Connect with us

Business

College Board CEO fears a ‘dangerous moment’ as high school kids ask ‘why bother?’ in the age of AI

Published

on



David Coleman isn’t just the CEO of the College Board, he’s a bona fide education activist, per Time magazine. When he took over the organization 12 years ago, which administers the Advanced Placement (AP) program and the SAT college-entry exams, he told Fortune that privileged kids were thriving, and the others were left behind.

“When I started at the College Board, we only gave the SAT over the weekend,” he said. “And that may sound fine, but the kid who self-selects to take an exam over the weekend is a certain sort of kid.” AP courses were no different, he said, “focused on a fairly narrow set of the top 20% to 30% of the high school.”

The College Board’s own research indicates that “AP students tend to be from higher-income families, attend suburban schools, and have better academic preparation for high school” than students who don’t take AP classes and exams.

Coleman told Fortune in an interview that “it’s a dangerous moment” for education. “The biggest fact of the American high school is that our kids are more and more disconnected than ever before from the whole enterprise of pursuing their future.”

Coleman described a downward spiral of worsening engagement with instruction in general. “In elementary school, they’ll take what we give them. In middle school, they become suspicious. And in high school, many of them are done. And they’re just not taking it. They’re not interested.”

The College Board CEO said this could get even worse in the age of artificial intelligence, describing his fears of a “why bother?” mentality taking hold. His remarks come in a climate when top CEOs are revealing that they’re having the same conversations around their kitchen tables. Just a few weeks ago, Ford CEO Jim Farley revealed a story about his own son working a mechanic job last summer and wondering aloud: “I don’t know why I need to go to college.”

Then, Coleman said, he got a call from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in late 2024. He said that when he sat down with the Chamber’s CEO, Suzanne Clark, and Chief Policy Officer, Neil Bradley, they quickly realized they were facing the same problem from different perspectives and were ready to take a “far bolder move” in overhauling the AP program.

Bradley told Fortune that it “quickly evolved into a deeper discussion about how we could bring together the best of what the College Board does in education and what the Chamber does in organizing the business community, with the full vision coming together at a meeting in the College Board’s New York offices in early 2025. In the spring, they had meetings in DC with nearly 100 state and local Chamber CEOs and launched a nationwide initiative.

The result was a brand-new course that launches this fall: AP Business with Personal Finance. Mastery in this course will be recognized by thousands of employers and can lead directly to employment or advanced study. Nearly 300 employers, including Aon, IBM, Nissan, SnapIT Solutions and Wells Fargo, as well as 75 local chambers of commerce across more than 40 states, have endorsed the new AP courses.

“We’re really saying this is something of value to almost all kids, that it’s a different thing, that we’ve got to stop it with a few kids getting the good stuff.” Coleman’s goal is ambitious: “that fundamental division between career education and general education must fall.”

How to end segregation?

Coleman called the “segregation” that he sees taking place among different types of students “cruel, socially, in high schools. It literally separates students from other students in very unkind ways.” It’s also “really dumb,” he added, because all kinds of students need the new offering on business, which is designed both for students headed to college and for those planning to go directly into trades or work, reflecting a changing landscape where career success increasingly depends on adaptability, innovation, and financial literacy.

Bradley said that, from the Chamber’s perspective, employers are sick and tired of scrounging for talent. The Chamber’s president and CEO, Suzanne Clark, remarked on the news of the new course, “We hear from business leaders all the time—they cannot find the talent. This course is about preparing students for day one of their first job and helping them see enterprise as a source of opportunity and growth.”

For years, Bradley told Fortune, Chamber members voiced frustration about the lack of readiness among young workers—a problem exacerbated by technological change and the rise of AI. “We’ve heard for a long time from [members], we’ve had concerns … that we wonder what particularly students are learning about business and our free-enterprise system.” Bradley noted that tradespeople—from welders to electricians—often aspire to one day run their own businesses and need business acumen just as much as future accountants or MBAs.​

Both leaders are betting that a relevant, applied course that offers college credit and real employability will ignite engagement among students hungry for autonomy and economic power.​ “They seem to be hungry for this,” Coleman said, commenting on how entrepreneurial he believes the current crop of high-school students are, citing interest in steady blue-collar, middle-class jobs like healthcare and nursing. “They’re most interested in business because they want to make money and thrive. And they’re very realistic about that, but we’re not giving it to them.”

