Connect with us

Business

How Trump’s latest H1-B visa move will help Canada

Published

on



In 2007, when Microsoft announced it was opening a software development center in Vancouver, the American tech giant explained it was making the move because of hassles getting H-1B visas for highly skilled employees from overseas, given the U.S. government’s recent reduction in national quotas on the hard-to-get work permits. Canada had no such caps.

The software maker, a longtime proponent of making more visas available for skilled foreigners because of a talent shortage stateside, said at the time that the Vancouver facility would “allow the company to continue to recruit and retain highly skilled people affected by the immigration issues in the U.S.” Seven years later, during another round of tightening of the H-1B program, Microsoft added an engineering hub in Vancouver, while other U.S. tech giants including Amazon, Facebook, and Salesforce opened facilities in the Pacific Coast city.

That’s why many are predicting that the $100,000 fees on new H-1B applications announced last week by U.S. President Donald Trump could have the unintended consequence of sending more tech jobs to Canada. It could also be a windfall for other countries, such as India and China, with more of their skilled highly workers staying or returning home instead of working in the U.S. after graduation. Indian and Chinese nationals make up 85% of H-1B visa recipients, according to an analysis by Pew Research—and many are opting for jobs at home.

“Cities like Vancouver or Toronto will thrive instead of American cities,” Garry Tan, CEO of prominent San Francisco startup incubator Y Combinator, wrote earlier this week in a now deleted X post, according to Bloomberg.

And Royal Bank of Canada CEO Dave McKay told Bloomberg on Tuesday that the new H-1B rule “is going to help Canada retain some of those great students we brought in” instead of losing them to Silicon Valley—and make it easier to recruit others.

The H-1B visa program is used primarily by the tech sector, as well as financial institutions and consulting. According to the U.S. government, the biggest users of H1-B visas are Amazon, the India-based tech giant Tata Consultancy Services, Microsoft, Meta Platforms and Apple Inc. Non-tech companies that hire many H-1B workers include J.P. Morgan Chase and Walmart Inc.

The visas are exceedingly difficult to obtain: Each year, companies must file petitions to the U.S. government on behalf of prospective employees by March, for a lottery held in April, with just 65,000 visas available. (There are another 20,000 for U.S. master’s graduates.) In 2025, over 470,000 applications were submitted. While other visas exist, such as the “O” visa for outstanding skills, many are just as hard, or even harder, to get.

To obtain an H-1B, companies must show that the foreign worker will fill a “specialty occupation” for which the company cannot find a qualified U.S. worker. The visa holder must be paid at least the prevailing wage, so as not to unfairly compete with U.S. workers, drive down their salaries, or replace them with cheaper labor.

The H-1B program has long had critics, with many saying companies use it to bring in cheaper foreign labor for skilled jobs. Over the years, there have been periodic pullbacks of the program by the U.S. government. In 2004, the government lowered the cap on visas granted from 195,000 to 65,000 a year, and it has not been raised since, other than to add the provision for U.S. master’s holders. (An analysis in 2020 found that that the move led to a 27% increase in hiring at employers’ international offices.)

During his first term in 2017, Trump signed the “Buy American, Hire American” executive order that led H-1B denial rates to spike to 15%, up from 4% two years earlier. (The quota was still reached.)

The most recent Trump announcement set off a frenzy at many large tech companies: Microsoft, J.P. Morgan and Amazon urgently advised employees with H-1B visas to remain in the U.S. or return quickly following Friday’s proclamation. (The White House quickly clarified that the fee applied to new applications only.)

Amid the uncertainty and chaos, Canada’s comparatively predictable, company-friendly approach may well become more of a draw. In recent years, Canadian cities seem to have benefited from a less welcoming environment for immigrant workers in the United States: In 2022, a New York Times report found Toronto was North America’s third largest tech hub—behind only Silicon Valley and New York, and bigger than Seattle, Austin, and Chicago. More recently, Montreal and Edmonton, Alberta, have emerged as major artificial intelligence hubs.

While talent, government incentives, and an often weak Canadian dollar have been contributing factors in the country’s emergence as a locale of choice for American tech giants, restrictions on H-1B visas have been one of the biggest points of friction for tech employers in the U.S.

Canada is often a top choice for American technology companies opening satellite offices because of the proximity of its tech-friendly cities to their headquarters (Vancouver is just 150 miles from Seattle, home to Amazon and Microsoft) and because Canada’s immigration policies have historically allowed in more foreign high-skilled workers.

The Canadian government, along with provincial and city governments, has never been shy about trying to lure foreign tech talent from the U.S. to Canada, with high-skilled temporary visas and no limits for permanent residence on a per-country basis. We saw that with the campaign to woo Microsoft in 2007, with promises of incentives and help with location services.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that H-1B turmoil will make Canada home to the next Silicon Valley. These are regional offices after all, not headquarters. “You don’t really see much of a domestic ecosystem, certainly not coming out of those back offices,” warned Kevin Bryan, an associate professor at University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management.

