Connect with us

Politics

Florida gas prices dip below $3 a gallon for first time this year

Published

on


The savings may not last.

Gas prices in Florida are now lower than they’ve been all year — or last year.

Sunday’s average for the Sunshine State was $2.97 per gallon, according to AAA — The Auto Club Group.

That’s 2 cents less than the 2024 low and the cheapest price point since December 2023.

More than 70% of filling stations statewide are now selling gas for less than $3 a gallon. Filling a 15-gallon gas tank costs an average of $44.55, $8.25 less than this time last year.

AAA spokesperson Mark Jenkins attributed the declining price to a combination of low oil prices and strong gasoline production numbers.

“However, it’s not clear how much lower prices will go,” Jenkins said in a statement.

“Springtime factors like refinery maintenance, strong demand, and the switch to summer gasoline typically keep upward pressure on prices at the pump.”

The cheapest gas can be found in Panama City and the Crestview-Fort Walton Beach area, where motorists are paying an average $2.84 per gallon, followed by Pensacola ($2.90).

The priciest fuel is in the West Palm Beach-Boca Raton Area ($3.11), followed by Gainesville ($3.08) and Naples ($3.06).

Nationally, the states enjoying the best pump savings are Mississippi ($2.67 per gallon), Oklahoma ($2.69) and Tennessee ($2.70).

Refueling is most expensive in California ($4.65), Hawaii ($4.52) and Washington ($4.11).


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump says he’s considering ways to serve a third term as president

Published

on


President Donald Trump said Sunday that “I’m not joking” about trying to serve a third term, the clearest indication he is considering ways to breach a constitutional barrier against continuing to lead the country after his second term ends in early 2029.

“There are methods which you could do it,” Trump said in a telephone interview with NBC News.

He also said “it is far too early to think about it.”

The 22nd Amendment, which was added to the Constitution in 1951 after President Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected four times in a row, says “no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”

NBC’s Kristen Welker asked Trump if one potential avenue to a third term was having Vice President JD Vance run for the top job and “then pass the baton to you.”

“Well, that’s one,” Trump responded. “But there are others too. There are others.”

“Can you tell me another?” Welker asked.

“No,” Trump replied.

Vance’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.

Trump, who would be 82 at the end of his second term, was asked whether he would want to keep serving in “the toughest job in the country” at that point.

“Well, I like working,” the president said.

He suggested that Americans would go along with a third term because of his popularity. He falsely claimed to have “the highest poll numbers of any Republican for the last 100 years.”

Gallup data shows President George W. Bush reaching a 90% approval rating after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. His father, President George H.W. Bush, hit 89% following the Gulf War in 1991.

Trump has maxed out at 47% in Gallup data during his second term, despite claiming to be “in the high 70s in many polls, in the real polls.”

Trump has mused before about serving longer than two terms before, generally with jokes to friendly audiences.

“Am I allowed to run again?” he said during a House Republican retreat in January.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Byron Donalds thinks there’s a ‘pretty good’ chance Ron DeSantis backs him for Governor

Published

on


U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds is actively running for Governor, and he says there’s a “pretty good” chance the current Governor endorses him sooner or later.

“A lot depends on what’s going to happen over the next couple of months,” the Naples Republican said on Fox News Sunday.

Donalds said he’s been “at the tip of the sphere” on battles against the left, “so I think that my track record in the Republican conservative movement is something that lines up with Governor Ron DeSantis.”

But with First Lady Casey DeSantis mulling a run, Donalds says her husband “has his own decisions to make.”

The intrigue continues about whether the First Lady actually runs; as Erika Donalds says, she has “teased” a campaign. And at least one poll released this month says she would start off in a decent position against the Donald Trump-endorsed Donalds.

Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy survey shows 53% of GOP voters in the state like Casey DeSantis, while only 9% do not. Donalds has 48% approval and 6% disapproval in the same survey. That gives DeSantis a leg up in terms of favorability.

However, another recent poll from the Trump-aligned Fabrizio Lee & Associates showed Byron Donalds leading Casey DeSantis 34% to 30% in a head-to-head matchup among Republican Primary voters.

The First Lady is being cryptic about her intentions at this point during interviews with friendly questioners.

She sidestepped a direct question at the National Review Institute’s “Idea Summit,” extolling her husband as “the GOAT” and offering vague criticisms of other politicians she wouldn’t name as part of a “long-winded answer” that ended with “we’ll see.”

“All that (Gov. DeSantis) has done is extremely fragile. You could get somebody in and it could revert back,” she said.

She also condemned politicians who “think about what’s next on the next political rung in their career.”