What are students really learning about free enterprise?

Bradley said many Chamber members are “just grappling with the different ways that people want to work and are willing to work and how they show up, particularly as employers were figuring out kind of the post-COVID hybrid back-in-office kind of environment.”

When asked to describe this in more detail, Bradley said that it’s not a new story, but one persisting for several years: “People are putting so much pressure on work to fulfill [many different] things” for them. He said the College Board was seeing similar pressures, and they quickly agreed there was an opening at the high-school level to try to fix this.

“We quickly realized we were trying to solve the same problem from different sides,” Bradley explained, noting their joint effort will send “market signals” that successful completion of the AP business course will be rewarded with endorsements from thousands of employers nationwide.​ This grows out of separate initiatives from the Chamber, Bradley added, mentioning the Grow with CO platform established five to six years ago, offering free online advice about how to start, run and grow a business. (CO is the U.S. Chamber’s digital platform for small business, dedicated to helping business owners across the U.S. start, run, and grow successful companies.) He also cited the popularity of Chamber articles around business advice, such as the different between a partnership and an LLC, understanding profit and loss statements, and where to go for credit.

“You can have the best idea in the world, but you’ve still got to understand how to form your business, how to understand what your profit and loss are, and how to manage those things,” Bradley said. “And if we can give people an introduction to that in high school, I think it can make a really meaningful difference on people’s entrepreneurial trajectory, whether that’s in the trades or in something else.”

Gen Z is bowling alone

Bradley resists calling the lack of business and finance education a “crisis,” but recognizes its deep personal impact on individual graduates entering the workforce unprepared. Noting that roughly a third of high-school graduates don’t go on into higher education (a rate that has stayed very consistent, per the National Center for Education Statistics), it should be a “realistic expectation” that high school prepares them to find a job, “and that’s just not true in a lot of places today.” (In his September press conference, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell commented on the difficulties in entry-level hiring, calling it a “low-hiring, low-firing” environment.)

In fact, the Chamber’s 2025 New Hire Readiness Report shows that 84% of hiring managers believe today’s high school graduates are not ready for the workforce, and 80% say young hires are less prepared than their predecessors. In the press release on the new AP course, Clark also cited a Gallup poll showing only 54% of Americans now hold a positive view of capitalism—the lowest on record.

Meanwhile, a separate Gallup poll, the American Job Quality Study, found widespread worker dissatisfaction with what the economy is providing, as 60% of U.S. workers overall are not in “quality jobs.” There appears to be a direct link, in this data and increasing numbers of analyses among social scientists, to dissatisfaction with work and a wider malaise in American society.

On a press call about the American Jobs Quality Survey, Gallup senior partner Stephanie Marken responded to a Fortune question about dissatisfaction specifically among recent graduates. She said 40 years of data indicates there really is something different about Gen Z, which is “looking for different things from their employers … we do see that Gen Z in particular is looking for something very different from their employer population.” Often, she added, they’re looking for mental health and work-life balance considerations in an outsized way compared to what decades of data show about millennials as they entered and participated in the workforce.

Bradley cited the classic work of sociology, Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone, with the memorable thesis that Americans were turning away from community. He said he largely agreed with the thesis that prior generations found personal fulfillment in lots of things or various things beyond their place of employment, such as going to church, belonging to a civic organization, even being in a bowling league. But that has stopped, “and therefore they try to put all of their personal validation in the place of business. They’re asking for their employer to be something beyond what their employer has traditionally been. I think that’s really hard.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia will start banning kids from social media this week

Published

on



Starting this Wednesday, many Australian teens will find it near impossible to access social media. That’s because, as of Dec. 10, social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram must bar those under the age of 16, or face significant fines. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the pending ban “one of the biggest social and cultural changes our nation has faced” in a statement.

