Connect with us

Business

Gen Z wants to have their AI cake and eat it, too: KPMG intern survey reveals a generation that wants to have things both ways

Published

on



For years, headlines have warned of robots taking jobs, automation erasing careers, and artificial intelligence (AI) creating an uncertain future for younger generations. But if you ask Generation Z interns entering the workforce in 2025, the story looks very different.

According to a new survey of more than 1,100 KPMG interns across the U.S., Gen Z doesn’t see AI as a looming threat. Instead, they see it as a powerful tool they feel confident using to boost their performance. While half of respondents expect roughly 20% of their jobs to be automated once they start full-time roles, 92% believe they can adapt. What they want from their employers isn’t protection from technology—it’s mentorship, stability, and a healthier balance between work and life.

“Gen Z is making AI work for them,” said Derek Thomas, National Partner-in-Charge of University Talent Acquisition at KPMG U.S. “While other generations are still debating whether to use it, Gen Z is exploring new and creative ways to utilize AI for increased efficiency in their daily lives and enhance their performance at work.”

In an interview with Fortune, Thomas said he’s seen how, with the integration of AI into early-career workflows, “some of those mundane things that they were doing before can now be automated and the things that just didn’t take a lot of thought, more routine-type processes are now being done through technology.” New hires, often Gen Z, are getting to a point where they can go a deal with bigger and deeper issues, and using more critical thinking, than the previous expectation. They’re “diving into the analytical side, the more higher-risk, complicated side of things, earlier in their career than I probably would have when I was coming up.”

Digitally experimental, but cautious

The survey, conducted in July 2025, shows Gen Z’s comfort with AI stands out sharply compared to older peers in the workplace. 60% of interns described themselves as more experimental with AI tools than other generations, applying them not only to school and work projects, but also to personal tasks. Nearly nine in 10 already use generative AI at least once or twice per week.

Still, confidence doesn’t mean blind trust. When asked about risks, interns pointed first to over-reliance: the fear of losing creativity and critical thinking in the process. Misinformation and algorithmic bias followed closely as concerns. This blend of enthusiasm and caution sets the generation apart: They want to master new technology, but not surrender to it.

That tension extends to education as well. Just 8% said their universities strongly encouraged the use of AI tools, while more than half reported that schools permitted AI under structured guidelines. For Gen Z, the message is clear: AI is valuable, but boundaries and balance matter. KPMG’s Big 4 rival, EY, had similar conclusions in its own sweeping survey of Gen Z. They’re the “pragmatic generation,” Marcie Merriman and Zak Dychtwald wrote, approaching “life’s traditional milestones” with a sort of “reasoned skepticism” that comes from seeing lots of myths busted in their formative years.

Thomas said that’s an interesting view, and in his experience, he’s seen Gen Z wanting to see evidence before they commit to a certain approach. “For instance, coming into the office, showing them that benefit.” He said he’s seen an attitude among Gen Zers like, “Okay, you’re telling me it’s going to be good for me, but is it really?” The more that leaders can show them what the benefits will be, the more confidence they’ll have they’re not just doing something for the sake of doing it. This is certainly a big change for Gen Xers and older millennials, who were expected to show up at the office every day from 8:30 or 9:00 a.m. onward, no excuses.

A 9-to-5 rebellion

Perhaps the most striking difference between Gen Z and previous cohorts isn’t their relationship with technology—it’s their vision for the workplace itself. Traditional 9-to-5 schedules, a cornerstone of corporate life for decades, are not part of their ideal future. Nearly half of the interns surveyed said eliminating rigid workday structures was their top desired change.

What they want more than anything? Balance. Work-life balance ranked as the top priority when considering full-time jobs, surpassing salary. Interns voiced anxiety about when, or if, it was acceptable to step away from their desks, revealing how workplace norms still dictate subtle pressures. Many also want employers to reduce mandatory video requirements during virtual meetings and to place more emphasis on well-being than previous generations experienced.

Thomas said in the survey Gen Z wants “great careers with real balance … Here’s the irony: the most digitally connected generation in history knows that real career magic happens face-to-face. They want mentors, not just managers — and they are learning by experiencing and observing in-person interactions.”

