Connect with us

Politics

Federal cuts create distrust on Capitol Hill as shutdown risk grows

Published

on


The money started drying up quickly, almost as soon as President Donald Trump began issuing his executive orders.

Head Start funds for early childhood programs. National Institutes of Health grants. Funding for the nation’s public libraries and museums. Money from a landmark bipartisan infrastructure law to help schools renovate classrooms and states build electric vehicle charging stations. Federal Emergency Management Agency food and shelter assistance.

“There’s a lot of fear out there,” said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director of the National Head Start Association, whose organization raised early concerns about funding delays that could impact children and families.

While the money is largely flowing again, he said, thanks in large part to Head Start’s track record — celebrating its 60th anniversary this year — “Obviously, we need to make sure our funding is reliable.”

All told, billions upon billions of dollars have been single-handedly stalled, scrapped or withheld by the Trump administration so far this year — with as much as $410 billion at risk, by certain congressional estimates — in one of the most brazen affronts to the federal process in 50 years, since the budget laws were overhauled in the Nixon era.

Trump’s willingness to order the government agencies to simply halt spending that’s already been approved by Congress and signed into law is a violation, according to a nonpartisan government watchdog. And it’s creating a crisis on Capitol Hill and beyond, with an undercurrent of deep distrust as lawmakers clash over legislation to prevent a federal government shutdown.

“Every single one of us should be deeply alarmed by the lawless course the administration is charting here,” Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said at a summer hearing with Trump’s budget director, Russ Vought, a chief architect of Project 2025.

On the surface, the standoff between Congress and the White House looks like a governmental dispute over federal spending levels, and the Trump administration’s desire to end so-called “woke” and wasteful programs across the nation, and the world.

But from DOGE’s budget-slashing efforts under billionaire Elon Musk to the budget rescission packages Vought has sent to Capitol Hill, what’s unfolding is a deeper debate over the separation of powers — raising stark questions over what happens if the White House moves more aggressively to cut House and Senate lawmakers out of the federal funding process.

This week, Trump’s Office of Management and Budget under Vought directed agencies to prepare for mass firings — reductions in force — rather than simply furloughs of federal workers, in the event of a shutdown next week.

“This is a high point in presidential assertion over the spending power — it might be the highest point ever,” said Kevin Kosar, a scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute.

While past presidents challenged Congress before — Jimmy Carter simply vetoed dozens of spending bills, and George W. Bush used presidential signing statements to carve out sections of legislation he disagreed with — Kosar said what Trump is doing “really garbles the logic” of the entire budget process.

“The rules don’t really apply much any more,” he said.

And it’s coming to an inflection point next week, Sept. 30, when Congress must pass legislation to keep the government from shutting down.

Vought’s office did not respond to a request for an interview, but he has been vocal about his views — and what’s to come.

Writing in Project 2025, Vought explained that “the great challenge” facing a conservative president “is the existential need for aggressive use of the vast powers of the executive branch.”

Vought said this will require a “boldness to bend or break the bureaucracy to the presidential will.”

Since Trump took office in January, the federal watchdog, the Government Accountability Office, has issued a flurry of notices of violations in a rare reprimand of instances where the Trump administration has failed to unleash the money in accordance with the appropriation laws from Congress.

Among the dozens of investigations GAO opened this year, the funding uncertainty around Head Start, the NIH, museums and libraries, energy and transportation infrastructure programs and FEMA are among those that rose to become violations. More decisions are expected in the days ahead, before the Sept. 30 deadline for the federal government to get certain funds out the door.

Edda Emmanuelli Perez, the general counsel at GAO, which was created more than 100 years ago as a check on federal spending, said presidents have the ability to roll back spending, so long as it follows the process.

“The president has that authority to make these proposals,” she said in an interview.

“If Congress then decides, yes, we agree, we’re going to pass a law to cancel the funds, then the funds get cancelled,” she said. “If Congress does not pass it, then that means the president has to, again, go back to the terms of the law and release those funds.”

That’s outlined in the Impoundment Control Act, which Congress approved in 1974 after concerns over then-President Richard Nixon’s refusal to allocate funds on programs he opposed. It requires the White House to notify Congress of its proposed rescissions. Congress then has 45 days, under a fast-track procedure, to vote on the president’s proposal.

This summer, Congress, where Republicans hold the majority, approved Trump’s request to claw back some $9 billion in already approved funding for public broadcasting, including National Public Radio, and certain foreign aid programs, over the objections of Democrats.

But Vought is testing the limits of the impoundment law.

The White House late last month sent Congress a second rescissions package of $4.9 billion in cuts to USAID foreign aid programs, bumping up against the Sept. 30 year-end deadline. If Congress fails to act before next Tuesday, the money would essentially go away, in a so-called “pocket rescission.”

