Connect with us

Business

Gen Z are ‘overemployed,’ holding down 5 jobs and earning over $3k a day—and it’s totally legal

Published

on



As news of Soham Parekh, the software engineer who has been accused of working for several Silicon Valley startups at the same time, spreads on social media, bosses have been venting their suspicions about their own remote workers. 

Their instincts may not be wrong. Post-pandemic remote work has quietly created a loophole that many, like Parekh, have exploited to hold down several gigs at once.

Research by Paychex from back in 2023 found a staggering 40% of workers were juggling two jobs. But Gen Z were the most prolific “polyworkers,” with 93% of the youngest generation of workers splitting their time between multiple employers. In comparison, just 28% of baby boomers and 23% of Gen Xers admitted to holding down three or more jobs.

For workers, it can mean paychecks in the tens of thousands, the ability to maximise their earning potential while they’re young and child-free (and not yet displaced by AI), and retire early. One Reddit user claims to have just landed a fifth concurrent job, bringing their income to over $3,000 a day. 

But employers are complaining about shoddy quality work, ghosted meetings, and a feeling they’ve been “scammed.”

What the law says about holding down multiple gigs

Unfortunately for disgruntled bosses, employment experts say there’s no law outright prohibiting holding down multiple jobs at once—at least not in the U.S. or UK.

Nicolas Lakeland, an employment law Partner, Laytons tells Fortune “it depends on what the contract of employment says but most full-time contracts of employment will have a clause which says that an employee will devote their ‘their whole time and attention’ to their work and not have alternative employment outside of that.”

The reason for this, he adds, is usually to stop employees working for competitors. “But also they want their employees to turn up on a Monday morning and be able to work productively.” 

So, the burden is mostly on employers to protect themselves. And with “overemployment” being a very new issue, they’ll need to check the scope of the restrictions in their contracts—and police it.

“In short, it is legal to do this in the US,” Peter Rahbar, employment attorney, workplace issues expert and founder of The Rahbar Group, echoes. “The key consideration for employees is whether their employer has a policy, or there is a provision in their offer letter or employment agreement that would prohibit holding other employment.”

Before accepting secret side jobs, Rahbar says employees should look into whether they “present a conflict of interest, or are competitive with, the primary job.” If the answer is yes, he’d “strongly advise that the employee not move forward, as it could present additional legal issues.” 

For employers, Rahbar recommends moonlighting policies—and outright prohibiting “other employment” in contracts. But on a more human level, he suggests paying employees well. “Most employees take other jobs for money, not intellectual curiosity,” he adds.

As Parekh, the software engineer who sparked the overemployment debate, told the tech show TBPN: “No one really likes to work 140 hours a week, I had to do it out of necessity.” 

“Last, managers should make sure to communicate frequently with their employees, this will not only help build trust and achieve team goals, but reduces the opportunity to do other work,” Rahbar adds.

Even if being overemployed is technically legal, that doesn’t mean there won’t be consequences

Just as there is no outright federal law preventing workers from holding down multiple gigs, there’s no law protecting that right either. “It would also not be illegal for an employer to fire the employee if it found out,” employment lawyer Tom Spiggle from The Spiggle Law Firm highlights.

Where workers could land on the wrong side of the law is if they share confidential information from one company with another, or work for a competitor.

“In that situation, the employee could be legally liable in some states for interfering with the initial employer’s business,” Spiggle explains. “The fancy legal term is ‘interference with prospective business advantage.’”

There are also tighter legal restrictions for those working for the federal government and some government contractors, particularly in the defense space. But in most cases, he says workers would simply be in breach of their contract, and while they could be “subject to monetary damages,” the most likely scenario would be they just get sacked. 

Lewis Maleh, CEO of executive recruitment agency Bentley Lewis, says he’s seen multiple workers dismissed for this exact reason. “If someone is doing a full-time perm job and being paid accordingly, they should not be doing another full-time perm role unless the company is OK with it,” he says. “I don’t think it’s ethical and will cost you down the road if you get found out.”

And apparently, the chances of being caught are fairly high. Maleh says workers have been exposed through LinkedIn activity, tax-record checks, background-screening companies and even by accident when a client happened to be on a Zoom interview for another job.

Even if the work is getting done, Maleh says employers care because:

  • It creates trust issues: If you’re hiding this, what else are you hiding?
  • Tax implications
  • Confidentiality risks: Sharing or reusing sensitive information across companies—intentionally or not—can pose legal issues
  • Availability concerns: You may be unreachable during emergencies, meetings, or required travel
  • Intellectual property disputes: Anything created on company time may become a grey area if you’re splitting hours between employers.

“It’s short-term financial gain and potential long-term career suicide,” he concluded. “Always be honest… The recruitment world is small, especially in senior roles, and it could impact references for years.”

If that second or third job really is that important to your livelihood, the safest bet is bringing it up with your employer right away.

