Connect with us

Politics

Bill lowering gun-buying age on target to reach House floor over objections of Parkland families

Published

on


Legislation that lowers the age to buy firearms, reversing restrictions implemented after the Parkland shooting, is moving to the House floor.

The House Judiciary Committee on a 16-6 vote advanced a bill (HB 759) that would allow 18-year-olds to purchase or take legal ownership of firearms, including the type used in the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High. That marked the last committee stop this year for the legislation before the full House membership can take it up for consideration.

Several family members of individuals killed in that tragedy spoke out during the committee hearing, urging lawmakers not to roll back gun access restrictions put in place in response.

Broward County School Board Chair Debbie Hixon, whose husband, Chris Hixon, was Campus Security Monitor at the Parkland high school and one of three adults murdered there, said lowering the age to purchase guns would betray families who demanded a policy response at the time.

“To me, this feels like salt being poured into an open wound. Families, very early into grief and shock of what happened, came up here to Tallahassee and asked you to do something, and you did it,” Debbie Hixon said.

“You did it as a bipartisan body that believed in the things that were in this bill. And you know what? It made our communities safer. And now you want to repeal things. To me, that makes me feel like you have forgotten who my husband and the other 16 victims were.”

A jury in 2023 convicted the mass shooter. He was 19 at the time and used an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle purchased shortly before committing the crime.

But Rep. Michelle Salzman, a Pensacola Republican, said it was important to restore the Second Amendment rights of adult Floridians. She sponsored the legislation, and said the state erred when compromising the constitutional rights of adults.

“I’ve had several events in my own community where we have people in Pensacola who are living at home with young children, 18-, 19-year-old single moms, who have not had the opportunity to have that,” Salzman said, “and they have expressed to me that they would like to be able to purchase a firearm for the protection of their home.”

Gun rights advocates said the Parkland bill passed by Republicans in 2018 overreached, and that the change in gun-buying age for long guns to 21 years old did not address the root cause of the tragedy.

“As a detective, I sat through the investigations and presentations for what happened in Parkland. It was horrific and it was a failure in government,” said Luis Valdes of Gun Owners of America.

“Again, gun control wouldn’t have solved this. The state’s argument that any adult under the age of 21 doesn’t have the mental faculties to possess and own a firearm is ludicrous, especially when we let 19-year-olds become sworn law enforcement officers in the state of Florida.”

But Democrats in the committee noted that the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law when the National Rifle Association challenged it on constitutional grounds.

“I’ve read the Second Amendment. Please point to me the part that says you get an AR-15,” said Rep. Dan Daley, a Parkland Democrat.Please point to the part that says you get to be 18 and 20 years old and have an AR-15. Show me the words. You can’t.”

The House in two prior Legislative Sessions also approved a reduction in gun-buying age, but such a policy has not moved in the Senate.

“God willing, it won’t,” Daley said. “But every single time we have to have this conversation, folks like Debbie Hixon have the scab ripped off.”

A companion bill (SB 920) sponsored by Sen. Jay Collins, a Tampa Republican, has not been scheduled for a committee hearing this year.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gay Valimont posts $6.5 million in fundraising ahead of CD 1 Special Election

Published

on


Fundraising reports from Democrat Gay Valimont confirm she raised nearly $6.5 million to run in a Special Election for Florida’s 1st Congressional District.

The massive amount dwarfs the $1.6 million she raised when she challenged and lost to former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz last year. With Gaetz since resigned, she now faces Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis in an April 1 Special Election in Florida’s 1st Congressional District.

Based on voter registration data in the district, Patronis should enter the contest as a favorite. However, Valimont’s numbers show she collected more than four times what Patronis reported through the last fundraising period, which ended on March 12.

Her FEC filings show Valimont collected nearly $6.4 million just since Jan. 9. The donations come from across the country as Democrats nationally look to express outrage at President Donald Trump’s policies since his return to office.

Patronis won a Republican Primary in January mainly because of the strength of Trump’s endorsement.

The National Democratic Committee announced on Thursday a coordinated campaign with the Florida Democratic Party in Special Elections in Florida congressional districts, part of an effort to organize Democrats in all parts of the country.

Still, Republicans significantly outnumber Democrats in CD 1. As of the March 3 closing of voter rolls, around 312,000 Republicans were registered and eligible to vote in the Special Election, compared to fewer than 119,000 Democrats and about 136,000 other voters.

The district remains the most Republican-heavy in Florida, and Trump won a higher percentage of the vote there than anywhere else in the state.

But just as Valimont challenged Gaetz as an embarrassment to the district, she said voters across the political spectrum are now agitated by Trump. She has also stressed she lives in the district while Patronis does not.