Thomas summed up the attitude he sees from Gen Z workers: “Can I have flexibility to get the work done, as long as I’m showing the results that you need to see?” He said there’s give-and-take to this, as flexibility doesn’t mean coming in at 5:00 am when nobody is in the office. Once that negotiation is worked out, he added, “It’s been surprisingly easier to get the younger folks into the office more often and wanting to be there more hands on than some of the folks who’ve been around for a little bit longer, so I’ve been pleasantly surprised to see they really do thirst for that in-person interaction.”

Wellness benefits are central to that equation. Financial wellness topped the list of desired support programs, followed by flexible wellness perks and family-oriented benefits. For a generation that came of age during economic volatility, financial health and long-term security weigh heavily.

Mentorship over machines

Another notable revelation from the survey: despite being digital natives, Gen Z shows a strong preference for in-person learning over anything tech-enabled. Interns said face-to-face mentoring, peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, and hands-on projects were the most effective ways to learn.

Ironically, short-form videos and AI-powered adaptive learning—formats designed to appeal to fast-paced learners—ranked among the least preferred.

The survey also underscores the importance of office culture in their development. Respondents found in-person interactions most helpful for navigating workplace norms, whether by observing managers in meetings or sharing informal conversations over lunch. These interactions not only built confidence but also forged personal connections: A majority reported making five or more genuine friendships with fellow interns this summer. Gallup has found support for this in recent polling, with Gen Z emerging as the generation least enamored of remote work.

Stability in an uncertain market

Though Gen Z is often stereotyped as restless or job-hopping, the survey tells another story. Nearly 60% said they expect to spend most of their careers at just one or two companies, climbing the ladder by building expertise rather than constantly switching employers. Another 35% anticipate staying in one field while changing roles over time, while 27% say they will prioritize purpose over traditional career paths.

Whatever the trajectory, stability looms large. These preferences reflect the economic pressures Gen Z has grown up with: global recessions, inflationary shocks, and waves of layoffs across industries. Security and growth opportunities outrank the allure of constant reinvention.

“Gen Z wants to go deep, not wide,” Thomas said. “They’re looking for employers who invest in their growth, offer purpose-driven work and provide the stability to build meaningful careers over time.”

Fighting labels and shaping culture

Cultural identity remains a key driver for this generation. When asked about building inclusive workplaces, respecting different perspectives ranked highest on the list, followed by accommodating diverse working styles. Their biggest challenge in digital workplace settings, though, was deciding how much personality to reveal online—a telling signal for a generation often scrutinized for oversharing on social media.

One of the clearest messages from the survey is that Gen Z wants to redefine the stereotypes attached to them. Nearly half of respondents said the perception of their generation as “lazy or unmotivated” was the label they most wanted to eliminate.

That stereotype is increasingly at odds with survey data and the behaviors employers are already observing. Gen Z is technologically savvy, proactive about wellness, intentional about careers, and focused on learning from real human interactions. They may not buy into the rigid structures of past decades, but they’re motivated by building purposeful, stable, and balanced lives.

Thomas shared that he had to overcome that kind of bias himself, before he recognized that what he thought was a reluctance to work hard was really Gen Zers being much more comfortable setting boundaries with him than he would have been at that age. “I didn’t grow up knowing that I could establish boundaries, that it was okay to sit there and try to figure out how to have that balance,” he said, offering praise for what he experiences as a “really innovative group of individuals.”

The Gen Z proposition

For employers, this research is more than a generational snapshot. Companies that treat AI purely as a cost-cutting replacement risk alienating a generation that sees it as an enhancement. Organizations that cling to rigid work schedules or underinvest in mentorship may miss the chance to retain some of the most adaptable talent entering the workforce.

Gen Z isn’t asking for less work. They’re asking for work that is smarter, more flexible, and more sustainable—work that allows them to grow as professionals without sacrificing their wellbeing.

“This generation wants careers that fuel their ambitions without burning them out,” Thomas concluded. “Gen Z brings their whole self to work and expects their employers to support every part of that equation. It’s about building a fulfilling life, not just a successful career.”

At the end of the day, Thomas told Fortune, work is still work and nothing succeeds like success. One thing he tells new hires is that the better they perform, the more they’ll get their longed-for flexibility. “We do express upon them the importance of being able to demonstrate that [they] can get the work done, and that [they] can be relied upon.” That sounds like something downright old-fashioned: a strong work ethic.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump slams Fed’s third-straight rate cut as ‘too small,’ saying he wishes it was twice as large

Published

on



The Federal Reserve reduced its key interest rate by a quarter-point for the third time in a row Wednesday but signaled that it may leave rates unchanged in the coming months.

