Connect with us

Politics

AI bill of rights legislation clears its first Senate committee stop

Published

on


A Senate committee advanced a bill to create an artificial intelligence bill of rights aiming to protect consumers and minors.

With unanimous bipartisan support, the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee backed Sen. Tom Leek’s bill (SB 482).

“Quite simply, we get a 60-day Session once a year. If we don’t act and Congress doesn’t act, those protections won’t exist for Florida’s children and vulnerable adults,” Leek, a Port Orange Republican, told lawmakers before the 10-0 vote Wednesday. “So I believe we have to act.”

Wednesday’s vote was the bill’s first committee stop to support Gov. Ron DeSantis’ agenda as the measure heads next to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

DeSantis has increasingly been calling for more regulation to protect young people from the dangers of AI technology. But President Donald Trump has also been critical of states passing AI reforms and signed an executive order in December aimed at restricting states from overregulating the technology.

Leek argued that his bill doesn’t defy Trump’s order.

“I think the protections that we’ve got here for minors and for vulnerable adults, and for all of us really, are in line with what President Trump wants,” Leek said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Leek argued Trump was striking back against “onerous restrictions,” while his bill was specifically focused on consumer protections.

“It is purposely and deliberately targeted at those protections and not … the universe of things that could be done,” Leek said.

Under Leek’s bill, chatbot platforms would be required to post pop-up warnings that a person is talking to AI. The message would appear at the start of the conversation and reappear at least every hour.

Children would not be allowed to communicate with chatbots without parental permission. Parents would have control to see their child’s communications with the chatbot and could also limit access or delete the child’s account.

The bill would also require minors to be reminded to “take a break” at least once every hour.

Chatbot platform operators that violate the proposed new rules could face civil fines up to $50,000 per violation.

The AI bill of rights legislation comes after a 14-year-old Orlando boy killed himself in 2024 after he had been chatting with an AI bot extensively. Some of the conversations turned sexual and romantic. The family later sued in a case that got national coverage by The New York Times.

“Artificial intelligence, holding a great deal of promise, also poses novel and unique threats. Generative AI in particular can be particularly insidious in some contexts when used by children or unsuspecting or vulnerable or adults,” Leek said at Wednesday’s hearing.

“Given the incredible pace of the evolution of the technology and its adoption by business and academia, it is incumbent on us to protect Floridians for some of its problematic results.”

Several advocates and Democrats praised the bill, while also arguing there was room for improvement in Leek’s legislation.

“We would like to be a part of the conversation,” said Florida AFL-CIO lobbyist Rich Templin. “This is a great consumer protection beginning, but what about workers?”

And Turner Loesel, a technology policy analyst at the James Madison Institute, warned that the bill’s language needed to be tweaked, which Leek teased is coming. Leek said he is still working with stakeholders to tighten the bill’s definitions.

“Its definition of artificial intelligence is broad enough to capture spam filters alongside companion chatbot platforms, and we look forward to the amendments on that definition,” Loesel said.

Sen. Carlos  Guillermo Smith, an Orlando Democrat, called the bill a good first step but also agreed the legislation could be beefed up.

“We need meaningful accountability in the bill. Floridians deserve more than promises. They deserve proof. That means compliance reporting and audits that show companies are actually protecting biometric data, that they’re preventing misuse, and that they’re operating transparently,” Smith said.

“I think relying solely on political actors in the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement is not enough. To stop harmful conduct, I think we need stronger civil protections, including a private cause of action for all ages to defend all of our rights that are outlined in this AI bill of rights.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Last Call for 1.21.26 – A prime-time read of what’s going down in Florida

Published

on


Last Call – A prime-time read of what’s going down in Florida politics.

First Shot

Black Democratic members of the Florida Legislature are set to push back against Attorney General James Uthmeier’s recent opinion declaring Florida’s affirmative action laws unconstitutional.

Lawmakers are scheduled to hold a noon news conference on the Fourth Floor Rotunda, where they are expected to challenge both the substance and the real-world implications of the Attorney General’s position.

According to a media advisory, Florida Legislative Black Caucus Chair Sen. Darryl Rouson, alongside two dozen Black Democratic members of the House and Senate, will discuss how the opinion could impact civil rights and equal protection, health care equity, education and workforce pipelines, small business development, public boards and governance, as well as how the opinion may be applied in practice across state government.

