Connect with us

Business

From Iselin to India: What we learned about tariffs, trade and trust

Published

on



It’s Diwali season — a five-day period when Hindus around the world commemorate the triumph of light over darkness on the Indian subcontinent centuries ago. But the colorful Diwali celebrations held annually in Indian-American communities throughout the United States are more muted this year compared to the past. The reason? Prices on everything from saris to spices have skyrocketed since August 27. That was the day President Trump imposed 50% tariffs on goods imported from India.    

The tariffs are pounding the hundreds of South Asian-themed stores here in Iselin and in neighboring Edison, which collectively represent “Little India.” On a recent tour along the area’s Oak Tree Road (the subject of an Emmy-nominated documentary directed by Indian-American journalist Rohit Vyas and his daughter Aditi), store owners shared their tariff-induced tales of woe. 

At Subzi Mandi, a South Asian supermarket, a manager says the store has been “empty” since the tariffs were imposed, with sharp declines in buying of rice, flour, oil, and noodles. “People are not shopping the way they used to,” he says, noting less foot traffic in the store, with customers only purchasing what they need day-to-day, not in bulk. 

The story is the same at Reema Jewelers, a retail store on Oak Tree Road. The owner, Ashok Sethi, has been in business for more than 30 years and 90% of his customers trace their ancestry to India. He says the tariffs, which have also contributed to the price of gold rising to more than $4,200 per ounce (up from $3,382 on August 26), have triggered price increases of nearly 40% in his store. 

Buying gold is typically a Diwali tradition, but he’s experienced a 60%-70% decline in sales, with people leaning toward individual jewelry pieces and not entire sets. When his customers look at something they want to buy, he says they “get completely astonished to see the new price.”

Tariffs taking a real toll

The owner of Aanchal Saris in Iselin, Pradip Sangari, told us the tariffs have been particularly painful in the runup to Diwali, which is typically the store’s busiest period. But the pain will persist after Diwali as well. Sounding like a disciple of Milton Friedman, Mr. Sangari says, “anytime is not a good time” for tariffs.  

New Jersey’s governor, Phil Murphy, who just returned from his second trade mission to India, told us in a recent interview that he’s seen how the tariffs are “taking a real toll” on Oak Tree Road businesses. 

Mr. Sethi, the jeweler, said if he could talk to President Trump, he would tell him, “Tariffs might sound like a quick fix, but they often hurt American consumers and small businesses. The real way to build strength is by investing in our people, our factories, and new technology so we can compete globally on quality.” He adds that, “our margins have diminished considerably. It’s hard for our business to survive.” 

That challenge is mounting as large India-based jewelry retailers, like the Tata-owned Tanishq, also open stores on Oak Tree Road. Such retailers don’t have the longstanding ties to, and trust with, the local community that are fundamental to Oak Tree Road’s success. One of us (Angela) worries about the long-term viability of the Indian grocery store where she takes her mom to shop.   

The tariff story is not limited to Oak Tree Road. Angela just returned from four weeks in India and met with business leaders, senior government officials, and investors in six major cities. They spoke about how India’s economy has suffered from trade tensions with the United States — and how changes to the H-1B visa program are upending plans for skilled Indians to find work at American companies. There was also speculation about trying to derisk through reduced investment in the United States — an outcome that could harm both economies.   

A deep, maybe irreparable rift

There’s an attempt to look on the bright side — some Indians see these changes as slowing the “brain drain” to the United States. But there’s also sadness about a deep rift — some characterize it as “irreparable” — with a country that is home to approximately 4.5 million people who trace their ancestry to India (more than in any other country) and that for decades has been a beacon of hope and opportunity. It’s a place where Indians have been able to prosper to such an extent that they have one of the highest household incomes ($151,200) of any ethnic group in the country. 

Some of that wealth can be traced to the success of Indians working in the technology industry. But it also stems from those who operate small businesses — whether a sari store in Iselin or a motel in Mississippi. And those business owners contribute to the vitality of the U.S. economy, while also strengthening the bonds with their ancestral home. 

These ties of commerce and kinship are just part of the reason why Antony Blinken, as Secretary of State, said the U.S.-India relationship was “among the most consequential relationships of any in the world.” 

Governor Murphy echoed this sentiment in our interview: “This is too important a relationship not to get right … We belong together.” He’s instituted $500 million in tax incentives for India-based companies that create jobs in New Jersey because he’s seen the positive impact other such companies — from HCLTech to TCS — have had in his state.    

