Connect with us

Business

Can Saks’ new CEO repair the damage done by years of being treated as a ‘financial plaything’?

Published

on



For the second time in his career, luxury executive Geoffroy van Raemdonck has been tasked with fixing an iconic department store company brought low by financial engineering. In 2018, he was hired to fix Neiman Marcus Group, which was struggling to to keep up with shifting consumer trends and unprofitable under the weight of heavy debt from years of private equity ownership.

This time, the job is twice as big. On Tuesday, Van Raemdonck was appointed CEO of Saks Global, the same day as the luxury department store giant, which includes Neiman Marcus Group (and its Bergdorf Goodman division) and Saks Fifth Avenue, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Saks Global is the result of a $2.7 billion deal in 2024 masterminded by real estate scion Richard Baker—one that failed spectacularly because of the confluence of slumping sales and sky-high debt, leaving in its wake angry vendors, empty shelves, and AWOL consumers.

Former Saks Global executive chairman Baker has the opposite of the “Midas Touch” when it comes to dealmaking, as I wrote last week—with most of the retailers he’s bought ultimately failing. And Baker left his successor (after a two-week stint where he stepped into the CEO role) with quite a mess to clean up. But van Raemdonck does seem to understand the assignment when it comes to reviving a high-end department store brand.

During his six years as Neiman CEO, during which he led the company through a pandemic and later returned it to profitability, van Raemdonck spoke often of “leading with love,” and the importance of remembering that luxury retail has to be about much more than completing transactions. In late 2024 at the WWD CEO conference, shortly before the Saks acquisition closed, van Raemdonck recalled how at the start of his tenure, he had challenged his Neiman Marcus C-suite with the question, “How do we reignite customers’ emotions?” That’s arguably the same question Van Raemdonck faces today. (He did not respond to a request for comment from Fortune.)

Instilling positive emotions in customers—and convincing them to act upon them—will be essential in Saks Global’s bankruptcy era. And it will have to begin with winning over the company’s beleaguered vendors. Between sluggish business and heavy debt, Saks has in the last two years delayed payments to many vendors. Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday that Chanel, and conglomerates Kering and LVMH were owed a combined $225 million—so Van Raemdonck has a lot of fences to mend.

Many of those vendors have stopped shipping to its stores, which has led to empty shelves and stale inventory, the antithesis of what a luxury department store should offer and certainly not a way to inspire a shopper’s love. It was one of the reasons for a 13% drop in quarterly revenue for the quarter ended August 2, 2025. Those moves reflected Baker’s priorities, including deploying funds to make acquisitions or to conserve cash for debt payments resulting from his dealmaking.

One key lesson in the past few years for these department stores is that they are no longer indispensable to brands. And stiffing the creators of the stuff they sell is not a way to attract the hot brands, especially newer ones, that make a retailer feel buzzy and relevant.

The changing relationship between department stores and brands can’t all be blamed on mismanagement; it’s also the result of a cultural shift. “Historically, the way you discovered an amazing new luxury brand was that a curator at a Saks or a Neiman would pick a product and merchandise it beautifully,” said Jason Goldberg, chief commerce strategy officer at Publicis Groupe, a global advertising and communications firm. “Now, consumers are much more likely to discover new fashion trends from influencers on social media.”

That’s not to say there won’t be need for Saks and Neiman in the luxury market. The U.S. market for personal luxury products is about $100 billion, and the chains rang up a combined estimated $8 billion in revenue last year, meaning they remain important. The recent success of Nordstrom and Bloomingdale’s—strong sales growth for several quarters, in good part at Saks’ expense—are further proof that upscale department stores are still valuable. But that depends on good relations with brands.

Early Wednesday, in its statement announcing the bankruptcy filing, Saks said it had lined up $1.75 billion in financing that among other things would make go-forward payments to vendors, a key step in repairing relations.

Indeed, one of the reasons van Raemdonck got the job, on top of his experience heading Neiman, was his many years of management experience as a vendor, including years at Ralph Lauren and Louis Vuitton, so he understands their priorities and concerns.

He also understands the value of key employees, from store workers to those who bolster a retailer’s “fashion authority,” a number of whom have recently left Saks Global: Catherine Bloom, a superstar personal shopper for Neiman Marcus, and Yumi Shin, Bergdorf Goodman’s merchandising director, recently left for Nordstrom. Van Raemdonck will certainly work to soothe the nerves of other such stars, and seek to avoid more defections.

