Connect with us

Sports

Aspinall retains UFC belt after an accidental eye poke by Gane

Published

on


The UFC 321 main event was ruled a no contest after Cyril Gane accidentally poked Tom Aspinall in the eye.

The UFC 321 main event was ruled a no contest after Cyril Gane accidentally poked Tom Aspinall in the eye.

The Frenchman poked Aspinall at the end of the first round after a close yet exciting fight on Saturday in the Etihad Arena, Abu Dhabi.

As the heavyweight champion, Aspinall still retains the belt, yet calls for an immediate rematch are loud by UFC and mixed martial arts fans alike as this seems like the most logical solution.

Both fighters started the first round on the front foot and had huge technical exchanges, especially Gane who caught Aspinall with a short left hook to the face.

SPORTS TALK FLORIDA

However, Aspinall came back with his own varied attacks like his effective kicks to the body.

The narrative from most heavyweight fans before the fight was that Aspinall was going to defeat Gane with ease, however Gane’s detailed preparation allowed him to nullify Aspinall’s forward pressure.

Gane used his body movement to evade attacks like stuffing takedowns with expert timing and circling to the right whenever necessary, a much more complete fighter than when he controversially beat Alexander Volkov after a tough fight last year.

According to official UFC fight statistics, both fighters were almost even in significant strikes landed, with 27 out of 39 by Aspinall and 30 out of 40 by Gane.

The fight was shaping up to be an intriguing and technical bout until the unfortunate eye-poke by Gane left Aspinall’s right eye compromised.

Aspinall was left visibly annoyed and frustrated by the incident and even questioned the fan’s booing of the situation, by saying that he was poked “knuckle-deep” and that could he not see out of the eye

Gane was also left emotionally distraught and apologised to Aspinall and the fans for the unfortunate situation.

As of now, no official rematch has been made but is very likely in the near future.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Buccaneers host rival Saints in key NFC South game

Published

on


The Tampa Bay Buccaneers enter Week 14 with a 7-5 record and first place in the NFC South, but the margin is razor-thin. Carolina (7-6) is surging and waiting for any slip-up. That makes Sunday’s divisional showdown against the rival New Orleans Saints at Raymond James Stadium a must-win for Tampa Bay.

MUST READS – SPORTS TALK FLORIDA

Key Players to Watch

Quarterback Baker Mayfield continues to lead the Buccaneers’ offense, averaging 216.7 passing yards per game. Rookie running back Bucky Irving has added balance to the attack with 59.6 rushing yards per game. Wide receiver Chris Godwin remains a reliable target, posting 78 yards in last week’s win over Arizona.

For New Orleans, rookie quarterback Tyler Shough has shown flashes, throwing for 239 yards and two touchdowns against Miami. Veteran linebacker Demario Davis anchors the Saints’ defense, ranking among the league leaders in tackles. Utility man Taysom Hill continues to be used in multiple roles, though his production has been limited.

Radio and TV Information

Kickoff is set for Sunday, December 7 at 1:00 p.m. ET from Raymond James Stadium. The game will be broadcast nationally on CBS, with Kevin Harlan and Trent Green on the call. Fans can also listen locally on 98ROCK in Tampa and WWL 105.3 FM/870 AM in New Orleans. Streaming options include NFL+, Fubo, and TuneIn Radio.

What Lies Ahead for the Buccaneers

The Buccaneers are chasing their fourth straight NFC South title, a feat that would cement their dominance in the division. With three straight divisional games ahead (Saints, Falcons, Panthers), Tampa Bay controls its destiny. A win over New Orleans would set the stage for a pivotal showdown against Carolina, which has emerged as a surprising contender.