Diwali is a time for celebration, but also reflection — on how to navigate challenges and seize opportunities — and there are plenty of both right now for Indians and for Indian-Americans. The holiday also commemorates the triumph of knowledge over ignorance centuries ago. What’s needed now is a modern-day triumph of knowledge — one that ends taxes on immigrant entrepreneurs and restores the U.S.-India relationship to where it needs to be.  

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

49-year-old Democrat who owns a gourmet olive oil store swipes another historically Republican district from Trump and Republicans

Published

on



Democrat Eric Gisler claimed an upset victory Tuesday in a special election in a historically Republican Georgia state House district.

Gisler said he was the winner of the contest, in which he was leading Republican Mack “Dutch” Guest by about 200 votes out of more than 11,000 in final unofficial returns.

Robert Sinners, a spokesperson with the secretary of state’s office, said there could be a few provisional ballots left before the tally is finalized.

“I think we had the right message for the time,” Gisler told The Associated Press in a phone interview. He credited his win to Democratic enthusiasm but also said some Republicans were looking for a change.

“A lot of what I would call traditional conservatives held their nose and voted Republican last year on the promise of low prices and whatever else they were selling,” Gisler said. “But they hadn’t received that.”

Guest did not immediately respond to a text message seeking comment late Tuesday.

Democrats have seen a number of electoral successes in 2025 as the party’s voters have been eager to express dissatisfaction with Republican President Donald Trump.

In Georgia in November, they romped to two blowouts in statewide special elections for the Public Service Commission, unseating two incumbent Republicans in campaigns driven by discontent over rising electricity costs.

Nationwide, Democrats won governor’s races by broad margins in Virginia and New Jersey. On Tuesday a Democrat defeated a Trump-endorsed Republican in the officially nonpartisan race for Miami mayor, becoming the first from his party to win the post in nearly 30 years.

Democrats have also performed strongly in some races they lost, such as a Tennessee U.S. House race last week and a Georgia state Senate race in September.

Republicans remain firmly in control of the Georgia House, but their majority is likely fall to 99-81 when lawmakers return in January. Also Tuesday, voters in a second, heavily Republican district in Atlanta’s northwest suburbs sent Republican Bill Fincher and Democrat Scott Sanders to a Jan. 6 runoff to fill a vacancy created when Rep. Mandi Ballinger died.

The GOP majority is down from 119 Republicans in 2015. It would be the first time the GOP holds fewer than 100 seats in the lower chamber since 2005, when they won control for the first time since Reconstruction.

The race between Gisler and Guest in House District 121 in the Athens area northeast of Atlanta was held to replace Republican Marcus Wiedower, who was in the seat since 2018 but resigned in the middle of this term to focus on business interests.

Most of the district is in Oconee County, a Republican suburb of Athens, reaching into heavily Democratic Athens-Clarke County. Republicans gerrymandered Athens-Clarke to include one strongly Democratic district, parceling out the rest of the county into three seats intended to be Republican.

Gisler ran against Wiedower in 2024, losing 61% to 39%. This year was Guest’s first time running for office.

A Democrat briefly won control of the district in a 2017 special election but lost to Wiedower in 2018.

Gisler, a 49-year-old Watkinsville resident, works for an insurance technology company and owns a gourmet olive oil store. He campaigned on improving health care, increasing affordability and reinvesting Georgia’s surplus funds

Guest is the president of a trucking company and touted his community ties, promising to improve public safety and cut taxes. He was endorsed by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, an Athens native, and raised far more in campaign contributions than Gisler.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Rivian CEO says it’s a misconception EVs are politicized, with a 50-50 party split among R1 buyers

Published

on



If Rivian’s sales are any indication, owning an electric vehicle isn’t such a partisan issue, despite President Donald Trump’s rollbacks of mandates, incentives, and targets for EVs.

At the Fortune Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said it’s a misconception that electrification is politicized, explaining that most customers buy a product based on how it fits their needs, not their ideology. The questions car buyers ask, he said, are the same whether they’re purchasing one with an internal-combustion engine or a battery: “Is it exciting? Are you attracted to the product? Does it draw you in? Does the brand positioning resonate with you? Do the features answer needs that you have?”

