Connect with us

Business

Elon Musk’s DOGE temporarily blocked from its ‘nearly unlimited’ access to millions of American’s Social Security information—for now

Published

on



WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from Social Security systems that hold personal data on millions of Americans, calling their work there a “fishing expedition.”

The order also requires the team to delete any personally identifiable data in their possession.

U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that the team got broad access to sensitive information at the Social Security Administration to search for fraud with little justification.

“The DOGE Team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion,” she wrote.

The order does allow DOGE staffers to access to data that’s been redacted or stripped of anything personally identifiable, if they undergo training and background checks.

“To be sure, rooting out possible fraud, waste, and mismanagement in the SSA is in the public interest. But, that does not mean that the government can flout the law to do so,” Hollander wrote.

The Trump administration says DOGE is targeting waste in the federal government. Musk has been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud, describing it as a “ ponzi scheme ” and insisting that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending.

The ruling, which could be challenged on appeal, comes in a lawsuit filed by labor unions, retirees and the advocacy group Democracy Forward. They argued that DOGE access violates privacy laws and presents serious information security risks. The lawsuit included a declaration from a recently departed Social Security official who saw the DOGE team sweep into the agency said she is deeply worried about sensitive information being exposed.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DOGE detailed a 10-person team of federal employees at the SSA, seven of whom were granted read-only access to agency systems or personally identifiable information, according to court documents.

The staffers were all federal employees allowed to access the data under federal privacy laws, the government argued, and there’s no evidence that any personal data was improperly shared.

The Justice Department also said that DOGE access doesn’t deviate significantly from normal practices inside the agency, where employees are routinely allowed to search its databases. But attorneys for the plaintiffs called the access unprecedented.

Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, called the ruling a “major win for working people and retirees across the country.”

Skye Perryman, president of Democracy Forward, said that “the court recognized the real and immediate dangers of DOGE’s reckless actions and took action to stop it.”

DOGE has gotten at least some access to other government databases, including at the Treasury Department and IRS.

At SSA, DOGE staffers swept into the agency days after Trump’s inauguration and pressed for a software engineer to quickly get access to data systems that are normally carefully restricted even within the government, a former official said in court documents.

The team appeared to be searching for fraud based on inaccuracies and misunderstandings, according to Tiffany Flick, the former acting chief of staff to the acting commissioner.

Hollander, 75, who is based in Baltimore and was nominated by President Barack Obama, is the latest judge to consider a DOGE related case.

The team has drawn nearly two dozen lawsuits. Earlier this week another Maryland judge found that DOGE’s dismantling of United States Agency for International Development was likely unconstitutional.

While other judges have raised questions about DOGE’s sweeping cost-cutting efforts, they have not always agreed any risks are imminent enough to block the team from government systems.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk offers to pay $100 to Wisconsin voters who sign a petition against ‘activist judges’

Published

on



  • Elon Musk is offering voters in Michigan $100 to sign a petition. It’s a smaller version of the $1 million payments he offered to select swing-state voters in 2024 and shows an increased willingness by the world’s richest man to push for a large role in the governmental process.

Elon Musk’s America PAC is offering registered voters in Wisconsin $100 each if they sign a petition against “activist judges who impose their own views.” Those payments come as another Musk-backed group is spending heavily in the state ahead of a Wisconsin Supreme court race.

At the same time, The Washington Post reports Musk has donated to several Republican senators who have moved to impeach federal judges.

The push comes as Donald Trump called for the impeachment of a federal judge earlier this week after the justice ordered the government to turn around planes that were deporting Venezuelan immigrants. Trump ignored that order, earning a rebuke from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Musk called a separate ruling by a judge that blocked Trump’s ban on transgender people serving in the military “a judicial coup,” adding, “We need 60 senators to impeach the judges and restore rule of the people.”

Paying people to sign a petition echoing his thoughts is becoming a go-to play for Musk. Last fall, he offered voters in swing states the chance to win $1 million each when they signed a petition his PAC put out “to support free speech and the right to bear arms.”

Prosecutors in Pennsylvania argued those payments were illegal, but a judge said the district attorney failed to present proper evidence and allowed Musk to continue making the offer.

Musk was the largest donor in the 2024 election and, while these contributions are small in comparison, they indicate an increased likelihood he intends to play a significant role in the midterm elections next year.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

What student loan borrowers need to know about Trump’s move to dismantle the Department of Education

Published

on



President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday aimed at winding down the U.S. Department of Education. While Republicans cheer on the move, which many observers are calling legally dubious, it has left nearly 45 million student loan borrowers with one more thing to worry about: what happens to their monthly payments?

