Connect with us

Business

Inside the $22 trillion world of private capital, an asset class so big it would be the world’s second-largest economy

Published

on


Top analysts at Bank of America Research are pulling back the curtain on the colossal $22 trillion universe of private capital, an asset class so massive it would be “the world’s second-largest economy” if it were treated as a country. As the global financial landscape faces tectonic shifts, Bank of America Research’s latest thematic investing report reveals that private capital is reshaping how companies, investors, and economies think about growth, risk, and control, challenging the primacy of public markets and opening new frontiers for both innovation and caution.​

Private capital, defined by the bank as assets not available on public markets, includes private equity, private credit and real assets. It has multiplied at a staggering pace, more than doubling since 2012 to $22 trillion by 2024. This explosion has been driven by a retreat from public markets. Since 2000, the number of U.S.-listed companies has halved to just over 4,000, even as the number of private venture-backed firms soared 25-fold. Startups now remain private for an average of 16 years, a third longer than a decade ago, reflecting a broad shift toward private capital and away from public scrutiny and regulation.​

The world’s most transformative firms aren’t found on the stock market ticker, BofA argues. Just as public stock markets have a “Magnificent 7,” so there is a “Private Magnificent 7” of “hectocorns,” each valued at $100 billion or more and growing. BofA’s Thematic Research team estimates that their combined valuations have skyrocketed nearly fivefold since 2023 to $1.4 trillion. They evaluated the top 16 companies in the space, representing $1.5 trillion in value, an astonishing 1% of global GDP. There are many other “decacorns” (valued at $10 billion+) and unicorns below them in the list.

For investors, BofA finds that private equity has notably outperformed the S&P 500 over this period, by six percentage points per year on average. And there are other benefits to privacy, BofA analysts add: “In the time spent on financial regulation paperwork every year, 12 Great Pyramids of Giza could be built.”

But as this asset class balloons, financial experts warn that opacity breeds risk, especially with regard to the $1 trillion-$3 trillion chunk of the asset class known as private credit. Public markets offer transparency, governance, and liquidity; private firms, by contrast, often avoid periodic reporting and undergo less rigorous oversight. This lack of visibility can mask financial and governance hazards, with analysts urging investors not to overlook the pitfalls in their quest for returns.​

Wall Street’s “fear index”—the VIX—spiked by more than 35% in the past month amid bankruptcies at subprime lender Tricolor Holdings and auto supplier First Brands, both marred by alleged fraud and loss events, slicing $100 billion off U.S. bank stock market capitalization. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warned, “When you see one cockroach, there are probably more,” pointing to the dangers of hidden risks in private lending markets. In fact, Dimon has been sounding a similar tune since at least May, when he warned that non-bank lending “hasn’t been tested in a downturn,” implying that a deluge of defaults could follow if a recession hits.

Capital allocation goes private

Historically, public companies were seen as the best vehicles for capital efficiency. They offered liquid investments, transparent financials, and were accessible to all. Yet, private capital is rewriting the rules. With fewer companies pursuing IPOs, public markets are losing their once-central role in economic growth. At the same time, innovation and digitization—sparked by disruptors like OpenAI’s ChatGPT—are increasingly nourished by deep-pocketed private investors. Since ChatGPT’s launch, BofA finds, Nvidia, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have invested in roughly half of the world’s 100 artificial intelligence (AI) unicorns.​

The data-center deals that are driving a significant chunk of GDP growth are increasingly based on private credit, to boot. Meta, for example, has secured a nearly $30 billion financing package or a data center in Louisiana, Bloomberg reported, adding that it is the largest private capital deal on record. The scale of spending in this space is unprecedented, with OpenAI alone estimating it will require trillions in infrastructure spend to keep up with rapid technological demands. In late October, Apollo Global Management Chief Economist Torsten Slok argued that private construction spending on data centers was so massive that there was “basically no growth in corporate capex outside of AI at this moment.”

​Even some of the beneficiaries of this are concerned. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman has drawn parallels to the dot-com bubble, cautioning that “someone’s gonna get burned there”—especially since 95% of generative AI projects reportedly don’t deliver any profit, according to a widely read piece of MIT research. Analysts warn that investors could face pain if speculative infrastructure bets outpace real-world utility or revenues, recalling lessons from early-2000s telecom overreach.