Another reason van Raemdonck was named CEO was his hands-on experience with guiding a company through a bankruptcy reorganization, having done so with Neiman Marcus Group in 2020, when the pandemic hit sales so badly that it became impossible to meet the company’s service of its massive debt.

This is likely to be a painful process. Though the company did not directly mention store closings in the announcement of its bankruptcy, Saks Global did say it “is evaluating its operational footprint to invest resources where it has the greatest long-term potential.” Saks has about 33 stores and Neiman 36, with some overlap in the same malls or same neighborhoods, meaning they are cannibalizing each other’s sales. Some culling of weak locations is almost certain.

Under van Raemdonck, Neiman Marcus did well protecting its market share from the headwinds buffeting luxury department stores. And while turning Saks Global into a fast growing retailer is a long shot, many in retail feel he is the man for the moment.

“He understands retail, luxury, and the brands the group owns. Even so, he will have his work cut out for him to get things back on track,” said Neil Saunders, a managing partner at GlobalData. “Ultimately, the lesson from Saks is that retailers should be run as retailers, and not used as financial playthings.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why a proposed 10% cap on credit card interest is rattling big banks

Published

on



Good morning. President Donald Trump’s proposal to temporarily cap credit card interest rates has both supporters and critics. In a social media post on Jan. 9, Trump called for a one-year cap on credit card interest rates at 10% starting Jan. 20, reviving a pledge from his 2024 campaign as the administration seeks to demonstrate progress on affordability.

Supporters argue a temporary cap could ease pressure on households facing average APRs above 20%.

But economists and bank executives warn that the move requires approval from Congress and that the policy could have unintended consequences by making banks more reluctant to offer credit, thus slowing down consumer spending.

“An artificial cap on credit card interest rates is likely to backfire on the White House by making credit less accessible to the cash-strapped households that most need it,” Columbia Business School economics professor Brett House told me.

Earnings call discussions

The proposal was a major topic this week during the earnings calls of America’s big banks. Executives broadly agree a 10% cap would reduce access to credit for higher-risk borrowers and could have adverse effects on consumer spending and growth, Morningstar director Sean Dunlop told me.

“I think Jane Fraser, CEO of Citigroup, provided the most context among the firms I cover, alluding to a previous time when President Carter tried to impose interest rate ceilings—and the administration had to abandon its efforts within two months, given the severity of the economic impact,” Dunlop said.

Fraser noted that consumers spend roughly $6 trillion annually on credit cards and carry about $1.2 trillion in balances. She warned that making card products unprofitable would curtail spending on those cards as credit availability declines, he said.

Other CEOs and CFOs had similar concerns:

JPMorgan Chase CFO Jeremy Barnum said the cap would likely reduce access to credit rather than help consumers. He argued that intense competition already compresses margins and that price controls would force broad lending cutbacks — especially for higher-risk borrowers.

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said the industry is committed to affordability but argued a cap would tighten credit. “You’re going to get restricted credit, meaning less people will get credit cards, and the balance available to them on those credit cards will also be restricted,” he said.

—Citi CFO Mark Mason called affordability an important issue and said Citi looks forward to working with the administration on a constructive solution. “I also say that an interest rate cap is not something that we would or could support,” he said, arguing it would restrict access to credit. 

Dunlop said if the proposal is implemented, banks would likely respond by tightening lending standards, competing more aggressively for higher-FICO borrowers, and seeking to offset lost interest income through higher fees.

Higher interest rates compensate lenders for nonpayment risk; without that flexibility, issuers would narrow underwriting and concentrate lending among the least risky borrowers. “For issuers that extend credit to lower-income borrowers, like Bread, the credit card economics simply don’t work out at lower interest rates, and they’d be forced to shrink their lending volumes dramatically,” Dunlop said.

The debate highlights the tension between lowering borrowing costs and preserving access to unsecured credit — a balance policymakers must weigh as affordability concerns collide with market realities.

Have a good weekend.

Quick note: In observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the next CFO Daily will be in your inbox on Tuesday.

Sheryl Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Fortune 500 Power Moves this week:

Dennis K. Cinelli was appointed CFO of Paramount, a Skydance Corporation (No. 147), effective Jan. 15, and as such has resigned his board of directors seat. Cinelli will succeed Andrew C. Warren, who has served as EVP and interim CFO since June 2025. Most recently, Cinelli served as CFO of Scale AI. He previously held senior finance and operational roles at Uber, including global head of strategic finance, and later running the U.S. and Canada Mobility (Rides) business. Before Uber, Cinelli was with G.E. Ventures as CFO. 

