Connect with us

Business

BofA sees ‘path to a 5% mortgage rate’ if the Fed pulls off these 2 things

Published

on



Bank of America’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) research team tackled the question of when U.S. mortgage rates could come down. President Donald Trump has been pressuring the Federal Reserve for much of 2025 to cut interest rates, even as Fed chair Jerome Powell cites rising inflation related to tariff policy and macroeconomic uncertainty as a reason to be careful. But mortgage rates remain elevated above 6%, freezing activity in the housing market that enjoyed a tremendous boom during the pandemic thanks to sub-3% mortgage rates.

The MBS team wrote on Tuesday it “does see a path to a 5% mortgage rate” as long as the Fed pulls off two actions: quantitative easing (QE) in mortgage-backed securities and aggressive yield-curve control to the point that 10-year Treasury yields come down to 3.00%-3.25%. The 10-year is pivotal since it serves as a benchmark for 30-year fixed mortgage rates.

Per the Bank of America Research “Situation Room” note released Sept. 16, the baseline expectation is for mortgage rates to end both 2025 and 2026 at 6.25%—a moderate decline from the current national average near 6.35%, which BofA notes was a big improvement from 6.9% recently. That’s based on a 10-year Treasury yield of about 4.00% and about 4.25% by year-end 2026.

While Wall Street is rallying behind the possibility, even a drop to 5% likely won’t bring broad relief to American homebuyers facing the tightest affordability crunch in decades.

Lance Lambert, cofounder and editor-in-chief of ResiClub, told Fortune he sees one of two scenarios playing out. In a hypothetical scenario where the unemployment rate spiked and the economy weakened, he said financial markets “could respond with a flight to safety—driving up demand for Treasuries, which would push bond prices higher and yields (including mortgage rates) lower.”

In the case of a recession were to hit, Lambert said the Fed could respond with emergency cuts to the federal funds rate and, “if the downturn were severe enough, potentially resume purchases of mortgage-backed securities, adding further downward pressure on mortgage rates.”

Why lower rates alone might not move the needle

Housing stocks have surged on anticipation of cuts, BofA noted, citing companies including D.R. Horton, Lennar and PulteGroup, but the analyst note stresses fundamentals have lagged, and real demand is “still sluggish” despite lower rates and increased incentives from builders. Even during previous episodes of falling rates, affordability failed to markedly improve.

Fortune’s Sydney Lake reported in August on Zillow projections it would take mortgage rates dropping to about 4.43% to make the average home affordable for the average buyer, but even a 0% rate wouldn’t help housingaffordability in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose and Miami. In July, Lake reported the number of first-time homebuyers had shrunk to just half the historical norm.

The BofA note quantifies the challenge: Through recent cycles, even sharp rate cuts didn’t deliver broad affordability. After the September 2024 rate cut—the most recent analog—mortgage rates briefly dropped but then rebounded, with homebuilder valuations peaking and stocks declining by 20% or more in subsequent months. Rising Treasury yields and persistent supply constraints undermined any potential buyer relief.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gen Z is drinking 20% less than Millennials. Productivity is rising. Coincidence? Not quite

Published

on



For all the noise surrounding alcohol today, one fact rarely enters the conversation: societies with moderate, responsible drinking habits consistently outperform economically. Across OECD economies, decades of analysis confirm this link, showing that responsible consumption supports higher productivity and more resilient growth.

This isn’t just a lifestyle trend — it’s a shift in the fundamentals of growth. Gen Z is drinking differently, Dry January participation continues to rise, and employers are increasingly focused on performance, wellbeing, and sustainable productivity. These cultural shifts map onto a deeper economic trend: moderation is no longer just a personal choice, it’s becoming a structural feature of modern business strategy.

At the same time, global conditions are changing. Demographic shifts, rising health awareness, and evolving consumer expectations are altering the way societies engage with alcohol. The question today is not only how much people drink, but how drinking patterns influence labor markets, healthcare budgets, consumer behavior, and business innovation. In short, moderation has become more than a public health issue — it’s now a lever for economic competitiveness.

Responsible Consumption as an Economic Lever

Globally, we’ve grown accustomed to the idea that the alcohol sector is propelled by volume. But volume-led growth no longer tells the full story. Industry analysis shows that even as volumes fall and more consumers moderate, global alcohol spending continues to rise. Emerging markets now contribute over 65 percent of leading brewers’ profits, and the no-alcohol category has become a market worth tens of billions of dollars, growing at double-digit rates. These dynamics illustrate a shift from volume to value: responsible consumption patterns are not reducing economic value; they’re redirecting it, toward premium formats, adjacent categories, and new job creation.

New reporting from IWSR shows that while sales volumes have softened in some markets, underlying consumer demand remains remarkably stable. In the United States, the average number of drinks per adult per week has hovered between 10 and 12 for decades and is only modestly below its 2021 peak. Rather than a collapse in consumption, the data suggests a shift toward lower-volume, higher-value formats, a move that benefits both public health and profit margins.

