Connect with us

Politics

Could the Science Center be Ken Welch’s undoing?

Published

on


Ken Welch just got lawyered.

St. Petersburg City Council member Lisset Hanewicz on Thursday — after the Council voted unanimously to support the Science Center project and identify land for a future water storage facility — offered a master class in the type of governance possible when you do your due diligence and have a handy background as a prosecutor.

Without ever mentioning his name — and even with one of his most trusted administrators taking the fall — Hanewicz eviscerated Welch over his administration’s handling of the St. Pete Science Center plan, which includes the city selling land to a third party that has plans to revitalize the education facility for mostly public use.

A price — $1.6 million — had even already been agreed upon.

So what happened?

That’s the line of questioning Hanewicz explored after a presentation updating the City Council on the Science Center issue, one showing that the facility, and the land it sits on, is needed not as a reimagined Science Center, but as future water storage.

Hanewicz — and as it turned out later in the meeting, the entire Council — wasn’t having it.

A group of concerned citizens, The St. Petersburg Group, submitted an unsolicited proposal to purchase the Science Center property in 2023. The $1.6 million price tag was agreed upon by both parties after two separate appraisals.

Welch changed course after a feasibility study showed the Science Center property as the city’s best option for future water storage. The city had claimed that the study was needed to assure debt holders that selling the property wasn’t essential to its utility services.

But that wasn’t true. Only a one-page document was needed, prompting Hanewicz to question whether the administration can be trusted. She said the one-page document would have signaled a sale was on the horizon. The feasibility study, she argued, was the opposite.

“This is to basically have documentation to say, ‘guess what, we’re not going to get rid of a property,’” she said, insinuating the feasibility study was ordered as cover to cancel the sale.

There are a lot of bad looks for the Mayor stemming from this one issue.

For starters, getting called out like that in a public meeting — in a tone anyone could recognize as an admonishment — sends a message to St. Pete residents that City Hall is suffering through at least some dysfunction between its executive and legislative branches.

Beyond that, it raises the question as to whether Welch’s hesitance to sell the Science Center property stems from sour grapes. Former St. Pete City Council member Robert Blackmon championed the project during his short tenure, and it was a priority when he ran for Mayor in 2021 against, you guessed it, Welch.

Finally, his response is a major red flag. It’s passive aggressive and dismissive.

“I appreciate City Council’s comments and input regarding the Science Center development and the consultant’s report on enhancing our Water and Wastewater infrastructure,” Welch said in a prepared statement.

Let’s unpack that before getting to the next part. We’re off to a good start, praising the City Council for its input. But then he references the report “enhancing our water and wastewater infrastructure.” This seems, on its surface, to be wise language. After last year’s back-to-back storms and the widespread flooding and impacts to water infrastructure the storms caused, shoring up water resources is a top issue.

But for anyone who knows political strategy, the posturing has already begun. He’s laying the foundation for saying, “nope, not going to listen to the City Council, because water is more important.”

Then, the statement really goes off the rails.

“Council’s rationale for moving forward on the Science Center agreement as a higher priority than maximizing our water/wastewater system capacity per the consultant’s recommendations is clear. I will give these items full consideration as we evaluate capacity, operational and cost impacts of the available alternatives.”

Welch gets points for saying he will consider alternatives — that’s kind of what the City Council asked him to do Thursday. But the details are troubling, ignoring what the City Council ACTUALLY said.

The eight members who all voted to encourage Welch to move forward with plans to sell the Science Center AND identify a future location for water storage never said they believed the Science Center revitalization was a “higher priority” than water infrastructure. In fact, they acknowledged the importance of such forward-thinking planning.

What Welch’s statement ignores, and what some Council members were quick to point out — most directly by Brandi Gabbard — is that there are currently no plans or funding for a water storage project. It’s conceptual.

And more broadly, his tone further highlights what political watchers locally have been saying for months, if not years — that Welch’s arrogance often gets in the way of progress.

I hope I am wrong, but his statement seems to imply the administration has no intention at this time to reverse course on the Science Center, and it does so with a level of bravado that can sometimes backfire.

As someone who is facing re-election next year with approval ratings that are only slightly above water, Welch may want to rethink his strategy here.

The Science Center has already attracted $10 million in public and private donations, with millions more pledged. And some of Welch’s own allies have been responsible for bringing home the bacon — most notably, Sen. Darryl Rouson, who was peeved Thursday night with the city’s stance.

A wrong move on this issue could be a cudgel for any would-be challenger.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Shared services agreement falls flat with Broward voters

Published

on


If something isn’t broken, don’t fix it — especially not behind closed doors.

That’s the message coming through in a new poll by The Tyson Group gauging public sentiment on a proposed shared services agreement between the North and South Broward Hospital districts.

The survey asked likely Broward County voters whether they approve or disapprove of the health care services currently available in the county. Nearly two-thirds (65%) say they approve, including 30% who strongly approve. Just 22% say they disapprove of Broward’s health services.

When asked whether the North and South Broward Hospital Districts should be allowed to change how they operate “without triggering the legal requirements, transparency, or voter approval normally required for a full merger,” nearly three-quarters of respondents (73%) said no, including 62% who said “definitely no.”  Only 16% say the Districts should be allowed.

