José Javier Rodríguez, a Democratic candidate for Attorney General, says he raised nearly $700,000 for the chance to unseat James Uthmeier.

“Floridians want an Attorney General who works for them, not for powerful interests. The strong support behind our campaign shows real momentum to restore integrity and accountability to the Attorney General’s office,” said Rodríguez, a Miami Democrat.

“As Attorney General, I’ll take on corruption, hold state government accountable, and be an independent voice for working families.”

Rodríguez launched his campaign in June. The former state Senator previously lost a re-election bid by just 34 votes in 2020. The results continued to be scrutinized for years as he also faced “ghost” candidate Alex Rodriguez, a no-party candidate who did not campaign but siphoned nearly 6,400 votes.

The financial support for Rodríguez in 2025 came to his campaign and his affiliated political committee, Floridians for JJR, the campaign announced. Rodríguez said it showed broad support and a desire for Floridians to see government stand up to corruption.

Rodríguez’s committee through the end of the year raised a total of nearly $309,000, and closed the year with more than $94,000 in cash on hand. Donations included a $50,000 check from Miguel Fernandez of Coral Gables in December. The Barbara Stiefel Trust donated $25,000 as well. The committee reported $10,000 donations from Laurie Schecter, Frank Morzani, Alix Ritchie and the accounting firm Terrell, Hogan Yegelwel.

Meanwhile, Rodríguez’s campaign account reported upward of $378,000 for the year. That included $3,000 from the 78 Political Committee, as well as $3,000 each from lawyer Stephen Pajcic and retiree Stuart Crandall.

Rodríguez currently faces Jim Lewis in a Democratic Primary. Lewis also sought to challenge then-Attorney General Ashley Moody but lost the Democratic nomination to Aramis Ayala.

Uthmeier, who was appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis to the Cabinet post to replace Moody after her ascension to the U.S. Senate, currently faces Steven Leskovich for the Republican nomination.

St. Petersburg City Council member Richie Floyd is running for re-election, framing his campaign as a continuation of a grassroots effort focused on affordability, tenant protections and fighting corporate influence in local government.

Floyd’s first run for office four years ago was centered on a promise to help build a city that “works for everyone.” He said his tenure on the City Council has included fighting for tenant protections, opposing corporate handouts and working to improve neighborhood safety, while navigating resistance from what he described as an entrenched political status quo.

Floyd, a Democrat who was recently named as Vice Chair of the City Council, announced his re-election campaign in a video. He said the City Council has delivered on his campaign promises, and that his re-election bid is aimed at creating a city that is both affordable and sustainable, with a particular focus on utilities and infrastructure.

He criticized profit-driven utility models and said St. Petersburg should invest more heavily in water and stormwater systems to make them more resilient and reliable.

“For the last four years, we’ve been delivering on that promise,” Floyd said in the Monday video.

“Fighting for tenant protections, pushing back on corporate handouts, and working to make our neighborhood streets safer because St. Pete residents deserve a city that we can afford to call home. It hasn’t been easy, we’ve been up against a political status quo that refuses to make bold changes in favor of everyday people, but we need to invest in doing the difficult work that makes people’s lives better.”

First elected in 2021, Floyd ran a grassroots campaign powered by small-dollar donations and volunteer support, according to his campaign website. He is a Florida native who previously worked as an electrical engineer and as a science teacher with Pinellas County Schools. He lives in the Central Oak Park neighborhood with his wife, Miranda, and became involved in civic and political organizing after moving to St. Petersburg.

According to his campaign, Floyd supports building mixed-income, city-owned social housing, expanding small-scale housing options and providing legal assistance to tenants facing eviction. His platform also calls for limiting short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods. Floyd also criticized approaches that subsidize landlords while rents continue to rise, saying the city should instead pursue policies that deliver meaningful affordability for residents.

Floyd’s campaign highlights several actions taken during his time on the City Council, including expanded tenant rights, increased funding for street safety projects, a resolution defending reproductive health care rights and efforts to lower base utility fees. His policy agenda also includes increasing developer impact fees, opposing large corporate tax subsidies, investing more in city employees and expanding public arts programs beyond the downtown core.

