity and be useful to people,” Altman continued. He added he’s “still waiting for that promise from the industrial revolution that we only had to work four hours a week and got to play on the beach and hang out with our kids,” he said, seemingly referring not to 19th-century forecasts on the future of work but 20th century economist John Maynard Keynes’ famous predictions about the future of work.

The panel did not wade into Keynes’ prediction that a 15-hour workweek would be achieved by the time of Keynes’ hypothetical grandchildren, as they would have been alive during the period leading up to 2030, almost exactly the current time. The conversation also didn’t expand into the subject of tariffs, protectionism or outsourcing, as the history of the decline of American manufacturing and the “China shock” of the 21st century suggest history is not a linear line in technological and economic disruption.

A future full of AI risk, even ‘fraud’

Altman also issued blunt warnings on the risks of AI, particularly synthetic fraud and impersonation, noting, “AI has fully defeated most of the ways that people authenticate currently other than passwords.” He urged banks and society to move away from voice- or image-only authentication methods and to prepare for new waves of cybercrime.

He described three broad risk categories: bad actors exploiting superintelligence, loss-of-control incidents (as sci-fi warns), and a subtler threat where society becomes so dependent on AI that human oversight, decision-making, and even government governance could degrade. “Emotional over-reliance,” especially among youth, is already emerging as a concern.

Throughout the conversation, Altman urged governments and businesses to move quickly but mindfully in adopting AI, stressing the importance of regulation that enables innovation rather than stifling it. He drew parallels to historical anxieties over calculators and Google, pointing out that such tools ultimately allowed people to focus on higher-level skills.

He also described how AI could become a global equalizer, especially in developing markets with limited access to professionals: “In a lot of the developing world, the alternative to a ChatGPT doctor is not a real doctor, it’s nothing at all, and then you’d definitely rather have this.”

In closing, Altman highlighted the rapid shift to advanced “reasoning models” in AI and invited financial leaders and government to embrace this new wave. “Government has got to embrace this technology, and we’ll be able to do everything better.”

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s chosen an HQ

Published

on



For years, Binance has dodged questions about where it plans to establish a corporate headquarters. On Monday, the world’s largest crypto exchange made an announcement that indicates it has chosen a location: Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates.

In its announcement, Binance reported that it has secured three global financial licenses within Abu Dhabi Global Market, a special economic zone inside the Emirati city. The licenses regulate three different prongs of the exchange’s business: its exchange, clearinghouse, and broker dealer services. The three regulated entities are named Nest Exchange Limited, Nest Clearing and Custody Limited, and Nest Trading Limited, respectively.

Richard Teng, the co-CEO of Binance, declined to say whether Abu Dhabi is now Binance’s global headquarters. “But for all intents and purposes, if you look at the regulatory sphere, I think the global regulators are more concerned of where we are regulated on a global basis,” he said, adding that Abu Dhabi Global Market is where his crypto exchange’s “global platform” will be governed.

A company spokesperson declined to add more to Teng’s comments, but did not deny Fortune’s assertion that Binance appears to have chosen Abu Dhabai as its headquarters.

Corporate governance

The Abu Dhabi announcement suggests that Binance, which has for years taken pride in branding itself as a company with no fixed location, is bowing to the practical considerations that go with being a major financial firm—and the corporate governance obligations that entails.

When Changpeng Zhao, the cofounder and former CEO of Binance, launched the company in 2017, he initially established the exchange in Hong Kong. But, weeks after he registered Binance in the city, China banned cryptocurrency trading, and Zhao moved his nascent trading platform. Binance has since been itinerant. “Wherever I sit is going to be the Binance office,” Zhao said in 2020.

The location of a company’s headquarters impacts its tax obligations and what regulations it needs to follow. In 2023, after Binance reached a landmark $4.3 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, Zhao stepped down as CEO and pleaded guilty to failing to implement an effective anti-money laundering program.

Teng took over and promised to implement the corporate structures—like a board of directors—that are the norm for companies of Binance’s size. Teng, who now shares the CEO role with the newly appointed Yi He, oversaw the appointment of Binance’s first board in April 2024. And he’s repeatedly telegraphed that his crypto exchange is focused on regulatory compliance.

Binance already has a strong footprint in the Emirates. It has a crypto license in Dubai, received a $2 billion investment from an Emirati venture fund in March, and, that same month, said it employed 1,000 employees in the country. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Leaders in Congress outperform rank-and-file lawmakers on stock trades by up to 47% a year

Published

on



Stocks held by members of Congress have been beating the S&P 500 lately, but there’s a subset of lawmakers who crush their peers: leadership.

According to a recent working paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, congressional leaders outperform back benchers by up to 47% a year.