The cut decreased the Fed’s rate to about 3.6%, the lowest it has been in nearly three years. Lower rates from the Fed can bring down borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards over time, though market forces can also affect those rates.

Chair Jerome Powell suggested at a news conference that after six rate cuts in the past two years, the central bank can step back and see how hiring and inflation develop. In a set of quarterly economic projections, Fed officials signaled they expect to lower rates just once next year.

Fed officials “will carefully evaluate the incoming data,” Powell said, adding that the Fed is “well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves.”

The chair also said that the Fed’s key rate was close to a level that neither restricts nor stimulates the economy, a significant shift from earlier this year, when he described the rate as high enough to slow the economy and quell inflation. With rates closer to a more neutral level, the bar for further rate cuts is likely higher that it was this fall.

“We believe the labor market will have to noticeably weaken to warrant another rate cut soon,” Ryan Sweet, global chief economist at Oxford Economics, said.

Three Fed officials dissented from the move, the most dissents in six years and a sign of deep divisions on a committee that traditionally works by consensus. Two officials voted to keep the Fed’s rate unchanged: Jeffrey Schmid, president of the Kansas City Fed, and Austan Goolsbee, president of the Chicago Fed. Stephen Miran, whom Trump appointed in September, voted for a half point cut.

December’s meeting could usher in a more contentious period for the Fed. Officials are split between those who support reducing rates to bolster hiring and those who’d prefer to keep rates unchanged because inflation remains above the central bank’s 2% target. Unless inflation shows clear signs of coming fully under control, or unemployment worsens, those divisions will likely remain.

“What you see is some people feel we should stop here and we’re in the right place and should wait, and some people think we should cut more next year,” Powell said.

A stark sign of the Fed’s divisions was the wide range of cuts that the 19 members of the Fed’s rate-setting committee penciled in for 2026. Seven projected no cuts next year, while eight forecast that the central bank would implement two or more reductions. Four supported just one. Only 12 out of 19 members vote on rate decisions.

President Donald Trump on Wednesday criticized the cut as too small, and said he would have preferred “at least double.” Trump could name a new Fed chair as soon as later this month to replace Powell when his term ends in May. Trump’s new chair is likely to push for sharper rate cuts than many officials will support.

Stocks jumped in response to the Fed’s move, in part because some Wall Street investors expected Powell to be more forceful in shutting down the possibility of future cuts. The broad S&P 500 stock index rose 0.7% and closed near an all-time high reached in October.

Powell was also optimistic about the economy’s growth next year, and said that consumer spending remains resilient while companies are still investing in artificial intelligence infrastructure. He also suggested growing worker efficiency could contribute to faster growth without more inflation.

Still, Powell said the committee reduced borrowing costs out of concern that the job market is even weaker than it appears. While government data shows that the economy has added just 40,000 jobs a month since April, Powell said that figure could be revised lower by as much as 60,000, which would mean employers have actually been shedding an average of 20,000 jobs a month since the spring.

“It’s a labor market that seems to have significant downside risks,” Powell told reporters. “People care about that. That’s their jobs.”

The Fed met against the backdrop of elevated inflation that has frustrated many Americans, with prices higher for groceries, rents, and utilities. Consumer prices have jumped 25% in the five years since COVID.

“We hear loud and clear how people are experiencing really high costs,” Powell said Wednesday. “A lot of that isn’t the current rate of inflation, a lot of that is e mbedded high costs due to higher inflations in 2022-2023.”

Powell said inflation could move higher early next year, as more companies pass tariff costs to consumers as they reset prices to start the year. Inflation should decline after that, he added, but it’s not guaranteed.

“We just came off an experience where inflation turned out to be much more persistent than anyone expected,” he said, referring to the spike in 2022. “Is that going to happen now? That’s the risk.”

The Fed’s policy meeting took place as the Trump administration moves toward picking a new Fed chair to replace Powell when his term finishes in May. Trump’s nominee is likely to push for sharper rate cuts than many officials may support.

Trump has hinted that he will likely pick Kevin Hassett, his top economic adviser. But on Wednesday, Trump said he would meet with Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who has also been on the short list to replace Powell.

