Connect with us

Business

Harvard’s defiance of Trump’s ‘authoritarian incursion’ supported by 60 past and present college and university presidents

Published

on



The Trump administration has recently escalated its destructive and illegal attacks on the core freedoms of American colleges and universities, which we have called on it to halt (Fortune, April 8). The demands issued to Harvard University (in an April 11 letter), followed by the freezing of $2.2 billion of federal research funds along with threats to Harvard’s tax-exempt status, violate no less than the freedom of all colleges and universities to admit students, hire faculty, and govern themselves consistently with the law, the First Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and long-standing principles of academic freedom. As current and former presidents of academic institutions, we strongly support Harvard’s President Alan Garber, who has rejected the demands on these grounds while the Trump administration threatens to demand control of numerous other schools. Just over three miles from Harvard Square is the Boston Tea Party site where, in 1773, American patriots fought government tyranny.

When the Trump administration conditions federal grants and contracts to universities on these demands, it threatens all Americans. Higher education is the greatest source of U.S. global competitiveness, cultural enrichment, and learning.  By partnering with the federal government for decades, American universities have made lifesaving discoveries and increased the prosperity, safety, security, and creativity of our country. When the Trump administration insists on anyone’s compliance with likely illegal and unconstitutional conditions, it is threatening everyone’s freedom from arbitrary rule. When it insists on controlling the admission of students, faculty hiring, and governance of a university, it is also threatening a prime source of the opportunity and economic prosperity of all Americans. We all know from Martin Neimoller’s haunting lament, this authoritarian incursion does not end with Harvard. 

Authors:

Edward Ayers, University of Richmond (Virginia) 

Kimberly Benston, Haverford College (Pennsylvania)

Katherine Bergeron, Connecticut College (Connecticut) 

Henry Bienen, Northwestern University (Illinois)

Lee Bollinger, Columbia University (New York), University of Michigan (Michigan)

Phil Boroughs, SJ, College of the Holy Cross (Massachusetts) 

William Brody, Salk Institute, The Johns Hopkins University (Maryland)

Robert Brown, Boston University (Massachusetts)

Alison Byerly, Carleton College (Minnesota)

Albert Carnesale, University of California – Los Angeles (California) 

Carol T. Christ, University of California – Berkeley (California)

Mary Sue Coleman, University of Michigan (Michigan), University of Iowa (Iowa)

Ron Crutcher, Wheaton College (Massachusetts) 

Nicholas Dirks, University of California – Berkeley (California) 

Adam Falk, Williams College (Massachusetts) 

Jonathan Fanton, The New School (New York) 

Drew Gilpin Faust, Harvard University (Massachusetts) 

Wayne A. I. Frederick, Howard University (Washington DC) 

Amy Gutmann, University of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania) 

Phil Hanlon, Dartmouth College (New Hampshire) 

Robert Head, Rockford University (Illinois) 

Mark A. Heckler, Valparaiso University (Indiana) 

John Hennessy, Stanford University (California) 

Catharine Bond Hill, Vassar College (New York) 

Jonathan Holloway, Rutgers University (New Jersey) 

Freeman Hrabowski, The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (Maryland) 

Nan Keohane, Duke University (North Carolina), Wellesley College (Massachusetts) 

Brit Kirwan, University System of Maryland (Maryland) 

Bernie Machen, University of Florida (Florida) 

Gail Mellow, LaGuardia Community College – City University of New York (New York) 

Pat McGuire, Trinity Washington University (Washington DC) 

Anthony Monaco, Tufts University (Massachusetts) 

Richard Morrill, Centre College (Kentucky) 

M. Duane Nellis, Ohio University (Ohio), Texas Tech University (Texas), University of Idaho (Idaho) 

Lynn Pasquerella, Mount Holyoke College (Massachusetts) 

Laurie Patton, Middlebury College (Vermont) 

Susan Poser, Hofstra University (New York) 

Steven Poskanzer, Carleton College (Minnesota) 

Gregory Prince, Hampshire College (Massachusetts) 

Stuart Rabinowitz, Hofstra University (New York) 

L. Rafael Reif, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Massachusetts) 

L. Song Richardson, Colorado College (Colorado) 

Michael S. Roth, Wesleyan University (Connecticut) 

George Rupp, Rice University (Texas), Columbia University (New York) 

Leonard A. Schlesinger, Babson College (Massachusetts) 

Mark Schlissel, University of Michigan (Michigan) 

Jake Schrum, Emory & Henry College (Virginia), Southwestern University (Texas), Texas Wesleyan University (Texas) 

Allen Sessoms, Queens College, City University of New York (New York), Delaware State University (Delaware), University of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) 

Donna Shalala, University of Miami (Florida), University of Wisconsin-Madison (Wisconsin), Hunter College of the City University of New York (New York)

Robert Sternberg, University of Wyoming (Wyoming) 

Beverly Daniel Tatum, Spelman College (Georgia) 