Head Coach Todd Bowles emphasized the importance of turnovers: “Any time we play them, it’s always who wins the turnover battle – every time”. If the Bucs can execute cleanly and keep Mayfield healthy, they remain favorites to secure another division crown and a playoff berth.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

BIG Ten and SEC may not expand in the next TV cycle

Published

on





TV AND THE SEC

Future expansion of the Big Ten and SEC in 2030 and beyond is far less certain than it was in the last cycle. Both leagues already function as national networks with coast-to-coast reach, and media companies like ESPN, FOX, CBS, NBC, Amazon, Apple, and YouTube are becoming more budget-conscious. Adding more schools could simply mean more mouths to feed without significantly increasing overall revenue, unless the new members bring undeniable brand power, recruiting markets, or television value.

Sports Talk Florida

Why Expansion May Slow Down

  • National footprint already achieved: The Big Ten stretches from Rutgers to USC, while the SEC dominates the South and Texas. Both conferences already cover the largest recruiting and media markets.
  • Media company selectivity: Networks are prioritizing billion-dollar NFL and MLB renewals, leaving less room for escalating college rights fees.
  • Cord-cutting pressures: Cable decline forces ESPN, FOX, and CBS to be more cautious with spending. Streaming platforms prefer marquee matchups rather than funding entire conferences.
  • Revenue-sharing with athletes: Following the House v. NCAA settlement, schools must share revenue with players, increasing costs and reducing the incentive to dilute payouts by adding more members.

Expansion Trade-Offs

  • Pros of adding schools:
    • Access to new recruiting markets (e.g., Florida State for Florida, UNC for Carolina).
    • Strengthening brand dominance against rival conferences.
    • Potential leverage in future media negotiations.
  • Cons of adding schools:
    • Dilution of per-school payouts (more mouths to feed).
    • Higher travel costs and logistical strain.
    • Risk of diminishing traditional rivalries and regional identity.

Likely Outlook for 2030+

  • Big Ten: May only expand if ACC schools like North Carolina or Virginia become available and deliver clear ROI. Otherwise, stability is favored.
  • SEC: Already dominant in the South; expansion beyond Texas and Oklahoma may not add significant value unless it’s a powerhouse brand.
  • Media companies: With tighter budgets, they will demand proof that any new member increases national ratings, not just conference size.

Bottom Line

By 2030, the Big Ten and SEC will likely be more cautious about expansion. Unless a school offers undeniable brand strength and media market value, adding members risks diluting payouts and creating logistical headaches. In a budget-conscious media environment, stability may prove more valuable than size.







Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Wait Until Next Year For Bears’ Ownership Stadium Plan

Published

on


Bears Arlington Heights stadium drawings

Bears’ ownership wants to build a stadium in Arlington Heights.

It is wait until next year for the National Football League Chicago Bears ownership in its quest to get public money for a planned stadium-village in Arlington Heights, Illinois. The Bears ownership failed twice to get money from the Illinois state lawmakers in 2025 but next year isn’t very far away.  The Illinois General Assembly starts on January 16th, 2026. Bears’ ownership has decided that Arlington Heights, a Chicago suburb is the right place for its stadium-village after running into opposition in Chicago over its plan to build a stadium-village in a Solider Field parking lot.

The Bears ownership’s stadium-village plan was first revealed in 2023. The Bears’ ownership bought the Arlington Park racetrack property in the Chicago suburb in Arlington Heights in February 2023 for $197 million. Bears’ ownership was set to build a stadium-village in town but then came the property tax bill. Bears’ ownership was alarmed with the tab and decided Chicago was a better option. In April 2024, Bears’ ownership unveiled a plan to build a domed lakefront stadium and surround the structure with a residential and retail zone. The McCaskey family, the owners of the football business, claimed they were willing to throw in about $2 billion to help finance the venture but they also said they needed public support. The McCaskeys claimed they would put up $2.025 billion and would get a $300 million loan from the NFL. The McCaskeys wanted at least $900 million in bonds from the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority. That funding would include extending bonds of an existing 2% hotel tax. That means people using hotels and motels would be paying for a football stadium that more than likely the hotel and motel users would never step foot in. The Bears ownership’s stadium-village saga continues.

Evan Weiner’s books are available at iTunes – https://books.apple.com/us/author/evan-weiner/id595575191

Evan can be reached at evan_weiner@hotmail.com

Chicago Bears





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.