Trump added that he wants someone who will lower interest rates. “Our rates should be the lowest rates in the world,” he said.

A government report last week showed that overall and core prices rose 2.8% in September from a year earlier, according to the Fed’s preferred measure. That is far below the spikes in inflation three years ago but still painful for many households after the big run-up since 2020.

Adding to the Fed’s challenges, job gains have slowed sharply this year and the unemployment rate has risen for three straight months to 4.4%. While that is still a low rate historically, it is the highest in four years. Layoffs are also muted, so far, as part of what many economists call a “low hire, low fire” job market.

The Fed typically keeps its key rate elevated to combat inflation, while it often reduces borrowing costs when unemployment worsens to spur more spending and hiring.

Powell will preside over only three more Fed meetings before he steps down. On Wednesday, he was asked about his legacy.

“I really want to turn this job over to whoever replaces me with the economy in really good shape,” he said. “I want inflation to be under control, coming back down to 2%, and I want the labor market to be strong.”

___

Associated Press Writers Collin Binkley and Alex Veiga in Los Angeles contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Coca-Cola names 30-year veteran Henrique Braun as new CEO

Published

on



Coca-Cola said Wednesday that its chief operating officer will become its next CEO in the first quarter of 2026.

The Atlanta beverage giant said its board elected Henrique Braun as CEO effective March 31. James Quincey, Coke’s current chairman and CEO, will transition to executive chairman of the company.

Braun, 57, has worked at Coca-Cola for three decades. Prior to assuming the COO role earlier this year, he led operations in Brazil, Latin America, Greater China and South Korea. He has held positions overseeing Coke’s supply chain, new business development, marketing, innovation, general management and bottling operations.

Braun was born in California and raised in Brazil. He holds a bachelor’s degree in agricultural engineering from the University Federal of Rio de Janeiro, a master of science degree from Michigan State University and an MBA from Georgia State University.

David Weinberg, Coca-Cola’s lead independent director, called Quincey, 60, a “transformative leader” who will continue to remain active in the business.

During Quincey’s nine years as CEO, Coke added more than 10 additional billion-dollar brands, including BodyArmor and Fairlife. He also brought Coke into the alcoholic drink market with Topo Chico Hard Seltzer, which went on sale in 2021.

In 2020, Quincey led a restructuring that reduced Coke’s brands by half and laid off thousands of employees. Quincey said Coke wanted to streamline its structure and focus its investments on fast-growing products like its Simply and Minute Maid juices.

But as Quincey steps down as CEO, Coke is facing numerous challenges, including tepid demand for its products in the U.S. and Europe and increasing customer scrutiny of its ingredients. This summer, after a nudge from President Donald Trump, Coke said it would release a version of its trademark Cola with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup.

Weinberg said the board is confident that Braun will build on the company’s strengths and seek out growth opportunities globally.

Coke shares were flat in after-market trading.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Warner Bros. merger fight draws fire across U.S. political divide

Published

on



The battle for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. has already lit a fire in Hollywood, with unions decrying the potential job losses, theaters sounding an alarm about the future of film releases and actors worrying about free speech. 

Now, the debate over which company will end up owning Warner Bros. — Netflix Inc. or Paramount Skydance Corp. — is carving up the country along political lines.

In Republican circles, it’s become fashionable to root against Netflix. Paramount is run by David Ellison, who has close ties to the White House and whose bid for Warner Bros. is backed by Jared Kushner, son-in-law of President Donald Trump. Some prominent Democrats, on the other hand, are voicing objections to the Paramount bid, crying foul over the $24 billion that’s coming from Middle East sources.

President Trump added drama on Wednesday when he said that any deal for Warner Bros. should include the sale of its CNN cable news network.

“It should be guaranteed that CNN is part of it or sold separately,” he said. The network is run by “a very dishonest group of people.”

Warner Bros. and Paramount declined to comment. Netflix didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Few mergers in recent memory have been as polarizing at the battle for Warner Bros., which combines the glamour of Hollywood, the influence of TV news, foreign intrigue tied to Middle Eastern funds and the specter of White House favoritism.

Trump’s comment triggered even more uncertainty. He had previously raised antitrust concerns about Netflix buying Warner Bros.

