Connect with us

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on



In September 2018, the CEO of what was then Michael Kors Holdings delivered thrilling news to investors. The company had agreed to acquire the storied Italian fashion house Versace from private equity giant Blackstone in a $2.1 billion blockbuster deal. 

The purchase created a multi-brand luxury powerhouse made up of Michael Kors jet-set lifestyle apparel and designer bags, the iconic Jimmy Choo footwear brand, plus the red-carpet glamour of Versace. Donatella Versace herself, who stepped up to lead after her brother Gianni’s tragic death in 1997, was in place as the creative visionary and said she was “excited” about the long-term prospects for the brand her brother founded in Milan in 1978. The nouveau American fashion conglomerate was poised to rival European competitors like Louis Vuitton and Hermes owner LVMH and Gucci owner Kering—with soaring revenues to boot. 

“We believe that the strength of the Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo brands, and the acquisition of Versace, position us to deliver multiple years of revenue and earnings growth,” said CEO and Chairman John D. Idol. “I am thrilled to have the opportunity to work with Donatella on Versace’s next chapter of growth.”

After the acquisition, the company renamed itself Capri Holdings after the striking three-rock formation that is one of the most recognizable sights on the Italian billionaire playground island of Capri. The company targeted revenues of $8 billion for the group, with Versace delivering $2 billion, Michael Kors behind $5 billion, and Jimmy Choo delivering $1 billion. 

Seven years on, that vision is in tatters. 

Capri has been in free fall. The company posted a $1.18 billion loss in fiscal 2025 and revenues have plummeted 21% from $5.6 billion to $4.4 billion during the past two fiscal years. The crown jewel, its Michael Kors brand which accounts for nearly 70% of the company’s revenues, has bled $864 million in sales since 2023. In April 2025, Capri announced it would sell Versace to Prada for $1.375 billion, a stunning loss after failing to capitalize on the tour de force of Donatella Versace, who stepped down as artistic director to the new role of chief brand ambassador in April 2025. Meanwhile, the company’s struggles are unfolding against the backdrop of a shrinking luxury market and a slowdown in buying. (Capri declined to comment for this story.)

Simeon Siegel, senior managing director at Guggenheim Partners, said Capri is also facing off against rival Tapestry, which has seen significant success with its Coach brand. “Tapestry is the hero of retail and they have succeeded like no other with Coach,” said Siegel, who notes that the rest of the Tapestry portfolio, which includes Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman, has lagged. Coach’s revenues tell the opposite story of Capri. In fiscal 2023, Coach saw $4.96 billion in sales, which climbed to $5.1 billion in 2024 and reached $5.6 billion in fiscal 2025. 

‘Help!!! Fast!!!’

Idol has led the company in the two decades since the Hong Kong private equity firm Sportswear Holdings—owned by Silas Chou and Lawrence Stroll—bought a majority stake in Michael Kors in 2003 for about $100 million. Michael Kors’ growth exploded from $20 million in sales in 2004 to roughly $3 billion a decade later. Idol added the chairman title in 2011, the same year the company went public, and he now reports to an eight-member board with an average tenure of 9 years.

Michael Kors sales hit a peak in 2016 of about $4.7 billion, and has been roughly on the decline in the years since. Meanwhile Idol has retained a tight grip on the leadership role even as two probable CEO candidates cycled through Capri. In August 2021, Capri announced that it had hired Joshua Schulman to the newly created role of CEO of Michael Kors—after plucking him from his previous role as CEO of Coach at Tapestry. (Schulman also served a previous stint as CEO of Jimmy Choo, before Capri bought it in 2017.) Schulman was set to ease in as CEO of Michael Kors before completely succeeding Idol in September 2022 as CEO of Capri, with Idol moving up to serve as executive chair. Idol told investors he would focus on long-term strategy, future potential luxury acquisitions, and board leadership as executive chair.

It wasn’t to be. Seven months later, Capri announced that Schulman was out, although Schulman still collected roughly $8 million in payments for contractually guaranteed salary and bonus. Capri also reduced his non-compete agreement to a six-month period. Idol stayed on as chairman and CEO, according to a March 7, 2022 announcement. In January 2023, Capri announced it had hired Cedric Wilmotte to serve as CEO of Michael Kors—only to announce his departure in November 2024. That time, the board didn’t announce a succession plan—only that Wilmotte would lead Michael Kors. Schulman is now CEO at Burberry and Wilmotte is an independent investor. Neither responded to requests for comment.