As Lakeland says: “There is nothing stopping an employee from negotiating a variation to their contract, but that means being open, honest, and upfront about what you want to do and asking the employer’s permission.”

Did your boss catch you for holding multiple jobs at once? Fortune wants to hear from you. Get in touch: orianna.royle@fortune.com 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump says Netflix-Warner Bros. deal ‘could be a problem’

Published

on



President Donald Trump raised potential antitrust concerns for Netflix Inc.’s planned acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., noting that the market share of the combined entity may pose problems. 

“Well, that’s got to go through a process, and we’ll see what happens,” Trump said when asked about the deal as he arrived at the Kennedy Center for an event, confirming that he has met Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos last week and complimenting the streaming company. “But it is a big market share. It could be a problem.”

The $72 billion deal would combine the world’s No. 1 streaming player with the No. 4 service HBO Max, which has raised red flags from antitrust regulators. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount

Published

on



Wall Street’s sentiment toward companies associated with artificial intelligence is shifting, and it’s all about two companies: OpenAI is down, and Alphabet Inc. is up.

The maker of ChatGPT is no longer seen as being on the cutting edge of AI technology and is facing questions about its lack of profitability and the need to grow rapidly to pay for its massive spending commitments. Meanwhile, Google’s parent is emerging as a deep-pocketed competitor with tentacles in every part of the AI trade.

“OpenAI was the golden child earlier this year, and Alphabet was looked at in a very different light,” said Brett Ewing, chief market strategist at First Franklin Financial Services. “Now sentiment is much more tempered toward OpenAI.” 

As a result, the shares of companies in OpenAI’s orbit — principally Oracle Corp., CoreWeave Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices Inc., but also Microsoft Corp., Nvidia Corp. and SoftBank, which has an 11% stake in the company — are coming under heavy selling pressure. Meanwhile, Alphabet’s momentum is boosting not only its stock price, but also those it’s associated with like Broadcom Inc., Lumentum Holdings Inc., Celestica Inc., and TTM Technologies Inc.

Read More: Alphabet’s AI Strength Fuels Biggest Quarterly Jump Since 2005

The shift has been dramatic in magnitude and speed. Just a few weeks ago, OpenAI was sparking huge rallies in any company related to it. Now, those connections look more like an anchor. It’s a change that carries wide-ranging implications, given how central the closely held company has been to the AI mania that has driven the stock market’s three-year rally. 

“A light has been shined on the complexity of the financing, the circular deals, the debt issues,” Ewing said. “I’m sure this exists around the Alphabet ecosystem to a certain degree, but it was exposed as pretty extreme for OpenAI’s deals, and appreciating that was a game-changer for sentiment.”

A basket of companies connected to OpenAI has gained 74% in 2025, which is impressive but far shy of the 146% jump by Alphabet-exposed stocks. The technology-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index is up 22%. 

The skepticism surrounding OpenAI can be dated to August, when it unveiled GPT-5 to mixed reactions. It ramped up last month when Alphabet released the latest version of its Gemini AI model and got rave reviews. As a result, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman declared a “code red” effort to improve the quality of ChatGPT, delaying other projects until it gets its signature product in line.

‘All the Pieces’

Alphabet’s perceived strength goes beyond Gemini. The company has the third highest market capitalization in the S&P 500 and a ton of cash at its disposal. It also has a host of adjacent businesses, like Google Cloud and a semiconductor manufacturing operation that’s gaining traction. And that’s before you consider the company’s AI data, talent and distribution, or its successful subsidiaries like YouTube and Waymo.

“There’s a growing sense that Alphabet has all the pieces to emerge as the dominant AI model builder,” said Brian Colello, technology equity senior strategist at Morningstar. “Just a couple months ago, investors would’ve given that title to OpenAI. Now there’s more uncertainty, more competition, more risk that OpenAI isn’t the slam-dunk winner.”

Read More: Alphabet’s AI Chips Are a Potential $900 Billion ‘Secret Sauce’

Representatives for OpenAI and Alphabet didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The difference between being first or second place goes beyond bragging rights, it also has significant financial ramifications for the companies and their partners. For example, if users gravitating to Gemini slows ChatGPT’s growth, it will be harder for OpenAI to pay for cloud-computing capacity from Oracle or chips from AMD.

By contrast, Alphabet’s partners in building out its AI effort are thriving. Shares of Lumentum, which makes optical components for Alphabet’s data centers, have more than tripled this year, putting them among the 30 best performers in the Russell 3000 Index. Celestica provides the hardware for Alphabet’s AI buildout, and its stock is up 252% in 2025. Meanwhile Broadcom — which is building the tensor processing unit, or TPU, chips Alphabet uses — has seen its stock price leap 68% since the end of last year.

OpenAI has announced a number of ambitious deals in recent months. The flurry of activity “rightfully brought scrutiny and concern over whether OpenAI can fund all this, whether it is biting off more than it can chew,” Colello said. “The timing of its revenue growth is uncertain, and every improvement a competitor makes adds to the risk that it can’t reach its aspirations.”

