Connect with us

Business

Gen Z might avoid the résumé as most firms do skills-based recruitment

Published

on



Trying to summarize every job you’ve ever had and then distill that onto a two-page résumé has been the bane of job hunter’s existence since around the 1950s. Fortunately, for Gen Z, it’s something they might never have to bore themselves with. 

That’s because research shows many companies are moving away from relying on the traditional job application requirement.

In fact, almost three-quarters of companies now use skills-based assessments throughout their hiring process, according to TestGorilla’s The State of Skills-Based Hiring 2023 report which surveyed 3,000 employees and employers around the world. This is up from 56% in the previous year.

Although many of those employers are still also using CVs, it might not be long until they’re a thing of the past because most bosses are already favoring the new hiring practice and reporting big results. 

Skills-based hiring is more effective, the data shows

The employers surveyed who use skills-based hiring—which includes role-specific skills assessments, instead of simply scanning someone’s listed career experience—reported massive gains.

According to TestGorilla’s research, it reduced the number of mis-hires by 88%, total time spent searching for the perfect candidate by 82%, and hiring-related costs by 74%.

Overall, 92% of the employers surveyed reported that skills-based hiring is more effective at identifying talented candidates than a traditional CV. Meanwhile, over 80% said it’s more predictive of on-job success and leads to new hires staying longer in their roles.

By testing candidates on how they would handle the actual day-to-day responsibilities of a role, employers are more likely to hire the best person for the job instead of being drawn by big names and snazzy titles.

As Khyati Sundaram, CEO of the skill-based recruitment platform Applied, previously told Fortune, just because someone has listed on their résumé that they’ve worked with the SEO team at somewhere alluring like Google, it doesn’t actually mean they know the ins and outs of search engine optimization to the extent that’s required for a role. 

“We are trying to make sure the test or the question is as relevant to the job as possible,” Sundaram said, adding, “That’s the reason that candidates love it too.”

Intuitively people may assume that taking multiple skills-based tests would feel like more of a nuisance for job seekers than simply blasting their CV at hundreds of roles—but the data shows otherwise. 

Most of the workers that TestGorilla surveyed think that skills-based hiring levels the playing field and improves their chances of bagging their dream jobs. 

This is especially true for candidates who are often overlooked. In fact, around three-quarters of the Black, Asian, and Arab employees that TestGorilla surveyed have already reportedly gained access to new employment opportunities through skills-based assessments.

Move to scrap CVs comes as firms drop degree requirements

The uptick in skills-based hiring comes as degrees have slidden down the priority list for employers.

Google, Microsoft, IBM, and Apple previously eliminated their long-held degree requirements to remove barriers to entry and recruit more diverse talent. Meanwhile, recruiters globally are five times more likely to search for new hires by skills over higher education.

A former Cisco top executive in the U.K. also said young aspiring workers would be better off skipping out on college to join the world of work straight away.

“In university, you come out with whatever degree you may get, but it’s almost certainly saddled with debt,” David Meads, former Cisco’s U.K. and Ireland CEO, told Fortune. “Is that better than on-the-job experience where you’re rotating through different parts of our organization, and living the reality and not just the theory?”

“For me, attitude and aptitude are more important than whatever letters you have after your name, or whatever qualifications you’ve got on a sheet,” he added.

But research has shown that skeptical Gen Z remain unconvinced: They’re shunning apprenticeship schemes in favor of going down the traditional route of college. So perhaps they will still go through the bore of writing a résumé—even if, like a college degree, it’s no longer needed.

A version of this story originally published on Fortune.com on November 23, 2023.

More on Gen Z careers:

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gen Z can skip college, and still earn big: Here are the top 15 highest-paying jobs that don’t require a degree

Published

on



Gen Z has been taking a harder look at the American Dream of pursuing a four-year degree as tuition costs have skyrocketed and AI takes over white-collar jobs. Luckily, they have an out—there are many careers that don’t require a bachelor’s and still pay six-figure salaries. 

