Connect with us

Business

How entrepreneurs outside the inner circle can break through

Published

on



Entrepreneurs who start out with connections to an inner circle are all but destined to gain the right opportunities to achieve success. They might have graduated from elite universities or reside in hot-spot startup hubs like Silicon Valley, New York City, or Austin.

They’re plugged into networks that carry influence and can accelerate advancement in business and career. Research shows that these connections offer a ready-made competitive advantage—access to venture capital, business leaders, distinguished faculty and alumni, inside knowledge, and invaluable resources. 

But what about entrepreneurs outside this inner circle- those from underrepresented backgrounds, minority communities, or regions far from these traditional power centers? Without proximity to these prestigious networks, they’re left to compete at a distinct disadvantage. 

How can we close this gap between privilege and potential?

At issue here is a concept called network centrality. The more centrally located an entrepreneur is within a web of influential contacts, the greater the access to social capital and other valuable resources. And, of course, vice versa, reinforcing the disparity for those in peripheral locations.

Our study of aspiring entrepreneurs casts light on network centrality — why it’s important, how it works, and what can be done to overcome it. Conducted by Lehigh@NasdaqCenter, in partnership with Reedley College in California, the study’s overarching goal was to determine how aspiring entrepreneurs, irrespective of college pedigree, household income and ethnic background, can have an equal opportunity to launch companies — in short, to level the playing field

We surveyed 250 community college students and 250 private college students, all of whom expressed an ambition to pursue entrepreneurship. Our study, building on prior research, compared differences in how the two populations behaved when it came to networking, with the private college students representing high centrality and the community college students low centrality.

Our top takeaway: The gaps that exist can be bridged. 

Here, then, based on our findings, are the top three lessons learned:

First, boost your networking self-effficacy, defined as your belief in your ability to achieve desired outcomes through networking. We found that community college students are more than four times more likely (39% versus 8%) than those in private colleges to exhibit low networking self-efficacy. These students perceive that opportunities to network are less available to them, resulting in lower confidence. But amping up efforts can lead to a whopping 25 percent increase in social capital, our prior study indicates

High networking self-efficacy can be developed. To start, think small. Network among your friends, colleagues and others you already know. Leveraging familiar relationships and settings with low pressure will build your networking skills, achieve small successes and bolster your confidence.

Second, pick the right passion.  We found that aspiring entrepreneurs from community colleges display nearly four times higher levels of “obsessive passion” — a compulsion to network frequently, emphasizing quantity of contacts over quality, which can result in superficial and short lived relationships — than their counterparts in private colleges (26% versus 7%). . Our study shows that obsessive passion cuts the chances of forming sustainable relationships through networking by 17%.

You’re better off shifting toward “harmonious” passion,  characterized by an understanding of how work fits into your life over all. It values quality of contacts over quantity in networking.

How to harness harmonious passion? Ask what motivates you to network in the first place. Schedule networking activities that balance your personal and professional pursuits. Evaluate whether new connections demonstrate consistency, reliability and commitment. Network for opportunities that represent the promise of longevity and ROI.

Third, keep your eye on the future. Aspiring entrepreneurs at community colleges are more than three times more likely than their private college counterparts (17% versus 5%) to focus on the present, our research found. But an orientation toward the future can boost your networking outcomes by 12%.

Looking ahead — as in envisioning your presence at upcoming business events — can expose you to opportunities that broaden your perspective. To  practice ‘future temporal focused’ networking, create a timetable and ask yourself key questions. Which actions should you take to expand your network? Which professional organizations should you join, which industry events should you attend, and which individuals in your field should you connect with?  

So if, as our research suggests, you believe in your networking abilities, embrace harmonious passion, and focus on the future, you’re practically guaranteed to network like a champion.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Miss Universe co-owner gets bank accounts frozen as part of probe into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking

Published

on



Mexico’s anti-money laundering office has frozen the bank accounts of the Mexican co-owner of Miss Universe as part of an investigation into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking, an official said Friday.

The country’s Financial Intelligence Unit, which oversees the fight against money laundering, froze Mexican businessman Raúl Rocha Cantú’s bank accounts in Mexico, a federal official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the investigation.

The action against Rocha Cantú adds to mounting controversies for the Miss Universe organization. Last week, a court in Thailand issued an arrest warrant for the Thai co-owner of the Miss Universe Organization in connection with a fraud case and this year’s competition — won by Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch — faced allegations of rigging.

The Miss Universe organization did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press seeking comment about the allegations against Rocha Cantú.

Mexico’s federal prosecutors said last week that Rocha Cantú has been under investigation since November 2024 for alleged organized crime activity, including drug and arms trafficking, as well as fuel theft. Last month, a federal judge issued 13 arrest warrants for some of those involved in the case, including the Mexican businessman, whose company Legacy Holding Group USA owns 50% of the Miss Universe shares.

The organization’s other 50% belongs to JKN Global Group Public Co. Ltd., a company owned by Jakkaphong “Anne” Jakrajutatip.

A Thai court last week issued an arrest warrant for Jakrajutatip who was released on bail in 2023 on the fraud case. She failed to appear as required in a Bangkok court on Nov. 25. Since she did not notify the court about her absence, she was deemed to be a flight risk, according to a statement from the Bangkok South District Court.

