Connect with us

Politics

Hemp legislation must protect kids, keep THC beverages out of gas stations

Published

on


As Rep. Michelle Salzman continues her work shepherding legislation to regulate hemp products, including THC-infused beverages, it is imperative for her to make decisions on the bill that make keeping products out of the hands of minors the top priority.

Her proposed amendment to tax THC-infused drinks and other products is appropriate, with a 20% proposed tax on the beverages that aligns with cigarette and wine taxes. But another part of the amendment she’s considering is dangerous, and should be reconsidered.

As it currently stands, the bill (HB 7029) would block sales of THC-infused beverages at gas stations and convenience stores, places easily accessible to kids and teens. While such stores can sell beer and wine, most do not carry liquor licenses to sell the harder stuff, and for good reason.

It makes sense to limit sales to establishments already licensed to sell liquor, such as at liquor stores, bars and certain restaurants. In the case of liquor stores, there are already rules in place that limit a minor’s access without a qualifying adult present.

The current version of the bill blocks sales of THC-infused beverages at convenience stores.

Salzman’s attempt to remove that restriction may have merit. Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a similar legislative package last year, writing in a veto message that regulations on the burgeoning hemp market would “impose debilitating regulatory burdens” on Florida retailers. Allowing sales at convenience stores may be an effort to ensure his support this year. But it’s foolhardy.

The measure, as well as a similar measure (SB 438) that has already cleared the upper chamber, rightly include various provisions to protect kids, including restricting packaging that may be attractive to children and, in the Senate version, signage that promotes the products.

It’s clear that sales of these products are appropriate — many consumers use them as an alternative to alcohol and, when used responsibly, they can be safe. But such sales should only be made under key conditions, including limiting THC dosage at 10 mg or less for single-use units or at 100 mg per package, as long as the serving size does not exceed 10 mg of THC.

There may be limited circumstances for which higher dosages are appropriate, but it is reasonable to expect that such sales be restricted to licensed medical marijuana dispensaries and not be readily available in liquor stores.

The legislation, for the most part, rightly seeks to regulate THC products derived from hemp — known as Delta-9 — similarly to alcohol. But unlike alcohol, which is often sold in attractive packaging, THC products should, as the bill currently insists, be sold without any imagery that could be attractive to minors and restricted to those 21 years of age or older.

And clear labels should be provided outlining the total THC content.

DeSantis was not entirely wrong for being concerned about retailers, but sensible regulation is critical in protecting our children, and it can be accomplished in a way that protects retailers such as liquor stores.

While it may be frustrating to convenience store business owners, kids simply must be prioritized over profit.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Topics to watch in Tampa Mayor Jane Castor’s 2025 State of the City address

Published

on


Tampa Mayor Jane Castor will deliver her annual State of the City Address Monday morning at 11 a.m., broadcast on the city’s YouTube and Facebook channels.

This will be Castor’s sixth State of the City Address, and the second of her final term in office, as some are already looking toward the 2027 race to succeed her.

The address also comes as the region faces ongoing recovery from back-to-back hurricanes in 2024, and as affordability issues continue to plague residents.

The speech is an opportunity for Castor to acknowledge pain, explain what she and other city leaders are doing to address it, and showcase Tampa as a city on the move despite its challenges.

Here are some topics to listen for in the Mayor’s address:

Infrastructure

Nothing calls attention to infrastructure problems more than severe weather events. Water and drainage systems are tested. Never in recent memory has Tampa been challenged the way it was in 2024 after Hurricanes Helene and Milton.

The city successfully cleared debris ahead of schedule, a testament to a quality public works team.

And work continues. Low lying areas, such as Davis Islands, parts of the Westshore area and Palmetto Beach, are still rebuilding from devastation driven largely by flooding. The city under Castor established a disaster assistance fund that she has an opportunity to tout.

But that recovery continues just over a month away from the next hurricane season, which is projected to again be active. While Castor can’t, as some may suggest, control the weather, she has worked throughout her two terms as Mayor to improve the city’s aging infrastructure. That’s an issue that plagues not just Tampa, but also neighboring St. Petersburg, where leaders are trying, but struggling, to keep up with demand.

In Tampa, Castor’s administration has invested big in infrastructure. She’d be wise to dive into the specifics of those investments, including the city’s largest public works project ever, PIPES. It’s a $2.9 billion funding plan approved in late 2019 that gradually increases water and wastewater rates over 20 years to bring the city’s infrastructure in line with current needs. Rates hadn’t been increased in the city for a decade prior to the passage of the PIPES program.

All of this is an opportunity to applaud devoted city staff and to remind residents who are still suffering, as well as those fearful for the next hurricane season, that city leaders and an army of rank-and-file civil servants are still there and understand their pain and anxiety over what a next storm could hold.

She can also promise them public safety.

Tampa first responders yielded thousands of calls during both Hurricane Helene and Milton and, during Milton, rescued more than a dozen people who were trapped in a home that was crushed by a tree. They also successfully evacuated more than 135 seniors from an assisted living facility that flooded.

The immediate response, particularly from a public safety standpoint, is an opportunity to put residents’ minds at some ease knowing first responders are trained and experienced for these sorts of rescues.