Behind this shift is a more intentional consumer. People increasingly ask not only what a product is, but how it aligns with their lifestyle, values, and expectations for transparency. These factors are shaping purchasing behavior, and forcing businesses to innovate in ways that reward responsibility over excess.

A Virtuous Cycle for Growth

While precise quantification is complex, evidence shows that countries with lower rates of harmful drinking experience lower healthcare burdens and fewer workdays lost to alcohol-related issues. These gains feed what economists call a virtuous cycle: healthier societies support stronger economies, and stronger economies enable healthier choices.

Some still see moderation as a threat to the alcohol industry. In reality, it’s a catalyst for smarter, more sustainable growth. Moderation and responsible consumption are part of a broader shift toward value creation that supports societal well-being, investor interest, and business continuity.

A More Inclusive Model of Economic Growth

A more inclusive growth model depends on balance, not the false binary of abstinence versus excess, but a middle ground where informed adults can enjoy products responsibly, underage drinking continues to decline, and companies innovate in ways that reflect both consumer values and public health priorities.

Governments play a key role through evidence-based regulation. Companies contribute by leading on responsible innovation. Consumers participate by making informed choices. Together, these forces are reshaping how economic value and public good coexist.

The Opportunity Ahead

We’re at an inflection point. The economics of alcohol are changing, and so is the definition of growth. As businesses and governments revisit what sustainable prosperity looks like in the decade ahead, moderation will be central to that conversation. It’s not a moral stance or a temporary trend — it’s a data-driven strategy for long-term resilience.

For executives, the message is clear: moderation isn’t a soft signal — it’s a sharp business edge. Those who embrace it early will lead.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Banking on carbon markets 2.0: why financial institutions should engage with carbon credits

Published

on



The global carbon market is at an inflection point as discussions during the recent COP meeting in Brazil demonstrated. 

After years of negotiations over carbon market rules under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, countries are finally moving on to the implementation phase, with more than 30 countries already developing Article 6 strategies. At the same time, the voluntary market is evolving after a period of intense scrutiny over the quality and integrity of carbon credit projects.

The era of Carbon Markets 2.0 is characterised by high integrity standards and is increasingly recognised as critical to meeting the emission reduction goals of the Paris Agreement.

And this ongoing transition presents enormous opportunities for financial institutions to apply their expertise to professionalise the trade of carbon credits and restore confidence in the market. 

The engagement of banks, insurance companies, asset managers and others can ensure that carbon markets evolve with the same discipline, risk management, and transparency that define mature financial systems while benefitting from new business opportunities.

Carbon markets 2.0

Carbon markets are an untapped opportunity to deliver climate action at speed and scale. Based on solutions available now, they allow industries to take action on emissions for which there is currently no or limited solution, complementing their decarbonization programs and closing the gap between the net zero we need to achieve and the net zero that is possible now. They also generate debt-free climate finance for emerging and developing economies to support climate-positive growth – all of which is essential for the global transition to net zero.

Despite recent slowdowns in carbon markets, the volume of credit retirements, representing delivered, verifiable climate action, was higher in the first half of 2025 than in any prior first half-year on record. Corporate climate commitments are increasing, driving significant demand for carbon credits to help bridge the gap on the path to meeting net-zero goals.

According to recent market research from the Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity initiative (VCMI), businesses are now looking for three core qualities in the market to further rebuild their trust: stability, consistency, and transparency – supported by robust infrastructure. These elements are vital to restoring investor confidence and enabling interoperability across markets.

MSCI estimates that the global carbon credit market could grow from $1.4 billion in 2024 to up to $35 billion by 2030 and between $40 billion and $250 billion by 2050. Achieving such growth will rely on institutions equipped with capital, analytical rigour, risk frameworks, and market infrastructure.

Carbon Markets 2.0 will both benefit from and rely on the participation of financial institutions. Now is the time for them to engage, support the growth and professionalism of this nascent market, and, in doing so, benefit from new business opportunities.

The opportunity

Institutional capital has a unique role to play in shaping the carbon market as it grows. Financial institutions can go beyond investing or lending to high-quality projects by helping build the infrastructure that will enable growth at scale. This includes insurance, aggregation platforms, verification services, market-making capacity, and long-term investment vehicles. 

By applying their expertise and understanding of the data and infrastructure required for a functioning, transparent market, financial institutions can help accelerate the integration of carbon credits into the global financial architecture. 

As global efforts to decarbonise intensify, high-integrity carbon markets offer financial institutions a pathway to deliver tangible climate impact, support broader social and nature-positive goals, and unlock new sources of revenue, such as:

  • Leveraging core competencies for market growth, including advisory, lending, project finance, asset management, trading, market access, and risk management solutions.
  • Unlocking new commercial pathways and portfolio diversification beyond existing business models, supporting long-term growth, and facilitating entry into emerging decarbonisation-driven markets.
  • Securing first-mover advantage, helping to shape norms, gain market share, and capture opportunities across advisory, structuring, and product innovation.
  • Deepening client engagement by helping clients navigate carbon markets to add strategic value and strengthen long-term relationships.