In the campaign video, Floyd said he will continue to push back against state and federal policies he believes marginalize communities, pledging to stand up for minority and LGBTQ residents. His campaign materials also emphasize opposition to what he describes as abuses tied to immigration enforcement.

Floyd said grassroots involvement remains central to his campaign, encouraging residents to volunteer, donate what they can and engage their neighbors as he seeks another term on the City Council.

“That’s why I’m running for re-election to create a St. Pete that’s affordable, sustainable, and pushes back against those profiting off of our existence,” Floyd said.

Legislation by Broward Democratic Sen. Barbara Sharief to prevent the state from tearing apart families on false child abuse claims is again advancing in the Senate after almost becoming law last year.

Members of the Senate Children, Families and Elder Affairs Committee voted unanimously for the measure (SB 42), which Sharief described as a “child safety and due process bill.”

“Under current law, certain complex medical conditions can be misinterpreted as signs of abuse and neglect, particularly in medically complex children,” Sharief said.

“When that happens, families can be subjected to unnecessary investigations, and children can be removed from their homes without the benefit of appropriate medical expertise.”

SB 42 would change child welfare investigations by allowing the Department of Children and Families (DCF) to delay referring allegations of child abuse to law enforcement when a parent reports a specified preexisting diagnosis or requests a medical examination.

It would also require Child Protection Teams to consult with qualified pediatric medical professionals when evaluating medically complex children or diagnoses that can mimic abuse, and gives parents limited rights to request additional examinations — at their own expense or through insurance — while barring second opinions on sexual abuse determinations.

The bill is dubbed “Patterson’s Law,” named after Michael and Tasha Patterson and their twin sons, whom the DCF took custody of in 2022 after broken bones the boys suffered raised alarms during an emergency room visit.

The couple took the matter to court, citing medical evidence showing that like their mother, the boys — who have still not been returned — have a rare genetic disorder called Ehlers-Danlos syndrome that causes fragile bones and easy bruising.

Sharief, a doctor of nursing practice and former Broward Mayor, said various preexisting genetic conditions like Ehlers-Danlos, rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency can lead to signs of bodily harm that aren’t due to physical abuse, but the state’s process for determining whether that’s the case is faulty, and it’s hurting families.

More than a dozen people who appeared at the Monday committee meeting backed up Sharief’s assertions along with several organizations — Disability Rights of Florida, the Florida Justice Association and Florida chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics among them — that signaled support for SB 42.

Tasha Patterson called the current system “broken,” as it “chooses to defend (DCF’s) mistakes instead of (correcting) them.” She detailed how DCF did not consider input from 12 experts on medically complex children and has continued to ignore evidence of non-abuse, including how her boys sustained additional injuries even after the state stepped in and while neither parent was with them.

“This year will make it four years of litigation to bring our children home. We are yet in another appeal,” she said. “My hope is that the system can learn to prioritize accountability, transparency and fairness when new information emerges.”

Another parent, Diana Sullivan, shared a similar story of how she and her husband were “thrust into an investigation process that treated the unknown as guilt.” The state, she said, took away her newborn daughter and other children after her daughter began exhibiting symptoms of Ehlers-Danlos and osteogenesis imperfecta.

Maddeningly, she continued, the initial DCF report included rare health maladies as a possible cause for the infant’s injuries, but the state still chose to take the children rather than investigate those possibilities.

“Tests were ordered. Answers were possible. But the tests were never run. Eight of our doctors, for a second opinion, deemed her condition not (to be) abuse and explained why,” she said. “We’re not asking for special treatment. We’re asking for humanity, a system … that protects children without destroying the families who love them.”

Sharief, in her closing remarks on the bill, noted that none of the people who spoke in support of SB 42 stand to benefit from it.

“They are here purely to prevent future families from going through the same thing,” she said.

SB 42 will next go to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, its second-to-last stop before reaching a floor vote. Its identical companion in the House (HB 47), sponsored by Weston Democratic Rep. Robin Bartleman and Shalimar Republican Rep. Patt Maney, awaits a first committee hearing.

The Senate passed “Patterson’s Law” last Session on a 37-0 vote. The bill then died in the House, where Bartleman and Maney’s version of the legislation was denied a hearing in its third and final committee stop.