Only two new directors have joined the Capri board in the past five years, a strategy consultant who now chairs the audit committee, and the CEO of Bacardi International. Idol has stayed away from podcasts or long-form discussions, although he made an exception in 2013 at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University when his daughter attended. However, Idol appears smiling in photos alongside fashion models, actresses, Formula 1 drivers and other celebrities at fashion shows and events. 

Emails made public during an FTC lawsuit show that, despite Idol’s relaxed appearance in the milieu of a fashion scrum, he scrutinizes Coach’s marketing and its promotional and sales activity closely, particularly his rival’s email blasts to consumers. 

“Coach’s creativity on these emails (outlet in particular) is killing us… Sorry our backgrounds look cheap and uninspiring,” Idol wrote to Kors executives in May 2023. “This needs to be corrected quickly… Help!!! Fast!!!” 

He forwarded a holiday marketing email from Coach to another executive: “[T]hey are winning with the Outlet and promotional strategy in the US. It’s not just brand heat!” Idol wrote. 

If Coach-owner Tapestry is the hero, that makes Capri either the underdog or the damsel in distress, said Siegel. “The company needs to reinspire morale, reinspire creativity, reintroduce compelling products and then reconvince the customer to pay for it,” he said. “With any brand rooted in product and storytelling, this is much easier said than done.”

The Capri spiral followed an unraveling of a tie-up between the two fashion holding companies. In August 2023 Capri agreed to be acquired by Tapestry. The deal would have seen Tapestry paying $57 a share for an enterprise value of $8.5 billion. Executives hoped the combination would forge a six-brand luxury conglomerate with global annual sales in excess of $12 billion, plus a retail presence in more than 75 countries and $2 billion in profit, according to the merger announcement. But the Federal Trade Commission sued to block the acquisition, claiming it would lead to less competition for accessible luxury purses and accessories. By November 2024, the engagement to be married was officially dead.

Since then, Capri has struggled. A Bain and Altagamma outlook report published in November reported that the luxury market was experiencing the first market contraction in 15 years of 2%, barring Covid. Globally, consumers have turned to “experiential indulgence” over “conspicuous consumption” as the new status symbols of wealth and wellness. The years ahead will see luxe resort travel, elite sporting events, and fine dining prioritized over high-priced bougie bags, shoes, and glam, the report states. Spending in China is expected to shrink between 3% and 5% as consumers switch to local and more accessible brands, while North and South America are expected to hold steady with growth between 0% and 2%—a small bright spot in the report. Overall, the number of luxury customers dropped from 400 million in 2022 to about 340 million in 2025.   

These trends align with the struggles Capri has faced and a transformation plan that already failed to gain traction. By brand revenue, Versace fell from $1.1 billion in fiscal 2023 to $821 million in fiscal 2025; Jimmy Choo dropped from $633 million to $605 million; and crown jewel Michael Kors fell from $3.9 billion to $3 billion. Goodwill impairment was a major driver of the $1 billion loss in fiscal 2025, driven in part by $430 million in impairment charges related to Versace and Jimmy Choo—meaning those acquired businesses are now worth less than previously expected. Total impairment across all three brand assets was $797 million. 

Of the Versace-to-Prada sale, Idol said the company was on track to stabilizing its business in fiscal 2027, and planned to reinstate stock buybacks. “With the successful completion of the sale of Versace, we plan to use the proceeds to repay the majority of our debt, which will substantially strengthen our balance sheet,” Idol told investors.

Siegel said it’s fair to say at this point that when Tapestry was looking for a deal, “the business somewhat stopped.”

“I think as soon as that announcement hit, people walked out of the building, shut off the lights, and assumed they would be subsumed by Tapestry and thought they would be let go or retire,” said Siegel. “People were effectively either put on pause or self opted in to a pause.”

In contrast, Tapestry-owned Coach took off like a rocket, while Capri essentially realized it “needed to go back in the building and turn on the lights,” said Siegel. 

Just months after the deal with Tapestry fell through, Idol admitted to investors during the third and fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls that the company had made multiple “missteps” in trying to reposition the Michael Kors and Versace brands that negatively impacted results. Some of them, he said, “were self-inflicted.” 

Idol blamed a “comprehensive transformation plan” of the brand that had started back in the fall of 2023 under his leadership that went awry. The transformation was intended to be “quite radical,” said Idol during a February investor day presentation, and shifted who the brand targeted as consumers. 

“As part of this plan, we aimed to appeal to a younger audience, attempted to elevate price points too quickly, and significantly reduced our signature product offering while injecting too much fashion for our core consumer,” said Idol. That transformation backfired spectacularly. The plan not only didn’t work it alienated core consumers, Idol told analysts. 