Every Friday morning, the weekly Fortune 500 Power Moves column tracks Fortune 500 company C-suite shifts—see the most recent edition.

Here’s more CFO moves this week:

Clare Kennedy was appointed CFO of Spencer Stuart, a global advisory firm, effective Jan. 12. Kennedy succeeds Christine Laurens as part of a planned succession and in support of Laurens’ retirement from full-time executive work. Kennedy, who is based in London, joins Spencer Stuart from Maples Group, an international advisory firm, where she served as global chief operating officer. She joined Maples Group from Freshfields, an international law firm, where she served as its global CFO. Kennedy previously spent 18 years at Linklaters, an international law firm, where she held a variety of senior finance and commercial leadership roles. She began her career at Arthur Andersen and EY as a chartered accountant, specializing in tax. 

Gillian Munson was appointed CFO of Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL), a mobile learning platform, effective Feb. 23. Matt Skaruppa will step down after nearly six years with the company; he will remain CFO until Munson starts her new role, at which time he will assume an advisory role. Munson assumes the CFO role after serving on the Duolingo board of directors since 2019 as chair of the audit, risk and compliance committee. She was most recently the CFO of Vimeo and previously held CFO positions at Iora Health, Inc. and XO Group Inc.

Betsabe Botaitis was appointed CFO of P2P.org, a non-custodial institutional staking provider. Botaitis brings over 20 years of leadership across financial services, fintech, and Web3, with experience building governance and operations in high-growth organizations. Most recently, Botaitis served as CFO and treasurer at Hedera. Botaitis’ career spans both traditional financial institutions and crypto-native organizations. She began in retail banking before holding senior finance roles at Citigroup and LendingClub, and later co-founding and serving as CFO of a blockchain company. 

Julie Feder was appointed CFO of Obsidian Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company. Feder brings over 20 years of strategic finance experience in life sciences and health care. Feder joins Obsidian from Aura Biosciences, where she served as CFO for six years. Before Aura, she was CFO at Verastem. Before that, Feder spent six years at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc., as CFO.

Deborah Ricci was appointed EVP and CFO of Acentra Health, a technology and health solutions company. Ricci joins Acentra Health from Guidehouse Inc., where she most recently served as partner and chief financial and administrative officer. Earlier in her career, Ricci held multiple senior finance leadership roles, including CFO positions at Constellis, Centerra Group, and A-T Solutions, and began her career as a certified public accountant with KPMG.

Rohan Ranadive was appointed managing director and CFO of GTCR, a private equity firm. Ranadive succeeds Anna May Trala, who is retiring. Trala will remain affiliated with the firm, serving as a senior advisor going forward. Ranadive brings more than 20 years of experience. He joins GTCR from Vista Equity Partners, where he was a managing director of finance operations. Before that, he was the CFO of Aviditi Advisors and spent 12 years at TPG Capital in various finance and accounting leadership roles.

Big Deal

Accenture’s latest Pulse of Change research is based on a survey of 3,650 C-suite leaders from the world’s largest organizations across 20 industries and 20 countries.

Companies are pouring resources into AI, with 78% now seeing it as a bigger driver of revenue growth than cost cuts, according to the report. At the same time, 35% of leaders said a solid data strategy and core digital capabilities would do the most to accelerate AI implementation and scale. However, 54% of employees report low‑quality or misleading AI outputs that waste time and hurt productivity. In AI, value follows quality, so trust in outputs and data accuracy remains critical for sustained growth, according to Accenture.

Going deeper

Here are four Fortune weekend reads:

Exclusive: Former OpenAI policy chief creates nonprofit institute, calls for independent safety audits of frontier AI models” by Jeremy Kahn

America’s $38 trillion national debt is so big the nearly $1 trillion interest payment will be larger than Medicare soon” by Shawn Tully 

Worried about AI taking your job? New Anthropic research shows it’s not that simple” by Sharon Goldman

America’s hottest job opening right now is in the NFL—no degree is required, you won’t be fixed to a desk and it pays up to $20 million” by Preston Fore

Overheard

“We have transitioned from a K-shaped recovery into a Barbell Economy, a system heavily weighted at the extremes of wealth and precarity, connected by a middle class that is rapidly snapping.”

—Katica Roy, a gender economist and the CEO and founder of Denver-based Pipeline, a SaaS company, writes in a Fortune opinion piece



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gen Z’s pursuit of the #RichTok lifestyle sends them to social media for investing advice

Published

on



Gen Z loves #RichTok — and they love being rich. Mash them together and you get a generation that overwhelmingly turns to social media for investing advice as they seek the most elusive thing of all for the young: financial independence.