The polling comes after Sarasota Republican Sen. Joe Gruters and Dania Beach Republican Rep. Hillary Cassel filed bills that would authorize two or more special hospital districts to jointly form, participate in, or control a wide range of collaborative health care ventures — including public or private, for-profit or nonprofit entities — anywhere within their combined boundaries.

Notably, the legislation would explicitly give the Districts and their partners immunity from state action, allowing them to collaborate regardless of anticompetitive effects or potential conflicts with state or federal antitrust laws.

When similar bills were filed last Session, critics warned that it amounted to a backdoor merger that would bypass public scrutiny, regulatory review and possibly a countywide referendum otherwise required under state law. Memorial Healthcare System employees, physicians and community advocates raised alarms about transparency, governance and the potential shifting of financial burdens from North Broward’s struggling Broward Health system onto South Broward taxpayers.

“Once voters understood that the shared services agreement would go into effect without public review or voter approval, it was impossible to generate support. Each message we tested reinforced the negative perception that the shared services agreement was a shady deal designed to circumvent quality control,” the polling memo reads.

Messaging tests in the survey included transparency, lack of a taxpayer vote, financial mismanagement, and consolidation of power — on each front, more than 60% of those polled express concern while no more than 10% are unbothered.

By the end of the poll, just 21% said they supported a shared services agreement, with 63% in opposition, including 47% who say they “strongly oppose” the deal.

The survey was conducted Dec. 8-10. The sample includes 500 likely voters in Broward County and carries a margin of error of 4.38 percentage points.

___

Jesse Scheckner of Florida Politics contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Matt McCullough joins race to replace Matt Carlucci on Jacksonville City Council

Published

on


A third candidate has joined the race in Jacksonville City Council at-large Group 4 to replace term-limited Matt Carlucci.

“After thoughtful discussions and with the support of my family, I am excited to officially announce my candidacy,” Matt McCullough said in a statement announcing his bid.

McCullough, a former Navy pilot who flew during the global war on terror in Operations Iraqi Freedom, Enduring Freedom and Active Endeavor, and has received two Air Medals, Navy Commendation Medals, a Meritorious Service Medal, and recognition as both Combat Aircrew of the Year and Pilot of the Year.

He currently is North Florida’s Navy Emergency Preparedness Liaison Officer, and believes that his military background is a unique value-add as he enters politics.

“As a veteran, I know what leadership and delivering results looks like. Jacksonville deserves a city government that works to put our residents first, keeps our neighborhoods safe, and invests responsibly in our future,” McCullough said. “I’ve had the honor of wearing our nation’s uniform and lead under pressure. I am ready to bring that leadership to City Hall on day one and continue my service on the Jacksonville City Council.”

Carlucci has yet to endorse in this race between three Republicans, in which a real front-runner has yet to emerge.

April Ethridge, an Army vet with an MBA, has raised just $1,550 after being in the race for the better part of 2025.

Andrew McCann, who made his career in medical services before he “made the pivotal decision to step away from corporate life to focus on his family, personal growth, and the betterment of Jacksonville,” raised and self-funded $13,100 since entering the race at the end of October.

Qualifying runs from noon on Jan. 11, 2027, to noon on Jan. 15, 2027. The First Election is March 9, 2027, while the General Election, which sees the top two finishers square off regardless of party label unless someone gets a majority in March, is May 18.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nicole Gomez Goldmeier, Jackie Arboleda promoted at LSN Partners

Published

on


Two weeks after announcing its first round of 2026 promotions, LSN Partners is following up with a couple more as it continues expanding its local, state and federal practices.

Round 2 includes the elevation of Nicole Gomez Goldmeier to Chief Growth Officer and Jackie Arboleda to Chief Marketing and Community Relations Officer.

Gomez Goldmeier previously held the COO title at LSN Partners. In her new role, she will drive revenue growth and business development for the firm with a focus on strengthening long-standing client relationships, advancing expansion into key markets driven by client demand, and supporting strategic engagement.

She will remain actively involved in the firm’s Republican Governors and Mayors practice, reinforcing LSN’s position as a trusted bipartisan adviser.

“Nicole understands our clients and the public-sector landscape in a way that few people do,” said Alex Heckler, founder and Managing Partner of LSN Partners. “She has played a central role in how we build relationships, identify opportunities, and position the firm for long-term success. This role formalizes the work she has already been leading.”

Arboleda, meanwhile, will oversee the firm’s marketing, communications, brand positioning and community engagement, ensuring that LSN’s messaging, events and external presence reflect the firm’s strategic priorities and client-focused initiatives.

LSN said she will continue serving as a leader within the firm’s health care practice while working directly with clients as a project manager, adding that her dual focus on marketing leadership and project management strengthens the firm’s ability to deliver results to clients across markets nationwide.

“Jackie has helped shape how clients experience and engage with LSN and how the firm is perceived in the market,” Heckler said. “Her understanding of our clients, our culture, and our mission allows her to deliver results at the highest level, whether in our healthcare practice or driving the firm’s communications strategy.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.