Connect with us

Business

Economists’ key concern about Trump’s Venezuela action is impact on $38 trillion national debt

Published

on



With the United States in debt to the tune of $38 trillion, President Trump has decided now is the time for the White House to also “run” another country. While the U.S. will not incur the costs needed to keep Venezuela’s economy moving, the action taken over the weekend will no doubt come with price tags attached.

This, says UBS, will be a key concern for investors evaluating the risk premium for U.S. debt going into 2026. America’s fiscal trajectory, namely its debt burden, has been a growing concern for the likes of JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, as well as droves of economists and Wall Street analysts.

These concerns are made sharper by recent changes to Trump’s tariff policies, some of which he has recently delayed. In the face of increased outlays, the Oval Office is also reducing its income. Last week the White House ordered the delay to an increase in tariff rates for upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities that was set to take place on January 1, 2026. It was pushed back by a year.

A seeming falter on tariffs—an unusual but significant policy in helping rebalance America’s books—is likely to cause investors to question how reliable the income stream will be. Indeed, cash is needed all the more at the outset of a new geopolitical upheaval.

At UBS this morning, chief economist Paul Donovan highlighted that the delay to new tariffs comes as the latest political lightning rod—affordability—continues to concern the electorate. Speaking in an audio note to clients, he added: “Reducing tariffs is a fiscal stimulus; delaying tariffs is a delayed fiscal tightening in the States, which has some marginal growth implications. It’s also important in its implications for the size of the U.S. fiscal deficit.”

A fiscal deficit is the shortfall between a government’s spending and its revenue. According to the Bipartisan Policy Centre, as of November, the government’s cumulative deficit for the fiscal year 2026 was already $439 billion (it ends on the final day of September). Any deficits the government incurs year to year are added to the national debt, which currently exceeds $38.5 trillion.

“This may also be a consideration from the recent U.S. action in Venezuela,” Donovan said. “While it is not clear what, if anything, is meant by statements that the U.S. will ‘run Venezuela,’ military adventures cost money. That might be the most significant consequence of the weekend’s activities: Social media warriors may get excited about other geopolitical threats, but these are likely to be less of a focus in financial markets.”

How long is a piece of string?

It’s still early days, but how costly President Trump’s intervention into Venezuela is depends on the magnitude and longevity of the action. The bill could come to something in the palatable billions, Wharton’s Professor Kent Smetters told Fortune, if U.S. troops remain offshore and a new president acceptable to both the White House and the Venezuelan public assumes power.

President Trump sidestepped questions about an election in Venezuela in a huddle with media on board Air Force One overnight, insisting that the U.S. is going to “run” the country but caveating “we’re not going to invest anything”—which oil companies will do instead. This potentially presents a net gain to the U.S. over time, the University of Pennsylvania professor added, as the nation may get access to a new heavy crude oil producer.

“However, if the Venezuela intervention becomes the new Iraq, then the costs could be hundreds of billions of dollars or even more over the next decade. So, I think the biggest risk is how this is managed going forward,” Professor Smetters said. If a conflict arises, then the “cost could be high.” Equally, if the U.S. is forced to show dominance, then this could increase the price of action to “tens of billions of dollars over the next few years,” Professor Smetters added.

America’s fiscal situation would be a pressing concern even without military intervention, according to Desmond Lachman, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute—but it’s certainly not helping. Lachman pointed out that America’s most pressing national debt threats remain the legality of the tariff regime (and hence, it’s valuable revenue) and President Trump’s pledge to give away said revenue instead of using it to pay down debt as was previously stated.

“What my concern about Venezuela is that … it’s just confirming that the United States isn’t a very reliable partner,” Lachman tells Fortune. “The bigger factor of the story, Venezuela and talking about Greenland, is going to just heighten geopolitical uncertainty. What it’s also going to do is raise questions, certainly in central banks’ minds: Do you really want to have your money in a form that the United States can freeze it, if they just decide that they don’t like you?

“My problem is that the budget deficit is so bad to begin with, and Venezuela is certainly not going to improve it; if anything, Venezuela makes it worse, so I think we’ve really got a big budget problem.” 

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



Lawmakers sounded the alarm on the Justice Department’s criminal inquiry into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, putting at risk President Donald Trump’s efforts to name a new central bank leader.

On Sunday, Powell revealed that the DOJ served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment over his testimony before the Senate last June related to renovations on the headquarters, which has seen cost overruns.

He called the allegations a pretext and said the investigation was really aimed at the Fed’s ability to set interest rates without political pressure. Trump has attacked Powell for much of the last year over his reluctance to cut rates, though the president said he didn’t know about the DOJ probe.

But Republican Sen. Them Tillis agreed with Powell’s assessment and instead pointed the finger at the DOJ.

“If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none,” he wrote in a post on X. “It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question.”

Tillis sits on the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the Fed and would vote on anyone Trump tries to put on the central bank.