Lara Tiedens, Scripps College (California) 

Steve Trachtenberg, George Washington University (Washington DC) 

Laura Walker, Bennington College (Vermont) 

Daniel H. Weiss, Haverford College (Pennsylvania), Lafayette College (Pennsylvania)

Julie Wollman, Widener University (Pennsylvania) 

Meredith Woo, Sweet Briar College (Virginia) 

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Toss founder Lee Seung-gun—onetime dentist, now Korea’s fintech maven—talks superapps, ‘rubbish ideas’, and IPO plans ‘in the near future’ 

Published

on


Lee Seung-gun—or “SG” for foreigners unfamiliar with Korean pronunciation—has a classic startup founder story that mixes tenacity, repeated failure, ultimate success…and dental care. 

It started in 2011, when Lee left a Samsung-owned private hospital to start Viva Republica. “I started as a dentist, like all the other Asian children whose parents want their kids to be neurosurgeons or dentists,” he says with a laugh.

“When I was 29 or 30, I had no dream. I just wanted to be a famous dentist,” he remembers. But he soon grew restless with just helping people on an individual scale. “To create impact at scale, I quickly realized that I had to focus on technology.”

His push into entrepreneurship had a difficult start. He devoted 150 million won of savings—about $105,000—towards his new venture. “For the first five years, I failed eight times,” he says. He reels off a couple of what he calls “rubbish ideas”: Social media, a voting app. 

A Bloomberg report from 2018 noted that, one point, Lee had just 20,000 won ($14) in the bank, and was pleading with the families of employees to let them keep working without pay.

Then, he found an idea that worked: a money transfer service. “Toss was another stupid idea, but we were crazy enough to do it, because we had nothing to lose,” he says with a smile. “And here we are.”

Almost 15 years after its founding in 2011, Toss is now part of a larger fintech “super app,” a single platform that combines banking, insurance, stock trading, and money transfer services. 

South Koreans have an average of five bank accounts and four credit cards—which means a lot of different financial accounts to juggle. Lee thinks that’s why Toss has proved so popular, as Koreans have “more occasions to check their finances.”

Viva Republica is now one of Korea’s most prominent startups, worth about $7 billion after a 2022 funding round. The company boasts backers like GIC, Paypal, and Qualcomm Ventures. Lee has also become one of South Korea’s newest billionaires, according to a 2021 estimate from Forbes.

The Toss platform claims to have close to 30 million registered users, which would be equal to around 60% of South Korea’s entire population. Over half of the company’s 25 million monthly active users visit the app at least 10 times a day. 

“Our monthly active userbase is actually a little shy of that of Instagram [in Korea],” he boasts. 

Super-app success

Asia is covered in super-apps, where platforms like Tencent’s WeChat include services like messaging, payments, food delivery, news, games, and more. Finance is a popular service for budding super-apps, even for non-finance companies, with Singapore’s Grab and Sea, and Indonesia’s GoTo among Asian platforms with fintech divisions. 

Super apps keep users on a single platform, rather than sending them off to another company. That allows for cross-promotion, resource sharing, and other support between various services. It also makes it harder to switch to another platform: If everything you ever need is on one app, why would you try something else?

Yet super apps have not taken off in the West, even as the model wins fans like X owner Elon Musk, who hopes to turn his social media network into a financial services platform.

Lee’s theory is that super apps are a better fit for the Asian internet, which initially lacked much of the digital infrastructure that underpins U.S. startups. 

In the U.S., a new startup can rely on a plethora of other companies that provide supporting services. In Asia—even in wealthy countries like South Korea—those companies just don’t exist. That means a platform like Toss, or its more established Big Tech peers Naver and Kakao, had to build those services itself. 

“When we launched our flagship money transfer service, it was loved by so many users, so we were able to grow very fast. We quickly realized that all the other vertical sectors of finance were not covered by other players,” he explains. “There has been a huge void in the Korea market, so we were able to capture those opportunities.”

Startup milestones

Viva Republica hit a key milestone last year, when it reported its first annual profit since its founding over a decade ago. The company reported a net profit of 21.3 billion Korean won ($15 million) for 2024, compared to a 216.6 billion won ($152 million) loss the year before. Revenue also jumped 43% to hit 1.96 trillion won ($1.4 billion).

Lee says the first-ever profit is due to a focus on growing revenue rather than building market share. “Unlike other fintech players, user growth doesn’t really correlate with revenue. Most of our revenue doesn’t come from users, but instead from our business customers,” attracted to Toss’s point-of-sale program, or its advertising opportunities. 

“For the next three to five years, it’s going to mostly be a story around acquiring more business customers,” he says.

Viva Republica’s profit also came from strong growth in Toss Securities, the platform’s stock trading service. Lee notes its the only service that charges users a fee, and contributes about 20% of the platform’s total revenue. 

He added that Toss Securities, after its launch in 2021, grew quickly due to the Toss superapp. 