The top high-wage job that doesn’t require a four-year degree and shows strong job growth may be unexpected: elevator and escalator installers and repairers. The role has a median annual salary of $106,580, only requiring a high school diploma, apprenticeship completion, and a state certification, according to a new report from Resume Genius analyzing U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data. 

The study placed transportation, storage, and distribution managers in second; by pursuing an entry-level role in logistics, new hires can put themselves on track to earn $102,010 per year. Flight attendants, chefs, athletes, and criminal investigators also made the list. 

Young people have been told that going to college is necessary for success, but Gen Zers wanting to skip costly degrees don’t have to sacrifice their careers. The report shows they have a litany of choices, from six-figure blue collar jobs to cushy office roles.

Resume Genius career expert Eva Chan told CNBC that “there’s no one way to get a high-paying job,” adding that all the ranked roles “have some degree of training, some have schooling, but they’re all very attainable without a degree.”

The top 15 high-paying jobs that don’t require four-year degrees

The top 15 highest-paying jobs that earn above the U.S. median, have positive projected job growth, and don’t require a four-year degree to apply, according to Resume Genius.

  1. Elevator and escalator installer and repairer (Median annual salary: $106,580)
  2. Transportation, storage, and distribution manager (Median annual salary: $102,010)
  3. Electrical power-line installer and repairer (Median annual salary: $92,560)
  4. Aircraft and avionics equipment mechanic and technician (Median annual salary: $79,140)
  5. Detective and criminal investigator (Median annual salary: $77,270)
  6. Locomotive engineer (Median annual salary: $75,680)
  7. Wholesale and manufacturing sales representative (Median annual salary: $74,100)
  8. Flight attendant (Median annual salary: $67,130)
  9. Property, real estate, and community association manager (Median annual salary: $66,700)
  10. Water transportation worker (Median annual salary: $66,490)
  11. Food service manager (Median annual salary: $65,310)
  12. Heavy vehicle and mobile equipment service technician (Median annual salary: $62,740)
  13. Athlete and sports competitor (Median annual salary: $62,360)
  14. Chef and head cook (Median annual salary: $60,990)
  15. Insurance sales agent (Median annual salary: $60,370)
Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI is hiring a head of preparedness, who will earn $555,000

Published

on



OpenAI is looking for a new employee to help address the growing dangers of AI, and the tech company is willing to spend more than half a million dollars to fill the role.

OpenAI is hiring a “head of preparedness” to reduce harms associated with the technology, like user mental health and cybersecurity, CEO Sam Altman wrote in an X post on Saturday. The position will pay $555,000 per year, plus equity, according to the job listing.

“This will be a stressful job and you’ll jump into the deep end pretty much immediately,” Altman said.

OpenAI’s push to hire a safety executive comes amid companies’ growing concerns about AI risks on operations and reputations. A November analysis of annual Securities and Exchange Commission filings by financial data and analytics company AlphaSense found that in the first 11 months of the year, 418 companies worth at least $1 billion cited reputational harm associated with AI risk factors. These reputation-threatening risks include AI datasets that show biased information or jeopardize security. Reports of AI-related reputational harm increased 46% from 2024, according to the analysis.

“Models are improving quickly and are now capable of many great things, but they are also starting to present some real challenges,” Altman said in the social media post.

“If you want to help the world figure out how to enable cybersecurity defenders with cutting edge capabilities while ensuring attackers can’t use them for harm, ideally by making all systems more secure, and similarly for how we release biological capabilities and even gain confidence in the safety of running systems that can self-improve, please consider applying,” he added.

OpenAI’s previous head of preparedness Aleksander Madry was reassigned last year to a role related to AI reasoning, with AI safety a related part of the job. 

OpenAI’s efforts to address AI dangers

Founded in 2015 as a nonprofit with the intention to use AI to improve and benefit humanity, OpenAI has, in the eyes of some of its former leaders, struggled to prioritize its commitment to safe technology development. The company’s former vice president of research, Dario Amodei, along with his sister Daniela Amodei and several other researchers, left OpenAI in 2020, in part because of concerns the company was prioritizing commercial success over safety. Amodei founded Anthropic the following year.