Transportation

A huge headaches for residents who must navigate it every day, for workers who commute into the city from elsewhere and for tourists visiting the area, transportation problems and stagnant congestion remain one of the most visible and tangible frustrations in Tampa.

Common bottlenecks around the West Shore area, downtown and the Interstate 4 interchange are clogged almost any time of day, any day of the week.

Castor cannot hide from this reality, and no shade of rose-colored glasses will convince anyone who has had to navigate Malfunction Junction at rush hour, which now feels like any hour, that the problem is getting better.

But acknowledgment goes a long way, and it’s an opportunity to remind that progress voters had asked for in the All for Transportation package was axed by the courts. Castor should remind her constituents that despite the setback, the city is doing its part.

That includes expanding the Streetcar and ongoing improvements under the city’s Mobility, Opportunity, Vision, Equity and Safety (MOVES) program continue, including strategic transit projects, new trails and greenways, efforts to eradicate pedestrian fatalities and more.

Affordable housing

Residents continue to face an affordability crisis. But Tampa is not alone in that challenge; it’s happening everywhere. Like others facing this crisis, Tampa has worked to increase housing supply to meet demand and, in doing so, drive prices down.

The city has used modern solutions, such as zoning changes, to bring more accessory dwelling units online and helping with down payments and rent payments.

It is often the case that when wallets get light, voices get loud. So affordability will remain a thorn in any administration’s side, and everyone has different ideas on how best to address the situation. Castor has an opportunity to remind that all reasonable solutions are on the table, and that help continues to be on the way.

The state of the city is strong

That’s always the takeaway in any state of the city, state of the state or state of the union address. It’s an expected applause line.

But it is perhaps more important now than ever to tout Tampa as the growing destination for live, work and play that it has become. Here, some of the city’s greatest challenges also serve as evidence of its success.

Transportation is bad because people keep coming here. Affordable housing is limited because supply is having trouble keeping up with demand. Yet despite the challenges success creates, people still keep coming, spotlighting Tampa as one of America’s great cities.

And Tampa continues to improve as what Castor has described as the Tampa of tomorrow. She continued work on the popular Riverwalk, and has overseen countless neighborhood revitalization projects that turn blight into a destination, including GasWorx, Water Street, the Midtown project and more.

She may only be about half way through her final term, but the things she does now will contribute to how her legacy is shaped. The state of the city address is an opportunity to write her own narrative, but also to inspire a community in desperate need of inspiration.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Byron Donalds says tax hikes for the rich are not going to happen

Published

on


Those who think wealthy people deserve to pay more in federal income tax will likely be discouraged by recent comments from Rep. Byron Donalds.

The Naples Republican and candidate for Governor says income tax increases for the rich are a non-starter with him and other Republicans in Congress.

“There’s been whispers of this, but this is not concrete. I don’t expect it to be in the (tax cut) package. I’ll just be clear. That’s not something I’m going to support and I know there are many Republicans on the Hill who are not going to support that. Frankly, the vast, vast, vast majority of Republicans are not going to support that,” Donalds said on “Sunday Morning Futures.”

President Donald Trump dangled the proposal as a possibility last week, but quickly walked away from it as it would be “very disruptive” and “a lot of millionaires would leave the country.”

Donalds embraces spending cuts as a way to right side the deficit-bloated federal budget, chiding colleagues who might lack the political mettle to back them.

“We can’t allow bloated federal spending that continues just because you’re worried about the midterm elections. If we cut spending appropriately, the American people see a more efficient government could still provide services and we have a better economy overall, the American people will reward us,” Donalds predicted.

Donalds has said previously $1.5 trillion in cuts is the baseline, but that $5 trillion would be possible if people had the political will. He previously said there was “at least” $600 billion in waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid,” hinting at possible cuts to the health care safety net program for low-income people.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

With China and U.S. at intense economic odds, nations forced to choose sides

Published

on


One went to the United States. The other went to China. It was a sign of the times.

While the Swiss president was in Washington last week to lobby U.S. officials over President Donald Trump’s threatened 31% tariff on Swiss goods, the Swiss foreign minister was in Beijing, expressing his nation’s willingness to strengthen cooperation with China and upgrade a free trade agreement.

As Trump’s trade war locks the world’s two largest economies on a collision course, America’s unnerved allies and partners are cozying up with China to hedge their bets. It comes as Trump’s trade push upends a decade of American foreign policy — including his own from his first term — toward rallying the rest of the world to join the United States against China. And it threatens to hand Beijing more leverage in any eventual dialogue with the U.S. administration.

With Trump saying that countries are “kissing my ass” to negotiate trade deals on his terms or risk stiff import taxes, Beijing is reaching out to countries far and near. It portrays itself as a stabilizing force and a predictable trading partner, both to cushion the impact from Trump’s tariffs and to forge stronger trade ties outside of the U.S. market.

“America and China are now locked in a fierce contest for global supremacy,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in an April 16 speech. “Both powers claim they do not wish to force countries to choose sides. But in reality, each seeks to draw others closer into their respective orbits.”

