Connect with us

Sports

Ex-Liverpool Boss Benitez Highlights Man Utd’s Issue with New Signings

Published

on


Former Liverpool and Everton manager, Rafa Benitez believes Manchester United’s new signings are struggling to adapt to the demands of being in a ‘top club’.

Despite signing to three key attacking players in the summer, United have struggled for results in the Premier League and they occupy the 10th position with three wins from seven matches.

New signings Cunha, Bryan Mbeumo and Benjamin Sesko have combined to score just three goals.

The Spanish coach drew a comparison between Liverpool and Manchester United’s recent transfer activities, and he ranked his former team as being better.

However, he remains optimistic about United’s resurgence with the current quality in Reuben Amorim’s selection and the support they enjoy from their fans.

“The top sides, they have seasons,” Benitez said in a forum organised by Aspire Academy at Subaru Park. “Sometimes you have good players coming from the academy, that means that you are performing at a very good level, or sometimes you are right with the signings, or you are with the coach, and then there are different things depending on that.

“In this case, Liverpool is consistent in terms of the way that they are doing things. They were good enough selling players, since my time with (Fernando) Torres and after (Philippe) Coutinho, Luis Suarez, so they were making some money.

“And they were quite successful in the signings.

“Manchester United, spending some money, the players didn’t have maybe the adaptation to the top side that is Manchester United.

“So that is the difference, but still I think they will come back because they are good enough and they have a massive support.”

Liverpool are set to host Manchester United at Anfield for a Premier League blockbuster after the international break on October 19.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Buccaneers host rival Saints in key NFC South game

Published

on


The Tampa Bay Buccaneers enter Week 14 with a 7-5 record and first place in the NFC South, but the margin is razor-thin. Carolina (7-6) is surging and waiting for any slip-up. That makes Sunday’s divisional showdown against the rival New Orleans Saints at Raymond James Stadium a must-win for Tampa Bay.

MUST READS – SPORTS TALK FLORIDA

Key Players to Watch

Quarterback Baker Mayfield continues to lead the Buccaneers’ offense, averaging 216.7 passing yards per game. Rookie running back Bucky Irving has added balance to the attack with 59.6 rushing yards per game. Wide receiver Chris Godwin remains a reliable target, posting 78 yards in last week’s win over Arizona.

For New Orleans, rookie quarterback Tyler Shough has shown flashes, throwing for 239 yards and two touchdowns against Miami. Veteran linebacker Demario Davis anchors the Saints’ defense, ranking among the league leaders in tackles. Utility man Taysom Hill continues to be used in multiple roles, though his production has been limited.

Radio and TV Information

Kickoff is set for Sunday, December 7 at 1:00 p.m. ET from Raymond James Stadium. The game will be broadcast nationally on CBS, with Kevin Harlan and Trent Green on the call. Fans can also listen locally on 98ROCK in Tampa and WWL 105.3 FM/870 AM in New Orleans. Streaming options include NFL+, Fubo, and TuneIn Radio.

What Lies Ahead for the Buccaneers

The Buccaneers are chasing their fourth straight NFC South title, a feat that would cement their dominance in the division. With three straight divisional games ahead (Saints, Falcons, Panthers), Tampa Bay controls its destiny. A win over New Orleans would set the stage for a pivotal showdown against Carolina, which has emerged as a surprising contender.

Head Coach Todd Bowles emphasized the importance of turnovers: “Any time we play them, it’s always who wins the turnover battle – every time”. If the Bucs can execute cleanly and keep Mayfield healthy, they remain favorites to secure another division crown and a playoff berth.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

BIG Ten and SEC may not expand in the next TV cycle

Published

on





TV AND THE SEC

Future expansion of the Big Ten and SEC in 2030 and beyond is far less certain than it was in the last cycle. Both leagues already function as national networks with coast-to-coast reach, and media companies like ESPN, FOX, CBS, NBC, Amazon, Apple, and YouTube are becoming more budget-conscious. Adding more schools could simply mean more mouths to feed without significantly increasing overall revenue, unless the new members bring undeniable brand power, recruiting markets, or television value.

Sports Talk Florida

Why Expansion May Slow Down

  • National footprint already achieved: The Big Ten stretches from Rutgers to USC, while the SEC dominates the South and Texas. Both conferences already cover the largest recruiting and media markets.
  • Media company selectivity: Networks are prioritizing billion-dollar NFL and MLB renewals, leaving less room for escalating college rights fees.
  • Cord-cutting pressures: Cable decline forces ESPN, FOX, and CBS to be more cautious with spending. Streaming platforms prefer marquee matchups rather than funding entire conferences.
  • Revenue-sharing with athletes: Following the House v. NCAA settlement, schools must share revenue with players, increasing costs and reducing the incentive to dilute payouts by adding more members.

Expansion Trade-Offs

  • Pros of adding schools:
    • Access to new recruiting markets (e.g., Florida State for Florida, UNC for Carolina).
    • Strengthening brand dominance against rival conferences.
    • Potential leverage in future media negotiations.
  • Cons of adding schools:
    • Dilution of per-school payouts (more mouths to feed).
    • Higher travel costs and logistical strain.
    • Risk of diminishing traditional rivalries and regional identity.

Likely Outlook for 2030+

  • Big Ten: May only expand if ACC schools like North Carolina or Virginia become available and deliver clear ROI. Otherwise, stability is favored.
  • SEC: Already dominant in the South; expansion beyond Texas and Oklahoma may not add significant value unless it’s a powerhouse brand.
  • Media companies: With tighter budgets, they will demand proof that any new member increases national ratings, not just conference size.

Bottom Line

By 2030, the Big Ten and SEC will likely be more cautious about expansion. Unless a school offers undeniable brand strength and media market value, adding members risks diluting payouts and creating logistical headaches. In a budget-conscious media environment, stability may prove more valuable than size.







Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Wait Until Next Year For Bears’ Ownership Stadium Plan

Published

on


Bears Arlington Heights stadium drawings

Bears’ ownership wants to build a stadium in Arlington Heights.

It is wait until next year for the National Football League Chicago Bears ownership in its quest to get public money for a planned stadium-village in Arlington Heights, Illinois. The Bears ownership failed twice to get money from the Illinois state lawmakers in 2025 but next year isn’t very far away.  The Illinois General Assembly starts on January 16th, 2026. Bears’ ownership has decided that Arlington Heights, a Chicago suburb is the right place for its stadium-village after running into opposition in Chicago over its plan to build a stadium-village in a Solider Field parking lot.

The Bears ownership’s stadium-village plan was first revealed in 2023. The Bears’ ownership bought the Arlington Park racetrack property in the Chicago suburb in Arlington Heights in February 2023 for $197 million. Bears’ ownership was set to build a stadium-village in town but then came the property tax bill. Bears’ ownership was alarmed with the tab and decided Chicago was a better option. In April 2024, Bears’ ownership unveiled a plan to build a domed lakefront stadium and surround the structure with a residential and retail zone. The McCaskey family, the owners of the football business, claimed they were willing to throw in about $2 billion to help finance the venture but they also said they needed public support. The McCaskeys claimed they would put up $2.025 billion and would get a $300 million loan from the NFL. The McCaskeys wanted at least $900 million in bonds from the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority. That funding would include extending bonds of an existing 2% hotel tax. That means people using hotels and motels would be paying for a football stadium that more than likely the hotel and motel users would never step foot in. The Bears ownership’s stadium-village saga continues.

Evan Weiner’s books are available at iTunes – https://books.apple.com/us/author/evan-weiner/id595575191

Evan can be reached at evan_weiner@hotmail.com

Chicago Bears





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.