OpenAI has faced multiple wrongful death lawsuits this year, alleging ChatGPT encouraged users’ delusions, and claiming conversations with the bot were linked to some users’ suicides. A New York Times investigation published in November found nearly 50 cases of ChatGPT users having mental health crises while in conversation with the bot. 

OpenAI said in August its safety features could “degrade” following long conversations between users and ChatGPT, but the company has made changes to improve how its models interact with users. It created an eight-person council earlier this year to advise the company on guardrails to support users’ wellbeing and has updated ChatGPT to better respond in sensitive conversations and increase access to crisis hotlines. At the beginning of the month, the company announced grants to fund research about the intersection of AI and mental health.

The tech company has also conceded to needing improved safety measures, saying in a blog post this month some of its upcoming models could present a “high” cybersecurity risk as AI rapidly advances. The company is taking measures—such as training models to not respond to requests compromising cybersecurity and refining monitoring systems—to mitigate those risks.

“We have a strong foundation of measuring growing capabilities,” Altman wrote on Saturday. “But we are entering a world where we need more nuanced understanding and measurement of how those capabilities could be abused, and how we can limit those downsides both in our products and in the world, in a way that lets us all enjoy the tremendous benefits.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

YouTube’s cofounder and former tech boss doesn’t want his kids to watch short videos

Published

on



  • YouTube cofounder Steve Chen is one of the latest tech trailblazers to warn against social media’s impact on kids. Chen warned in a talk short-form video “equates to shorter attention spans” and said he wouldn’t want his own kids to exclusively consume this type of content. Companies that distribute short-form video (which includes the company he cofounded, YouTube) should add safeguards for younger users, he added.

A YouTube cofounder who helped pave the way for our modern, content-obsessed world is the latest tech whiz to come out against short-form videos because of their effects on kids. 

Steve Chen, who served as YouTube’s former chief technology officer before it was acquired by Google in 2006, railed against the TikTok-ification of online life in a talk earlier this year at Stanford Graduate School of Business.

“I think TikTok is entertainment, but it’s purely entertainment,” Chen said during the talk, which was published on YouTube Friday. “It’s just for that moment. Just shorter-form content equates to shorter attention spans.”

Chen, who has two children with wife, Jamie Chen, said he wouldn’t want his kids only consuming short-form content, and then not be able to watch something longer than 15 minutes. He said he knows of other parents who force their kids to watch longer videos without the eye-catching colors and gimmicks that hook especially younger users. This strategy works well, he claims.

“If they don’t get exposure to the short-form content right away, then they’re still happy with that other type of content that they’re watching,” he said. 

Many companies have had to rush to offer short-form content after the rise of TikTok, he said, but these companies now have to balance their motivations for monetization and attracting users’ attention with content that’s “actually useful.” 

Companies that distribute short-form video, which includes his former company YouTube, could face problems with addictiveness. These companies should add safeguards for kids on short-form content, such as age restrictions for apps and limits on the amount of time some users can use them, he said. 

Chen joins fellow tech trailblazers Sam Altman of OpenAI and Elon Musk in sounding the alarm about social media’s impact on children. In a podcast interview, Altman specifically called out social media scrolling and the “dopamine hit” of short-form video for “probably messing with kids’ brain development in a super deep way.”

Musk, who owns the social network X (née Twitter), said in 2023 he doesn’t have any restrictions on social-media use for his children, but added this “might have been a mistake,” and encouraged parents to take a more active role in their kids’ social-media habits.

“I think, probably, I would limit social media a bit more than I have in the past and just take note of what they’re watching, because I think at this point they’re being programmed by some social media algorithms, which you may or may not agree with,” Musk said.

A version of this story originally published on Fortune.com on July 29, 2025.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.