“That was a mistake,” Idol told the audience at a consumer and retail conference in December hosted by Morgan Stanley

After Capri announced the deal to offload Versace to Prada, Idol told investors in an earnings call that Capri raised prices on Michael Kors’ ready-to-wear business by 20% to 40%. Idol later said that the company had since decreased prices by the same amount. The higher pricing strategy worked for a while, said Idol, but customers ultimately didn’t take to it. The CEO told analysts during an investor day event last year that the company didn’t rework its strategy right away because “there was a… a group who decided we needed to stay with this, and give it a chance and not just pivot after six months.” Idol said he later decided to pivot.

“The customer came back and said, ‘that’s not exactly what we expect from Michael Kors,’” Idol said during the fourth quarter earnings call. “There is a window of pricing that we enjoy consuming your products in, and we’d really like you to stay there.” 

But undoing damage is tricky. Discounting prices to that extent had a negative effect on the brand image and on the way customers and potential customers perceived the Kors brand, Idol told analysts. The company’s average unit retail prices (AURs), which indicate the average price customers pay for products as opposed to the ticket price, dropped by “high single digits” for the Michael Kors brand, said Idol. The widening gap between the raised ticket price and the actual selling price can do a number on profit margins, and it alters brand perception. 

Rick Patel, managing director of equity research at Raymond James, compared Tapestry’s Coach brand to Capri. Tapestry elevated its perception in the market as being a premier luxury brand, while Michael Kors became known as a heavily discounted brand. 

“Right now, part of improving consumer perception means pulling back on promotions, having compelling newness, and supporting it with strong storytelling,” Patel said. Michael Kors customers “became accustomed to waiting for sales before transacting, which is the opposite of what you want to see for a premier brand.”

Now, Idol said the company has refocused on Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo and they’re going back to basics. In May, Idol pointed to some early signs of potential progress driven by new purse collections, the Leila, Dakota, and Bryant, priced at what has been a historical sweet spot for Kors, which is $200 to $400. 

Capri is also planning a major store revamp, renovating 50% of its retail spaces over the next three years. There’s also a new marketing campaign, Hotel Stories, that focuses on “the joy of traveling the world in style.” The first chapter featured the glittering Ibiza landscape and English model and actress Suki Waterhouse. During the call with analysts, Idol leaned in heavily on the celebrity tethers to the Kors brand. Idol noted that the Fall-Winter 2025 runway show included attendees Waterhouse and actresses Uma Thurman, Kerry Washington, and Lea Michelle. 

Idol also promised a “renewed focus” on Jimmy Choo, with marketing focused on “an empowered sense of glamour” and growing the brand’s accessories and casual footwear offerings. 

Idol has said these initiatives could help Capri return to growth in fiscal 2027 and beyond. The plan, as it stands, is to target $4 billion in revenue from Kors and $800 million from Jimmy Choo. Whether Capri can execute the playbook successfully is an open question and the company is asking consumers to give a second chance to a brand they learned to wait for discounts to buy all in a luxury market that was smaller than it was two years ago. 

Siegel noted that retail is “rife” with turnarounds. Many companies that were once high flyers find themselves on the outs. “That’s what makes it fashion,” Siegel said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

As billionaires debate California’s wealth tax, a tech investor suggests other ways to raise revenue

Published

on



One of the hottest topics in the tech sector is a proposed wealth tax in California aimed at billionaires, and the debate is yielding some insights into how they live.

While Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said he’s “perfectly fine” with it, many others aren’t, including LinkedIn cofounder and major Democratic donor Reid Hoffman, who called it “horrendous” for innovation. Meanwhile venture capitalist Peter Thiel as well as Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have already taken steps to sever ties with the Golden State just in case it qualifies for the November ballot and passes.

The proposal calls for California residents worth more than $1 billion to pay a one-time tax equivalent to 5% of their assets. The payment can be made over five years. The union pushing the measure, the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, has estimated the wealth tax could raise $100 billion in revenue and help offset federal cuts to health spending.

But one tech investor offered alternatives while acknowledging a massive loophole that the rich use to get around paying income taxes.

During a recent episode of the All-In podcast, cohost David Friedberg characterized the potential ballot initiative as more of an asset seizure—one that could be renewed beyond a year and set a precedent for similar ones elsewhere.

“It’s totally reasonable to say that billionaires aren’t paying their fair share of taxes, and it’s totally reasonable to say that ultra-high net worth people aren’t paying their fair share of taxes,” he said. “They pay an income tax. But the truth is a lot of ultra wealthy people borrow money against their assets and live off of that borrowed money. So they never have to pay taxes by selling the stuff that they own.”