“We’re talking to every voter we can. Yet, my opponent is ducking every chance to face voters at debates and joint forums,” Valimont posted this week. “If he doesn’t care enough to connect with our district now, what do you think he’ll be like as FL-1’s rep?”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Last Call for 3.20.25 – A prime-time read of what’s going down in Florida

Published

on


Last Call – A prime-time read of what’s going down in Florida politics.

First Shot

After a lengthy debate, the House Health & Human Services Committee approved legislation expanding the breadth of procedures and prescriptions administered by optometrists.

Sponsored by Rep. Alex Rizo, HB 449 is this year’s edition of the long-running “Eyeball Wars.” Optometrists have sought authority to provide more advanced care, such as laser surgeries for years. Ophthalmologists firmly oppose any scope of practice expansion.

Both professions require extensive post-baccalaureate education.

Ophthalmologists who attend medical school, receive a medical doctorate, and complete a multi-year residency under the supervision of one or more established ophthalmologists; optometrists hold doctorates in optometry, and while sometimes referred to as “optometric physicians,” they neither attend medical school nor do they complete a residency. 

In practice, optometrists’ primary concern is vision care, such as the provision of corrective lenses. By contrast, ophthalmologists’ focus is eye care, which encompasses the diagnosis and treatment of all maladies involving the eye, impact on vision notwithstanding.

Multiple ophthalmology residents stressed the gravity of that distinction during public testimony. Spencer Barrett, a third-year resident physician at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute in South Florida, emphasized the importance of the highly specialized training he and others in his cohort receive.

“I, as a microsurgeon, would not feel qualified in the slightest to perform brain surgery or vascular surgery or know when to do it any more than I would trust a brain surgeon to operate on the eye because I have not undergone the years of training needed to do so safely,” he told members of the committee.

“Giving optometrists the opportunity to conduct these surgeries and procedures without the training required puts Floridian safety at risk.”

Proponents of HB 449 recognize the distinction between the two professions but say that the current state of eye care access in Florida demands legislative action. 

Rizo bolstered this claim — and even converted an initially reticent committee member from a “nay” to a “yay” — by citing American Medical Association data recommending one ophthalmologist per 4,000 residents in a given region. There are approximately 1,700 ophthalmologists in Florida, which would be adequate for a state of 7 million residents, not Florida’s 23.5 million and growing.

Rizo addressed medical doctors directly in closing: “Everything that you do, every single one of you, every single one of you that is in the medical profession. Thank you. Thank you for what you do.”

He then emphasized that optometrists would only be able to conduct specific, less complex procedures — multiple opponents harped on the vagueness of this section of the bill — and that statistics show the action is warranted.

“The question is not what you look at, but what you see. And I hope that throughout today’s presentation, throughout our conversations, I hope that we can see what we need to do,” Rizo said, quoting Henry David Thoreau.

Committee members voted 13-5 in favor of the bill, which next heads to the House Health & Human Services Committee.

Evening Reads

—“How the Justice Department is remaking itself in Donald Trump’s image” via Jeremy Roebuck, Mark Berman, Perry Stein and Spencer S. Hsu of The Washington Post

—”How the GOP went from championing campus free speech to fighting it” via Jeremy W. Peters of The New York Times

—”The left’s misguided critique of abundance liberalism” via Eric Levitz of Vox

—”Dr. Oz is now the grown-up in the room” via Benjamin Mazer of The Atlantic

—”New College of Florida could take over USF Sarasota-Manatee, Senator says” via Lawrence Mower of New College of Florida

—”Florida’s GOP-led Legislature aims to limit the power of city, county governments” via John Kennedy of USA Today Network-Florida

—”Ron DeSantis wonders why ‘young people’ aren’t doing immigrants’ jobs” via A.G. Gancarski of Florida Politics

—”‘A true champion’: Ben Albritton honored for rural advocacy” via Janelle Irwin Taylor of Florida Politics

—”James Uthmeier wants pay raises, promotions for cops who stop Tesla vandals” via A.G. Gancarski of Florida Politics

—”Every ‘Snow White’ controversy over the film’s tortured production” via Krystie Lee Yandoli of Rolling Stone

Quote of the Day

“Why do we say we need to import foreigners, even import an illegal, when, you know, teenagers used to work at these resorts?”

— Gov. Ron DeSantis, questioning why “young people” aren’t doing immigrants’ jobs.

Put it on the Tab

Look to your left, then look to your right. If you see one of these people at your happy hour haunt, flag down the bartender and put one of these on your tab. Recipes included, just in case the Cocktail Codex fell into the well.