Harnessing the opportunity

To make the most of these opportunities, financial institutions should consider engagements in high-integrity carbon markets to signal confidence and foster market stability. Visible participation, such as integrating high-quality carbon credits into institutional climate strategies, can help normalise the voluntary use of carbon credits alongside decarbonisation efforts and demonstrate leadership in climate-aligned financial practices.

Financial institutions can also deliver solutions that reduce market risk and improve project bankability. For instance, de-risking mechanisms like carbon credit insurance can mitigate performance, political, and delivery risks, addressing one of the core challenges holding back investments in carbon projects. 

Additionally, diversified funding structures, including blended finance and concessional capital, can lower the cost of capital and de-risk early-stage startups. Fixed-price offtake agreements with investment-grade buyers and the use of project aggregation platforms can improve cash flow predictability and risk distribution, further enhancing bankability.

By structuring investments into carbon project developers, funds, or the broader market ecosystem, financial institutions can unlock much-needed finance and create an investable pathway for nature and carbon solutions.

For instance, earlier this year JPMorgan Chase struck a long-term offtake agreement for carbon credits tied to CO₂ capture, blending its roles as investor and market facilitator. Standard Chartered is also set to sell jurisdictional forest credits on behalf of the Brazilian state of Acre, while embedding transparency, local consultation, and benefit-sharing into the deal. These examples offer promising precedents in demonstrating that institutions can act not only as financiers but as integrators of high-integrity carbon markets.

The institutions that lead the growth of carbon markets will not only drive climate and nature outcomes but also unlock strategic commercial advantages in an emerging and rapidly evolving asset class.

However, the window to secure first-mover advantage is narrow: carbon markets are now shifting from speculation to implementation. Now is the moment for financial institutions to move from the sidelines and into leadership, helping shape the future of high-integrity carbon markets while capturing the opportunities they offer.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

This CEO went back to college at 52, but says successful Gen Zers ‘forge their own path’

Published

on



Being a successful college dropout is worn like a badge of honor for many in the business world. After all, some of the wealthiest leaders—Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Larry Ellison—never finished their degrees, and they’re proud of it.

Lauren Antonoff once wore that badge, too. After her apartment burned down as a student at University of California, Berkeley, and she missed finishing her diploma, she still managed to break into tech, spending nearly two decades at Microsoft and later serving as a senior executive at GoDaddy. After building a career without the credential she was supposed to have, Antonoff took pride in proving she didn’t need it.

But after 25 years in the industry, Antonoff became burdened by what she felt was “unfinished business.” So in 2022, during a rare career break, she was back in a UC Berkeley lecture hall—this time as a 52-year-old peer among classmates half her age. Antonoff’s schedule was filled with courses in rhetoric, political science, and even biotech.

Going back to school wasn’t ultimately revolutionary for her career, she admitted to Fortune, but it did sharpen her perspective on adaptivity and staying focused on long-term goals—even when life takes unexpected turns.

“There are probably some people who approach college from like, ‘I’m going to do the assignment and do what I’m told,’” she told Fortune. “But the students I think that really thrive are the ones who forge their own path.”

Now, as CEO of Life360—the family location app worth more than $5 billion—she sees clear parallels between navigating a classroom and navigating the C-suite.

“That’s a lot of what CEOs do is look at the range of possibilities, figure out what the options are, and pick a path,” she added. “And pick a path knowing that you can’t know the future, knowing that you don’t get to know if you’re right until after and being the ones to shoulder that responsibility.”

Forging your own path can sometimes be somewhat of a privilege and can take time, Antonoff admitted. But, she said, small steps can create momentum. 

“I’m a big believer in finding your way in the world,” Antonoff said. “That’s not just about getting a job; if you don’t have a job, start something. If you don’t have a job, go volunteer someplace. In my experience, being active and working on problems that you’re interested in—one thing leads to another.”

The secret to reach the ‘highest levels of success’

Growing up, Antonoff thought she knew exactly where her career was heading: civil rights law. At UC Berkeley, she planned to study rhetoric and political science and then make the jump to law school.

But after buying her first MacBook to write papers, she found an unexpected fascination in technology—and began asking questions. That curiosity led her to the Berkeley Mac User group, where she realized tech might be more than just a hobby.

Her advice for Gen Z echoes that early pivot.

“Do what you love,” she said. “I think it’s very hard to reach the highest levels of success if you don’t have the energy and the passion. I think when you are excited about something, it sort of fuels those creative juices and those insights that allow you to chart the future and bring people along with you.”

In December 2022, Antonoff finally walked across the stage and added one long-awaited line to her résumé: B.A., UC Berkeley. By the following May, she had been named COO of Life360—and within two years, CEO.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.