Connect with us

Politics

Donald Trump administration says it will pay immigrants in the U.S. illegally $1K to leave

Published

on


Pushing forward with its mass deportation agenda, President Donald Trump’s administration said Monday that it would pay $1,000 to immigrants who are in the United States illegally and return to their home country voluntarily.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said in a news release that it would also pay for travel assistance — and that people who use an app called CBP Home to tell the government they plan to return home will be “deprioritized” for detention and removal by immigration enforcement.

“If you are here illegally, self-deportation is the best, safest and most cost-effective way to leave the United States to avoid arrest,” Secretary Kristi Noem said. “DHS is now offering illegal aliens financial travel assistance and a stipend to return to their home country through the CBP Home App.”

The department said it had already paid for a plane ticket for one migrant to return home to Honduras from Chicago and said more tickets have been booked for this week and next.

It’s a major part of Trump’s administration

Trump made immigration enforcement and the mass deportation of immigrants in the United States illegally a centerpiece of his campaign, and he is following through during the first months of his administration. But it is a costly, resource-intensive endeavor.

While the Republican administration is asking Congress for a massive increase in resources for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement department responsible for removing people from the country, it’s also pushing people in the country illegally to “self-deport.”

It has coupled this self-deportation push with television ads threatening action against people in the U.S. illegally and social media images showing immigration enforcement arrests and migrants being sent to a prison in El Salvador.

The Trump administration has often portrayed self-deportation as a way for migrants to preserve their ability to return to the U.S. someday.

But Aaron Reichlen-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, which advocates for immigrants, said there’s a lot for migrants to be cautious about in the latest offer from Homeland Security.

He said it’s often worse for people to leave the country and not fight their case in immigration court, especially if they’re already in removal proceedings. He said if migrants are in removal proceedings and don’t show up in court they can automatically get a deportation order and leaving the country usually counts as abandoning many applications for relief including asylum applications.

It can be an intricate process

And Homeland Security is not indicating that it is closely coordinating with the immigration courts so that there are no repercussions for people in immigration court if they leave, he said.

“People’s immigration status is not as simple as this makes it out to be,” Reichlen-Melnick said.

He questioned where Homeland Security would get the money and the authorization to make the payments — and he suggested they are necessary because the administration can’t arrest and remove as many people as it has promised so it has to encourage people to do it on their own.

“They’re not getting their numbers,” he said.

As part of its self-deportation effort, the Trump administration has transformed an app that had been used by Joe Biden’s administration to allow nearly 1 million migrants to schedule appointments to enter the country into a tool to help migrants return home. Under the Biden administration, it was called CBP One; now it’s dubbed CBP Home.

Homeland Security said “thousands” of migrants have used the app to self-deport.

But Mark Krikorian, who heads the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for less immigration, said he doesn’t see the offer of paying people to go home as an admission that something in the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement agenda isn’t working.

Considering the millions of people who are in the country illegally, he said, it’s impossible to deport all of them so the administration has to combine its own enforcement efforts with encouraging people to go home voluntarily.

Krikorian said he supports the idea of paying migrants to leave although he questioned how it would work in reality.

“How do you make sure that they’ve actually gone home? Do you make them sign an agreement where they agree not to challenge their removal if they were to come back?” he questioned. “The execution matters, but the concept is sound.”

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida Supreme Court suspends Gary Farmer from Broward bench amid misconduct inquiry

Published

on


Judge Gary Farmer won’t be hearing cases as his own gets underway.

The Florida Supreme Court has suspended Farmer — without pay — as he faces judicial misconduct charges stemming from a series of documented actions and remarks he made from the Broward Circuit bench.

The high court approved the recommendation of the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission’s (JQC) Investigative Panel and formally suspended Farmer, pending resolution of disciplinary proceedings.

The effective date is May 19.

The court instructed the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit’s Court Administrator to submit the necessary paperwork for processing the suspension. It also urged the JQC to expedite the remaining proceedings “in a manner consistent with the Commission’s rules and the procedural rights of the respondent.”

The suspension marks the latest in a series of events that unfolded over the past year involving Farmer, a Democrat and former Senate Democratic Leader, and his atypical approach to presiding over judicial proceedings.

The JQC launched an inquiry into Farmer’s conduct in late 2024 following a series of complaints that resulted in his reassignment from the Broward Circuit’s criminal division to its civil court. That investigation culminated in formal charges that he had engaged in inappropriate behavior and made lewd comments while presiding over cases.

The panel concluded that Farmer was “unfit to serve” due to behavior that included repeatedly making inappropriate and sexual comments from the bench and engaging in other conduct that diminished public confidence in the judiciary.

Among the incidents cited were remarks directed at attorneys and courtroom observers that the JQC described as “discriminatory, offensive, sexually charged, and demeaning.”

That included references to ejaculate, suggesting a defendant would impregnate his defense lawyer, reciting homoerotic quotes from an “In Living Color” sketch and several instances where the JQC said he unduly exceeded his judicial role.