Senate President Ben Albritton gets a Country Life for being recognized as a “true champion” for small-town Florida during Rural Counties Day

Gov. Ron DeSantis may wonder why Florida youth aren’t snapping up jobs once held by immigrants. We presume they aren’t old enough to enjoy a Rise and Grind.

Attorney General James Uthmeier is offering pay raises and promotions to cops who bust Tesla vandals, so why not complete the set with an ice-cold Bounty?

Breakthrough Insights

Tune In

Gators tip off in Big Dane tomorrow

The Gators begin their run in the NCAA basketball tournament tomorrow against Norfolk State (6:50 p.m. ET, TNT).

After winning the SEC tournament, Florida earned the top seed and ended the season with a 30-4 record. This season marks the first time since 2014 that Florida has entered the tournament as a number-one seed. That season, Florida earned a trip to the Final Four.

The Gators’ impressive season included wins over eight teams ranked at the time, including beating Tennessee and Auburn when each program was #1 in the country.

Florida is led by Walter Clayton Jr., who was named this week as a first-team All-American. It is the first time in program history that a Gator has earned first-team All-America honors. Joekim Noah was a second-team All-America selection in 2007. Claton leads Florida in scoring, assists, and field goal percentage. He made 97 three-pointers this season to lead Florida. 

According to ESPN Bet, the Gators are the second favorite to win the national championship. Only Duke, the top overall seed in the tournament, has better odds. The Gators are 28.5-point favorites against Norfolk State.

The Spartans (24-10) won the MEAC tournament to gain the automatic berth into the Big Dance. Norfolk State faced only one ranked team this season, losing to then-top-ranked Tennessee. 

___

Last Call is published by Peter Schorsch, assembled and edited by Phil Ammann and Drew Wilson, with contributions from the staff of Florida Politics.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Disney shareholders reject anti-LGTBQ and climate change proposals

Published

on


In a rebuke against Florida’s anti-woke and anti-DEI legislation, Disney shareholders overwhelmingly rejected a conservative group’s push for Disney to withdraw from an LGBTQ rights organization’s corporate ratings.

Disney shareholders also nixed another shareholder proposal urging Disney to examine its investments in the fight against climate change.

The two politically loaded shareholder proposals were voted down during Thursday’s annual company shareholders meeting. The counted election results were not immediately available after the meeting.

The National Center for Public Policy Research, which describes itself as “the original and premier opponent of the woke takeover of American corporate life,” took aim at the Human Rights Campaign’s annual Corporate Equality Index, where Disney had gotten a “perfect score” since 2007.

In the 2025 addition, the Human Rights Campaign gave Disney high scores for offering benefits for same-sex couples, doing LGBTQ outreach and providing training on inclusive culture.

“Disney disastrously engaged in such activism when it inserted itself in the middle of a divisive public debate over the Parental Rights in Education Act,” according to the shareholder proposal. “Consequently, Disney stock fell 44% in 2022 – its worst performance in 50 years – amid putting this divisive agenda ahead of parental rights and political neutrality.”

The shareholder proposal brought up the fight between Gov. Ron DeSantis and Disney over the 2022 law dubbed “Don’t Say Gay.” The feud escalated when the state passed several laws targeting Disney World’s government in its special district and the monorail inspections, although the two sides are at peace these days.

“The Human Rights Campaign acts as a kind of Mafia, forcing companies to embrace gender ideology in exchange for a high rating in the Corporate Equality Index,” said Stefan Padfield, the center’s executive director.

He urged shareholders to vote for Disney to stop participating because he said it was bad for business.

Ultimately, shareholders rejected his bid and supported the company, which argued in response, “Given the Company’s existing practices to assess participation in transparency efforts and the Board’s oversight of ESG reporting, workforce equity matters and human rights policies, we do not believe this proposal would provide additional value to shareholders.”

Shareholder activist James McRitchie also warned Disney heavily invests employees’ retirement plans in companies that are high carbon or are cutting down trees. Disney’s portfolios are at risk financially, and so is its reputation since the company’s “mission to inspire young people around the world.”

“Disney knows we must address climate risk head-on,” he said.

Climate change affects the castle at home, too.

With Florida’s rising temperatures, Disney World firefighters are regularly responding to 911 calls for visitors suffering heat-related illnesses, according to Florida Politics reporting.

McRitchie, who spoke on behalf of the nonprofit As You Sow, asked shareholders to require Disney to write a report about how the company protects retirement plan beneficiaries from climate change.

Disney wanted shareholders to reject it because it argued the company’s investments are diverse and the report would not be a “valuable use of Company time and resources, nor enhance long-term shareholder value.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.