Connect with us

Politics

Could red flag laws be replaced by involuntary commitment?

Published

on


Gov. Ron DeSantis is calling for a “repeal” of “red flag” laws that stop people from buying guns if a court says they’re too dangerous to own them.

The legislation, signed into law during the last year of the Rick Scott administration, was a response to the lack of oversight that facilitated a former student’s mass murder at a Parkland High School in Feb. 2018.

The Governor believes red flag laws are a huge due process violation.”

“If you look at this red flag law that was passed, you can go in, they can go in and say, this person’s a danger, they should have their firearms taken away, which is property in addition to being something connected with the constitutional right. And then the burden shifts where you have to prove to a court that you are not a a menace or a threat. That’s not the way due process works. The burden’s always on the government, yet they’ve shifted the burden for doing that,” DeSantis said this week.

So what would replace red flag laws?

Potentially, “involuntary commitment” would be the move, if DeSantis’ comments as a presidential candidate are meaningful.

In 2023, he said that a murder of 18 people in Lewiston, Maine, likely would have been avoided if the killer had been locked in a mental hospital, but that red flag laws like Florida’s wouldn’t have helped avert the tragedy.

“I mean, I think he obviously was a well-trained individual. There were these flags when he was training, he did go to the hospital. I think the question is why wasn’t he committed? Beyond that, we’ll probably figure out going forward. But clearly this is a guy that’s very dangerous because he’s got the training and then he seems to have had a breakdown,” DeSantis told CNN.

DeSantis added that “an involuntary commitment though would have kept him off the street and I think that would have probably done the trick.” Then he expounded on his problems with red flag laws.

“What red flag is, is people would go in and say you may be a danger so you could have someone lodge a complaint, different states do it differently, oftentimes with not adequate due process,” DeSantis said, though it’s unclear how due process would have played into what would have been a long-term involuntary commitment for the gunman.

Staying with the 2023 interview, he argued America “used to do higher levels of involuntary commitment.”

“The pendulum swung a lot to the other direction. I’m not saying it needs to go all the way back where it was. But I do think that we need to recognize that there are some people whose behavior is a danger to community and danger to society that right now are getting put back on the street and I’d want there to be a mechanism to, to do that. I think realistically, you know, you have to have the resources in place and the facilities in place to do that,” DeSantis said.

The argument for increased involuntary commitment has been workshopped before by DeSantis on the trail, including in August in Iowa.

“If you look at what happens at a police station when people are coming into the criminal justice system, there’s a huge percentage of these people that have mental health issues and it’s not even, like, a big shooting that gets all the headlines, just regular crimes. So many people, we used to have more of an institutional process where people would be institutionalized, who couldn’t function in society,” DeSantis said.

“We deinstitutionalized some 30 or 40 years ago. You know, I’m not sure that that was the right thing to do,” DeSantis added. “I see all these homeless in Los Angeles and San Francisco and some of these other liberal cities, they’re doing drugs or doing all this, but their mental health is ultimately the root of this. It’s behavior, it’s not that there’s not enough jobs or anything like that.”

Former President Ronald Reagan, who DeSantis has cited as a role model, is most responsible for said deinstitutionalization.

Reagan repealed legislation championed by Jimmy Carter that supported mental health institutions. The Mental Health Systems Act authorized grants to public and nonprofit private community mental health centers for operational costs, with an eye toward helping the “chronically mentally ill.” It arose from work during Carter’s single term, via a presidential commission on mental health.

Reagan instead provided block grants to the states at reduced levels, amounting to 75% to 80% of what they would have gotten under the Carter framework.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Air Force intercepts aircraft flying in a restricted zone near Mar-a-Lago

Published

on


There were 2 incidents this weekend when officials had to advise pilots of air space for Donald Trump’s Florida home.

Air Force fighter jets intercepted a civilian aircraft flying in the temporarily restricted airspace near Donald Trump’s Florida home Sunday, bringing the number of violations to more than 20 since the president took office on Jan. 20.

