Connect with us

Business

How Palantir’s CEO forged a connection with investors by writing spicy shareholder letters that quote philosophers and skewer ‘technocratic elites’

Published

on



Earnings calls are typically a masterclass in how to get away with saying as little as possible. Executives ramble on with non-answers about their “momentum” and “promising pipelines,” or offer vague forecasts of “corporate headwinds.” More often than not, they’re “excited” (sometimes even “really excited!”) about their latest product or initiative. 

Call it corporate propaganda. Or just plain pablum. It’s one of the reasons that Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, the defense software and artificial intelligence company now worth nearly a half-trillion dollars, didn’t want to do earnings calls in the first place.

“I kind of thought the whole thing was BS,” Karp said in an interview at Palantir’s annual conference for its commercial software product in September.

Somewhere along the way, Karp changed his tune. He has done the earnings calls since Palantir went public, and about two years after that, Karp started carving out additional time to pen lengthy missives in the form of shareholder letters. Alongside the company’s financial results, Karp fills the letters with the sorts of topics most executives bend over backwards to avoid: global politics, philosophy, or even religion. You may not like what Karp has to say (he is the first to say that quite a number of people do not), but one thing is guaranteed: It’s going to be interesting.

In the 14 quarterly shareholder letters he has published over the last three years (plus a handful of spontaneous musings on topics like “software and war”), Karp has pilloried Silicon Valley business leaders (“technocratic elites”), technology skeptics (“critics and bystanders”), and woke culture (the “shallow and ritualistic shaming of others in the public sphere that masquerades as thought”). Karp writes the letters with Nick Zamiska, who works in the Palantir “office of the CEO” and co-authored The Technological Republic with Karp, a book published earlier this year that expands on many of the points about technology, Big Tech, and Western democracies that Karp touches on in his letters.

Published in English, French, and German, the letters can range from a few hundred to 1,500 words, depending on how feisty Karp is feeling. He has bashed tech companies for monetizing consumers’ most intimate data (while then turning around and asking consumers to trust Palantir with it). He has pledged his support to Israel in the aftermath of the October 7th Hamas attack. He has described his employees as both “radical leftists skeptical of institutional power” and “free speech absolutists resistant to liberal establishment orthodoxy.” And he has pelted insults at the country’s “establishment,” saying the U.S. “is not merely adrift, as many have claimed, but has lost a sense of confidence, self-possession, and internal resolve.”

It’s not enough to make any corporate public relations’ head explode. Lisa Gordon, Palantir’s head of communications, says that she reads Karp’s letters before they go up, but “never” edits them: “They go as Alex wishes them to be… Only Nick and he discuss the letter,” she told Fortune in an email. In his candid remarks on earnings calls, Karp doesn’t always follow advice for talking points. “As usual, I’ve been cautioned to be a little modest,” Karp warned on Palantir’s last earnings call, before he went on to brag about the company’s “bombastic numbers.”

The letters have piqued interest from investors—especially the company’s cult following of retail bulls—since the beginning, though they have gained much more significant traction in the last several months, as Palantir’s stock has soared to record highs and Karp has gained newfound notoriety as a result.

“It resonated with me, for sure,” says Amit Kukreja, one of Palantir’s investors, who has invested in the company’s stock since 2021 and runs a popular YouTube channel with a big following on investing, in which he reads Karp’s shareholder letters out on a livestream every quarter. “A lot of people give Karp a lot of shit because he speaks in these abstractions that are not really rooted in reality, but when you really dig into them, it’s the most real thing you could say, but he says it in a philosophical way.”

Kukreja estimates that, over the last year, Karp’s following, and the people paying attention to his talks and writings, has grown by “100x.”

“He’s become a rock star,” Kukreja says, noting how he’s seen people start to run up to him after he gives a talk at a conference, or noting the video Palantir posted on X earlier this week of a line of people waiting for him to arrive when he showed up to meet with the CEOs of several conglomerates in South Korea. 

Tackling controversy head on

While Karp’s pugnacious dispatches may seem to some like mere schtick intended to draw attention—or perhaps even a symptom of a lack of filter—Karp describes them as an effort to explain the company directly to those who really want to understand the business, likely because they are investing their own money in it.