Tariffs on Chinese goods are off the charts

Trump has paused some of his steepest tariffs on most American partners for 90 days after global financial markets melted down. But he has raised tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, drawing rebukes from Beijing, which has vowed to “fight to the end.” U.S. companies are warning of higher prices, meaning Trump could face both higher inflation and empty store shelves.

The magnitude of the taxes are already dramatically affecting American imports, with the shipping containers set to arrive at the Port of Los Angeles down nearly 36% over the past two weeks, according to Port Optimizer, which tracks vessels. It’s lending urgency for both the U.S. and China to bolster support from alternate partners.

While Trump administration officials suggest the president could ease the duty rates on Chinese goods at his discretion, there has been no indication he’s yet looking for a reduction. That, after all, could suggest his protectionist policies were hurting the American economy.

“They want to make a deal obviously,” Trump told reporters Sunday, saying the U.S. had gone “cold turkey” on trade from China. “Right now, they’re not doing business with us.”

The White House has framed any negotiations as being between the U.S. president and Chinese President Xi Jinping, but neither leader seems willing to make the initial outreach without some kind of concession. The two countries can’t even agree publicly whether they are holding talks.

Earlier this month, Xi — on his first foreign trip this year — visited Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia, resulting in mutual pledges for closer economic and trade ties. In Vietnam, which faces the 46% tariff from the U.S., Beijing and Hanoi agreed to strengthen industrial and supply chain cooperation. In Malaysia and Cambodia, Xi secured similar agreements. Cambodia is faced with a 49% tariff from the U.S., and Malaysia 24%.

Then there’s Japan: Despite its long-standing enmity towards the nation that once colonized parts of it, the Chinese government has reached out to Tokyo and urged a coordinated response, according to Kyodo News.

China digging in

China is ready to use the stick, too. A South Korean newspaper reported China is demanding South Korean businesses not to ship goods containing China’s rare earth minerals to U.S. defense companies or face likely sanctions.

Earlier this month, Beijing warned no country should reach a deal with the U.S. at China’s expense and vowed to take countermeasures in a “resolute and reciprocal manner” should such a situation arise.

Hal Brands, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, said China will “try to exploit Trump’s abrasive behavior to make inroads with U.S. allies and countries in the Global South.”

Some scholars say Beijing is already gaining. “People lost the confidence, or even trust, for the United States, particularly for Donald Trump in the U.S. Not for China,” said Li Cheng, professor of political science at the University of Hong Kong. “So in that regard, China gains in the geopolitical landscape.”

In the latest Ipsos poll, for the first time, more people globally now say China has a positive impact on the world than the United States. The pollster cited the broad backlash to Trump’s tariffs.

Countries have to choose, but it’s difficult

China is the world’s largest exporter and the U.S. the largest importer. Total trade for China reached a record 43.85 trillion yuan (US$6 trillion) in 2024, and the country is the biggest trading partner for most of the world, including the European Union, Japan, South Korea and the grouping of the 10 Southeast Asian countries known as ASEAN.

The U.S. is the biggest destination for China’s exports, though China is only the third-largest trading partner with the U.S., behind Mexico and Canada. Total trade for the U.S. last year was US$5.4 billion, with a record deficit of $1.2 trillion. For ASEAN countries, trade with the U.S. totaled $477 billion in 2024, including $352 billion worth of goods sold to the U.S. But China does more business with ASEAN.

Countries caught between the U.S. and China are in “an impossible situation” because they need to stay economically connected both to China, “a source of a lot of their input and imports” and to the powerhouse U.S. market, said Matthew Goodman, director of the Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“They cannot choose one or the other, because they need both,” Goodman said.

In Europe, China is preparing to lift sanctions to revive a trade deal, according to the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post. Chinese state media have been calling on European leaders to join China in safeguarding the multilateralism.

Back in Beijing, Xi has been receiving foreign leaders. On Thursday, he told Kenya’s President that China’s market has always kept its door open to high-quality products from Kenya and that China encourages more capable Chinese enterprises to invest and start businesses in Kenya, according to the official Xinhua News Agency. On Wednesday, Xi met Azerbaijan’s president. Xi criticized the trade war as undermining the rights and interests of all countries.

Beijing sounds resolute

On Friday, when Xi presided over a key economic meeting, Beijing’s leadership struck a positive tone but acknowledged “increasing impact from external shocks” and “urged preparing for worst-case scenarios with sufficient planning,” according to Xinhua.

Wang Yiwei, a senior fellow at Beijing’s Center for China and Globalization, said China, after dealing with Trump’s first term, is prepared for his latest tariff approach. “China is prepared for the worst,” Wang said, “and it is no longer living in the fantasy of globalization.”

Victor Gao, vice president of the Center for China and Globalization, said Beijing is prepared for decoupling. “What will be the end? It’s a complete halt, meaning no more U.S exports to China, no more China exports to the United States,” he said.

And, despite high costs to China’s economy, China will survive, Gao said. “For a country especially like China with a history of 5,000 years, what kind of people have we not seen? Whatever invaders, robbers, and barbarians,” Gao said. “But at the end, they all leave. They all disappear, all get defeated.”

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.