Buyers of Rivian’s R1 electric SUV are split roughly 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats, Scaringe told Fortune’s Andrew Nusca. “I think that’s extraordinarily powerful news for us to recognize—that this isn’t just left-leaning buyers,” he added. “These are people that are saying, ‘I like the idea of this product, I’m excited about it.’ And this is thousands and thousands of customers. This is statistically relevant information.”

Buying an EV was once an indication of left-leaning politics, but the politics got scrambled after Tesla CEO Elon Musk became the top Republican donor and a close adviser to Trump. That drew some new customers to Tesla, and turned off a lot of progressive EV buyers, with many existing owners putting bumper stickers on their Teslas explaining that they bought their cars before Musk’s hard-right turn. Trump and Musk later had a stunning public feud, in part over the administration’s elimination of EV and solar tax credits.

But Scaringe said he started Rivian with a long-term view, independent of any policy framework or political trends. He also insisted that if Americans have more EV choices, sales would follow. Right now, Tesla dominates a key corner of the market, namely EVs in the $50,000 price range. Rivian’s forthcoming R2 mid-size SUV will represent a new choice in that market, with a starting price of $45,000 versus the R1’s $70,000.

Ten years from now, Scaringe said he hopes—and believes—that EV adoption in the U.S. will be meaningfully higher than it is today across the board, explaining that the main constraint isn’t on the demand side. Instead, it’s on the supply side, which suffers from “a shocking lack of choice,” especially compared to Europe and China, he added. EV options in the U.S. are limited by the fact that Chinese brands are shut out of the market.

More choices for U.S. EV buyers would presumably create more competition for Rivian—and indeed, the flood of low-priced Chinese EVs in other auto markets has created a backlash, with countries such as Canada imposing steep tariffs on them. But Scaringe appears to view more competition as positive for the market overall.

“I do think that the existence of choice will help drive more penetration, and it actually creates a unique opportunity in the United States,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Powell warns of a ‘very unusual’ economy as inflation remains high amid a weakening job market

Published

on



Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday described the U.S. economy as “very unusual,” saying policymakers are navigating a rare combination of tariff-driven goods inflation and a labor market that may already be weaker than official data suggests.

The Fed cut interest rates for the third consecutive meeting, a quarter-point reduction Powell framed not as a confident pivot toward easier policy, but as a defensive move meant to keep the labor market from slipping further. He repeatedly emphasized risks to employment have risen “in recent months,” and noted that behind the headline numbers, job creation may already be negative.

Powell made the striking admission the Fed believes the official payroll figures—which have slowed sharply since the summer—are overstating job growth by roughly 60,000 per month. 

“Forty thousand jobs could be negative 20,” he said, adding this dynamic is not well understood by the public because unemployment claims remain historically low—something both economists Mark Zandi and Claudia Sahm recently toldFortune could be giving people a false sense of security about the job market.

“I think a world where job creation is negative… we need to watch that very carefully,” Powell said. 

It is this weakening backdrop Powell said makes the current moment “very unusual”: Inflation remains elevated, but most of the remaining overshoot comes from goods categories directly affected by tariffs, as opposed to domestic economic overheating, which he said the Fed has worked hard to cool since its 2022 highs; inflation excluding tariff-affected goods is “in the low [two percent],” he said. Services inflation is cooling, wage pressures are easing, and neither the labor market nor business surveys suggest a “Phillips-curve” kind of inflation threat, Powell said, referring to the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. 

Instead, Powell said, the bulk of the problem is a “one-time price increase” pushing up goods categories as import levies work their way through supply chains. Goods inflation, he noted, should peak around the first quarter of 2026, assuming no additional tariff rounds.

Those crosscurrents have fractured the Fed. Three officials formally dissented from the rate cut on Wednesday, and several others offered what Powell described as “soft dissents,” when an official’s personal projection falls out of what they ultimately voted for. There were six such “soft dissents” this time, during one of the deepest divides inside the FOMC in years, driven by disagreement over how to weigh the risks of lingering inflation against the possibility that job growth is weaker—and much more fragile—than reported.

Powell stressed that policymakers cannot simply choose one mandate to prioritize. 

“There is no risk-free path,” he said, a refrain he’s repeated for months. “When both sides of the mandate are threatened, you should be kind of neutral.” 

He characterized the current stance as being at the “high end” of neutral, allowing the Fed to “wait and see” how the data evolve.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.