Farmer, who was elected to the bench in 2022, has pushed back against the allegations. In a legal filing last week, he requested a trial over the matter and asked to remain on the bench during the proceedings. His legal team maintained that the charges are exaggerated and his comments were mischaracterized or taken out of context.

The Supreme Court opted instead for immediate suspension.

Farmer’s background in Florida politics and law has made this case particularly high-profile. As a legislator, he served as Senate Democratic Leader and was known for his sharp rhetoric and partisan clashes. His transition to the judiciary was viewed as a significant career pivot, but one now marred by controversy.

Should the JQC’s full panel recommend removal and the Florida Supreme Court concurs, Farmer could be permanently barred from serving as a Judge in the state.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Padmini Soni sees AI unlocking humanity’s potential, and it’s keeping her up at night

Published

on


Artificial intelligence is already changing how society operates in ways most people don’t immediately see. That’s why Rezonance AI founder Padmini Soni says it’s mandatory that ethics drive responsible AI growth.

“AI is no longer a buzzword,” she said. “From our lives, our work, the way we interact with people, everything has changed with AI.”

In a speech to Florida TaxWatch, she said that includes policy guardrails. Speaking to a watchdog policy group, she said AI will provide tremendous policy tools, but that there should also be considerations as governments consider regulatory frameworks.

“Look at the AI policy and strategy, establish the ‘why,’ ‘where’ and ‘how’ of AI adoption,” she said. “Then build the mindset and the muscle for leading an AI project. And finally, design items that are scalable, ethical and effective.”

Soni said she became passionate about AI after her father suffered a fall, and she found ChatGPT a valuable tool in managing her busy schedule as she became a caretaker.

“That’s when something shifted inside me, when I started seeing some little responses,” she said. “And that’s when I started thinking about ChatGPT or AI being more than just a productivity or an automation tool.”

But not everyone realizes how AI has already started to change their lives.

“You have more power at your fingertips than ever before,” she said. But, paraphrasing a famous Spiderman moral, she said great power comes with great responsibility.

Soni said Florida TaxWatch and others in The Process can use AI for direct benefits. She helped California develop a chatbot to inform the public about the Secure and Secure Innovation Frontier bill, using AI to educate about AI regulation. But the technology can also be used to find government efficiency or to run comparisons of bills and policy proposals.

All of that, though, needs to come with restrictions and an awareness that technology needs to be directed to assist humanity and not harm it.

“What keeps me up is having this mass innovation without guardrails,” she said.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Electronic sensors could detect the next condo collapse. But will Florida building codes require them?

Published

on


Could modern technology predict or prevent the next major structural collapse in Florida?

A case study presented by RADISE International founder Kumar Allady showed attendees of Florida TaxWatch’s Spring meeting how sensors embedded in concrete could detect and track corrosion of cement.

“Sensor technology and the Internet of Things is revolutionizing concrete structures,” he said.

Ahead of the presentation, Florida TaxWatch Vice President of Research Bob Nave reminded attendees of several recent disasters that drew national attention.

The most notable was the collapse of Champlain Towers South in Surfside in 2021, which killed 98 people. But smaller disasters like the Florida International University pedestrian bridge collapse in 2018 also claimed five lives.

Florida TaxWatch in April released an independent study on how the use of microelectronic sensors to continuously monitor structures could alert engineers and public officials immediately to potential hazards with structures.

“This technology acts more like a streaming movie as opposed to one-time or periodic on-site inspections,” the report reads. “This technology can save many millions of dollars in inspection costs and protect many lives, as well as save billions of dollars worth of public infrastructure and property.”

Allady spoke on the topic, and along the way showed how the technology is being used already with several bridge projects in the state of Florida. That includes a massive road project connecting Interstate 395, State Road 386 and Interstate 95 in Miami-Dade County.

But for the most part, most $20,000 cars brought to the market today have more electronic sensors than $1 million towers being constructed.

Allady stressed that condominium associations and developers likely won’t embrace the technology on their own.

“The decision has to come at the policy level, because you’ve got to implement some of these things,” he told Florida Politics. “A lot of the condominium side, we had some of the instrumentation, they don’t want to see the data. They don’t want litigation, part of a legality point of view, and will not listen. The contractors or the engineers or the owners, some people are progressive and they want to see the data, but some people don’t.”

He said sensors can be installed in existing or new construction. The process will be different in either situation. But sensors will glean the most data if they can be installed as part of building foundations.

“Every structure that we are building presently, we are losing an opportunity,” he said.

The Legislature did enact new regulations after the Surfside collapse, but revisited the law this year amid outcry on costs. Allady, though, said policymakers could put in sensor requirements at a measured pace.

“As a starting point you want to do with size threshold buildings, or the high-rise buildings about three stories or four stories,” he said. “Then they can go from there.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.