Connect with us

Business

Elon Musk’s X raises almost $1 billion in new equity funding

Published

on



Elon Musk’s social network X has raised close to $1 billion in new equity from investors, according to people with knowledge of the matter—a deal that gives the company a valuation in line with when Musk took it private in 2022. 

Musk himself participated in the equity raise, said some of the people, all of whom asked not to be identified discussing private information. The company is considering using some of the proceeds to pay down its remaining debt load, one of the people said.

The deal values X’s equity at roughly $32 billion. The Twitter buyout included at least $12.5 billion in debt, meaning the latest fundraising was completed at roughly the same $44 billion enterprise value as Musk’s initial purchase.

Darsana Capital Partners, which bought some of X’s debt earlier this year, participated in the equity round, some of the people said. The investment firm 1789 Capital, which has backed xAI and SpaceX, also invested, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

Representatives for X, Darsana and 1789 declined to comment.

Musk regularly turns to the private markets for backing for several of his companies, including SpaceX, which completed a tender offer valuing the startup at about $350 billion, and xAI, which is said to have canvassed investors about raising fresh funding at a valuation of $75 billion.

At the same time that Musk’s companies have gained in the private markets, shares of his automaker Tesla Inc. have tumbled by more than 40% so far this year, in part because his political prominence has soured some consumers on his cars. Heightened competition is also weighing on the stock. On Tuesday, Tesla sank 5.3% following news that Chinese automaker BYD Co. had unveiled an electric car that could be charged as quickly as a gas vehicle is refueled.

After Musk bought Twitter and renamed it X, the company underwent a tumultuous period, marked by deep cuts and advertiser departures. X’s advertising business took a hit shortly after the acquisition as many marketers fled the service, or paused their spending, over concerns that their messages might appear alongside inappropriate content. 

Musk has since fought marketers in court to try to bring them back. X is suing several major brands for withholding advertising spending, alleging that their decision amounts to anti-competitive behavior.

Some marketers have started to return, though industry insiders believe a threat of legal action from Musk could be driving those decisions, Bloomberg News has reported. Musk’s powerful role within the Trump administration has also been a factor for some marketers, who worry about being on the billionaire’s bad side.

X’s business has rebounded since President Donald Trump was re-elected, though Fidelity Investments, an X investor, had marked down its stake in the company by 68% as of January. In addition to some advertisers returning, bankers recently sold X debt that they held for years after Musk’s initial purchase.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

TON surges 24% as Telegram founder Pavel Durov returns home to Dubai amid ongoing investigation

Published

on



While the crypto markets continued to take a beating over the weekend, one coin is actually gaining ground. TON, which is associated with messaging app Bitcoin stayed flat.

“As you may have heard, I’ve returned to Dubai after spending several months in France due to an investigation related to the activity of criminals on Telegram,” Durov wrote on Telegram. “The process is ongoing, it feels great to be home.”

Durov will be required to return to France by Apr. 7. 

Telegram began to develop TON—also known as The Open Network—in 2017, to allow its rapidly growing user base to quickly process transactions in the app using blockchain technology. It is now an integral part of the platform, used to pay for games, advertisements and transaction fees. It has amassed a market cap of over $8 billion. 

Telegram and alleged criminal activities

Durov had been banned from leaving France since August after he was arrested near Paris last year.  

Telegram has attracted nearly one billion global users since it was founded in 2013 through its emphasis on privacy and security. It was the company’s policy to not comply with government requests for user information until September when Durov reversed this policy in the wake of his arrest. French authorities say the app has been used for the distribution of child sexual abuse material, drug trafficking, fraud and other criminal activities. 

Telegram previously said it was “absurd” to hold Durov responsible for criminal activities that occur on Telegram in a X post following his arrest. “It is absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform,” the company wrote, adding that its moderation practices are “within industry standards and constantly improving.” The company did not immediately respond to Fortune‘s request for comment.