Much is riding on this ban—and not just in Australia. Other countries in the region are watching Canberra’s ban closely. Malaysia, for example, said that it also plans to bar under-16s from accessing social media platforms starting next year. 

Other countries are considering less drastic ways to control teenagers’ social media use. On Nov. 30, Singapore said it would ban the use of smartphones on secondary school campuses. 

Yet, governments in Australia and Malaysia argue a full social media ban is necessary to protect youth from online harms such as cyberbullying, sexual exploitation and financial scams.

Tech companies have had varied responses to the social media ban. 

Some, like Meta, have been compliant, starting to remove Australian under-16s from Instagram, Threads and Facebook from Dec. 4, a week before the national ban kicks in. The social media giant reaffirmed their commitment to adhere to Australian law, but called for app stores to instead be held accountable for age verification.

“The government should require app stores to verify age and obtain parental approval whenever teens under 16 download apps, eliminating the need for teens to verify their age multiple times across different apps,” a Meta spokesperson said.

Others, like YouTube, sought to be excluded from the ban, with parent company Google even threatening to sue the Australian federal government in July 2025—to no avail.

However, experts told Fortune that these bans may, in fact, be harmful, denying young people the place to develop their own identities and the space to learn healthy digital habits.

“A healthy part of the development process and grappling with the human condition is the process of finding oneself. Consuming cultural material, connecting with others, and finding your community and identity is part of that human experience,” says Andrew Yee, an assistant professor at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU)’s Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information.

Social media “allows young people to derive information, gain affirmation and build community,” says Sun Sun Lim, a professor in communications and technology at the Singapore Management University (SMU), who also calls bans “a very rough tool.”

Yee, from NTU, also points out that young people can turn to platforms like YouTube to learn about hobbies that may not be available in their local communities. 

Forcing kids to go “cold turkey” off social media could also make for a difficult transition to the digital world once they are of age, argues Chew Han Ei, a senior research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in the National University of Singapore (NUS).

“The sensible way is to slowly scaffold [social media use], since it’s not that healthy social media usage can be cultivated immediately,” Chew says.

Enforcement

Australia plans to enforce its social media ban by imposing a fine of 49.5 million Australian dollars (US$32.9 million) on social media companies which fail to take steps to ban those under 16 from having accounts on their platforms.

Malaysia has yet to explain how it might enforce its own social media ban, but communications minister Fahmi Fadzil suggested that social media platforms could verify users through government-issued documents like passports. 

Though young people may soon figure out how to maintain their access to social media. “Youths are savvy, and I am sure they will find ways to circumvent these,” says Yee of NTU. He also adds that young may migrate to platforms that aren’t traditionally defined as social media, such as gaming sites like Roblox. Other social media platforms, like YouTube, also don’t require accounts, thus limiting the efficacy of these bans, he adds.

Forcing social media platforms to collect huge amounts of personal data and government-issued identity documents could also lead to data privacy issues. “It’s very intimate personally identifiable information that’s being collected to verify age—from passports to digital IDs,” Chew, from NUS, says. “Somewhere along the line, a breach will happen.”

Moving towards healthy social media use

Ironically, some experts argue that a ban may absolve social media platforms of responsibility towards their younger users. 

“Social media bans impose an unfair burden on parents to closely supervise their children’s media use,” says Lim of SMU. “As for the tech platform, they can reduce child safety safeguards that make their platforms safer, since now the assumption is that young people are banned from them, and should not have been venturing [onto them] and opening themselves up to risks.”

And rather than allow digital harms to proliferate, social media platforms should be held responsible for ensuring they “contribute to intentional and purposeful use”, argues Yee.

This could mean regulating companies’ use of user interface features like auto-play and infinite scroll, or ensuring algorithmic recommendations are not pushing harmful content to users.

“Platforms profit—lucratively, if I may add—from people’s use, so they have a responsibility to ensure that the product is safe and beneficial for its users,” Yee explains. 

Finally, conversations on safe social media use should center the voices of young people, Yee adds.

“I think we need to come to a consensus as to what a safe and rights-respecting online space is,” he says. “This must include young people’s voices, as policy design should be done in consultation with the people the policy is affecting.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Jimmy Kimmel signs ABC extension through 2027

Published

on



Kimmel’s previous, multiyear contract had been set to expire next May, so the extension will keep him on the air until at least May 2027.