The first phase of AI build-out was largely peer-to-peer, but now bond investors and private credit lenders are providing two to three times the funding of public markets. Tech “hyperscalers” have tapped private credit for sustained, long-tenor loans, and commercial mortgage-backed securities tied to AI infrastructure hit $15.6 billion in August, JPMorgan estimated at the time. Major deals now feature 20-30 year funding horizons—extraordinary bets on technologies whose commercial viability five years from now remains uncertain. “We are conservative in our assessment of forward cash flows because we don’t know what they will look like, there’s no historical basis,” Ruth Yang, global head of private market analytics at S&P Global Ratings, told Bloomberg in August.

Shawn Tully, who has reported extensively on private credit for Fortune, noted a distinction between major players such as Apollo, Ares, and KKR, who are “pioneering a highly original strategy by extending credit they originate independently, often backed by high-earning assets from rail cars to data centers, that lock in borrowers for a number of years.” Borrowers are willing to pay a lot more in interest than the traditional lengthy, expensive syndication process that requires ratings from S&P and Fitch, tough covenants, and sometimes long.

Two top executives in the space, David Spreng of Runway Growth Capital and Ted Goldthorpe of BC Partners Credit, argued in a Fortune commentary this month that private credit is not, in fact, a shadowy bogeyman but “structured finance built on cash flow, enterprise value, and downside protection.” Far from venture-style risk-taking, they argue that many private debt vehicles are publicly listed or institutionally backed, while reporting audited financials and operating under legal and fiduciary obligations. To be sure, they add, there are riskier parts of the market with looser standards such as covenant-lite loans, aggressive structures, or promises of liquidity where underlying assets are illiquid.

Earlier this month, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management CIO Lisa Shalett told Fortune she was particularly concerned about how much of the spending boom has been driven by private credit. “Every morning the opening screen on my Bloomberg is what’s going on with CDS spreads on Oracle debt,” she said, referring to credit default swaps, the financial instrument infamous for the role it played in the 2008 Great Financial Crisis global market meltdown. “If people start getting worried about Oracle’s ability to pay,” Shalett said, “that’s gonna be an early indication to us that people are getting nervous.”

The long view: opportunity vs. oversight

The tectonic shift toward private investing carries enormous implications for society. BofA analysts note that as private firms scale, they shape how technology develops, how jobs are created, and how risks are managed. The top 120 private unicorns now boast a total valuation roughly equal to Germany’s entire market cap, signaling their outsized influence on the global stage.​

Jim Rossman, the global head of Barclays’ shareholder advisory group, has been tracking private assets with a particular focus on hedge funds for decades on Wall Street, and he sees a wider transformation taking place. “The growth of private capital is really a reflection of the fact that companies, particularly these now that Apollo and Blackstone and TPG, are closing in on trillion-dollar platforms,” he told Fortune in a recent interview, noting that they’ve acquired their own insurance companies in some cases and are growing beyond the traditional conception of an investment firm.

These firms are so flush with capital and assets, Rossman said, that he sees the private capital boom facilitating the growth of alternative platforms to public markets. “You could see an age when private equity, private capital allows companies to remain in a private format for longer. And if 401(k)s get opened up” for private equity investments, he added, he could envision some kind of investment platform where wealth advisors could invest money just as freely in the private capital space as they can now in equities. “And that would give you exposure to a much broader part of the economy than just what’s public.”

More generally, Rossman added, the world of finance is undergoing many changes. “I think there’s a technology change, a generational change, and then finally, the structural change [that] may be the most important is the growth of mutual fund investing.” Instead of seeing private capital as a shadowy and risky thing, Rossman argued it is opening up more kinds of companies to investment, and that will likely grow, even mutate in surprising ways to many investors.

Rossman recalled buying his first mutual fund through a leading asset manager in the late 1990s: “It cost 300 basis points, three percentage points to join, and they would select 28 interesting technology companies … and then, oh, the expense ratio would be two-and-a-half, 250 basis points a year.” Today, he said, the index-fund revolution has democratized access to the point where you can get the same fund for just 5, 15 or 25 basis points. “It’s just so incredible.”

As the line between public and private capital blurs, the $22 trillion world of private capital is not just a financial story—it’s a signpost for how our economies, companies, and innovations will be built and valued in the years to come. With private assets rivaling the size of national economies and the biggest names in tech betting big outside the public eye, top analysts believe this is a revolution that’s just getting started.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX to offer insider shares at record-setting $800 billion valuation

Published

on



SpaceX is preparing to sell insider shares in a transaction that would value Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite maker at as much as $800 billion, people familiar with the matter said, reclaiming the title of the world’s most valuable private company. 

