Members of a new House Select Committee on Property Taxes convened for their first meeting to discuss five proposals Speaker Daniel Perez proffered as a “springboard” for talks on delivering relief to Florida homeowners.
Some were more popular than others. One was summarily rejected as “a really bad idea.”
The panel, led by Chairs Vicki Lopez and Toby Overdorf, first went over the key concepts, definitions and structures by which property taxes are administered in the state.
Overdorf, a Palm City Republican, said that when it comes to finding solutions that fit state and local demands, “everything is on the table.”
He noted a sharp rise in property tax rates in recent years. In 2015, collections by counties, municipalities, school districts and certain independent special districts were about $28.3 billion.
By 2020, however, they had increased to $37.7 billion. Since then, they grew by another $17.5 billion.
“Collections do not have to increase just because property values have skyrocketed,” he said, conceding that property values had risen sharply. “This is a choice by the taxing authorities when they set their millage rates.”
The Florida Constitution prohibits a state property tax but authorizes counties, municipalities, school districts and certain independent special districts to levy them. Accordingly, any change to that model and the ability of local governments to levy property taxes requires a constitutional amendment by statewide referendum or a county-level vote on the matter.
The five proposals take that into consideration to varying effects.
Several of the committee’s members agreed that regardless of which, if any, of the proposals lawmakers pursue when the Legislature reconvenes for Session next year, it is vital that localities be included in the conversation.
Republican Rep. Richard Gentry of Astor said lawmakers should be cautious in shifting the burden to sales taxes as it would make Florida noncompetitive with other states. It could also upset the fiscal equilibrium of smaller, more financially constrained counties as the state redistributes the funds.
“I would hate to have to try and outvote Dade, Broward and Palm Beach,” he said. “Just the conversation about sales taxes raises the hair on the back of my neck.”
Astor Republican Rep. Richard Gentry and others urged the committee’s members to be mindful of the unintended impacts on smaller counties and cities. Image via Florida Politics/Colin Hackley.
Belleview Republican Rep. Ryan Chamberlin, who last year sponsored legislation to abolish property taxes in Florida and replace them with a new “consumption tax,” said tackling the issue of property tax reform is so difficult because its central concept is unjust.
“We’re trying to tweak and adjust an unfair tax. … We’re taxing people on unrealized gains instead of taxing on real transactions and not bureaucratic opinion,” he said. “And when you’re taxing on bureaucratic opinions, you’ve got all these moving parts that you’re trying to make feel right, but it just never ends up feeling right.”
The committee discussed the five proposals below. Included are key comments about each. Lopez, a Miami Republican, reminded members that the proposals are “just starting points.”
“We will be considering,” she said, “any and all suggestions (and) recommendations that we hear (from) of our constituents and stakeholders across the state.”
Proposal 1: Require every city, county and special district to hold a referendum at the next General Election on the question of eliminating property on homestead properties
This proposal, perhaps because it came first, drew the longest discussion Friday. Some, like Tampa Democratic Rep. Dianne Hart, expressed worry about how local governments would be able to pay for services without property taxes.
Parkland Democratic Rep. Christine Hunschofsky said she is concerned that many residents don’t understand what their property taxes pay for and recommended that consideration be given to better educating them before any decision is made.
“We realized in the last election there may have been issues with how people were talking about issues that were on the ballot,” she said, referring to confusion around six proposed constitutional amendments voters weighed in on in 2024.
Port Orange Republican Rep. Chase Tramont said non-homestead properties shouldn’t be left out of the equation.
“People often say renters don’t pay property taxes. That’s not true,” he said. “They are being passed down to them.”
Proposal 2: Create a new $500K homestead exemption for all non-school taxes and increase the exemption to $1M for residents who are 65 or older or who have had a homestead exemption for 30 years or more
Orlando Democratic Rep. Anna Eskamani described this proposal as “very thoughtful,” considering how many longtime residents living on fixed incomes are having an increasingly harder time making ends meet as property values skyrocket.
In Miami-Dade County, for instance, she said there are few properties valued below $500,000, and Florida’s current homestead exemptionsaren’t helping homeowners much.
“Creating this new exemption … and then for our elderly people, who are the ones that are in most need and are being displaced from their homes they’ve lived in for decades at a time,” she said, “would provide some real relief.”
Democratic Rep. Anna Eskamani of Orlando said Florida’s elderly residents, who account for some of the state’s hardest-hit homeowners, could benefit greatly from Proposal 2. Image via Florida Politics/Colin Hackley.
Rep. Shane Abbott, a DeFuniak Springs Republican, said it’s the opposite problem in his district, where some counties may not have more than a couple houses each worth $500,000 or more.
He recommended that if the state moves forward with the proposal that there should be “some type of state offset” to compensate for the shortfall it would create.