Friedberg described the “buy, borrow, die” strategy of avoiding income taxes by living on debt that doesn’t get paid off until after the borrower dies. Then the heirs settle any outstanding loans by selling the deceased’s assets, and the gains that piled up during their lifetime aren’t subject to taxation.

In Friedberg’s view, it’s this practice that the proposed wealth tax for California is really trying to tackle.

“There’s a simple way to address it, which is to charge them a capital gains tax if they borrow against their assets that they haven’t paid capital gains tax on,” he added. “Very simple. That can resolve this.”

Another way to approach the issue would be to raise the capital gains tax, Friedberg said, though he doesn’t personally support doing that.

Those levies apply when assets like real estate or stocks are sold, but he explained that hiking them instead of relying on a wealth tax would make it function more like an income tax.

A group of California billionaires are also arguing about the wealth tax on a Signal chat, according to the Wall Street Journal. In that running back-and-forth, other alternatives that have come up include giving the government illiquid stock as a zero- or low-interest loan for a certain number of years and taxing stock that’s already public.

Opponents of the tax have warned about the impact it could have on economic growth and startups, while supporters point to the AI boom and say California’s ultra-rich would still be among the world’s wealthiest, sources told the Journal.

The tax has also split California’s Democratic lawmakers. Gov. Gavin Newsom is against it, while U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna is for it. But even the congressman has conceded the language needs some work and doesn’t want illiquid stakes or voting shares to be taxed.

Newsom told The New York Times on Tuesday that he was relentlessly working behind the scenes against the proposal, and he would continue to oppose it, even if it reached the November ballot.

Palmer Luckey, cofounder of defense tech startup Anduril, has said the tax would force founders to sell big pieces of their companies if privately held shares, which are commonly used as compensation in startups that aren’t yet profitable, grow in value.

Meanwhile, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan recently warned that a provision in the ballot measure would value voting shares as equivalent to ownership stakes, putting holders on the hook for a much higher tax bill.

“This means if a founder holds shares representing only 3% of economic interest but 30% of voting control (through Class B supervoting shares), the tax would presume their ownership stake is at least 30% for valuation purposes, not 3%,” he said in a post on X on Friday. “The wealth tax is poorly defined and designed to drive tech innovation out of California.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Down Arrow Button Icon

Published

on


President Trump announced yesterday he would impose a new tariff of 25% on any country trading with Iran. He also predicted disaster if the U.S. Supreme Court were to rule his tariff orders are illegal. The president estimated that “many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars” or even “Trillions” were at stake if the government was forced to refund anyone who paid them.

“It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay,” he said on Truth Social. “If the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!”

The court could issue a ruling as soon as Wednesday. It had been expected to rule last week. It is not clear why the court is delaying.

But Wall Street analysts are increasingly sanguine about the ruling. As time goes by, many say, the tariff issue becomes less and less dramatic. And in the bigger macro picture, they’re less significant than predicted.

The longer the delay in the ruling the more likely it is because the court is leaning toward Trump, according to JPMorgan.

“Legal experts continue to expect the Supreme Court to rule against the use of emergency powers [under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act] to authorize tariffs, but note that each week the Supreme Court delays its decision increases the likelihood of the Trump administration prevailing,” JPMorgan analysts Amy Ho and Joyce Chang told their clients. “Historically, SCOTUS reserves its most impactful decisions for the end of its term in June, which allows for extended deliberation.” Both Supreme Court cases on the Affordable Care Act were pushed to June, they wrote.

The pair also note that in the underlying case, only $135 billion in potential tariff refunds are at stake. 

Although Trump has touted the tariffs as a method of paying off the $38 trillion national debt, the reality is that collections so far have been too small to have much of an affect, according to James Knightley, ING’s chief international economist in the U.S. “Since April, tariff revenues are up $206 billion in those eight months relative to [fiscal] 2024, but not all are the IEEPA tariffs—they are estimated to perhaps be $130 billion. Sounds a lot, but the US is a $30 trillion-plus economy,” he told Fortune in an email.

“Many companies will be wary of drawing the ire of the president by claiming a refund and the hoops to jump through to reclaim through the courts could be quite onerous and deter others. Hence the actual amount that is reclaimed may be quite a lot less than $130 billion.”

Besides, he said, even if Trump loses the Supreme Court case he will likely reimpose the tariffs via some other regulation. “Given tariffs are a signature policy and the Republican polling isn’t looking very strong right now ahead of the midterms, the Administration will move swiftly to reinstate tariffs through other legally recognized routes. The promise of a $2,000 tariff dividend needs to be paid for somehow. This is merely shuffling money around seeing as Americans paid the tariffs in the first place only to get money returned, so it is difficult to argue this will be a major stimulus for the economy,” he said.