Durov’s arrest prompted backlash from the likes of Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden, who said the move was a politically-motivated attack on freedom of speech. 

Durov has maintained his innocence throughout the investigation, writing on Telegram on Monday: “When it comes to moderation, cooperation, and fighting crime, for years Telegram not only met but exceeded its legal obligations.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Finland is the world’s happiest country yet again. Here are the top 10 on the list

Published

on



It’s a good day to be a Finn—again

For the 8th successive year, Finland ranks no.1 on the annual World Happiness Report. The report, published on the UN’s International Day of Happiness, is based on analysis of how the residents of over 140 countries rate their quality of life. With 10 meaning someone is currently living the best possible life they can imagine, Finns came in first with an average score of 7.74. 

“They’re wealthy, they’re healthy, have social connections, social support, [and] a connection with nature,” Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, professor of economics at the University of Oxford, leader of the Wellbeing Research Center and editor of The World Happiness Report, tells Fortune. “They’re not happy, joyful, dancing in the streets type people, but they’re very content with their lives.”

Finland was followed by Denmark (no.2), Iceland (no.3), Sweden (no.4), and the Netherlands (no.5). While Mexico (no.10) and Costa Rica (no.6) joined the top 10 for the first time in the list’s history, the U.S. dropped to its lowest ranking at no. 24. Last year, the U.S. dropped out of the top 20 for the first time since the 2012 inaugural list. 

The Nordic countries, historically at the top, are getting happier while the U.S. is getting less happy. While GDP per capita is relatively similar across the Nordic countries, the U.S., Australia, and the UK, the distribution of wealth sets them apart. 

“In these Nordic Scandinavian countries, a rising tide lifts all boats, so the levels of economic inequality are much less, and that reflects in well-being as well,” De Neve says. “In Finland, most people will rate themselves as seven or an eight, whereas if you look at the distribution of well-being in the States, there’s a lot of 10s out there, but there’s a lot of ones as well.”

While the rankings factored in a country’s GDP per capita, wealth distribution, and life expectancy, they found social trust and connection help determine happiness more than people may think. 

This year, the researchers found a strong correlation between someone believing in the kindness of others and their own perceived happiness. Across the board, too often, people underestimate the kindness of others, like, say, if someone will return a lost wallet. It affects well-being. Wallets are returned to their owner at almost twice the rate people assume. However, compared to the U.S., more people in Nordic countries believe a lost wallet will be returned (and more people are likely to return it).  

Maintaining a strong sense of community with acts such as regularly dining with others, for example, improves social trust and happiness, the report found. “The more you believe in the kindness of others, or in other words, are socially trusting, the higher your individual well-being and the higher collective well-being,” De Neve says. “The Nordic countries, the Scandinavian countries, do better, both in the belief in others’ kindness and in the actual wallet drop.” 

As for Mexico and Costa Rica joining the top 10 for the first in the list’s history, De Neve points to the strength of the countries’ social fabrics. Latin American countries reported the highest number of shared meals and ranked high on social connectedness and trust. It helps explain why their rankings dipped more dramatically in the COVID-19 isolation years (De Neve says that 13 out of 14 meals shared across seven days correlated to the highest well-being measure).

“It is not because of high GDP and the highest life expectancy,” De Neve says about these two countries. “They do spend time dining and lunching with others, having friends, and it’s not all cannibalized by social media, and so we picked this up in the data.” 

The report is published yearly by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford, alongside partners, including Gallup, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and an editorial board that analyzes the findings pro bono.  

As De Neve dug into why Finland kept its reign, something else came to light that helped them stand out even from their Nordic counterparts. 

“They’re content with less,” he says. “They had less, and they’re more content with less. So they’re happier with what they’ve got.” 