Whether Canada tries takes the new rules for H-1B applicants as an opportunity to attract more foreign tech workers remains to be seen. The wildcard is public opinion in Canada, which has also cooled to immigration. The Canadian government’s target for new permanent residents this year is 395,000 people—well below the 500,00 last year, with more decreases coming in the next two years.

But if it does, there will likely be great interest: in 2023, the Canadian government introduced a new work permit aimed squarely at H-1B holders tired of U.S. immigration procedures. The 10,000 permit applications limit was hit on the first day.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX to offer insider shares at record-setting $800 billion valuation

Published

on



SpaceX is preparing to sell insider shares in a transaction that would value Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite maker at as much as $800 billion, people familiar with the matter said, reclaiming the title of the world’s most valuable private company. 

The details, discussed by SpaceX’s board of directors on Thursday at its Starbase hub in Texas, could change based on interest from insider sellers and buyers or other factors, said some of the people, who asked not to be identified as the information isn’t public. SpaceX is also exploring a possible initial public offering as soon as late next year, one of the people said. 

Another person briefed on the matter said that the price under discussion for the sale of some employees and investors’ shares is higher than $400 apiece, which would value SpaceX at between $750 billion and $800 billion. The company wouldn’t raise any funds though this planned sale, though a successful offering at such levels would catapult it past the record of $500 billion valuation achieved by OpenAI in October.

Elon Musk on Saturday denied that SpaceX is raising money at a $800 billion valuation without addressing Bloomberg’s reporting on the planned offering of insiders’ shares. 

“SpaceX has been cash flow positive for many years and does periodic stock buybacks twice a year to provide liquidity for employees and investors,” Musk said in a post on his social media platform X. 

The share sale price under discussion would be a substantial increase from the $212 a share set in July, when the company raised money and sold shares at a valuation of $400 billion. The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times earlier reported the $800 billion valuation target.

News of SpaceX’s valuation sent shares of EchoStar Corp., a satellite TV and wireless company, up as much as 18%. Last month, EchoStar had agreed to sell spectrum licenses to SpaceX for $2.6 billion, adding to an earlier agreement to sell about $17 billion in wireless spectrum to Musk’s company.

Subscribe Now: The Business of Space newsletter covers NASA, key industry events and trends.

The world’s most prolific rocket launcher, SpaceX dominates the space industry with its Falcon 9 rocket that lifts satellites and people to orbit.

SpaceX is also the industry leader in providing internet services from low-Earth orbit through Starlink, a system of more than 9,000 satellites that is far ahead of competitors including Amazon.com Inc.’s Amazon Leo.

Elite Group

SpaceX is among an elite group of companies that have the ability to raise funds at $100 billion-plus valuations while delaying or denying they have any plan to go public. 

An IPO of the company at an $800 billion value would vault SpaceX into another rarefied group — the 20 largest public companies, a few notches below Musk’s Tesla Inc. 

If SpaceX sold 5% of the company at that valuation, it would have to sell $40 billion of stock — making it the biggest IPO of all time, well above Saudi Aramco’s $29 billion listing in 2019. The firm sold just 1.5% of the company in that offering, a much smaller slice than the majority of publicly traded firms make available.

A listing would also subject SpaceX to the volatility of being a public company, versus private firms whose valuations are closely guarded secrets. Space and defense company IPOs have had a mixed reception in 2025. Karman Holdings Inc.’s stock has nearly tripled since its debut, while Firefly Aerospace Inc. and Voyager Technologies Inc. have plunged by double-digit percentages since their debuts.

SpaceX executives have repeatedly floated the idea of spinning off SpaceX’s Starlink business into a separate, publicly traded company — a concept President Gwynne Shotwell first suggested in 2020. 

However, Musk cast doubt on the prospect publicly over the years and Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnsen said in 2024 that a Starlink IPO would be something that would take place more likely “in the years to come.”

The Information, citing people familiar with the discussions, separately reported on Friday that SpaceX has told investors and financial institution representatives that it’s aiming for an IPO of the entire company in the second half of next year.

Read More: How to Buy SpaceX: A Guide for the Eager, Pre-IPO

A so-called tender or secondary offering, through which employees and some early shareholders can sell shares, provides investors in closely held companies such as SpaceX a way to generate liquidity.

SpaceX is working to develop its new Starship vehicle, advertised as the most powerful rocket ever developed to loft huge numbers of Starlink satellites as well as carry cargo and people to moon and, eventually, Mars.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

National Park Service drops free admission on MLK Day and Juneteenth while adding Trump’s birthday

Published

on



The National Park Service will offer free admission to U.S. residents on President Donald Trump’s birthday next year — which also happens to be Flag Day — but is eliminating the benefit for Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth.