Tariff revenue is being generated at a current rate of $30.4 billion per month, for an annualized rate of $364.5 billion, according to data from Bloomberg provided to Fortune via Pantheon Macroeconomics. However, those revenues are already in decline as companies find workarounds and as Trump himself cuts deals, compromises, or delays the imposition of harsher measures. 

Convera analyst Antonio Ruggiero is also unruffled by the upcoming ruling. If the tariffs are ruled illegal, “we expect the immediate [foreign currency exchange] reaction to be limited, as the broader consensus is that alternative mechanisms will be found to keep tariff revenues intact.”

“That said, in the medium term, we cannot exclude the possibility of mild bearish pressure on the dollar tied to expectations of further uncertainty and erratic trade manoeuvres should the administration be forced to remove such tariffs, particularly at a time when USD sentiment is increasingly fragile amid concerns over Federal Reserve independence,” he advised clients in an email seen by Fortune.

Here’s a snapshot of the markets ahead of the opening bell in New York this morning:

  • S&P 500 futures were down 0.15% this morning. The last session closed up 0.16%. 
  • STOXX Europe 600 was flat in early trading.
  • The U.K.’s FTSE 100 was up o.o5% in early trading. 
  • Japan’s Nikkei 225 was up 3.1%.
  • China’s CSI 300 was down o.6%. 
  • The South Korea KOSPI was up 1.47%. 
  • India’s NIFTY 50 was down 0.25%. 
  • Bitcoin was at $92K.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Two Southeast Asia 500 companies may merge—forming Malaysia’s largest construction conglomerate

Published

on



Malaysian construction giant Sunway has announced a $2.7 billion share-and-cash takeover of competitor IJM Corporation, which would bring together two of Malaysia’s largest property developers. 

The proposed merger, announced on Jan. 12 by Sunway president Anuar Taib, will form an entity with a combined market capitalization of $11.7 billion, surpassing current leader Gamuda Berhad, valued at $7.2 billion. 

If the merger goes through, it will create one of Malaysia’s largest property developers as the Southeast Asian country’s construction market heats up amid a data center and infrastructure boom. 

Both Sunway and IJM are on Fortune’s Southeast Asia 500 ranking, which lists the region’s largest companies by revenue. Sunway, at No. 190, generated $1.7 billion in revenue in 2024; IJM, at No. 228, generated $1.3 billion. A merged Sunway-IJM would have 2024 revenue totaling $3 billion, lifting it to No. 120—overtaking Gamuda. 

In a stock filing in Bursa Malaysia, the country’s stock exchange, Sunway said the merger would “position the enlarged Sunway Group to pursue mega projects such as development of large-scale data centers, industrial facilities and public infrastructure projects.”

Malaysia is currently undergoing a boom in data center construction, as regional demand for AI and cloud computing services surge. In 2024, industry consultant DC Byte found that the country was Asia-Pacific’s fastest growing market for data centers.

Under the conditional takeover bid, Sunway is proposing to acquire IJM at $0.78 a share—15% higher than its 2025 closing price of $0.68 a share. Shareholders of IJM are being offered 10% in cash and 90% in newly-issued Sunway shares.

IJM shares rose 2.9% on Tuesday; Sunway shares are up just 0.2%. Trading in both companies’ shares were suspended on Monday pending the merger announcement. Sunway’s shares are up almost 25% over the past 12 months, ahead of Malaysia’s benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI index.

Fortune has reached out to Sunway for further comment.

A history of developments

Sunway is a family-run conglomerate founded in 1974 by Malaysian tycoon Jeffrey Cheah, who is still its key shareholder. The firm is famous for its “build-own-operate” business model and slew of diverse properties including the Sunway Lagoon theme park, Sunway Medical Center, and two educational institutions, Sunway College and Sunway University.

IJM was established in 1983, via the merger of three Malaysian construction firms: IGB Construction, Jurutama, and Mudajaya. The firm’s assortment of businesses span construction, property and infrastructure. It built major roads and bridges in Malaysia, including the West Coast Expressway, an interstate highway running along the west coast of the country.

In a stock filing, Sunway’s Taib said the deal would create “synergistic value”, allowing both firms to improve margins through economies of scale and access a broader pool of talent and technical expertise. The enlarged Sunway Group will also have an expanded landbank of 2,300 hectares, according to the filing. 

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.