Connect with us

Politics

Florida should embrace, not regulate, AI innovation

Published

on


The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent years has been one of the most consequential technological advances since the emergence of the internet.

AI has the potential to change and improve every facet of our lives, from automating simple routine tasks like scheduling a doctor’s appointment to more complex efforts like coding a new computer program.

Yet, this transformative technology may never reach its potential if policymakers rush to regulate what they do not yet fully understand.

Like all breakthrough technologies, AI needs room to grow, including opportunities for innovators to experiment, iterate, and scale new applications. Just as the United States led the global digital revolution, empowering American tech companies to achieve superior market positions with limited regulatory interference, we now face a similar crossroads with AI.

Unfortunately, some state-level efforts risk undermining this progress.

States like Colorado and California have recently introduced or passed regulatory frameworks that could deter investment, suppress AI deployment in their respective states, and slow national momentum. With international competitors racing ahead with their own AI development programs, every unnecessary regulatory barrier we erect gives them a strategic advantage.

Federal leadership plays an important role. President Donald Trump’s recently announced AI Action Plan sets the framework for how the government can support technological advancement by prioritizing innovation, investing in AI infrastructure, and promoting U.S. leadership in global standards-setting.

While national initiatives lay the groundwork for progress, state-level action is vital in translating these goals into tangible outcomes.

Here in Florida, we are committed to fostering a regulatory environment that encourages responsible innovation. By aligning with forward-looking national efforts and resisting the urge to overregulate, we can ensure AI remains a force for economic opportunity, technological leadership, and public benefit.

With the right policies, we can ensure those benefits are realized without unnecessary barriers or delays.

___

John Snyder is the state Representative of Florida House District 86 and served as Chair of the House Information Technology Budget and Policy Subcommittee in the 2025 Legislative Session.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Universal tourist sues after she said she got whiplash on a roller coaster

Published

on


An Alabama woman is suing Universal in federal court after she said she was hurt riding Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit in 2021.

Annie Parrish moved her lawsuit from the Orange Circuit Court to the U.S. District Court this week.

She claims she got whiplash and had three herniated discs in her cervical spine after riding the Universal Studios roller coaster known for playing music while riders whizzed up to 65 mph. Universal shut down the ride earlier this year to make way for something new.

Parrish demanded $1 million from Universal to settle the lawsuit last year after incurring $18,500 in medical bills, court records showed.

Parrish’s attorney insisted the $1 million demand “is not mere puffery.”

The demand letter said Parrish went to the emergency room the same day she rode the coaster, complaining of severe neck pain.

“She described the pain as throbbing and 10/10 in severity,” according to the demand letter that was included in court records and detailed her list of treatments and medical visits.

Parrish said she “boarded the ride and secured her lap restraint,” but Universal employees “did not check the restraint and/or otherwise failed to fully secure Plaintiff into the ride,” according to her lawsuit initially filed in October 2025 in state court. “As a result of that failure, she was launched forward and unable to reposition her neck and head, causing significant injuries.”

Universal denied many of the allegations in her lawsuit.

“If Plaintiff was injured as alleged, she was fully aware of the risk,” Universal said in response to her lawsuit. “She expressly assumed all risk and is barred from recovery by express assumption of the risk.”

Universal also said Parrish “negligently and carelessly failed to follow the instructions and warnings for the ride and her own negligence caused or contributed to her injury.”

Universal and Parrish’s attorneys did not respond to a request for comment Friday for this story.

Universal has been in the headlines over ride safety after a man with disabilities died after riding a roller coaster at the new Epic Universe theme park in September.

New media reports this week detailed the tragic circumstances of Kevin Rodriguez Zavala’s death.

His head had slammed into the seat in front of him repeatedly with blood splattering on his girlfriend who tried in vain to call for help as the ride went on. Rodriguez Zavala’s femur had been broken in half, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

The Orange County Sheriff’s Office investigated and said the 32-year-old’s death was accidental and no criminal charges will be filed.

Universal Orlando President Karen Irwin previously said Stardust Racers was operating properly at the time of his death and employees followed proper protocols.

“In addition, the ride system manufacturer of record and an independent, third-party roller coaster engineering expert conducted their own on-site testing and validated our findings,” Irwin wrote in a memo to employees this Fall.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

After mural crackdown, St. Pete installs 11 Pride-inspired bike racks

Published

on


There is a little more Pride on the streets of St. Pete, following the installation of 11 Pride-inspired bike racks in honor of Pride street murals that were removed earlier this year.

The City of St. Petersburg installed rainbow bike racks in the Grand Central District along Central Avenue and 25th Street. The intersection was the site of one of five prominent street murals removed in St. Pete during a statewide crackdown on street art, including artwork representing LGBTQ+ Pride and Black history. 

