Connect with us

Politics

Chris Mitchell: Democrats, this is not how we win

Published

on


I tried my best to stay quiet.

Like many in the political world these past few weeks, I’ve watched these Special Elections in Florida’s 1st and 6th Congressional Districts unfold with a growing sense of frustration. I wanted to give the benefit of the doubt, to trust that the strategy made sense, that there was a bigger picture I wasn’t seeing.

But as we approach the final days of these races, it’s clear we have been lying to ourselves. And the cost of that delusion is too high to ignore.

Nearly $20 million has been spent on these two races, districts that Donald Trump won by overwhelming margins.

As of this writing, CD 1 shows a 19-point Republican turnout advantage and CD 6 has a 9-point GOP edge. These are not swing districts. These are not close races. And yet, every day, I see the same ads flooding social media: “We can win this. Donate now. We’re closing the gap.” When in fact, the gap is widening, not closing.

Let’s be clear: these races were never truly winnable. That’s not defeatism. That’s math. Now, I understand that this $20 million wouldn’t have been raised if not for these races. The candidates, the urgency, the fear, they all generated energy, and in turn, money.

But that’s exactly the problem.

We’re fueling a system that prioritizes emotional appeal over strategic outcomes. And while small-dollar donors give in good faith, believing their contribution might flip a seat, the only people consistently benefiting are the consultants cashing the checks.

This isn’t just poor planning. It’s donor abuse. It’s an unethical use of resources in a state that desperately needs long-term investment. Even the state party and the DNC, institutions that typically bring oversight and structure to competitive races, got swept up in the momentum.

I don’t know what internal conversations may have happened, but from the outside, it looked like no one stepped in to apply the kind of rigor or accountability we expect in viable races. And that’s not a criticism of leadership; it’s simply a hard truth about what happens when hope and hype go unchecked.

Imagine what we could have done with that $20 million. We could have launched the largest voter registration program Florida has ever seen. We could have hired and trained organizers in underserved communities. We could have built lasting infrastructure that would benefit not just one race, but every race to come.

Instead, we burned through donor dollars on campaigns that will leave nothing behind: no new voters, no stronger party infrastructure, no sustained momentum. Just grifters with a payday and a movement no stronger than it was before.

Let me be clear: I’m not accusing anyone of criminal conduct. But just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s right. And just because a campaign exists doesn’t mean it should be used as a fundraising funnel for consultants and vendors with no long-term plan for the communities they claim to serve.

I understand the desire to fight everywhere. I understand the symbolism. But if we want to win, really win, we have to stop confusing activity with strategy. We have to be honest about what’s winnable, what’s worth building, and what actually helps us take back power.

We need to stop mistaking good intentions for good planning, and we need to stop letting consultants write checks with other people’s hope. As a consultant, I know I’m part of this system. And that’s exactly why I’m speaking up.

We should expect better from each other and demand more from the institutions and professionals who claim to fight for democracy. The party deserves better. Our donors deserve better. Our voters deserve better. And so do the candidates we recruit, people who give up their time with their families, careers, and so much more to step into the arena and run.

If we’re serious about building a real, sustainable movement in Florida or anywhere else, we have to stop chasing quick wins and start investing in lasting infrastructure.

This isn’t about giving up the fight. It’s about fighting smarter, with integrity, purpose, and accountability. We all love to say, “The stakes are too high.” Well, if that’s true, then the excuses have to stop. It’s time to act like it.

___

Chris Mitchell is a managing partner for Statecraft Digital.

The post Chris Mitchell: Democrats, this is not how we win appeared first on Florida Politics – Campaigns & Elections. Lobbying & Government..



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Elijah Manley raises $275,000 to challenge Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick in Democratic Primary

Published

on


Progressive active Elijah Manley announced he raised more than $275,000 to challenge U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick in a Democratic Primary.

The Fort Lauderdale Democrat said his campaign for Florida’s 20th Congressional District, which launched in February, received more than 11,000 donors, with contributions from every state and Washington, D.C.

The fundraising haul comes as Cherfilus-McCormick faces an expanded investigation by the House Ethics Committee.

“South Florida’s working families are getting squeezed more every day. Our campaign is showing we have the momentum to fight for and win a better future,” Manley said.

“While my opponent defends her political career amidst a state lawsuit and a congressional ethics investigation, we are building a grassroots movement across Broward and Palm Beach to elect the working-class champion South Floridians deserve.”

Manley’s full fundraising report has not yet been made public through the Federal Election Commission. He is the first candidate to announce totals in the race.

Cherfilus-McCormick also faces a challenge from Republican Rodenay Joseph, who has previously run for the U.S. Senate as a Democrat. He changed parties last year before endorsing U.S. Sen. Rick Scott in the General Election.

Last election cycle, Cherfilus-McCormick won re-election without opposition. She raised almost $632,000 but spent much of that, including paying off a $135,000 candidate loan. At the end of the year, she had just over $7,500 in the bank.

As a sitting incumbent, Cherfilus-McCormick likely has access to financial resources from Washington. Manley expects the controversy around Cherfilus-McCormick to make her vulnerable to a challenge.

“The incumbent’s political and legal scandals have robbed District 20 voters of our voice in Congress for years,” Manley said. “It’s time to end the national embarrassment of a corrupt healthcare CEO representing this seat in Congress. I’m not afraid of standing up to entrenched power, and that’s exactly what District 20 will need to make real change in Washington.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate passes ‘Patterson’s Law’ to protect families against false child abuse claims, separation

Published

on


Legislation to help innocent parents disprove false child abuse claims just passed in the Senate with unanimous support.