Here are the world’s 25 happiest countries

  1. Finland
  2. Denmark
  3. Iceland
  4. Sweden
  5. Netherlands
  6. Costa Rica 
  7. Norway 
  8. Israel 
  9. Luxembourg
  10. Mexico 

For more on happiness:

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Unilever hit ‘new levels of oppressiveness,’ Ben & Jerry’s claims as its CEO was sacked over social activism

Published

on



Ben & Jerry’s has filed yet another legal complaint against its parent company, the consumer goods giant Unilever, claiming that it sacked Ben & Jerry’s CEO after a standoff on political issues.

In its latest complaint, filed late Tuesday in a New York federal court, Ben & Jerry’s alleges that Unilever has threatened staff who oppose its efforts to “silence the social mission.”

David Stever had been with Ben & Jerry’s for 34 years—as a tour guide, as CMO, and then as CEO. The Vermont-based ice cream brand claimed that Stever was not fired for performance reasons but because he didn’t comply with Unilever’s standards on not speaking out about political issues. 

Unilever then “informed the Independent Board” that Stever would be replaced as Ben & Jerry’s CEO on Mar. 3, 2025. 

The move hindered “the CEO’s duties, purposely undermining Ben & Jerry’s Social Mission and Brand Integrity,” the filing said. 

Ben & Jerry’s added that Unilever’s control over its social mission had hit “new levels of oppressiveness.”

A Unilever spokesperson said the company followed due processes in the removal of Ben & Jerry’s CEO.

“Regrettably, despite repeated attempts to engage the Board and follow the correct process, we are disappointed that the confidentiality of an employee career conversation has been made public,” the spokesperson said.


Representatives at Ben & Jerry’s didn’t immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

A complex legal web

The ice cream brand and its much larger parent company have repeatedly sparred over issues in recent times. Ben & Jerry’s was founded in 1978 with social causes at its heart. 

Even after Unilever bought Ben & Jerry’s in 2000, the brand didn’t shy away from having progressive viewpoints that drifted away from its parent company’s stance. It has spoken out against GMO ingredients in its ice cream pints and supported the Black Lives Matter movement, among others. 

The recent clashes began in 2021 when Ben & Jerry’s said it wouldn’t sell its products in the Israel-occupied West Bank. That resulted in customer anger against Unilever, which was accused of being anti-Semitic in allowing such a move. 

The FTSE100 company, which had a turnover of €61 billion in 2024 and operates in 190 countries, suddenly found itself in a bind managing the “purpose-led” Ben & Jerry’s social and political takes. 

A year later, Ben & Jerry’s sued Unilever because its parent company planned to sell the Israeli operations of Ben & Jerry’s to a local licensee, allowing its ice creams to continue to be marketed in the war-torn region. The lawsuit also said Unilever’s move would breach its 2000 acquisition deal, which let Ben & Jerry’s continue with its social mission. The consumer giant sold its Israeli Ben & Jerry’s arm in 2022, and Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s settled. 

But the friction didn’t end there. In 2024, Ben & Jerry’s filed a fresh lawsuit against Unilever claiming “inappropriate muzzling” when it wanted to support Palestinian refugees amid the war in Gaza. The filing said that Unilever even threatened to dismantle the Ben & Jerry’s board and sue individual members if Ben & Jerry’s advocated for a cease-fire. 

Unilever rejected this claim, arguing it “will defend our case very strongly,” according to Bloomberg. 

In January, Ben & Jerry’s accused Unilever of suppressing its release of a social policy statement because it mentioned President Donald Trump. Claims about the brand’s CEO being ousted are just the latest in a stream of legal complaints.

This complex David-and-Goliath tussle is unfolding just as Unilever announced plans last month to spin off its entire ice cream business, including Magnum and Ben & Jerry’s, through a triple listing.

Ben & Jerry’s founders are reportedly considering buying the ice cream brand back, Bloomberg reported last month. But Unilever said it “wasn’t for sale” and would be part of its soon-to-be ice cream entity.

Update, March 19, 2025: This article has been updated with a comment from Unilever.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.