Powell’s term as chair expires in May, and Trump has said he already has someone in mind to replace him who will lower rates further. But the DOJ investigation into Powell could blow up that process.

“I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed—including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy—until this legal matter is fully resolved,” Tillis said.

While Powell’s term as chair expires in May, his term as a member of the Fed board of governors expires in 2028. When prior Fed chairs have stepped down, they typically have resigned from the board as well. Powell could choose to stay to preserve the Fed’s independence.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat who also sits on the Senate Banking Committee, accused Trump of trying to force Powell off the Fed board “to complete his corrupt takeover of our central bank.”

“He is abusing the law like a wannabe dictator so the Fed serves him and his billionaire friends,” she added. “The Senate must not move ANY Trump Fed nominee.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



U.S. equity futures fell sharply Sunday night after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell confirmed that he is under investigation related to testimony he gave last June concerning the renovation of Federal Reserve buildings. 

The New York Times report breaking news of the investigation and Powell’s subsequent disclosure rattled markets, reviving fears that years of President Donald Trump pressuring the Federal Reserve could now be realized into a direct assault on its independence.

Futures tied to the Nasdaq 100 led the decline, falling about 0.8%, as interest-rate-sensitive technology stocks bore the brunt of the selloff. S&P 500 futures were down roughly 0.5%, while Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell about 0.4%, according to late-evening pricing.

Investors sought protection in the traditional safe-haven assets. Gold futures rose 1.7% to around $4,578 an ounce, while silver jumped more than 4%, reflecting renewed demand for protection against political and monetary instability. The U.S. dollar weakened modestly against several major currencies, including the Swiss franc and Japanese yen.

After years of largely staying silent while Trump repeatedly mocked and threatened him, Powell appeared to have reached a breaking point, issuing a rare and pointed statement. 

He wrote that while “No one—certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve—is above the law,” the attack should be seen in the “the broader context of the administration’s threats and ongoing pressure.” 

“This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings…Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.”

Economists warn that if the executive branch successfully co-opts the Fed, it could create a “self-fulfilling prophecy” of higher long-term inflation.

As Oxford Economics recently noted, any “cracks in the Fed’s independence” could spread rapidly through markets and ultimately raise borrowing costs for the businesses the administration seeks to protect with low interest rates. 

In a note published last July, when Trump publicly threatened to fire Powell, Deutsche Bank warned that such a move could spark severe market disruption.

“Both the currency and the bond market can collapse,” the bank wrote, citing heightened risks of inflation and financial instability. “The empirical and academic evidence on the impact of a loss of central-bank independence is fairly clear.”

Wall Street executives have echoed those concerns. Brian Moynihan, chief executive of Bank of America, said recently the erosion of Fed independence would carry serious consequences.

“The market will punish people if we don’t have an independent Fed,” Moynihan said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Magnificent 7’s stock market dominance shows signs of cracking

Published

on



To beat the market in recent years, many investors applied a simple strategy: Load up on the biggest US technology stocks. 

It paid handsomely for a long time. But last year, it didn’t. For the first time since 2022, when the Federal Reserve started raising interest rates, the majority of the Magnificent 7 tech giants performed worse than the S&P 500 Index. While the Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Index rose 25% in 2025, compared with 16% for the S&P 500, that was only because of the enormous gains by Alphabet Inc. and Nvidia Corp.

Many Wall Street pros see that dynamic continuing in 2026, as profit growth slows and questions about payoffs from heavy artificial intelligence spending rise. So far they’ve been right, with the Magnificent 7 index up just 0.5% and the S&P 500 climbing 1.8% to start the year. Suddenly stock picking within the group is crucial. 

“This isn’t a one-size-fits-all market,” said Jack Janasiewicz, lead portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers Solutions, which has $1.4 trillion in assets. “If you’re just buying the group, the losers could offset the winners.”

The three-year bull market has been led by the tech giants, with Nvidia, Alphabet, Microsoft Corp. and Apple Inc. alone accounting for more than a third of the S&P 500’s gains since the run began in October 2022. But enthusiasm for them is cooling as interest in the rest of the S&P 500 rises.

With Big Tech’s earnings growth slowing, investors are no longer content with promises of AI riches — they want to start seeing a return. Profits for the Magnificent 7 are expected to climb about 18% in 2026, the slowest pace since 2022 and not much better than the 13% rise projected for the other 493 companies in the S&P 500, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence.

“We’re already seeing a broadening of earnings growth and we think that’s going to continue,” said David Lefkowitz, head of US equities at UBS Global Wealth Management. “Tech is not the only game in town.”

One source of optimism is the group’s relatively subdued valuations. The Magnificent 7 index is priced at 29 times profits projected over the next 12 months, well below the 40s multiples earlier in the decade. The S&P 500 is trading at 22 times expected earnings, and the Nasdaq 100 Index is at 25 times. 

Here’s a look at expectations for the year ahead.