“And you’re talking about wiping out the entire tax base,” he said. “This one scares me a lot, actually.”
Tallahassee Democratic Rep. Gallop Franklin suggested a formula be used rather than a flat number. Islamorada Republican Rep. Jim Mooney agreed, noting that the median price of a home in Monroe County is more than $900,000.
“Throwing a blanket across the state of Florida is simply not going to work,” he said.
Davie Democratic Rep. Mike Gottleib warned that giving such an “aggressive tax break” could “trap people in their homes.” Instead, he said, the state should work more on affordability or finding ways to help elderly people move into smaller, more affordable homes.
Proposal 3: Authorize the Legislature to raise the homestead exemption up to any value by statute
Republican Rep. Dean Black of Jacksonville praised this option because it would enable lawmakers to act as needed on property taxes, including eliminating them altogether — something to which the two prior proposals don’t fully speak.
“One of the impetuses for us actually having this committee is in recognition of the fact that ad valorem taxes are inherently unfair. You work your whole life to create a home, but you never, ever truly own it,” he said. “This option provides us the freedom and the flexibility to make sure that we do enough to ensure that people are forever free of taxes on property that they’ve bought, that they’ve worked for and they’ve paid for.”
Eskamani said any implementation of the proposal should come with additional ways for localities to generate revenue, since the Legislature would likely have difficulty increasing taxes again if there are fiscal issues.
“If this body were to, for example, reduce the tax liability and expand the exemption, we’re never going to bring it back up,” she said. “Politically speaking, voting to reduce an exemption — i.e., tax more people — is so politically difficult to do and also requires a two-thirds majority in the legislative body, based on the state constitution. I would worry about tying hands in a way that you’re never going to be able to change.”
Tallahassee Democratic Rep. Gallop Franklin (pictured) and Republican Rep. Jim Mooney of Islamorada warned against a one-size-fits-all approach to property tax reform. Image via Florida Politics/Colin Hackley.
Proposal 4: Change the existing homestead exemption cap from 3% a year to 3% every 3 years and reduce the non-homestead level from 10% annually to 15% every 3 years for non-school taxes
Black said this was his least favorite option because it wouldn’t accomplish what he believes should be the prime objective of this effort: eliminating unfair property taxes.
Lakewood Ranch Republican Rep. Bill Conerly said the proposal would shift the tax burden to non-homestead properties, which brings problems.
“In my experience, every industry in Florida is labor-constrained, and one of the main constraints is associated with housing,” he said. “This, I think, would have an extremely negative impact on rental property. … It’s going to increase the cost … and it will have a significant impact on those who have not yet been able to secure a permanent home.”
Placida Republican Rep. Danny Nix, a commercial Realtor, warned that increasing non-homestead taxes could hurt the rental market.
Proposal 5: Eliminate the ability to foreclose on a homestead property due to a property tax lien
Everyone hated this idea, and each comment criticizing its logic and merit solicited laughter.
“No disrespect to whoever came up with this one,” Abbott said. “Nobody will pay their property taxes, ever. I mean, I might not at this point.”
Rep. Michael Owen, an Apollo Beach Republican, called the proposal “a disaster.”
“What are you going to tell a bank?” he said. “What would this do to a title insurance policy? Any time you go to close, every lien has to be removed from a property. What you’re doing is you’re actually encouraging a default on the best investment you can make, usually, in your life. This is a really bad idea.”
Hart concurred, describing the proposal as “just awful.”
“Because nobody would pay, and if they don’t pay and if they want to sell their house, it wouldn’t be of any value because they’ve given it all away in liens,” she said. “So yeah, I think we should take this one off the board.”
Overdorf said Perez expects the committee to develop one or more joint resolutions before committees begin meeting ahead of the 2026 Session, which will likely require the panel’s 37 members meet again as inter-chamber negotiations on the state’s next budget recommence.
Orange County Elections Supervisor Karen Castor Dentel is urging voters to mark their calendars and have a summer plan to vote so they don’t miss the upcoming deadlines for the Senate District 15 and House District 40 Special Elections.
“One-third of Orange County voters live in districts where a special election is taking place this summer,” Castor Dentel said in a statement as her office launches a summer campaign reminding voters of the key dates.
May 27 is the deadline for voter registration and party affiliation changes.
June 12 is the vote-by-mail request deadline.
Then, early voting runs June 14-22 daily from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. The four early voting locations are: Supervisor of Elections Office , 119 W. Kaley St; West Oaks Library , 1821 E. Silver Star Road in Ocoee; Apopka Community Center, 519 S Central Ave, in Apopka; Eatonville Town Hall , 307 E. Kennedy Blvd. in Eatonville.
The Primary is scheduled for June 24 with the General Election Sept. 2.
The two Special Elections are happening after Sen. Geraldine Thompsondied from surgery complications in February. Thompson, a Democrat, had represented Central Florida in Tallahassee for years.