“It took Robinhood two years to get two million securities accounts,” Lee says. “We achieved that in five days.”

Toss has higher penetration among younger Koreans, with as many as 90% of those in their twenties using the platform. Lee says that while there aren’t a lot of differences between Toss’s younger and older users, one major divergence is that newer generations are more open to investing in foreign stocks, primarily in the U.S. 

Now that Viva Republica has found a profitable business model, is the company on a path to a public debut, the next big milestone for a startup?

Lee says that Viva Republica plans to go public “in the near future,” but declined to give specific details on timing and location. 

According to local media, Viva Republica is considering a U.S. IPO, abandoning plans to list in South Korea late last year. The company reportedly believes that Korean equity markets won’t properly value a fintech platform like Toss. (Lee declined to share details when pressed.) 

Shares in competing fintech services KakaoBank and KakaoPay have lost around 70% and 80% of their value since their respective 2021 IPOs.

Market confidence

Korean equities often suffer from low valuations—sometimes dubbed the “Korea Discount”. Analysts blame the threat posed by nearby North Korea and poor corporate governance among the country’s chaebols, the massive conglomerates that dominate the economy. The country considered passing market reforms that would unlock value, similar to what was successfully pursued by its neighbor Japan. 

Yet reforms have stalled due to a more pressing political crisis.

In December, then-President Yoon Suk Yeol tried to impose martial law. After widespread protests from the public and the opposition, Yoon withdrew his declaration just a few hours later.

Lawmakers quickly suspended and impeached Yoon, spurring months of political instability. Things are now starting to come to a close after the country’s Constitutional Court upheld Yoon’s impeachment, formally removing him from office—the second time a president has been removed in less than a decade. Korea will hold snap presidential elections in early June.

Still, Lee thinks the crisis shows South Korea’s strengths. “I’m gaining more confidence in the market,” he says. “Everything was done by the constitution, and the process was peaceful.”

“This is the tipping point where we really need to focus on economic growth, not only from businessmen, but from politicians as well,” Lee continues. 

South Korea is grappling with disillusionment amongst the young, frustrated with high levels of debt, unaffordable housing, and more limited social mobility. That’s partly why many have turned to retail trading in stocks, or even more speculative assets like cryptocurrencies. 

The East Asian country, a major exporter, is also frantically negotiating with the U.S. to alleviate tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, including 25% auto tariffs and 26% “reciprocal tariffs.” 

When asked whether uncertainty more broadly is affecting confidence among individual Koreans, Lee points to growth in Toss’s ads business last year as proof that the country’s economy is still strong. 

And he remains bullish on South Korea as an attractive market for anyone that wants to get into fintech. 

“Despite its limited population,” Lee says, “the Korean market is massive.”

The interview was conducted in collaboration with Fortune Korea.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump floats cutting China tariffs ‘substantially’ in trade deal

Published

on

President Donald Trump said he plans to be “very nice” to China in any trade talks and that tariffs will drop if the two countries can reach a deal, a sign he may be backing down from his tough stance on Beijing amid market volatility.

“It will come down substantially but it won’t be zero,” Trump said Tuesday in Washington, following earlier comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the tariff standoff is unsustainable. Trump added that “we’re going to be very nice and they’re going to be very nice, and we’ll see what happens.” 

Trump also said he didn’t see the need to say he’d “play hardball” with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and that during discussions he wouldn’t raise COVID-19, an issue that is very politically sensitive in Beijing. The White House recently launched a website that suggested the virus came from a lab in China, irking the nation’s diplomats.

Trump’s comments come as U.S. stocks and Treasuries have been battered since he rolled out sweeping tariffs on April 2, later announcing a 90-day reprieve for most nations. The 145% duties Trump placed on China this year remain in place, though he’s made exceptions for computers and popular consumer electronics.

“Trump is panicking due to the markets plummeting and still very high U.S. Treasury yields,” said Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief Asia Pacific economist at Natixis. “He needs a deal and quick. China does not need to offer anything big in such circumstances.”

China hasn’t officially responded to Trump’s pledge to play “nice” but the media outlet Cailian called it “a sign that Trump is already softening stance on his signature tariff policies.”

Beijing indicated earlier this month that it wants to see a number of steps from the Trump administration before agreeing to any discussions, especially reining in disparaging remarks by members of his cabinet.

Other conditions include a more consistent U.S. position and a willingness to address China’s concerns around American sanctions and Taiwan, according to a person familiar with the Chinese government’s thinking, who asked not to be identified.

Beijing also wants the U.S. to appoint a point person for talks who has the president’s support and can help prepare a deal that Trump Xi can sign when they meet, the person said. 

Beijing had earlier expressed displeasure with comments Vice President JD Vance made about “Chinese peasants,” with one diplomat calling them “ignorant and disrespectful.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk says 10 to 20 Tesla Model Ys in Austin will offer paid robotaxi rides in June but gives few tech details

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.