The news conference comes after Uthmeier issued a nonbinding but sweeping opinion asserting that Florida statutes requiring race-based considerations in hiring, contracting and other government functions violate the U.S. and Florida Constitutions. The opinion drew immediate attention, particularly given its release on Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

In the 14-page opinion, the Attorney General specifically cited an “egregious” Florida statute that mandates statewide participation in “programs of affirmative and positive action” and stipulates that every executive agency “develop and implement an affirmative action plan” that includes goals for race-based hires.

Evening Reads

—”Donald Trump hails ‘framework’ of Greenland deal, reversing tariff threats” via Emily Davies, Cat Zakrzewski and Michael Birnbaum of The Washington Post

—”MAGA’s ‘Manifest Destiny’ coalition has arrived” via Makena Kelly of WIRED

—”How ‘if you give a mouse a cookie’ explains Donald Trump’s 2nd term” via Chris Cillizza of So What

—“In 2026, ICE detainees are dying at an alarming rate” via Judd Legum, Rebecca Crosby, and Noel Sims of Popular Information

—”The Supreme Court is likely to hand Trump a rare loss on the Federal Reserve” via Ian Millhiser of Vox

—“’I think about Jurassic Park’: Ron DeSantis-backed AI bill of rights clears first Committee hurdle” via Liv Caputo of the Florida Phoenix

—”Florida State Guard director practiced flying on state planes, members say” via Lawrence Mower of the Tampa Bay Times

—“As pennies fade away, Senate panel advances Don Gaetz proposal setting cash-rounding rules” via Jesse Mendoza of Florida Politics

—“Al Lawson verging on decision to run for Tallahassee Mayor” via James Call of the Tallahassee Democrat

Quote of the Day

“Every time I think about this, I think about Jurassic Park. There was a message there. … There was a warning about technologies exactly like this. Just because you can do something doesn’t necessarily mean you should.”

— AFL-CIO Director of Politics and Public Policy Rich Templin, on the “AI bill of rights.”

Put it on the Tab

Look to your left, then look to your right. If you see one of these people at your happy hour haunt, flag down the bartender and put one of these on your tab. Recipes included, just in case the Cocktail Codex fell into the well.

Slide a Copper Illusion (it’s tastier than a Petit Zinc) to Sen. Don Gaetz for his bill prepping Florida for a penny-free world.

Rep. Yvette Benarroch is due for a Tandem Bike now that her e-bike and scooter regulation bill has joined its Senate companion in clearing its first committee stop.

Order a Final Approach for Rep. Adam Botana, whose proposal to turn the Naples Airport Authority into a Board elected by voters soared through the Government Operations Committee.

Breakthrough Insights

Tune In

UCF women play at No. 14 Baylor

The UCF Knights women’s basketball team travels to Waco, Texas, for a matchup with No. 14 Baylor tonight (8 p.m. ET, ESPN+).

The Knights (10-8, 2-5 in Big 12) are coming off a 74-68 victory over Colorado in the annual Space Game. The Knights rebrand as the Citronauts for the game and wear Space U uniforms. The game honors UCF’s founding mission from 1963 to provide personnel for the U.S. Space program.

Against Colorado, UCF saw sophomore guard Summer Yancy score a career-high 25 points, including making five three pointers in the victory. Yancy is one of 12 players in the conference to score 25 points with at least six rebounds and four assists in a game.

Baylor (17-3) is tied with Texas Tech and TCU atop the Big 12 standings. The Bears’ success has been based on a strong defense. Baylor ranks No. 1 in the nation in 3-point defense, holding opponents to 22% from beyond the arc. They have been even stingier in conference play, limiting Big 12 opponents to under 20% from long range.

The Bears come into the game on a six-game winning streak. Baylor is led by Taliah Scott, who averages 20.5 points per game. The Orange Park, Fla. native began her career at Arkansas before transferring to Auburn and now to Baylor. She has averaged at least 20 points in all three of her college seasons.

Tonight’s matchup is the first of two between the programs this season. The Bears return to Central Florida on Feb. 15.

After tonight’s game, the Knights continue the homestand against another ranked team from Texas when they host No. 9 TCU on Saturday.