According to Karp, part of the reasoning behind his letters is that he hopes to communicate the complexity within Palantir’s business. After all, as a technology provider to the U.S. military and its allies, Palantir regularly finds itself in controversial waters, whether it’s the company’s longstanding contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which have drawn renewed scrutiny due to the agency’s heightened enforcement under the Trump Administration; or Palantir’s more recent contract with Israel to help with its “war-related missions.” His approach has been to tackle that controversy head-on—even when it’s coming from inside the company, such as on Slack, where he says his employees regularly complain and publicly disagree with his views. (“There is no requirement at Palantir to agree with me on any of these things—Ukraine, ICE, Israel,” he says).

American exceptionalism is a recurring theme that runs throughout Karp’s oeuvre. The notion that America is the leader of the West, and that the West is superior to the non-West is a fundamental principle that Palantir stands for and a sentiment Karp says is “basically in every letter” he has written. 

Then there are the references and citations, which run the gamut from 20th century German philosophers to the New Testament. Readers of Karp’s letters are likely to encounter a cast of characters that has included Saint Augustine, Richard Nixon, French author Michel Houellebecq, and Samuel Huntington (a 20th century Harvard political scientist). “We’re writing to people we believe to be intellectually curious and intelligent, and who will figure out things on their own,” says Karp, who has a PhD in neoclassical social theory.

He also hopes the letters convey the “rigor of thought” within the organization when it comes to making decisions.

As he has written in his letters, Karp hopes people take away that Palantir believes in something, and that those views directly influence the product they put out. “It’s like a meandering proclamation of things we believe to be true,” Karp says. “And one of the ways to figure it out if you agree or disagree with someone is for them to lay out their assumptions and debate it.” 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Borrowing by AI companies represents a ‘mounting potential threat to the financial system’: Zandi

Published

on



Tech companies are issuing more debt now than before the dot-com crash as a rapid infrastructure buildout unfolds in the AI boom, Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi said in a LinkedInpost on Sunday.

Even after adjusting for inflation, big tech companies are issuing more bonds than during the late 1990s. And the companies aren’t just refinancing existing debt—they’re taking on additional debt.

“While the increasingly aggressive (and creative) borrowing by AI companies won’t be their downfall, if they do fall short of investors’ expectations and their stock prices suffer, their debts could quickly become a problem,” Zandi wrote. 

“Borrowing by AI companies should be on the radar screen as a mounting potential threat to the financial system and broader economy.”

The 10 largest AI companies, including Meta, Amazon, Nvidia and Alphabet, will issue more than $120 billion this year, Zandi said in a LinkedIn analysis last week.

And this time is different from dot-com era debt issuance, as internet companies back then didn’t have a lot of debt, he pointed out. Instead, they were funded by stocks and venture capital.

“That’s not the case with the AI boom,” Zandi added.

Even though hyperscalers like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft could pay for the AI buildout with their profits, bond issuance is the “cheapest and cleanest” way to finance an infrastructure buildout of this scale, which will likely last more than a decade and be worth trillions of dollars, Shay Boloor, chief market strategist at Futurum Equities, told Fortune.

“These companies are a lot more comfortable issuing 10- to 40-year papers, for example, at very low spreads, because the market now views them as quasi-utility names—because they’re building all this infrastructure—not just a pure tech company anymore,” Boloor said.

He added that in the previous six months, tech companies have shown “proof in the pudding” that future demand for AI is booming.

Despite AI bubble concerns, Nvidia delivered a strong earnings report for its third quarter last month, saying its AI data center revenue increased by 66% from last year. 

Still, critics warn that the buildout may not keep up with how rapidly AI is developing.

Computer hardware, which makes up most AI data centers’ cost, may be more susceptible to becoming obsolete and replaced by more advanced technology during the AI boom as opposed to wireless and internet buildouts, much of which still runs today, George Calhoun, professor and director of the Hanlon Financial Systems Center at Stevens Institute of Technology, told Fortune.

“The cycle of innovation in the chip industry is much faster than for wireless technology or fiber optics,” he said explained. “There is a real risk that much of that hardware may become competitively disadvantaged by newer technologies in a much shorter timeframe,” before being fully paid off.

At the same time, big players in the AI boom—namely OpenAI—do not have the profits currently to cushion their massive investments at the moment, increasing their risk, Calhoun said.