The details, discussed by SpaceX’s board of directors on Thursday at its Starbase hub in Texas, could change based on interest from insider sellers and buyers or other factors, said some of the people, who asked not to be identified as the information isn’t public. SpaceX is also exploring a possible initial public offering as soon as late next year, one of the people said. 

Another person briefed on the matter said that the price under discussion for the sale of some employees and investors’ shares is higher than $400 apiece, which would value SpaceX at between $750 billion and $800 billion. The company wouldn’t raise any funds though this planned sale, though a successful offering at such levels would catapult it past the record of $500 billion valuation achieved by OpenAI in October.

Elon Musk on Saturday denied that SpaceX is raising money at a $800 billion valuation without addressing Bloomberg’s reporting on the planned offering of insiders’ shares. 

“SpaceX has been cash flow positive for many years and does periodic stock buybacks twice a year to provide liquidity for employees and investors,” Musk said in a post on his social media platform X. 

The share sale price under discussion would be a substantial increase from the $212 a share set in July, when the company raised money and sold shares at a valuation of $400 billion. The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times earlier reported the $800 billion valuation target.

News of SpaceX’s valuation sent shares of EchoStar Corp., a satellite TV and wireless company, up as much as 18%. Last month, EchoStar had agreed to sell spectrum licenses to SpaceX for $2.6 billion, adding to an earlier agreement to sell about $17 billion in wireless spectrum to Musk’s company.

Subscribe Now: The Business of Space newsletter covers NASA, key industry events and trends.

The world’s most prolific rocket launcher, SpaceX dominates the space industry with its Falcon 9 rocket that lifts satellites and people to orbit.

SpaceX is also the industry leader in providing internet services from low-Earth orbit through Starlink, a system of more than 9,000 satellites that is far ahead of competitors including Amazon.com Inc.’s Amazon Leo.

Elite Group

SpaceX is among an elite group of companies that have the ability to raise funds at $100 billion-plus valuations while delaying or denying they have any plan to go public. 

An IPO of the company at an $800 billion value would vault SpaceX into another rarefied group — the 20 largest public companies, a few notches below Musk’s Tesla Inc. 

If SpaceX sold 5% of the company at that valuation, it would have to sell $40 billion of stock — making it the biggest IPO of all time, well above Saudi Aramco’s $29 billion listing in 2019. The firm sold just 1.5% of the company in that offering, a much smaller slice than the majority of publicly traded firms make available.

A listing would also subject SpaceX to the volatility of being a public company, versus private firms whose valuations are closely guarded secrets. Space and defense company IPOs have had a mixed reception in 2025. Karman Holdings Inc.’s stock has nearly tripled since its debut, while Firefly Aerospace Inc. and Voyager Technologies Inc. have plunged by double-digit percentages since their debuts.

SpaceX executives have repeatedly floated the idea of spinning off SpaceX’s Starlink business into a separate, publicly traded company — a concept President Gwynne Shotwell first suggested in 2020. 

However, Musk cast doubt on the prospect publicly over the years and Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnsen said in 2024 that a Starlink IPO would be something that would take place more likely “in the years to come.”

The Information, citing people familiar with the discussions, separately reported on Friday that SpaceX has told investors and financial institution representatives that it’s aiming for an IPO of the entire company in the second half of next year.

Read More: How to Buy SpaceX: A Guide for the Eager, Pre-IPO

A so-called tender or secondary offering, through which employees and some early shareholders can sell shares, provides investors in closely held companies such as SpaceX a way to generate liquidity.

SpaceX is working to develop its new Starship vehicle, advertised as the most powerful rocket ever developed to loft huge numbers of Starlink satellites as well as carry cargo and people to moon and, eventually, Mars.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

National Park Service drops free admission on MLK Day and Juneteenth while adding Trump’s birthday

Published

on



The National Park Service will offer free admission to U.S. residents on President Donald Trump’s birthday next year — which also happens to be Flag Day — but is eliminating the benefit for Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth.

The new list of free admission days for Americans is the latest example of the Trump administration downplaying America’s civil rights history while also promoting the president’s image, name and legacy.

Last year, the list of free days included Martin Luther King Jr Day and Juneteenth — which is June 19 — but not June 14, Trump’s birthday.

The new free-admission policy takes effect Jan. 1 and was one of several changes announced by the Park Service late last month, including higher admission fees for international visitors.