“The Trump Administration is committed to getting America’s fiscal house in order by cutting government spending that is woke, weaponized, and wasteful,” the White House said in a message to Congress announcing the rescissions proposal.

“Now, for the first time in 50 years, the President is using his authority under the Impoundment Control Act to deploy a pocket rescission, cancelling $5 billion in foreign aid and international organization funding.”

Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the powerful chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, has said the administration’s attempt to rescind the funds without congressional approval would be “a clear violation of the law.”

But late Friday, the Supreme Court, in a victory for Trump’s reach, extended an order allowing the administration to keep the funds frozen.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lois Frankel, Debbie Wasserman Schultz scold Florida for proposed cuts to AIDS care eligibility

Published

on


Democrats representing Florida in Congress say Florida’s Health Department doesn’t need to nix support for 10,000 AIDS patients. Worse, they say doing so could both cost lives and lead to further spread of the disease.

U.S. Reps. Lois Frankel and Debbie Wasserman Schultz slammed a recent decision by the Department of Health (DOH) to change eligibility requirements for the Ryan White AIDS Drug Assistance Program. That program, named for deceased child AIDS activist Ryan White, provides prescription drugs for more than 50,000 people living with HIV or AIDS in Florida. But financial eligibility changes strip coverage for more than 10,000 people.

“Researchers estimate the average lifetime health care costs associated with HIV infection can get up into the hundreds of thousands,” said Frankel, a West Palm Beach Democrat.

She made the comments on a press call featuring Florida Democrats and medical experts.

Frankel said the decision to kill funding for the program likely means a death sentence for many who will lose access to care, and now she wants the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to investigate Florida’s administration of the program.

Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat, said ending coverage for many would be a choice, and a wrong one, by Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration.

“This is a lifeline that provides critical financial assistance to low-income Floridians living with HIV and AIDS. It helps ensure that they can afford their prescriptions and their health insurance, and despite its resounding success now the program is in jeopardy,” she said.

She said the change means most Floridians applying for the program would be denied if they made $120,000 or more, but HIV medication can cost thousands each month.

The subject has already spurred discussions in the Florida Legislature about whether other funding should be diverted.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo told the Senate Health and Human Service Appropriations Committee, “It’s a really, really serious issue,” as reported by the Tampa Bay Times.

He notably blamed a budget shortfall on a federal government shutdown in the Fall, one that ultimately failed to lead to any extension in funding for pandemic-era Affordable Care Act tax credits. Ultimately, he said, that left funding for the program $120 million short.

But cutting the AIDS program is the wrong answer, experts on the call said. Michael Rajner, a public health advocate who personally has lived with HIV since 1995, said cutting the eligibility for the program will create an impossible financial burden on many patients.

“We need the Surgeon General and the Governor to give a halt to this and reverse these cuts and find the money, whether it’s through a budget spending authority request to the Legislature and the Governor,” he said.

Moreover, he said he believed money had been misappropriated. DOH has been criticized for spending money on marketing campaigns about marijuana and abortion ballot measures ultimately defeated at the ballot box last year, though Rajner declined to say explicitly which funding he was referring to. But he said some spending mistakes are easily documented.

“This is a problem that they created themselves because of how they administer the program and the fact that they’ve also forced out several staff over the last year,” Rajner said.

Carl Baloney Jr., President and CEO of AIDS United, said the consequences of cutting participation in the program could be far-reaching.

“This is not only morally wrong, it’s financially reckless,” Baloney said. “Consistent HIV treatment saves money, and disrupting care leads to emergency room visits, hospitalizations and higher uncompensated care. Florida is acting without transparency, without following the required regulatory process.”

Wasserman Schultz noted that Biktarvy was the most prescribed once-daily pill used by HIV patients, and forcing people to switch off that drug could cost individuals thousands each year and put their health at risk.

Dr. Elizabeth Sherman of Nova Southeastern University, an HIV clinical pharmacy specialist, said Florida ranks third in the nation right now for new HIV diagnoses. But with the help of public funding, the state has also seen fast incorporation of treatments like Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, which uses drugs that not only treat HIV, but prevent its transmission.

That suggests that ending programs won’t just shorten lives, but will potentially lead to more infections.

“We have been the envy of many other states for successfully implementing test-and-treat programs where people with HIV are started on treatment on day one of their diagnosis,” she said. “We can continue to make incredible progress, or we can let our guard down now and watch it get worse.”

Frankel dismissed accusations that the problem came from the federal government. The U.S. House Appropriations Committee member said Florida has not requested additional help.

“Florida, I think, last year got about $130 million. And as far as I know, there has not been any request by the federal government to the states to put in their own funds,” she said, “nor do I know of any outreach by Gov. DeSantis to any of us on appropriations for more money.”

She said the impact on eligibility warranted a federal investigation to figure out the true cause of the funding shortfall.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

House subcommittee backs bill to regulate e-bikes in Florida, establish task force

Published

on


A House panel is on board with legislation that aims to increase regulations of electronic bikes and scooters in Florida.