Shang-Jin Wei from Columbia University and Columbia Business School along with Yifan Zhou from Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University looked at lawmakers who ascended to leadership posts, such as Speaker of the House as well as House and Senate floor leaders, whips, and conference/caucus chairs.

Between 1995 and 2021, there were 20 such leaders who made stock trades before and after rising to their posts. Wei and Zhou observed that lawmakers underperformed benchmarks before becoming leaders, then everything suddenly changed.

“Importantly, whilst we observe a huge improvement in leaders’ trading performance as they ascend to leadership roles, the matched ‘regular’ members’ stock trading performance does not improve much,” they wrote.

Leadership’s stock market edge stems in part from their ability to set the regulatory or legislation agenda, such as deciding if and when a particular bill will be put to a vote. Setting the agenda also gives leaders advanced knowledge of when certain actions will take place.

In fact, Wei and Zhou found that leaders demonstrate much better returns on stock trades that are made when their party controls their chamber.

In addition, being a leader also increases access to non-public information. The researchers said that while companies are reluctant to share such insider knowledge, they may prioritize revealing it to leaders over rank-and-file lawmakers.

Leaders earn higher returns on companies that contribute to their campaigns or are headquartered in their states, which Wei and Zhou said could be attributable to “privileged access to firm-specific information.”

The upper echelon also influences how other members of Congress vote, and the paper found that a leader’s party is much more likely to vote for bills that help firms whose stocks the leader held, or vote against bills that harmed them. And stocks owned by leadership tend to see increases in federal contract awards, especially sole-source contracts, over the following one to two years.

“These results suggest that congressional leaders may not only trade on privileged knowledge, but also shape policy outcomes to enrich themselves,” Wei and Zhou wrote.

Stock trades by congressional leaders are even predictive, forecasting higher occurrences of positive or negative corporate news over the following year, they added. In particular, stock sales predict the number of hearings and regulatory actions over the coming year, though purchases don’t.

Investors have long suspected that Washington has a special advantage on Wall Street. That’s given rise to more ETFs with political themes, including funds that track portfolios belonging to Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

And Paul Pelosi, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, even has a cult following among some investors who mimic his stock moves.

Congress has tried to crack down on members’ stock holdings. The STOCK Act of 2012 requires more timely disclosures, but some lawmakers want to ban trading completely.

A bipartisan group of House members is pushing legislation that would prohibit members of Congress, their spouses, dependent children, and trustees from trading individual stocks, commodities, or futures.

And this past week, a discharge petition was put forth that would force a vote in the House if it gets enough signatures.

“If leadership wants to put forward a bill that would actually do that and end the corruption, we’re all for it,” said Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., on social media on Tuesday. “But we’re tired of the partisan games. This is the most bipartisan bipartisan thing in U.S. history, and it’s time that the House of Representatives listens to the American people.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus

Published

on



French President Emmanuel Macron warned that the European Union may be forced to take “strong measures” against China, including potential tariffs, if Beijing fails to address its widening trade imbalance with the bloc.

“I’m trying to explain to the Chinese that their trade surplus isn’t sustainable because they’re killing their own clients, notably by importing hardly anything from us any more,” Macron told Les Echos newspaper in an interview published on Sunday.

“If they don’t react, in the coming months we Europeans will be obliged to take strong measures and decouple, like the US, like for example tariffs on Chinese products,” he said, adding that he had discussed the matter with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Macron has just returned from a three-day state visit in China, where he pressed for more investment as Paris seeks to recalibrate its relationship with the world’s second-largest economy. France’s goods trade deficit with China reached around €47 billion ($54.7 billion) last year, according to the French Treasury. Meanwhile, China’s goods trade surplus with the EU swelled to almost $143 billion in the first half of 2025, a record for any six-month period, according to data released by China earlier this year.

Tensions between France and China escalated last year after Paris backed the EU’s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Beijing retaliated by imposing minimum price requirements on French cognac, sparking fears among pork and dairy producers that they could be targeted next.

‘Life or Death’

Macron said the US approach to China was “inappropriate” and had worsened Europe’s position by diverting Chinese goods toward the EU market.

“Today, we’re stuck between the two, and it’s a question of life or death for European industry,” Macron said, while noting that Germany — Europe’s biggest economy — doesn’t entirely share France’s stance.

In addition to Europe needing to become more competitive, the European Central Bank too has a role to play in strengthening the EU’s single market, Macron said, arguing that monetary policy should take growth and jobs into account, not just inflation, he said.

He also said the ECB’s decision to continue selling the government bonds it holds risks pushing up long-term interest rates and weighing on economic activity.

“Europe must — and wants to — remain a zone of monetary stability and credible investment,” Macron said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.