After a months-long auction, Warner Bros. agreed last week to sell its studios and streaming business, including HBO, to Netflix for $27.75 a share. Under the Netflix deal, Warner Bros. would move forward with its plan to spin off its cable networks, including CNN and TNT, into a separate company called Discovery Global.

Paramount, which kicked off the sale process by making several unsolicited offers for the company, responded on Dec. 8 by launching a $30-a-share hostile tender offer for all of Warner Bros., including the cable networks.

Paramount released a letter to shareholders on Wednesday reiterating that its offer is superior and more likely to win approval in Washington. 

Ellison has spoken publicly about having a good relationship with the Trump administration. His father Larry Ellison, the cofounder of Oracle Corp. and world’s second-richest person, is a Trump ally. 

Still, Trump hasn’t fully endorsed Paramount’s bid. He bashed the company on Monday over a 60 Minutes interview with Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has become a vocal critic of the president. He also said that neither Netflix nor Paramount “are particularly great friends of mine.” 

Other politicians have been much clearer about who they’re rooting against in the bidding war.

In November, Republican Congressman Darrell Issa of California wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking whether a Netflix deal with Warner Bros. would give the streaming leader too much market power.

“Netflix is already the dominant streaming platform in the United States and permitting it to absorb a major competitor raises antitrust concerns that could result in a harm to consumers,” Issa wrote.

Democratic Representatives Sam Liccardo of California and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts sent a letter to Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav on Wednesday raising concerns about the participation of foreign investors in Paramount’s bid, which includes backing from sovereign wealth funds in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Abu Dhabi. 

“These investors, by virtue of their financial position or contractual rights, could obtain influence — direct or indirect — over business decisions that bear upon editorial independence, content moderation, distribution priorities, or the stewardship of Americans’ private data,” the lawmakers wrote. 

Like many in Hollywood, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts would prefer no sale at all. She called Paramount’s offer a “five-alarm antitrust fire” on Monday after previously branding Netflix’s bid as an “anti-monopoly nightmare.”

Within the pro-Trump MAGA-verse, influencers and media commentators called on Trump to block a Netflix-Warner Bros. deal. Conservative commentator Laura Loomer zeroed in on Netflix’s ties to former President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle. They signed a deal with the company in 2018.

“If Netflix is allowed to buy Warner Bros. and Trump’s administration doesn’t kill off the merger, CNN will be transformed into the Obama News Network, featuring shows hosted by Michelle Obama @MichelleObama where she lectures Americans about how racist and sexist we are,” Loomer wrote on X

Right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson said combining Netflix with Warner Bros.’ streaming and studios asset would be “the most dangerous media consolidation in American history” and deliver “a monopoly on children’s entertainment” to “the Democrat super-donors that run Netflix.”

Former US Representative Matt Gaetz, who was previously nominated for attorney general by Trump before withdrawing, wrote “TRUMP MUST STOP THIS!” in a post on X shortly after the Netflix deal was announced.

“The most massive content distributor lashing to a massive content producer / catalog will create a homogenized, woke nightmare for the media landscape,” he wrote.

For Hollywood, much of the focus has been on how each deal would impact an industry already facing job losses, production cuts and the threat of artificial intelligence. 

With Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos previously deeming the experience of going to a movie theater to be “outdated,” some in the industry are concerned his company’s takeover of Warner Bros.’s streaming business would spell disaster for theater chains and film production. 

Michael O’Leary, CEO of movie theater trade group Cinema United, said in a statement last week that the Netflix deal “poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business.”

“Netflix’s stated business model does not support theatrical exhibition,” he wrote. “In fact, it is the opposite.”

The Producer’s Guild of America urged protection for producers’ livelihoods and theatrical distribution. 

“Our legacy studios are more than content libraries – within their vaults are the character and culture of our nation,” the guild said.

Actress Jane Fonda spoke out against the Netflix deal last week calling it “an alarming escalation of the consolidation that threatens the entire entertainment industry, the democratic public it serves and the First Amendment itself.”

Other creatives commented on how the consolidation might affect consumers. In a skit from Morning Brew’s YouTube Channel Good Work, a movie viewer starts to stream a film at home, only to be barraged by a series of studio logos that include Netflix, Warner Bros., Paramount, HBO, Pixar and the Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund. The viewer quickly gets bored before grabbing the remote.

“Let’s turn this off,” he says. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.