“If OpenAI fails, the snowball effect of that is gonna be substantial,” Futuruum Equities’ Boloor said. Though larger tech companies won’t likely be impacted much by a potential OpenAI bust, companies that largely rely on its business like Oracle could, he added.

Still, Boloor is optimistic about the AI buildout, saying the main bottleneck for its success is U.S. energy capacity.

“I think that the risk is that trillions of dollars of AI capacity gets built faster than the North American grid can support it, which could slow realization,” he warned. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

International deals race forward to end China’s hold on critical minerals since US can’t do it alone

Published

on



Pini Althaus saw the signs. In 2023, he left the company he founded, USA Rare Earth, to develop critical minerals mining and processing projects in central Asia, after realizing that the U.S. will need all the international help it can get to end China’s supply chain dominance.

“I realized we only have a handful of large critical minerals projects that were going into production between now and 2030,” Althaus, chairman and CEO of Cove Capital, told Fortune. “I understood that we’re going to have to supplement the United States critical minerals supply chain with materials coming in from our allied and friendly countries.”

Over a series of decades, China built up its stranglehold on much of the world’s critical minerals supply chains, including the 17 rare earths, used to make virtually all kinds of high-performance magnets and parts for vehicles, computers, power generation, military defense, and more. The rest of the world deferred to Beijing in exchange for cheap prices.

Amid an ongoing tariff war with the U.S.—and a temporary truce—the Trump administration is racing to build up domestic mining and processing capabilities, while also developing the global partnerships necessary to eventually undermine China, which controls 90% of the world’s rare earths refining.

In October, Trump inked a deal with Australia for both countries to invest $3 billion in critical minerals projects by mid-2026. Australia is home to the largest publicly traded critical minerals miner in the world, Lynas Rare Earths. Trump then signed a series of bilateral critical minerals deals in eastern and southeastern Asia, including Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Cambodia. The U.S. also has new deals with Ukraine, Argentina, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Kazakhstan, and more.

Althaus is specifically developing mining and processing facilities for tungsten—a heat-resistant metal used in electronics and military equipment—and rare earths in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. He sees the most potential in former Soviet Union nations in central Asia.

“The Soviets spent many decades exploring and developing mines. Many of their databases have been left and are quite meticulous,” Althaus said. “This gives companies looking to develop projects in central Asia a jumpstart compared to what would be here in the United States, where most of the opportunities are greenfield—very early stages, very high risk, and very little appetite for investment.”

In November, the Ex-Im Bank offered Cove Capital a $900 million financing letter of interest for the $1.1 billion Kazakh tungsten projects. A separate letter of interest was received from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation.

Jeff Dickerson, principal advisor for Rystad Energy research firm, said only a long-term, coordinated effort—essentially a “wartime” approach—both domestically and with international partnerships can lead to success. But it cannot be done without new projects with foreign allies. “The challenge is that the U.S. doesn’t have a strong pipeline of mature mineral projects that are shovel ready,” he said. 

“The cycle of China extracting concessions on the back of mineral geopolitics and weakening the U.S. strategic negotiating position will likely continue without a coordinated, long-term response during the current moment of heightened attention to critical minerals,” Dickerson said, questioning whether the U.S. will maintain a concerted focus for years to come.

New emphasis

The Trump administration is increasingly making financial partnerships with critical minerals developers—even becoming a majority shareholder of U.S. rare earths miner MP Materials—and offering deals for floor-pricing mechanisms to offset China’s recurring dumping practices that aim to eliminate competition.

A native Australian turned New Yorker, Althaus is, naturally, a big fan of this approach. Chinese price dumping has crippled global competition and scared away potential investors, he said.

“By providing a price floor, it removes the question marks; it removes the instability; it removes the most significant risk in funding a project that’s about to go into production,” Althaus said. “It creates a predictability where you can take geology all the way through to profitability. I think there should be a global effort to create transparent markets and prices for the key critical minerals.”

Critical minerals are increasingly included in U.S. negotiations for all foreign deals. In the tariff agreement with Indonesia, for instance, the Asian nation agreed to lift export bans on nickel. The White House leveraged its military support for Ukraine by demanding the rights to its critical minerals in return. And the recent U.S. bailout of Argentina included a partnership on critical minerals mining.