Social media ranked the top reason 55% of Gen Z and 44% of millennial investors say they got into investing, according to a survey of 300,000 investors over five years by the Oliver Wyman Forum. 

In their search for alternative pathways toward financial security, personal finance influencers are providing solutions. Videos describing how to invest $1,000 in the stock market or explaining “the stock market tea” in terms of the Kardashians or The Real Housewives franchise get hundreds of thousands of views across platforms. 

Vivian Tu, better known as Your Rich BFF, has 2.7 million TikTok and 3.8 million Instagram followers and gives advice on investing, financial planning,and tax loopholes.

“Suddenly, you have someone who doesn’t look like your dad’s financial advisor. You have somebody who looks like I could be anybody’s college best friend,” Tu previously told Fortune. “I want to entertain my audience and turn finance into funance and just make talking about money more accessible for the next generation of rich BFFs.”

Creator Rebecca Ma, who goes by Becca Bloom online, has 8.2 million followers on Instagram and TikTok. She shares her daily routine, feeding her cat caviar for breakfast and showcasing her endless luxury clothing hauls. Each one gets millions of views and likes. 

The popularity of these videos shows a common desire for extreme financial success. The Oliver Wyman Forum survey found in 2022, 18% of people said they felt pressure to make money to feel successful. By 2025, that number had climbed to 33%, and this feeling more than doubled among low-income earners and boomers nearing retirement. 

Economic uncertainty is driving Gen Z to invest early  

More than half of Gen Z started to learn about investing before entering the workforce, compared to only 20% of Baby Boomers, according to a World Economic Forum survey from 2024. Nearly a third started investing in college or early adulthood, twice the rate of millennials who invested at that age. 

Early investing is part of a strategy towards financial independence, which is now the

fastest-growing unmet financial need, according to the survey. Economic nihilism is growing within Gen Z as they face a stagnant job market and are pessimistic about the future of safety net programs like Social Security. 

“There’s this genuine interest to learn. Isaid Natalya Guseva, head of financial markets and resilience initiatives at WEF, which has surveyed investor habits every two years since 2022. She sees Gen Z’s lust for financial literacy as “driven by various things,” but overwhelmingly a sense from them that they can’t rely on things like governments and pensions as much as prior generations did. She also points to more access to information and diversified products to invest in as a draw for Gen Z.

Across all age groups, financial independence is the top skill people wished that they had learned more about earlier, according to WEF. Gen Z has taken this very seriously and is set on making as much money as possible.  

“Gen Z and young people in general have many financial goals, and we see many of them are actually quite medium to long term,” Guseva said. “Only about a tenth or fewer of our investors say they want to beat the market or speculate.”

Young people prefer AI over traditional advising

Nearly half of people consult AI when investing, compared to just over a third in 2023, according to the Oliver Wyman survey. Investors using AI typically use it as a sounding board rather than letting it independently invest their money. Compared to traditional financial advising, AI provides a judgment-free environment to learn, respondents said, and makes them feel more understood than human advisors. 

“We also see that younger generations, especially Gen Z, say that they would trust an institution more if it had an AI chat bot. ” Guseva said. “Many are using AI to learn about investing” 

With increased pressure, Gen Z is making riskier investments. While Oliver Wyman Forum found that Gen X and Baby Boomers’ investment portfolios tend to have more traditional compositions with higher levels of diversification and risk-hedging, cryptocurrency makes up more than one third of 71% of Gen Z investors’ portfolios, according to WEF.

“We see that more people know how to access crypto than stock, CTFs, and bonds, and more people feel like they can understand crypto than stocks, CTFs and bonds,” Guseva said. “What that shows to us is that what crypto has done is had a really great marketing campaign and awareness campaign. To us, it’s a lesson on, how do you meet people where they are?” 

Gen Z’s pivot toward higher-risk, high-reward assets like cryptocurrency isn’t just a trend. Their financial habits rank second among the areas where they feel most misjudged, the survey found, and their rejection of slow and steady wealth accumulation is a sign that they’re done with conventional wisdom that doesn’t fit their vision of the future. 