Rep. Yvette Benarroch, a Naples Republican and co-sponsor of the House bill (HB 243), presented it before the House Government Operations Subcommittee. She offered a committee substitute bill, which the panel unanimously approved.

It’s identical to a measure that was approved by the Senate Transportation Committee Tuesday.

E-bikes especially have gained unflattering attention in recent years as they have been involved in more and more accidents. Benarroch during her presentation provided a list of about a half-dozen fatalities involving e-bikes on Florida roads recently.

“Unfortunately, this bill was inspired by tragedy,” Benarroch said during her presentation. “Young people have been seriously injured.”

She added that the number of e-bike accidents is not going down and there needs to be more data collected to understand how profound the issue is. She said she’s been working on the bill for about the past half-year.

“There are many others whose stories do not make the headlines,” Benarroch said. “The call to act is immediate.”

Benarroch’s bill is identical to Sen. Keith Truenow’s measure (SB 382). The Tavares Republican amended his original bill to include provisions establishing an “electric bicycle task force,” which are also included in the House proposal.

That task force would collect data on e-bike and scooter accidents, provide recommendations on enforcement, and submit a report to the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

The bill would also limit e-bikes to operating at 10 mph on sidewalks if a pedestrian is within 50 feet.

Several law enforcement organizations, hospitals and School Boards supported Benarroch’s bill Wednesday.

Rep. Linda Chaney, a St. Petersburg Republican and Chair of the House subcommittee, said she was thankful for Benarroch’s work on the measure because local municipalities have approached the e-bike issue with inconsistent measures.

“There are a lot of different areas in our state with different laws, depending on how fast the bike goes, how you peddle it if you have a motor (and) there’s a lot of confusion out there. … This is going to have far-reaching impact,” Chaney said.

Two actions in North Florida in 2024 demonstrate the wide range of approaches to dealing with e-bikes.

Two 15-year-old boys were seriously injured in St. Johns County alone last year. The St. Johns County Commission passed a resolution in August to join forces with the Sheriff’s Office and the St. Johns County School District to promote more awareness and safety for the operators of e-bikes, as well as e-scooters and other electronic motorized devices.

The County Commission’s measure promised joint education with the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office and the St. Johns County School District.

St. Johns County Sheriff Rob Hardwick said the resolution’s timing was right.

The Palm Coast City Council in 2025 also passed an ordinance that makes it illegal for e-bike owners to modify their vehicles so they can exceed state-defined speed limits on streets, sidewalks or paths.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Charlie Kirk Day of Remembrance bills advance in Senate, House

Published

on


An annual day to remember fallen conservative icon Charlie Kirk is closer to becoming law after meetings of the Senate Education Postsecondary Committee and the House Governmental Operations Subcommittee.

The panels voted on party lines to devote Oct. 14 to remember the activist and commentator who spoke for a generation on the Right before he was gunned down while addressing a Utah university crowd.

Under bills from Sen. Jonathan Martin and Rep. Yvette Benarroch (SB 194, HB 125), the Governor would be compelled to issue a proclamation every Oct. 14  — Kirk’s birthday — for the “Charlie Kirk Day of Remembrance.”

“This bill would have this day be a day of remembrance and recognition of Charlie Kirk’s influence on civic engagement, youth leadership, and constitutional education. It does not create a state holiday or mandate closures,” Martin said Wednesday.

Martin extolled Kirk’s “alternative viewpoint” and willingness to debate, saying “what he was doing when he was assassinated goes to the very core of who we are as Americans.”

“The First Amendment does not exist to protect comfortable speech,” Benarroch said. “It exists to protect speech we disagree with. It exists to protect debate, House Bill 125 is not about asking anyone to agree with Charlie Kirk. It is not about endorsing every statement he ever made. It is not about elevating a personality. This bill is about what happens when violence replaces debate.”

Ahead of the Senate vote and after numerous members of the public cited various racially provocative things Kirk said into live microphones, an amendment from Sen. Shevrin Jones creating the gubernatorial option for a George Floyd day of remembrance was rejected, saying his killing, like Kirk’s, changed “public consciousness.”

Jones noted that when he was in the House, legislation like the main bill wouldn’t have advanced, which he framed as a measure of how far to the right discourse in the Capitol has moved in just the last few years.

“We’re passing days of remembrance of an individual who … probably wouldn’t spit on me if I was on fire,” Jones said, before his amendment was turfed.

These bills are part of several efforts to remember the founder of Turning Point USA.

A proposed road renaming in Miami-Dade, an honorary naming of the Florida Civics and Debate Initiative championship trophy, and Attorney General James Uthmeier’s Combat Violent Extremism Portal all exemplify state leaders’ effort to pay tribute to a leading advocate for the kind of unapologetic conservatism Florida Republicans embrace.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.