The Department of Education’s Federal Student Aid (FSA) office manages a student loan portfolio valued at around $1.7 trillion, and oversees repayment and deferral plans. Trump has said that FSA isn’t up to the challenge, saying the Treasury Department or another larger agency is better equipped to handle the portfolio load.

Though the order has been signed, it’s not immediately clear what will happen to the student loan portfolio.

It’s also not clear if the Education Department will continue to lend money going forward or how much, although Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said Thursday that the department will still “support” borrowers. It is a goal of the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025—which has acted as a roadmap for much of the Trump administration’s actions so far—for all loans to be privatized.

“Closing the Department does not mean cutting off funds from those who depend on them,” McMahon said in a statement. “We will continue to support K-12 students, students with special needs, college student borrowers, and others who rely on essential programs.”

Transferring the student loan portfolio to a new department would cause “considerable upheaval initially and the issues could persist for years,” Kevin Ladd, chief operating officer and co-creator of Scholarships.com, who has worked in the higher education funding field for 25 years, previously told Fortune. The new department would need more staffing and new computer systems, and there would need to be new oversight and other protection processes put in place, says Ladd. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is aggressively cutting federal government staff.

Programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and income-driven repayments plans that help students discharge their loans more quickly are also at risk of “going away,” Ladd said.

“While federal student loans would likely continue to be an option for current and future college students, the terms would likely be much stricter and students should be taking that into consideration before signing off on anything,” he said.

Student loan system in upheaval

Trump signed an executive order earlier this month stating borrowers working at nonprofit groups will not be eligible for student loan forgiveness if the Administration deems they have engaged in “improper” activities . While it is unclear what exactly would fall into this category, this will comes as worrying news for some borrowers who have spent years working in careers that been eligible for loan forgiveness.

Additionally, a federal court recently upheld an injunction related to former President Joe Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, an income-based repayment plan that greatly reduced some borrowers’ monthly payments. That has sent bills sky-rocketing for some borrowers. Others have taken major hits to their credit scores.

And McMahon has stated she is cutting the department’s workforce by nearly 50%, reducing it from 4,133 workers to roughly 2,183.

Critics of the president’s actions say that more people will need to take out private loans to attend school, which will be detrimental to their long-term financial health. Private loans have fewer consumer protections than federal loans, and potentially higher interest rates.

“Without the Department, fewer students would be able to go to college, student loan borrowers would default in droves, and fraudulent colleges would prey on students with impunity,” says Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, an independent nonprofit that advocates for better access to higher education.

Also a worry: the companies managing student loans on behalf of the government already face complaints about mismanaging the repayment terms—particularly when there is a change in which company is processing the payments. Increasing the disarray could increase headaches for borrowers.

Those enrolled in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, for example, will have to be extra careful checking that their payment counts are being updated. Once these borrowers make 120 on-time payments in certified professions, the remainder of their loans are legally supposed to be forgiven. But there have been numerous issues with this process in years past, and that was while the Education Department was operating as intended.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett was reportedly paid $2 million for her new book coming this year, including a $425,000 advance

Published

on

NEW YORK (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has a book coming out in September that her publisher is billing as an invitation for “readers to see the Supreme Court through the lens of her experience.”

“Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution” will be released Sept. 9, according to Sentinel Books, a conservative imprint of Penguin Random House.

“In ‘Listening to the Law,’ Justice Barrett illuminates her role and daily life as a justice, touching on everything from her deliberation process to dealing with media scrutiny,” Friday’s announcement by Sentinel reads in part. “With the warmth and clarity that made her a popular law professor, she brings to life the making of the Constitution and lays out her approach to interpreting its text, inviting readers to wrestle with questions of originalism and to embrace the rich heritage of the Constitution.”

In a statement issued through Sentinel, Barrett said, “The process of judging, which happens behind closed doors, can seem like a mystery. It shouldn’t.”

Her signing with Sentinel was first reported in 2021, and financial documents released the following year showed Barrett receiving a $425,000 advance as part of a reported $2 million deal.

Other current justices have published books in recent years, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Barrett, 53, is the youngest member of the court, which she joined in 2020 just weeks after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The third justice appointed by President Donald Trump, Barrett solidified a conservative majority that has overturned abortion rights, broadened religious rights and ended affirmative action in college admissions. Barrett has also tried to promote a spirit of civil debate: She and Sotomayor, one of the court’s liberals, made a handful of joint public appearances i n 2024.

“I don’t think any of us has a ‘my way or the highway’ attitude,” Barrett told a conference of civics educators in Washington.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.