The new list of free admission days for Americans is the latest example of the Trump administration downplaying America’s civil rights history while also promoting the president’s image, name and legacy.

Last year, the list of free days included Martin Luther King Jr Day and Juneteenth — which is June 19 — but not June 14, Trump’s birthday.

The new free-admission policy takes effect Jan. 1 and was one of several changes announced by the Park Service late last month, including higher admission fees for international visitors.

The other days of free park admission in 2026 are Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Constitution Day, Veterans Day, President Theodore Roosevelt’s birthday (Oct. 27) and the anniversary of the creation of the Park Service (Aug. 25).

Eliminating Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth, which commemorates the day in 1865 when the last enslaved Americans were emancipated, removes two of the nation’s most prominent civil rights holidays.

Some civil rights leaders voiced opposition to the change after news about it began spreading over the weekend.

“The raw & rank racism here stinks to high heaven,” Harvard Kennedy School professor Cornell William Brooks, a former president of the NAACP, wrote on social media about the new policy.

Kristen Brengel, a spokesperson for the National Parks Conservation Association, said that while presidential administrations have tweaked the free days in the past, the elimination of Martin Luther King Jr. Day is particularly concerning. For one, the day has become a popular day of service for community groups that use the free day to perform volunteer projects at parks.

That will now be much more expensive, said Brengel, whose organization is a nonprofit that advocates for the park system.

“Not only does it recognize an American hero, it’s also a day when people go into parks to clean them up,” Brengel said. “Martin Luther King Jr. deserves a day of recognition … For some reason, Black history has repeatedly been targeted by this administration, and it shouldn’t be.”

Some Democratic lawmakers also weighed in to object to the new policy.

“The President didn’t just add his own birthday to the list, he removed both of these holidays that mark Black Americans’ struggle for civil rights and freedom,” said Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada. “Our country deserves better.”

A spokesperson for the National Park Service did not immediately respond to questions on Saturday seeking information about the reasons behind the changes.

Since taking office, Trump has sought to eliminate programs seen as promoting diversity across the federal government, actions that have erased or downplayed America’s history of racism as well as the civil rights victories of Black Americans.

Self-promotion is an old habit of the president’s and one he has continued in his second term. He unsuccessfully put himself forwardfor the Nobel Peace Prize, renamed the U.S. Institute of Peace after himself, sought to put his name on the planned NFL stadium in the nation’s capital and had a new children’s savings program named after him.

Some Republican lawmakers have suggested putting his visage on Mount Rushmore and the $100 bill.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a ‘real problem’

Published

on



JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon called out slow bureaucracy in Europe in a warning that a “weak” continent poses a major economic risk to the US.

“Europe has a real problem,” Dimon said Saturday at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “They do some wonderful things on their safety nets. But they’ve driven business out, they’ve driven investment out, they’ve driven innovation out. It’s kind of coming back.”

While he praised some European leaders who he said were aware of the issues, he cautioned politics is “really hard.” 

Dimon, leader of the biggest US bank, has long said that the risk of a fragmented Europe is among the major challenges facing the world. In his letter to shareholders released earlier this year, he said that Europe has “some serious issues to fix.”

On Saturday, he praised the creation of the euro and Europe’s push for peace. But he warned that a reduction in military efforts and challenges trying to reach agreement within the European Union are threatening the continent.

“If they fragment, then you can say that America first will not be around anymore,” Dimon said. “It will hurt us more than anybody else because they are a major ally in every single way, including common values, which are really important.”

He said the US should help.

“We need a long-term strategy to help them become strong,” Dimon said. “A weak Europe is bad for us.”

The administration of President Donald Trump issued a new national security strategy that directed US interests toward the Western Hemisphere and protection of the homeland while dismissing Europe as a continent headed toward “civilizational erasure.”

Read More: Trump’s National Security Strategy Veers Inward in Telling Shift

JPMorgan has been ramping up its push to spur more investments in the national defense sector. In October, the bank announced that it would funnel $1.5 trillion into industries that bolster US economic security and resiliency over the next 10 years — as much as $500 billion more than what it would’ve provided anyway. 

Dimon said in the statement that it’s “painfully clear that the United States has allowed itself to become too reliant on unreliable sources of critical minerals, products and manufacturing.”

Investment banker Jay Horine oversees the effort, which Dimon called “100% commercial.” It will focus on four areas: supply chain and advanced manufacturing; defense and aerospace; energy independence and resilience; and frontier and strategic technologies. 

The bank will also invest as much as $10 billion of its own capital to help certain companies expand, innovate or accelerate strategic manufacturing.

Separately on Saturday, Dimon praised Trump for finding ways to roll back bureaucracy in the government.

“There is no question that this administration is trying to bring an axe to some of the bureaucracy that held back America,” Dimon said. “That is a good thing and we can do it and still keep the world safe, for safe food and safe banks and all the stuff like that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.