Rep. LaVon Bracy Davis is running for Thompson’s old seat and has resigned from HD 40, creating the other open race.
Bracy Davis is going head-to-head against her own brother, former state Sen. Randolph Bracy, in the Democratic Primary along with former U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson, and Coretta Anthony-Smith. Republican Willie Montague is the lone Republican candidate awaiting in the General Election.
The race for Bracy Davis’ open seat casts former Rep. Travaris McCurdy against RaShon Young, Bracy Davis’ former Chief of Staff in the Democratic Primary. The winner faces Republican Tuan Le in the General.
Castor Dentel’s message in the new voter engagement campaign: “As you make summer plans, make a plan to VOTE.”
She held a press conference this week with other voting advocates, and is running ads and doing community outreach to get the word out.
“Even if you aren’t voting in this round, it’s the perfect moment to make sure your registration is accurate and up to date,” Castor Dentel said. “This initiative is about readiness, access, and engagement — and we want every voter to feel confident their voice will be heard every election cycle.”
As the Legislature’s Regular Session drew to a close, a seemingly minor disagreement over four words spelled the end for a bill that would have mandated life sentences without parole for defendants convicted of manslaughter in the death of a police officer.
Now weeks after the “Officer Jason Raynor Act” died, its sponsors are still at odds over who killed it.
The bill (SB 234) died in House messages May 2, leaving its supporters and Republican sponsors — Sen. Tom Leek of Ormond Beach and Rep. Jessica Baker of Jacksonville — frustrated over what they described as a breakdown in bicameral collaboration.
The legislation, named for Daytona Beach Police officer Jason Raynor, who was fatally shot in 2021 by a man who resisted arrest, sailed through its committee stops with little opposition, as did its analog in the House.
It would have clarified that no person can use violence or threaten violence to resist an officer “engaged in the performance of his or her duties.” The change is necessary, Bakerexplained, because “jurors can get confused” when interpreting the law and defense lawyers have used that confusion to secure lighter sentences for their clients.
In early April, Leek amended the bill to include and define a “good faith” standard for police conduct during arrest and detainment situations. It came at the request of the Senate Black Caucus, which raised concerns that removing the standard could expose communities of color to unchecked police power.
The Senate passed the updated version 37-0 on April 2. More than three weeks later, on April 29, the House approved the measure 116-0. But ahead of the vote, Baker amended the language governing arrests, replacing a reference to a “lawful or an unlawful” arrest with one that referenced “any” arrest.
The difference, on the surface, appeared negligible. In the same way that a person saying they like colors that are blue and not blue is the same as saying they like any or all colors, referring to both lawful and unlawful arrests can generally be interpreted as referring to any or all arrests.
Baker told Florida Politics that the change merely mirrored language she had negotiated with Democrats and the former House Judiciary Committee Chair when she carried the measure in the 2024 Session. And it was in her House bill (HB 175) this year.
“To me, it wasn’t a big deal of a change,” Baker said. “It just makes it clearer. It was language that was already in the bill.”
But when the amended version of SB 234 arrived back in the Senate later that day, Leek balked. With support from the chamber, he sent the bill back April 30 with a request that the House concur with the prior Senate language. He argued on the floor that Baker’s amendment was due more to her being resentful about not being involved in the “good faith” change than about tightening the bill’s text.
Ormond Beach Republican Sen. Tom Leek discusses SB 234 Friday, May 2, 2025, at the Capitol in Tallahassee. Image via Colin Hackley/Florida Politics.
Baker, on May 1, insisted on the amendment and warned repeated bouncing would “kill this good bill for the second year in a row.”
Leek blamed a lack of cross-rotunda communication. He said her “any arrest” phrasing was introduced on third reading without prior committee vetting. That’s true on the Senate side but not in the House, where Baker introduced HB 175 with that exact language.
“It just makes it clearer,” Baker said. “It was not a surprise.”
Leek told Florida Politics that the question of whether there’s a real difference between “lawful or unlawful” and “any” is not a settled issue.
“Whether you think it was innocuous or substantive, not everyone agreed,” he said. “We know (the language of the Senate version is) supported by the Florida Sheriff’s Association, all law enforcement, the state prosecutors and every one of the stakeholders who had advised the House sponsor not to disrupt anything. And for whatever reason, the House sponsor decided to go ahead and do that against the advice of everybody.”
He added that if there wasn’t any real difference between “lawful or unlawful” and “any,” then Baker insisting on the change in the 11th hour of Session needlessly imperiled the legislation, noting that SB 234 “sat in House messages” for “a long time” before the lower chamber took it up on the floor.
“If it’s innocuous, don’t do it,” he said. “And if it is substantive, why would you wait to the very last second to do it?”