An executive order from Gov. Ron DeSantis led the removal effort. The Florida Department of Transportation completed it overnight at St. Pete’s expense, prompting Mayor Ken Welch to call for creative ways to honor the artwork’s importance to the community.

Welch and the City Council have debated what that would look like in subsequent discussions, but the bike racks represent one step toward honoring the neighborhood’s lost mural. The mural was iconic, decorating the intersection with brightly colored stripes in the colors of the progressive Pride flag, drawn just steps from a popular LGBTQ+ nightclub and other safe spaces for the community. Funding for the project was through the City’s long-standing public bike rack program.

Welch’s Chief of StaffJordan Doyle Walsh, told City Council members in an email that the bike rack installation is only one component of the ongoing response to the erasure of the street art.

The other murals removed include the Black History Matters mural on 9th Avenue South, despite protests from two local pastors, Revs. Andy Oliver and Benedict Atherton-Zeman were arrested for sitting on the mural and later released. The Fluid Structures mural located at the University of South Florida St. Pete campus, the Common Ground mural, and the Crux mural in Child’s Park were also removed.

“We were excited that there was consensus around one of the Administration’s proposed actions discussed during the previous (Committee of the Whole) meeting and other forums regarding City and community response,” Walsh said in the email.

“We intend that this small gesture of inclusion and celebration will be a symbol of our resolve to not be silenced,” he said. “We thank City Council for supporting and collaborating on this effort and we look forward to working with you and the community as we move forward together.”

___

Janelle Irwin Taylor of Florida Politics contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Public weighs in on potential end to some school vaccine mandates

Published

on


In Panama City on Friday, state officials heard arguments for and against potential revisions to Florida Administrative Code Rule 64D-3.046.

Proposed changes, which are backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, include expanding opt-out provisions to include religious exemptions for personal and philosophical reasons, and removal of requirements to vaccinate for Varicella (chickenpox), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and Hepatitis B (Hep B) for schools as well as Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV15/20) for day care students.

Arguments abounded both to eliminate mandates and to protect the current requirements.

Susan Sweetin of the National Vaccine Information Center, appearing in her personal capacity, fought back tears as she said she was coerced into having her son get the Hep B vaccine, or else his pediatrician wouldn’t see him.

Cynthia Smith, a nurse, said she suffered hearing loss from childhood vaccines that impacted her work in school as a child and now in professional environments.

“This is not about being anti-medicine,” Smith said, arguing for “medical freedom.”

Larry Downs Jr. argued against MMR vaccines, saying that there’s no “measles outbreak” in America, as he said people don’t need a “permission slip from Big Daddy Government” to shun shots.

“What about the measles outbreak? How many (outbreaks) come from these shots from these injections? This is nonsense. The default setting should be freedom. You should not have to get a religious or personal objection,” Downs said.

Rick Frey attributed two of his child relatives’ “non-verbal” states to vaccines before attacking pediatricians.

“It’s obviously about freedom, but it’s also about the children that these pediatricians damage because they get paid to vaccinate these kids. And they’re here being paid, and they’re here to ensure that they’ll still make their money to get their bonus, to do this stuff. It’s just wrong on so many levels, and the smug way that they sit back there and act like they’re above all of us makes me want to throw up, to be honest with you,” Frey said.

Michelle Posey, a School Board candidate in Sarasota who also leads the local Turning Point USA chapter, said she didn’t want either side “demonizing” the other before expressing her own concerns.

“I have never, in my life, known of a product that is both safe and effective, and a miracle worker, and yet it requires a marketing campaign, a marketing blitz, immunity for those that build it, and some kind of incentive for those who inject it,” Posey said, arguing against mandates.

Dr. Frederick S Southwick, an Infectious Disease Specialist with decades of experience, spoke to the impact of bacterial meningitis.

“If you are ending that vaccine, it’s going to cause tremendous damage and cost the state $50 to $80 million,” he said.

Danielle Carter, the President of the Florida Academy of Family Physicians, argued that scientific evidence didn’t support the removal of vaccines, that they have reduced infections while facilitating “herd immunity.”

Joseph Harmon, representing the Conference of Catholic Bishops, criticized the proposed rule as “an improper expansion of what’s allowed by statute” and advocated no change.

Lewis Jennings spoke for NAACP chapters around the state when he condemned the proposal as a “direct threat to public health, equity, and civil rights.”

Jamie Schanbaum, who survived meningitis, described the consequences of the disease over the last 17 years since she had it.

“I’ve accumulated millions of dollars in hospital bills, months of physical therapy, and occupational therapy, not to mention I had my leg re-amputated last year. That was a good time. How about re-learning to use my hands, feed myself, wipe myself? This is the reality of what it’s like to survive something like this. And if I want to go and do any sport, I have to pay $30,000 just for the legs.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.