In fairness, investors greeted many of these deals with excitement, because they appeared to mint the next generation of AI winners. But with the shift in sentiment, they’re suddenly taking a wait-and-see attitude.

“When people thought it could generate revenue and become profitable, those big deal numbers seemed possible,” said Brian Kersmanc, portfolio manager at GQG Partners, which has about $160 billion in assets. “Now we’re at a point where people have stopped believing and started questioning.”

Kersmanc sees the AI euphoria as the “dot-com era on steroids,” and said his firm has gone from being heavily overweight tech to highly skeptical.

Self-Inflicted Wounds 

“We’re trying to avoid areas of over-hype and a lot of those were fueled by OpenAI,” he said. “Since a lot of places have been touched by this, it will be a painful unwind. It isn’t just a few tech names that need to come down, though they’re a huge part of the index. All these bets have parallel trades, like utilities, with high correlations. That’s the fear we have, not just that OpenAI spun up this narrative, but that so many things were lifted on the hype.”

OpenAI’s public-relations flaps haven’t helped. The startup’s Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar recently suggested the US government “backstop the guarantee that allows the financing to happen,” which raised some eyebrows. But she and Altman later clarified that the company hasn’t requested such guarantees. 

Then there was Altman’s appearance on the “Bg2 Pod,” where he was asked how the company can make spending commitments that far exceed its revenue. “If you want to sell your shares, I’ll find you a buyer — I just, enough,” was the CEO’s response.

Read More: Sam Altman’s Business Buddies Are Getting Stung

Altman’s dismissal was problematic because the gap between OpenAI’s revenue and its spending plans between now and 2033 is about $207 billion, according to HSBC estimates.

“Closing the gap would need one or a combination of factors, including higher revenue than in our central case forecasts, better cost management, incremental capital injections, or debt issuance,” analyst Nicolas Cote-Colisson wrote in a research note on Nov. 24. Considering that OpenAI is expected to generate revenue of more than $12 billion in 2025, its compute cost “compounds investor nervousness about associated returns,” not only for the company itself, but also “for the interlaced AI chain,” he wrote. 

To be sure, companies like Oracle and AMD aren’t solely reliant on OpenAI. They operate in areas that continue to see a lot of demand, and their products could find customers even without OpenAI. Furthermore, the weakness in the stocks could represent a buying opportunity, as companies tied to ChatGPT and the chips that power it are trading at a discount to those exposed to Gemini and its chips for the first time since 2016, according to a recent Wells Fargo analysis. 

“I see a lot of untapped demand and penetration across industries, and that will ultimately underpin growth,” said Kieran Osborne, chief investment officer at Mission Wealth, which has about $13 billion in assets under management. “Monetization is the end goal for these companies, and so long as they work toward that, that will underpin the investment case.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals

Published

on



Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said China has been complying with the terms of the bilateral trade agreements and that the US is constantly monitoring commitments made by China in a bid to maintain a stable trade relationship.

“With China, it’s always we verify and we monitor and we watch the commitments. The commitments are quite specific,” Greer said Sunday on Fox News’ The Sunday Briefing. “So all of these things that we’ve agreed to with the Chinese recently are very concrete, we can monitor them with some ease, and so far, we’re seeing that they’re in compliance.”

Greer said China has gotten approximately “a third” of the way through its soybean purchase commitment for this growing season.

Bloomberg previously reported that after a series of orders placed in late October — the first of this season — China’s purchases of American soybeans appeared to have stalled. 

President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October agreed to extend a tariff truce, roll back export controls and reduce other trade barriers. But some elements of the deal — including the soybean purchases, sale of social media app TikTok and an increase in licenses to export critical rare earths from China — remain in progress.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Greer held a video call with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng on Friday, according to China’s state-run news agency Xinhua, during which the officials had an “in-depth and constructive” discussion in which they vowed to keep stable ties and address “respective concerns” on trade and the economy, the outlet said.

Read More: Top US, Chinese Officials Pledge Cooperation on Trade Deal

Bessent on Sunday told CBS News’ Face the Nation that China will not speed up purchases, but they are still expected to take place this crop season and said soybean prices are up 12% to 15% since the agreement with China. He also said he divested from a soybean farm to comply with an ethics agreement

The Trump administration is expected to release its long-awaited farm aid plan this week, US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a cabinet meeting last Tuesday.

Asked whether chipmakers like Nvidia should give China advanced chips or if doing so would pose a security risk to the US, Greer expressed a need for the US to be cautious.

“My own view is we need to be very cautious about this,” Greer said on Fox News. “We want companies’ bottom lines to do well, but as policymakers, we need to make sure that the national security is placed first and foremost, and that’s why you’ve heard President Trump talk about the types of chips that maybe would be restricted and there’s always an open discussion on where that threshold lies, and it changes over time.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.