On Friday, May 2, with hours remaining before adjournment, the Senate — at Leek’s request — formally refused to concur with the House amendment and bounced the bill back to the House for a third time with a request to remove Baker’s language.
But procedural rules prevented the House from sending the bill back a fourth time, and without Senate concurrence, SB 234 died in messages — indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration.
Baker blamed Leek’s decision to “performatively” bounce the bill as a House-rule violation for the measure’s demise.
“He ultimately killed the bill in the Senate by not concurring,” she said.
Jacksonville Republican Rep. Jessica Baker answering questions about SB 234, also known as the ‘Officer Jason Raynor Act,’ at the Capitol in Tallahassee on Thursday, May 1, 2025. Image via Colin Hackley/Florida Politics.
Supporters — including Miami Rep. Ashley Gantt, Tamarac Sen. Rosalind Osgood and former Senate Democratic Leader Jason Pizzo — had praised the bipartisan tweaks and urged the two chambers to unite behind the measure.
“The policy that was in the original language in the bill, that the Senate changed, is good policy for Florida,” Gantt said in March. “I am very honored to applaud you, support you and say, ‘You go, Baker.’”
Pizzo, who last week confirmed he’s running for Governor as an independent, said Leek was “incredibly magnanimous” when he considered the Black Caucus’ concerns “at perhaps an inconvenient time” and made the “good faith” change.
“You did the right thing, sir,” Pizzo said.
Leek, who took up the legislation that Fort Myers Republican Sen. Jonathan Martin carried last year with Baker, said he plans to refile the measure for next year, “get the bill through the Senate and then work as close as we can with the Governor to get it signed.”
“I want to do what’s right for the Raynor family,” he said.
Asked whether he wanted to work with Baker on the bill again, Leek demurred.
“I’m not going to opine on that,” he said.
Baker, meanwhile, said she has “every intention of filing the bill again — with Leek’s “good faith” language.
Because that’s how everyone voted on it,” she said.
As for working with Leek again on the legislation next year, Baker said she hopes to “continue to have that conversation” and “come to a mutual understanding that he had compromises and so did I.”
“And if it’s not a big, substantive change, my way to his way,” she said, “then hopefully he can understand where I’m coming from and we can move forward with a solid bill that’s the same on both sides.”
Florida Polytechnic University President Devin Stephenson has been formally inducted into the esteemed Royal European Academy of Doctors (RAED), a defining achievement in his leadership journey that reinforces the University’s expanding international presence.
Stephenson had been named a correspondent academician of RAED last month.
RAED works to research and disseminate knowledge in the health, social, human, experimental, and technological sciences. Among its global ranks of professional standouts are Nobel laureates, former heads of state, and tenured academics specializing in economics, law, medicine, philosophy, physical sciences, and engineering.
Stephenson was inducted on Thursday in Barcelona, Spain, where he delivered an inaugural address on the evolving role of leadership in higher education.
“This recognition is not just a professional milestone but a deeply personal one for me, reflecting the collective influence of mentors, colleagues, and the many higher education leadership experiences that have shaped me and my abilities to serve the better good for mankind,” Stephenson said to the gathering of RAED’s influential members.
“To be among such prestigious academicians, innovators and thought leaders is a reminder that, while individual achievements mark our progress, it is our shared pursuit of knowledge and transformation that gives them true meaning,” he added.
His speech, entitled “Reinventing the Future of Higher Education,” drew on Stephenson’s expertise in leadership. He emphasized the importance of driving effective change by building a culture of excellence rooted in strong relationships, mutual trust and a commitment to innovation and adaptability.
“Change leadership, I have come to believe, is about navigating uncertainty with agility, about taking calculated risks, and about positioning ourselves to anticipate and respond to the forces that will shape tomorrow,” Stephenson said. “This approach demands a delicate balance between vision and execution. It requires the courage to venture into uncharted waters, to make decisions that may not always be popular but are necessary for long-term growth.”
Jordi Martí Pidelaserra, a member of RAED’s Board of Governors, praised Stephenson as a strong addition to the academy.
“Dr. Stephenson’s speech illustrates that the true meaning of leadership emerges in times of uncertainty,” Martí Pidelaserra said. “His vision serves as a guiding force to reshape the future trends of higher education.”
In addition to his formal inauguration as a correspondent academician of RAED, Stephenson met with Fulbright Scholars who have collaborated on research at Florida Poly; MateoValero, director of the Barcelona Supercomputing Center; and executives from IDIADA, a global leader in engineering and testing services for the fast-evolving automotive industry, including autonomous and electric vehicles.
“I am honored to have joined the illustrious Royal European Academy of Doctors and to contribute to its enduring legacy of education and global service,” Stephenson said. “The connections forged with academy members, leaders of Spain’s technological sector, and other international partners will open new doors for Florida Poly, creating greater opportunities for our students, our University, and the state of Florida.”