North American Aerospace Defense Command said in a statement that Sunday’s incident, which took place as Trump finished a round of golf at his West Palm Beach golf course, saw F-16s deploy flares to get the attention of the civilian pilot. Jets also conducted an intercept on Saturday morning shortly after Trump arrived at the course from his private Mar-a-Lago club and residence.

The airspace intrusions in the heavily congested south Florida airspace have prompted fighter jet intercepts but did not alter Trump’s schedule or impact his security, officials said. NORAD says the flares may have been visible from the ground but that they burn out quickly and don’t pose danger.

Federal officials maintain a permanent flight restriction over Trump’s club that expands to a radius of 30 nautical miles when the president is in residence.

Violations, and intercepts, are relatively routine, but NORAD is raising alarm over the frequency of the intrusions since Trump’s inauguration, saying it has responded to more than 20 incidents and blames civilian pilots for not following regulations requiring them to check for airspace restrictions before taking off.

“Adherence to TFR procedures is essential to ensure flight safety, national security, and the security of the President,” Gen. Gregory Guillot, the commander of NORAD and US Northern Command said in a statement. “The procedures are not optional, and the excessive number of recent TFR violations indicates many civil aviators are not reading Notice to Airmen, or NOTAMS, before each flight as required by the FAA, and has resulted in multiple responses by NORAD fighter aircraft to guide offending aircraft out of the TFR.”

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The Players PGA tourney gears up for competition this week and sizeable charitable donations

Published

on


The Players PGA golf tournament being held this week has now contributed to more than $120M in nonprofit contributions.

Arguably the highest profile golf tournament in Florida in recent memory gets underway this week and there’s going to be a lot more than golf pros competing for a purse of $25 million. While competition among the golfers will be intense, the bounty of charitable donations will be sizeable.

The Players Championship at Sawgrass has quite a setting ahead of it for the tournament at The Players Stadium Course this week as one of the most compelling story lines is rising PGA super star Scottie Scheffler will be aiming for a “three-peat” of winning the tournament in Ponte Vedra Beach. No player has ever won The Players tournament three years in a row since it was founded in 1974.

While the competition will heat up until the final round of competition March 16, the contributions to the community will be flowing from organizers of The Players. It’s often been debated whether The Players should officially become the fifth major golf tournament on the PGA Tour, but there’s no debating the huge charitable contributions generated from the event.

Since its founding 51 years ago, The Players Championship has contributed $120 million in donations to Northeast Florida nonprofit organizations.

“It’s a big number, and sometimes hard to fully grasp, but it’s one that’s changing lives,” a news release from The Players said.

This year, The Players organizers have dedicated each day of the tournament to represent a charity that the tournament will prioritize for contributions. Tuesday, when the official tournament gets underway, The Players will single out the Five Star Veterans Center for focus.

Wednesday will shift attention to the Jacksonville Humane Society while Thursday shines the spotlight on the First Tee nonprofit organization dedicated to developing  youth leadership in communities.

Friday guides contributions toward the Wounded Warrior Project while Saturday raises awareness for the Community Hospice Foundation.

The curtain falls on The Players on March 16 and final rounds on that Sunday which will see the tournament highlighting efforts to help with donations to the Malivai Washington Youth Foundation. That nonprofit assists in youth academic and athletic development.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Facing competition from Big Tech, states dangle incentives and loosen laws to attract power plants

Published

on


Facing projections of spiking energy demand, U.S. states are pressing for ways to build new power plants faster as policymakers increasingly worry about protecting their residents and economies from rising electric bills, power outages and other consequences of falling behind Big Tech in a race for electricity.

Some states are dangling financial incentives. Others are undoing decades of regulatory structures in what they frame as a race to serve the basic needs of residents, avoid a catastrophe and keep their economies on track in a fast-electrifying society.

“I don’t think we’ve seen anything quite like this,” said Todd Snitchler, president and CEO of the Electric Power Supply Association, which represents independent power plant owners.

The spike in demand for electricity is being driven, in large part, by the artificial intelligence race as tech companies are snapping up real estate and seeking power to feed their energy-hungry data centers. Federal incentives to rebuild the manufacturing sector also are helping drive demand.