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stocks: ‘Dedollarization’ is dead—investors discount Trump’s drama as they pile into U.S. assets

Published

on


There is a conflict between Wall Street analysts right now over the right strategy for dealing with U.S. dollar-denominated assets. Some, like Pimco chief investment officer Dan Ivascyn, have recommended investors diversify out of U.S. equities because the Trump administration is so unpredictable. And analysts at ING have been pushing a “sell America” argument for a while now, noting that the 9% decline in the value of the dollar over the last 12 months has imposed a harsh haircut on anyone who bought U.S. assets in that period.

But yesterday we got some data showing that the tide may be turning against the “sell America” crowd.

First, the S&P 500 ticked up 0.26% yesterday and futures were up 0.36% this morning. One day’s trading is not significant on its own, of course. But it means that the S&P is up 1.45% year to date—a pretty decent pace of growth over such a short stretch.

More significantly, The U.S. government released its most recent numbers for Treasury International Capital Data (covering November) and they revealed that net foreign inflows into U.S. assets of all kinds were $212 billion.

That’s a lot, according to ING’s Chris Turner.

“The main takeaway is that foreigners continue to pour money into U.S. asset markets. The TIC release is a volatile data set, but looking at the rolling 12-month average, in November the net foreign purchase of US assets was around $100 billion per month – compared to around $25 billion in the summer of 2024,” he told clients this morning.

Cathie Wood adjusts her ‘rolling recession’ theory

There are several other factors giving traders good vibes about the U.S.

Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood announced in a new commentary that her “rolling recession” theory (that various sectors of the economy have suffered recessions even though the economy as a whole has held up) may be coming to an end. The U.S. “has evolved into a coiled spring that could bounce back powerfully during the next few years,” she said.

Wood is an idiosyncratic investor but she has a fervent fanbase buoyed by the performance of her ARK Innovation ETF, which is up 45% over the last 12 months, per Yahoo Finance:

Tech bulls are enthusiastic about Q4 earnings

Her bullishness looks tepid compared to Wedbush’s Dan Ives, who told clients to ignore all the people who have hating on tech stocks recently.

“We believe tech stocks will have a very strong 4Q earnings season led by Big Tech as the cloud stalwarts Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon had very robust AI enterprise demand in the quarter based on our field checks,” he said. “We believe … the Street is still underestimating how big this AI spending trajectory is and we expect 4Q tech earnings to be another validation moment with a doubling down on aggressive initial cap-ex numbers into 2026. Our bullish view is that investors are still not fully appreciating the tidal wave of growth on the horizon from the $3 trillion of spending over the next 3 years coming from enterprise and government.”

There’s a price gauge showing he may be right: The price of copper is up 33% over the last 12 months (based on the Comex continuous contract). President Trump’s copper tariffs didn’t help, of course, but the underlying issue is that tech companies building AI data centers need as much copper as they can get—so the copper price looks like an indicator of robust tech activity.

Trump: much smoke, less fire

Lastly, investors are becoming inured to Trump’s political dramas as they learn that much smoke often means little fire. Trump may have apprehended Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro but he left the remainder of his regime in place. He may have threatened to bomb Iran again, but then he didn’t. His administration may be criminally investigating U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, but after Powell came out against him with guns blazing in a video on Sunday Wall Street was reassured that Fed independence wasn’t going away in the short term. Even Trump’s threat to invade Greenland looks like it might end up in the Pentagon’s “Easier said than done” file.

‘De-dollarisation is going to take some time’

ING’s Turner isn’t giving up on his theory that the world is slowly moving away from the dollar, yet. But his note this morning admitted that the greenback isn’t dead yet. The dollar has gained nearly a full percentage point in value on the DXY index of foreign currencies since the start of the year.

“The dollar is drifting higher this week on probably what is best described as a macro move. U.S. data has come in on the firmer side, e.g. retail sales and jobless claims, while the Fed’s Beige Book presented a view of a gently expanding economy and no immediate threat to the jobs market,” he told clients.

“We would again conclude that de-dollarisation is going to take some time and that if the dollar is to come lower this year, it will be driven by lower U.S. [interest] rates and increased foreign hedging of U.S. assets.”

Here’s a snapshot of the markets ahead of the opening bell in New York this morning:

  • S&P 500 futures were up 0.36% this morning. The last session closed up 0.26%.
  • STOXX Europe 600 was flat in early trading.
  • The U.K.’s FTSE 100 was flat in early trading. 
  • Japan’s Nikkei 225 was down 0.32%.
  • China’s CSI 300 was down 0.41%. 
  • The South Korea KOSPI was up 0.9%. 
  • India’s NIFTY 50 was up 0.16%. 
  • Bitcoin was down to $95.5K.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.