The court rescheduled her hearing for Dec. 26.

Rocha Cantú was also a part owner of the Casino Royale in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey, when it was attacked in 2011 by a group of gunmen who entered it, doused gasoline and set it on fire, killing 52 people.

Baltazar Saucedo Estrada, who was charged with planning the attack, was sentenced in July to 135 years in prison.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk’s X fined $140 million by EU for breaching digital regulations

Published

on



European Union regulators on Friday fined X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, 120 million euros ($140 million) for breaches of the bloc’s digital regulations, in a move that risks rekindling tensions with Washington over free speech.

The European Commission issued its decision following an investigation it opened two years ago into X under the 27-nation bloc’s Digital Services Act, also known as the DSA.

It’s the first time that the EU has issued a so-called non-compliance decision since rolling out the DSA. The sweeping rulebook requires platforms to take more responsibility for protecting European users and cleaning up harmful or illegal content and products on their sites, under threat of hefty fines.

The Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, said it was punishing X because of three different breaches of the DSA’s transparency requirements. The decision could rile President Donald Trump, whose administration has lashed out at digital regulations, complained that Brussels was targeting U.S. tech companies and vowed to retaliate.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on his X account that the Commission’s fine was akin to an attack on the American people. Musk later agreed with Rubio’s sentiment.

“The European Commission’s $140 million fine isn’t just an attack on @X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” Rubio wrote. “The days of censoring Americans online are over.”

Vice President JD Vance, posting on X ahead of the decision, accused the Commission of seeking to fine X “for not engaging in censorship.”

“The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage,” he wrote.

Officials denied the rules were intended to muzzle Big Tech companies. The Commission is “not targeting anyone, not targeting any company, not targeting any jurisdictions based on their color or their country of origin,” spokesman Thomas Regnier told a regular briefing in Brussels. “Absolutely not. This is based on a process, democratic process.”

X did not respond immediately to an email request for comment.

EU regulators had already outlined their accusations in mid-2024 when they released preliminary findings of their investigation into X.

Regulators said X’s blue checkmarks broke the rules because on “deceptive design practices” and could expose users to scams and manipulation.

Before Musk acquired X, when it was previously known as Twitter, the checkmarks mirrored verification badges common on social media and were largely reserved for celebrities, politicians and other influential accounts, such as Beyonce, Pope Francis, writer Neil Gaiman and rapper Lil Nas X.

After he bought it in 2022, the site started issuing the badges to anyone who wanted to pay $8 per month.

That means X does not meaningfully verify who’s behind the account, “making it difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with,” the Commission said in its announcement.

X also fell short of the transparency requirements for its ad database, regulators said.

Platforms in the EU are required to provide a database of all the digital advertisements they have carried, with details such as who paid for them and the intended audience, to help researches detect scams, fake ads and coordinated influence campaigns. But X’s database, the Commission said, is undermined by design features and access barriers such as “excessive delays in processing.”

Regulators also said X also puts up “unnecessary barriers” for researchers trying to access public data, which stymies research into systemic risks that European users face.

“Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU. The DSA protects users,” Henna Virkkunen, the EU’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a prepared statement.

The Commission also wrapped up a separate DSA case Friday involving TikTok’s ad database after the video-sharing platform promised to make changes to ensure full transparency.

___

AP Writer Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia CEO says U.S. data centers take 3 years, but China ‘can build a hospital in a weekend’

Published

on



Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said China has an AI infrastructure advantage over the U.S., namely in construction and energy.

While the U.S. retains an edge on AI chips, he warned China can build large projects at staggering speeds.

“If you want to build a data center here in the United States from breaking ground to standing up a AI supercomputer is probably about three years,” Huang told Center for Strategic and International Studies President John Hamre in late November. “They can build a hospital in a weekend.”

The speed at which China can build infrastructure is just one of his concerns. He also worries about the countries’ comparative energy capacity to support the AI boom.

China has “twice as much energy as we have as a nation, and our economy is larger than theirs. Makes no sense to me,” Huang said.

He added that China’s energy capacity continues to grow “straight up”, while the U.S.’s remains relatively flat.

Still, Huang maintained that Nvidia is “generations ahead” of China on AI chip technology to support the demand for the tech and semiconductor manufacturing process.

But he warned against complacency on this front, adding that “anybody who thinks China can’t manufacture is missing a big idea.”

Yet Huang is hopeful about Nvidia’s future, noting President Donald Trump’s push to reshore manufacturing jobs and spur AI investments.

‘Insatiable AI demand’

Early last month, Huang made headlines by predicting China would win the AI race—a message he amended soon thereafter, saying the country was “nanoseconds behind America” in the race in a statement shared to his company’s X account.

Nvidia is just one of the big tech companies pouring billions of dollars into a data center buildout in the U.S., which experts tell Fortune could amount to over $100 billion in the next year alone.

Raul Martynek, the CEO of DataBank, a company that contracts with tech giants to construct data centers, said the average cost of a data center is $10 million to $15 million per megawatt (MW), and a typical data centers on the smaller side requires 40 MW.

“In the U.S., we think there will be 5 to 7 gigawatts brought online in the coming year to support this seemingly insatiable AI demand,” Martynek said.

This shakes out to $50 billion on the low end, and $105 billion on the high end.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.