The other days of free park admission in 2026 are Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Constitution Day, Veterans Day, President Theodore Roosevelt’s birthday (Oct. 27) and the anniversary of the creation of the Park Service (Aug. 25).

Eliminating Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth, which commemorates the day in 1865 when the last enslaved Americans were emancipated, removes two of the nation’s most prominent civil rights holidays.

Some civil rights leaders voiced opposition to the change after news about it began spreading over the weekend.

“The raw & rank racism here stinks to high heaven,” Harvard Kennedy School professor Cornell William Brooks, a former president of the NAACP, wrote on social media about the new policy.

Kristen Brengel, a spokesperson for the National Parks Conservation Association, said that while presidential administrations have tweaked the free days in the past, the elimination of Martin Luther King Jr. Day is particularly concerning. For one, the day has become a popular day of service for community groups that use the free day to perform volunteer projects at parks.

That will now be much more expensive, said Brengel, whose organization is a nonprofit that advocates for the park system.

“Not only does it recognize an American hero, it’s also a day when people go into parks to clean them up,” Brengel said. “Martin Luther King Jr. deserves a day of recognition … For some reason, Black history has repeatedly been targeted by this administration, and it shouldn’t be.”

Some Democratic lawmakers also weighed in to object to the new policy.

“The President didn’t just add his own birthday to the list, he removed both of these holidays that mark Black Americans’ struggle for civil rights and freedom,” said Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada. “Our country deserves better.”

A spokesperson for the National Park Service did not immediately respond to questions on Saturday seeking information about the reasons behind the changes.

Since taking office, Trump has sought to eliminate programs seen as promoting diversity across the federal government, actions that have erased or downplayed America’s history of racism as well as the civil rights victories of Black Americans.

Self-promotion is an old habit of the president’s and one he has continued in his second term. He unsuccessfully put himself forwardfor the Nobel Peace Prize, renamed the U.S. Institute of Peace after himself, sought to put his name on the planned NFL stadium in the nation’s capital and had a new children’s savings program named after him.

Some Republican lawmakers have suggested putting his visage on Mount Rushmore and the $100 bill.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a ‘real problem’

Published

on



JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon called out slow bureaucracy in Europe in a warning that a “weak” continent poses a major economic risk to the US.

“Europe has a real problem,” Dimon said Saturday at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “They do some wonderful things on their safety nets. But they’ve driven business out, they’ve driven investment out, they’ve driven innovation out. It’s kind of coming back.”

While he praised some European leaders who he said were aware of the issues, he cautioned politics is “really hard.” 

Dimon, leader of the biggest US bank, has long said that the risk of a fragmented Europe is among the major challenges facing the world. In his letter to shareholders released earlier this year, he said that Europe has “some serious issues to fix.”

On Saturday, he praised the creation of the euro and Europe’s push for peace. But he warned that a reduction in military efforts and challenges trying to reach agreement within the European Union are threatening the continent.

“If they fragment, then you can say that America first will not be around anymore,” Dimon said. “It will hurt us more than anybody else because they are a major ally in every single way, including common values, which are really important.”

He said the US should help.

“We need a long-term strategy to help them become strong,” Dimon said. “A weak Europe is bad for us.”

The administration of President Donald Trump issued a new national security strategy that directed US interests toward the Western Hemisphere and protection of the homeland while dismissing Europe as a continent headed toward “civilizational erasure.”

Read More: Trump’s National Security Strategy Veers Inward in Telling Shift

JPMorgan has been ramping up its push to spur more investments in the national defense sector. In October, the bank announced that it would funnel $1.5 trillion into industries that bolster US economic security and resiliency over the next 10 years — as much as $500 billion more than what it would’ve provided anyway. 

Dimon said in the statement that it’s “painfully clear that the United States has allowed itself to become too reliant on unreliable sources of critical minerals, products and manufacturing.”

Investment banker Jay Horine oversees the effort, which Dimon called “100% commercial.” It will focus on four areas: supply chain and advanced manufacturing; defense and aerospace; energy independence and resilience; and frontier and strategic technologies. 

The bank will also invest as much as $10 billion of its own capital to help certain companies expand, innovate or accelerate strategic manufacturing.

Separately on Saturday, Dimon praised Trump for finding ways to roll back bureaucracy in the government.

“There is no question that this administration is trying to bring an axe to some of the bureaucracy that held back America,” Dimon said. “That is a good thing and we can do it and still keep the world safe, for safe food and safe banks and all the stuff like that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.