“The founders never thought that politics should ever have been a career, right? You were supposed to go up and serve, and you come home and you live under the laws that you pass. But it’s really changed,” said the wife of a man who ran for Senate while in Congress, and then ran for President immediately after being elected Governor a second time.

Her coyness about her political future started in earnest back in February.

“To quote the late Yogi Berra,” the First Lady said when asked if she was running, “if you see a fork in the road, take it.”

She also warned about “squishes wanting to go Republican lite by continuing to spend on massive boondoggles and not implementing the will of the people,” in comments vague enough to conceivably apply to Donalds, especially given what the Governor said about him directly.

“You got a guy like Byron Donalds, he just hasn’t been a part of any of the victories that we’ve had here over the Left over these last years. He’s just not been a part of it,” Gov. DeSantis said in Tampa.

“He’s been in other states campaigning, doing that, and that’s fine. But OK, well, then deliver results up there. You know, that’s what I want to see. I want to see them delivering results for the people of Florida. We deliver it here all the time for the people of Florida, and that’s what we need to be doing.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Chris Mitchell: Democrats, this is not how we win

Published

on


I tried my best to stay quiet.

Like many in the political world these past few weeks, I’ve watched these Special Elections in Florida’s 1st and 6th Congressional Districts unfold with a growing sense of frustration. I wanted to give the benefit of the doubt, to trust that the strategy made sense, that there was a bigger picture I wasn’t seeing.

But as we approach the final days of these races, it’s clear we have been lying to ourselves. And the cost of that delusion is too high to ignore.

Nearly $20 million has been spent on these two races, districts that Donald Trump won by overwhelming margins.

As of this writing, CD 1 shows a 19-point Republican turnout advantage and CD 6 has a 9-point GOP edge. These are not swing districts. These are not close races. And yet, every day, I see the same ads flooding social media: “We can win this. Donate now. We’re closing the gap.” When in fact, the gap is widening, not closing.

Let’s be clear: these races were never truly winnable. That’s not defeatism. That’s math. Now, I understand that this $20 million wouldn’t have been raised if not for these races. The candidates, the urgency, the fear, they all generated energy, and in turn, money.

But that’s exactly the problem.

We’re fueling a system that prioritizes emotional appeal over strategic outcomes. And while small-dollar donors give in good faith, believing their contribution might flip a seat, the only people consistently benefiting are the consultants cashing the checks.

This isn’t just poor planning. It’s donor abuse. It’s an unethical use of resources in a state that desperately needs long-term investment. Even the state party and the DNC, institutions that typically bring oversight and structure to competitive races, got swept up in the momentum.

I don’t know what internal conversations may have happened, but from the outside, it looked like no one stepped in to apply the kind of rigor or accountability we expect in viable races. And that’s not a criticism of leadership; it’s simply a hard truth about what happens when hope and hype go unchecked.

Imagine what we could have done with that $20 million. We could have launched the largest voter registration program Florida has ever seen. We could have hired and trained organizers in underserved communities. We could have built lasting infrastructure that would benefit not just one race, but every race to come.

Instead, we burned through donor dollars on campaigns that will leave nothing behind: no new voters, no stronger party infrastructure, no sustained momentum. Just grifters with a payday and a movement no stronger than it was before.

Let me be clear: I’m not accusing anyone of criminal conduct. But just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s right. And just because a campaign exists doesn’t mean it should be used as a fundraising funnel for consultants and vendors with no long-term plan for the communities they claim to serve.

I understand the desire to fight everywhere. I understand the symbolism. But if we want to win, really win, we have to stop confusing activity with strategy. We have to be honest about what’s winnable, what’s worth building, and what actually helps us take back power.

We need to stop mistaking good intentions for good planning, and we need to stop letting consultants write checks with other people’s hope. As a consultant, I know I’m part of this system. And that’s exactly why I’m speaking up.

We should expect better from each other and demand more from the institutions and professionals who claim to fight for democracy. The party deserves better. Our donors deserve better. Our voters deserve better. And so do the candidates we recruit, people who give up their time with their families, careers, and so much more to step into the arena and run.

If we’re serious about building a real, sustainable movement in Florida or anywhere else, we have to stop chasing quick wins and start investing in lasting infrastructure.

This isn’t about giving up the fight. It’s about fighting smarter, with integrity, purpose, and accountability. We all love to say, “The stakes are too high.” Well, if that’s true, then the excuses have to stop. It’s time to act like it.

___

Chris Mitchell is a managing partner for Statecraft Digital.

The post Chris Mitchell: Democrats, this is not how we win appeared first on Florida Politics – Campaigns & Elections. Lobbying & Government..



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.