In some cases, Big Tech is arranging its own power projects.

But energy companies also are searching for ways to capitalize on opportunities afforded by the first big increase in electricity consumption in a couple of decades, and that is pitting state political leaders against each other for the new jobs and investment that come with new power plants.

Moves by states come as a fossil fuel – friendly President Donald Trump and Republican-controlled Congress take power in Washington, D.C., slashing regulations around oil and gas, boosting drilling opportunities and encouraging the construction of pipelines and refineries that can export liquefied natural gas.

States are seeking action, with the National Governors Association asking Congress to make it easier and faster to build power plants and criticizing the U.S. as among the slowest developed nations in approving energy projects.

But there may be less that the federal government can do right away about a looming power shortage, since greenlighting power plants to feed the electric grid is largely the province of state regulators and regional grid operators.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro wants to establish an agency to fast-track the construction of big power plants and dangle hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks for projects providing electricity to the grid.

The state, and the country, needs more power plants to win the artificial intelligence race and provide reliable and affordable power to residents, said Shapiro, who suggested Pennsylvania may leave the regional grid operated by PJM Interconnection in favor of “going it alone.”

“It has proven over the last number of years too darn hard to get enough new generation projects off the ground because of how slow PJM‘s queue is,” Shapiro told a news conference on Feb. 27.

Indiana, Michigan and Louisiana are exploring ideas to attract nuclear power while Maryland lawmakers are floating ideas about commissioning the construction of a new power plant there.

In Ohio, a lawmaker wants to restrict the influence of electric utilities in hopes of giving independent power producers more incentive to build power plants to feed the state’s fast-growing tech sector.

The bill, which awaits a vote, won the support of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, the state’s residential ratepayer watchdog, and business groups whose members care about electric prices. However, it split the energy sector between companies operating in competitive markets and those operating under state utility monopolies.

In Missouri, utilities including Ameren and Evergy, as well as the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry, labor unions and the state’s top utility regulator are backing legislation to repeal a nearly half-century old law preventing utilities from charging customers to build a power plant until it is operational.

The law was approved in a 1976 voter referendum when states were looking to hedge against utilities saddling ratepayers with financing upfront, potentially bloated, inefficient or, worse, aborted power projects.

Consumer and environmental groups protested the bill, saying it would result in new natural gas plants that are likelier to be more costly to ratepayers.

Last year, similar legislation passed almost unanimously in Kansas, along with companion legislation extending tax breaks to new power plants.

Within months, Evergy announced alongside the state’s leaders that it would build two 705-megawatt natural gas plants and said the legislation will “help Kansas compete with other states for investment and ultimately save customers money.”

John Coffman, the utility consumer counsel for the Consumers Council of Missouri, said utilities are playing the two states, Missouri and Kansas, against each other and were planning to build the power plants anyway.

But, he said, “They’re just looking for opportunities to squeeze more money out of the process.”

Snitchler said action is being spurred by states realizing that longstanding power reserves are dwindling, especially as coal-fired and nuclear power plants retire, and now all sorts of power companies are leaping at the chance to make money.

A pitfall he sees in the race to build plants is an undoing of protections that some states once adopted to shield ratepayers and put the risk of building expensive power projects onto corporate shareholders.

“The problem, of course, is it shifts the risk back on the people who perhaps should not be bearing it,” Snitchler said.

A Pennsylvania state lawmaker, Sen. Gene Yaw, wants to set up a massive power plant-financing fund like Texas, which established a $10 billion low-interest loan program after the state was wracked by a deadly winter blackout in 2021.

Yaw, a Republican, has no misgivings about Pennsylvania helping finance power plants. Even by conservative estimates, the state will need dozens more power plants to meet projections of rising demand, he said.

“And what do we have underway or planned right now? Nothing,” Yaw said. “And we haven’t built anything since 2019. So we’ve got to do something to encourage people to come here and build in Pennsylvania just to maintain the status quo.”

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.