Members of the Senate voted 37-0 for SB 304, which among other things would give parents whose children are removed from their custody on suspicion of physical abuse the right to request and receive additional medical examinations — at their expense — in certain situations

“This bill seeks to mend the gaps in Florida’s child abuse investigation procedures that can fail to consider infants and young children with preexisting genetic conditions,” said the bill’s sponsor, Broward County Democratic Sen. Barbara Sharief.

“The goal of this legislation is to protect vulnerable children, give parents a right to a qualified medical opinion for their children and reunify families who would otherwise be wrongfully separated. … This good bill strengthens (the) Florida child welfare system by incorporating medical expertise into investigations, preventing unjust separations and preserving the integrity of the process.”

SB 304 is called “Patterson’s Law” after Michael and Tasha Patterson and their twin sons, whom the Department of Children and Families (DCF) took custody of in 2022 after broken bones the boys suffered raised alarms during an emergency room visit.

The couple took their matter to court, citing medical evidence showing that like their mother, the boys — who have still not been returned — have a rare genetic disorder called Ehlers-Danlos syndrome that causes fragile bones and easy bruising.

The Pattersons’ story is not an isolated incident. One Facebook group for families “who have been impacted by the medical misdiagnosis of child abuse” called Parents Behind The Pinwheels has 9,200 likes and 16,000 followers.

Sharief, a doctor nursing practice and former Broward Mayor, said various preexisting genetic conditions like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency can lead to signs of bodily harm that aren’t due to physical abuse, but the state’s process for determining whether that’s the case is faulty, and it’s hurting families.

Today, she said, when there is a report of physical abuse, DCF conducts a visit and if visible bodily harm is observed, the child is immediately removed from the parent for their safety. A 24-hour shelter follows, after which a temporary protective supervision process begins, lasting up to 21 days until a determination is made.

But genetic testing critical to identifying preexisting conditions can take upward of six months to process, and in many cases siblings must also undergo testing that further delays reunification.

“The issue is that child protective investigators who may not be familiar with these diseases often make initial determinations of abuse based solely on physical findings — injuries such as broken ribs, bowed limbs (and) dislocated joints, which are characteristic of certain medical conditions — (that) can be misdiagnosed as a sign of physical abuse,” Sharief said earlier this month.

“This bill will ask that a qualified physician or medical professional gives an opinion to determine whether (the child’s injuries are) consistent with an underlying medical condition or with child abuse. Currently, parents do not have enough time to identify or submit a second opinion (from a qualified physician or medical professional to challenge an abuse determination, (and) families are wrongfully separated.”

SB 304 aims to fix that. It would give DCF more time to forward allegations of criminal conduct to a law enforcement agency if a parent alleges the existence of certain preexisting medical conditions or has requested an examination.

The bill, effective July 1, would require child protective investigators to remind parents at the beginning of an investigation that they have a duty to report their child’s preexisting conditions and provide supporting records in a timely manner. It would also mandate that child protective teams consult with a licensed physician or advanced practice registered nurse with relevant experience in such cases.

In the bill’s final committee stop last week, Boynton Beach Democratic Sen. Lori Berman commended Sharief for filing SB 304 and noted that numerous parents who had been affected by the issue had spoken in favor of the legislation at the bill’s prior committee stop.

“It was so emotional and moving and gut-wrenching because a lot of them have still not even been reunited with their children,” said Berman, who in 2023 passed Greyson’s Law to better safeguard children at risk of parental harm. “This is a really necessary bill.”

Sharief, a freshman state lawmaker, thanked Republican Sens. Erin Grall, Kathleen Passidomo and Clay Yarborough for helping her to fine-tune her bill during its committee stops.

More than 60 residents, the Florida Smart Justice Alliance and Florida Justice Association have signaled support for SB 304 and its lower-chamber analog (HB 511) by Weston Democratic Rep. Robin Bartleman and Shalimar Republican Rep. Patt Maney.

The House bill awaits a hearing before the last of three committees to which it was referred. So far, it has only received “yes” votes.

Prior to its passage in the Senate on Wednesday, Sharief amended SB 304 so that its language matched that of HB 511, easing the process of passing the legislation once it reaches the House floor.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

University pollsters warily watching Senate amendment restricting polling topics

Published

on


If this language becomes law, issues could be polled. Races could not.

New language proposed for a Senate higher education bill could impact public polls in Florida.

Sen. Alexis Calatayud proposed an amendment to her bill (SB 1726) that is designed to severely restrict the topics on which university polling operations can conduct surveys.

“The Board of Governors shall adopt regulations prohibiting universities that conduct public opinion survey research from polling activities related to candidates for any federal, state, or local office,” the amendment reads.

While the Calatayud proposal says they may “conduct survey research to measure opinions and inform the public about social, political, and economic issues unrelated to candidate preference,” the proposal could dramatically impact operations from the University of North Florida’s Public Opinion Research Lab (UNF PORL) and Florida Atlantic University (FAU).

“It’s got my attention,” said UNF PORL’s Michael Binder of the “out of the blue” proposal that “wasn’t on people’s radar” but is poised to be attached to a bill “midway through the Session.”

Binder believes the timing of the amendment is no accident.

“If they stick it on that bill, that bill’s going to pass.”

Binder said “candidate stuff” is what drives response to polls “from media and consumers of media” and that “candidates matter.”

“Look at Donald Trump. He’s not just a basket of policies,” Binder said.

Another university pollster had less to say.

“We don’t comment on proposed legislation as it would be too speculative to do so before the process is complete,” said FAU’s Joshua Glanzer.

Polls from UNF and FAU drew a lot of national attention in recent cycles, paralleling Florida’s increased prominence in the political world. Surveys without candidates included likely wouldn’t have that kind of juice.

We reached out to Calatayud before publication, but have yet to get a response.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.