Kimmel’s future looked questionable in September, when ABC suspended “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” for remarks made following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Following a public outcry, ABC lifted the suspension, and Kimmel returned to the air with much stronger ratings than he had before.

He continued his relentless joking at the president’s expense, leading Trump to urge the network to “get the bum off the air” in a social media post last month. The post followed Kimmel’s nearly 10-minute monologue on Trump and the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Kimmel was even on Trump’s mind Sunday as the president hosted the Kennedy Center Honors in Washington.

“I’ve watched some of the people that host,” Trump said. “I’ve watched some of the people that host. Jimmy Kimmel was horrible, and some of these people, if I can’t beat out Jimmy Kimmel in terms of talent, then I don’t think I should be president.”

Kimmel has hosted the Oscars four times, but he’s never hosted the Kennedy Center show.

Just last week, Kimmel was needling Trump on the president’s approval ratings. “There are gas stations on Yelp with higher approval ratings than Trump right now,” he said.

Kimmel will be staying longer than late-night colleague Stephen Colbert at CBS. The network announced this summer it was ending Colbert’s show next May for economic reasons, even though it is the top-rated network show in late-night television.

ABC has aired Kimmel’s late-night show since 2003, during a time of upheaval in the industry. Like much of broadcast television, late-night ratings are down. Viewers increasingly turn to watching monologues online the day after they appear.

Most of Kimmel’s recent renewals have been multiyear extensions. There was no immediate word on whose choice it was to extend his current contract by one year.

Bill Carter, author of “The Late Shift” and veteran chronicler of late-night TV, cautioned against reading too much into the length of the extension. Kimmel, at age 58, knows he’s getting close to the end of the line, Carter said, but when he leaves, he doesn’t want it to appear under pressure from Trump or anyone.

“He wants to make sure that it’s on his terms,” Carter said.

Kimmel has become one of the leading voices resisting Trump. “I think it’s important for him and for ABC that they are standing up for him,” Carter said.

Following Kirk’s killing, Kimmel was criticized for saying that “the MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” The Nexstar and Sinclair television ownership groups said it would take Kimmel off the air, leading to ABC’s suspension.

When he returned to the air, Kimmel did not apologize for his remarks, but he said he did not intend to blame any specific group for Kirk’s assassination. He said “it was never my intention to make the light of the murder of a young man.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump says he’ll allow Nvidia to sell advanced chips to ‘approved customers’ in China

Published

on



President Donald Trump said Monday that he would allow Nvidia to sell an advanced type of computer chip used in the development of artificial intelligence to “approved customers” in China.

There have been concerns about allowing advanced computer chips to be sold to China as it could help the country better compete against the U.S. in building out AI capabilities, but there has also been a desire to develop the AI ecosystem with American companies such as chipmaker Nvidia.

The chip, known as the H200, is not Nvidia’s most advanced product. Those chips, called Blackwell and the upcoming Rubin, were not part of what Trump approved.

Trump said on social media that he had informed China’s leader Xi Jinping about his decision and “President Xi responded positively!”

“This policy will support American Jobs, strengthen U.S. Manufacturing, and benefit American Taxpayers,” Trump said in his post.

Nvidia said in a statement that it applauded Trump’s decision, saying the choice would support domestic manufacturing and that by allowing the Commerce Department to vet commercial customers it would “strike a thoughtful balance” on economic and national security priorities.

Trump said the Commerce Department was “finalizing the details” for other chipmakers such as AMD and Intel to sell their technologies abroad.

The approval of the licenses to sell Nvidia H200 chips reflects the increasing power and close relationship that the company’s founder and CEO, Jensen Huang, enjoys with the president. But there have been concerns that China will find ways to use the chips to develop its own AI products in ways that could pose national security risks for the U.S., a primary concern of the Biden administration that sought to limit exports.

Nvidia has a market cap of $4.5 trillion and Trump’s announcement appeared to drive the stock slightly higher in after hours trading.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.