Nvidia

The dominant AI chipmaker is under pressure from rising competition and concerns about the sustainability of spending by its biggest customers. The stock is up 1,165% since the end of 2022, but it has lost 11% since its Oct. 29 record.

Rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. has won data center orders from OpenAI and Oracle Corp., and Nvidia customers like Alphabet are increasingly deploying their own custom made processors. Still, its sales continue to race ahead as demand for chips outstrips supply. 

Wall Street is bullish, with 76 of the 82 analysts covering the chipmaker holding buy ratings. The average analyst price target implies a roughly 39% gain over the next 12 months, best among the group, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Microsoft

For Microsoft, 2025 was the second consecutive year it underperformed the S&P 500. One of the biggest AI spenders, it’s expected to invest nearly $100 billion in capital expenditures during its current fiscal year, which ends in June. That figure is projected to rise to $116 billion the following year, according to the average of analyst estimates.

The data center buildout is fueling a resurgence in revenue growth in Microsoft’s cloud-computing business, but the company hasn’t had as much success in getting customers to pay for the AI services infused into its software products. Investors want to start seeing returns on those investments, according to Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management.

“What you’re seeing is some people looking for a little bit more quality management in terms of that cash flow management and a better idea on what profitability really looks like when it comes to AI,” Mulberry said.

Apple

Apple has been far less aggressive with its AI ambitions than the rest of the Magnificent 7. The stock was punished for it last year, falling almost 20% through the start of August. 

But then it caught on as an “anti-AI” play, soaring 34% through the end of the year as investors rewarded its lack of AI spending risk. At the same time, strong iPhone sales reassured investors that the company’s most important product remains in high demand. 

Accelerating growth will be the key for Apple shares this year. Its momentum has slowed recently, the stock closed higher on Friday, narrowly avoiding matching its longest losing streak since 1991. However, revenue is expected to expand 9% in fiscal 2026, which ends in September, the fastest pace since 2021. With the stock valued at 31 times estimated earnings, the second highest in the Magnificent 7 after Tesla, it will need the push to keep the rally going.

Alphabet

A year ago, OpenAI was seen as leading the AI race and investors feared Alphabet would get left behind. Today, Google’s parent is a consensus favorite, with dominant positions across the AI landscape. 

Alphabet’s latest Gemini AI model received rave reviews, easing concerns about OpenAI. And its tensor processing unit chips are considered a potential significant driver of future revenue growth, which could eat into Nvidia’s commanding share of the AI semiconductor market. 

The stock rose more than 65% last year, the best performance in the Magnificent 7. But how much more can it run? The company is approaching $4 trillion in market value, and the shares trade at around 28 times estimated earnings, well above their five-year average of 20. The average analyst price target projects just a 3.9% gain this year. 

Amazon.com

The e-commerce and cloud-computing giant was the weakest Magnificent 7 stock in 2025, its seventh straight year in that position. But Amazon has charged out of the gate in early 2026 and is leading the pack.

Much of the optimism surrounding the company is based on Amazon Web Services, which posted its fastest growth in years in the company’s most recent results. Concerns that AWS was falling behind its rivals has pressured the stock, as has the company’s aggressive AI spending, which includes efforts to improve efficiency at its warehouses, in part by using robotics. Investors expect the efficiency push to start paying off before long, which could make this the year the stock goes from laggard to leader. 

“Automation in warehouses and more efficient shipping will be huge,” said Clayton Allison, portfolio manager at Prime Capital Financial, which owns Amazon shares. “It hasn’t gotten the love yet, but it reminds me of Alphabet last year, which was sort of left behind amid all the concerns about competition from OpenAI, then really took off.”

Meta Platforms

Perhaps no stock in the group shows how investors have turned skeptical about lavish AI spending more than Meta. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg has pushed expensive acquisitions and talent hires in pursuit of his AI ambitions, including a $14 billion investment in Scale AI in which Meta also hired the startup’s CEO Alexandr Wang to be its chief AI officer.

That strategy was fine with shareholders — until it wasn’t. The stock tumbled in late October after Meta raised its 2025 capital expenditures forecast to $72 billion and projected “notably larger”spending in 2026. When the shares hit a record in August they were up 35% for the year, but they’ve since dropped 17%. Demonstrating how that spending is boosting profits will be critical for Meta in 2026.

Tesla

Tesla’s shares were the worst performers in the Magnificent 7 through the first half of 2025, but then soared more than 40% in the second half as Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk shifted focus from slumping electric vehicle sales to self-driving cars and robotics. The rally has Tesla’s valuation at almost 200 times estimated profits, making it the second most expensive stock in the S&P 500 behind takeover target Warner Bros. Discover Inc.

After two years of stagnant revenue, Tesla is expected to start growing again in 2026. Revenue is projected to rise 12% this year and 18% next year, following an estimated 3% contraction in 2025, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Still, Wall Street is pessimistic about Tesla shares this year. The average analyst price target projects a 9.1% decline over the next 12 months, data compiled by Bloomberg show. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.