Connect with us

Politics

Could the Science Center be Ken Welch’s undoing?

Published

on


Ken Welch just got lawyered.

St. Petersburg City Council member Lisset Hanewicz on Thursday — after the Council voted unanimously to support the Science Center project and identify land for a future water storage facility — offered a master class in the type of governance possible when you do your due diligence and have a handy background as a prosecutor.

Without ever mentioning his name — and even with one of his most trusted administrators taking the fall — Hanewicz eviscerated Welch over his administration’s handling of the St. Pete Science Center plan, which includes the city selling land to a third party that has plans to revitalize the education facility for mostly public use.

A price — $1.6 million — had even already been agreed upon.

So what happened?

That’s the line of questioning Hanewicz explored after a presentation updating the City Council on the Science Center issue, one showing that the facility, and the land it sits on, is needed not as a reimagined Science Center, but as future water storage.

Hanewicz — and as it turned out later in the meeting, the entire Council — wasn’t having it.

A group of concerned citizens, The St. Petersburg Group, submitted an unsolicited proposal to purchase the Science Center property in 2023. The $1.6 million price tag was agreed upon by both parties after two separate appraisals.

Welch changed course after a feasibility study showed the Science Center property as the city’s best option for future water storage. The city had claimed that the study was needed to assure debt holders that selling the property wasn’t essential to its utility services.

But that wasn’t true. Only a one-page document was needed, prompting Hanewicz to question whether the administration can be trusted. She said the one-page document would have signaled a sale was on the horizon. The feasibility study, she argued, was the opposite.

“This is to basically have documentation to say, ‘guess what, we’re not going to get rid of a property,’” she said, insinuating the feasibility study was ordered as cover to cancel the sale.

There are a lot of bad looks for the Mayor stemming from this one issue.

For starters, getting called out like that in a public meeting — in a tone anyone could recognize as an admonishment — sends a message to St. Pete residents that City Hall is suffering through at least some dysfunction between its executive and legislative branches.

Beyond that, it raises the question as to whether Welch’s hesitance to sell the Science Center property stems from sour grapes. Former St. Pete City Council member Robert Blackmon championed the project during his short tenure, and it was a priority when he ran for Mayor in 2021 against, you guessed it, Welch.

Finally, his response is a major red flag. It’s passive aggressive and dismissive.

“I appreciate City Council’s comments and input regarding the Science Center development and the consultant’s report on enhancing our Water and Wastewater infrastructure,” Welch said in a prepared statement.

Let’s unpack that before getting to the next part. We’re off to a good start, praising the City Council for its input. But then he references the report “enhancing our water and wastewater infrastructure.” This seems, on its surface, to be wise language. After last year’s back-to-back storms and the widespread flooding and impacts to water infrastructure the storms caused, shoring up water resources is a top issue.

But for anyone who knows political strategy, the posturing has already begun. He’s laying the foundation for saying, “nope, not going to listen to the City Council, because water is more important.”

Then, the statement really goes off the rails.

“Council’s rationale for moving forward on the Science Center agreement as a higher priority than maximizing our water/wastewater system capacity per the consultant’s recommendations is clear. I will give these items full consideration as we evaluate capacity, operational and cost impacts of the available alternatives.”

Welch gets points for saying he will consider alternatives — that’s kind of what the City Council asked him to do Thursday. But the details are troubling, ignoring what the City Council ACTUALLY said.

The eight members who all voted to encourage Welch to move forward with plans to sell the Science Center AND identify a future location for water storage never said they believed the Science Center revitalization was a “higher priority” than water infrastructure. In fact, they acknowledged the importance of such forward-thinking planning.

What Welch’s statement ignores, and what some Council members were quick to point out — most directly by Brandi Gabbard — is that there are currently no plans or funding for a water storage project. It’s conceptual.

And more broadly, his tone further highlights what political watchers locally have been saying for months, if not years — that Welch’s arrogance often gets in the way of progress.

I hope I am wrong, but his statement seems to imply the administration has no intention at this time to reverse course on the Science Center, and it does so with a level of bravado that can sometimes backfire.

As someone who is facing re-election next year with approval ratings that are only slightly above water, Welch may want to rethink his strategy here.

The Science Center has already attracted $10 million in public and private donations, with millions more pledged. And some of Welch’s own allies have been responsible for bringing home the bacon — most notably, Sen. Darryl Rouson, who was peeved Thursday night with the city’s stance.

A wrong move on this issue could be a cudgel for any would-be challenger.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.