In addition to its strategic defense location, rare earths are even a reason Trump continues to show interest in annexing Greenland from Denmark.

Veteran geologist Greg Barnes, who founded the massive Tanbreez mining project, which remains in development, briefed Trump at the White House during his first presidential term. This year, Critical Metals acquired 92.5% ownership of the Tanbreez project.

Critical Metals CEO Tony Sage is keen to supply the U.S. with desired rare earths, and the company recently received a letter of intent for a $120 million Ex-Im Bank loan. The goal is to start construction by the end of 2026.

“There’s an absolute need to make sure that more than 50% of the supply of these heavy rare earths come from outside of China—mined and processed outside of China,” Sage told Fortune.

Regardless of any long-shot annexation bids, Sage said Greenland can and should be a key ally to the U.S. for critical minerals. “They definitely don’t want to be part of the U.S., but I think they’ll be pro-U.S.,” he said.

For his part, Althaus said he sees all the international deals as progress, and not as competition for his Cove Capital.

“I think it’s a positive, and I think we’ll start to see a lot more happen in the coming months in terms of the U.S. and collaboration with other countries.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Amazon’s new Alexa aims to detangle chaos in the household, like whether someone fed the dog

Published

on



It’s 10 p.m. after a long day when you walk in the door and wonder aloud: “Did anyone feed the dog? Who fed the dog,” Panos Panay says he calls out to his family of six.

Turns out, nobody fed the dog and so all the kids “scatter to their corners,” he told Fortune’s Brainstorm AI audience in San Francisco on Monday. 

The senior vice president of devices and services at Amazon says the new generative AI-powered Alexa+, which runs on Echo hardware and can integrate with other devices like Amazon’s Ring security cameras, aims to ease the constant mental load in a household: remembering whether the pets ate, restaurants each family member pitched and saw vetoed, and regular grocery orders. The idea is to have “ambient” artificial intelligence around your house so that devices can assist in tasks, chores, and other household command center issues, said Panay.

The new Alexa+ is much more conversational, Panay said, and you no longer have to pronounce everything perfectly and discretely in order for it (or her, as Panay refers to the virtual assistant) to understand you.

“She’s the best DJ on the planet, in my opinion,” said Panay. “You have a personal shopper, you have a butler, you have a personal assistant, you have your home manager. Different people use Alexa for different things, and now she’s pretty much supercharged,” Panay said.

In addition to confirming that the dogs have not been fed, Panay said he used Alexa+ on Sunday night to head off another age-old debate: where the family should go for dinner. Both dinner decisions and pet chores are “classic fight[s] in my house,” Panay told the Brainstorm AI audience.

His youngest had previously suggested a few restaurants she wanted to visit for a quick bite and hadn’t yet been to, and Panay asked Alexa to remind them which ones his daughter suggested specifically. It was a sushi joint and she enjoyed it, Panay said. That type of ambient listening and assistance with debate is the point, he said, and stops people needing to pull out their phones and start typing and scrolling for information.   

From there, Panay said Alexa can also take more concrete actions like making a reservation on dining platform OpenTable, ordering delivery on nights in, getting an Uber, and handling home issues such as telling you how many packages were delivered or the number of guests who stopped by. Panay said Amazon has more than 150 partners to aid in these integrations, although there is work ahead to get more partners on board, he added.  

Thus far, Alexa+ has been rolled out to early-access users and this week the product is available to those on a lengthy waitlist, said Panay, and it’s been boosted by Amazon’s advertising. This week, the product is being released to anyone with an Echo device. The business monetization model involves “flywheels” from Amazon’s $2.4 trillion retail ecosystem, particularly around shopping for clothes, groceries, and other consumer items. “If you’re shopping on the grocery list and order groceries often enough, Alexa knows what you’re doing, and ultimately, can just order ahead of time for you moving forward,” he said.

Ultimately, Panay envisions users wanting “your assistant everywhere you go” because “the more it understands about you, the more informed it is, the better it can serve your needs.” And while Panay said there will be continued innovation from Amazon in this space, he refused to reveal any specific products. He said Amazon has a “lab full of ideas,” but most won’t make it out of that lab. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.