___

Last Call is published by Peter Schorsch, assembled and edited by Phil Ammann and Drew Wilson, with contributions from the staff of Florida Politics.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

James Uthmeier issues opinion that municipalities can’t force businesses to have shopping cart container plans

Published

on


The Attorney General published his opinion after Davie was considering a shopping cart retaining ordinance.

Attorney General James Uthmeier has issued an opinion that municipal governments can’t force businesses to submit a shopping cart collection plan to the local government for approval.

Uthmeier published his three-page opinion following a request from Allan Weinthal, the Town Attorney for Davie in South Florida. Weinthal asked for an opinion from the Attorney General’s Office in March as the Davie Town Council was considering enacting a shopping cart retention ordinance.

Weinthal asked in a letter to the Attorney General’s Office if state law preempts municipalities from enacting such a law. He also wanted to know if local governments can impose monetary penalties on businesses that don’t submit a plan.

In his opinion, Uthmeier said local governments don’t have any authority to establish such ordinances and they don’t have the legal ability to generally impose fines.

Uthmeier cited Florida law that “expressly preempts municipal ordinances that allow a municipality to require a business owner to submit a shopping cart retention plan to the municipality (or) deny a shopping cart retention plan (and) impose a monetary penalty for failing to submit and adhere to a shopping cart retention plan.”

Uthmeier said he understands the questions from Davie’s Town Attorney since Florida precedent does provide some leeway to municipalities, as they are “given broad authority to enact ordinances under its municipal home rule powers.” But state law preempts any “fee, fine, or costs” from being assessed, according to Uthmeier’s opinion.

Uthmeier acknowledged that local governments can impose fines on retailers if their carts are found on public property if the carts were removed from the retail establishment by retailers themselves. In that case, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services has upheld some fines.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lois Frankel, Debbie Wasserman Schultz scold Florida for proposed cuts to AIDS care eligibility

Published

on


Democrats representing Florida in Congress say Florida’s Health Department doesn’t need to nix support for 10,000 AIDS patients. Worse, they say doing so could both cost lives and lead to further spread of the disease.

U.S. Reps. Lois Frankel and Debbie Wasserman Schultz slammed a recent decision by the Department of Health (DOH) to change eligibility requirements for the Ryan White AIDS Drug Assistance Program. That program, named for deceased child AIDS activist Ryan White, provides prescription drugs for more than 50,000 people living with HIV or AIDS in Florida. But financial eligibility changes strip coverage for more than 10,000 people.

“Researchers estimate the average lifetime health care costs associated with HIV infection can get up into the hundreds of thousands,” said Frankel, a West Palm Beach Democrat.

She made the comments on a press call featuring Florida Democrats and medical experts.

Frankel said the decision to kill funding for the program likely means a death sentence for many who will lose access to care, and now she wants the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to investigate Florida’s administration of the program.

Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat, said ending coverage for many would be a choice, and a wrong one, by Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration.

“This is a lifeline that provides critical financial assistance to low-income Floridians living with HIV and AIDS. It helps ensure that they can afford their prescriptions and their health insurance, and despite its resounding success now the program is in jeopardy,” she said.

She said the change means most Floridians applying for the program would be denied if they made $120,000 or more, but HIV medication can cost thousands each month.

The subject has already spurred discussions in the Florida Legislature about whether other funding should be diverted.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo told the Senate Health and Human Service Appropriations Committee, “It’s a really, really serious issue,” as reported by the Tampa Bay Times.

He notably blamed a budget shortfall on a federal government shutdown in the Fall, one that ultimately failed to lead to any extension in funding for pandemic-era Affordable Care Act tax credits. Ultimately, he said, that left funding for the program $120 million short.

But cutting the AIDS program is the wrong answer, experts on the call said. Michael Rajner, a public health advocate who personally has lived with HIV since 1995, said cutting the eligibility for the program will create an impossible financial burden on many patients.

“We need the Surgeon General and the Governor to give a halt to this and reverse these cuts and find the money, whether it’s through a budget spending authority request to the Legislature and the Governor,” he said.

Moreover, he said he believed money had been misappropriated. DOH has been criticized for spending money on marketing campaigns about marijuana and abortion ballot measures ultimately defeated at the ballot box last year, though Rajner declined to say explicitly which funding he was referring to. But he said some spending mistakes are easily documented.

“This is a problem that they created themselves because of how they administer the program and the fact that they’ve also forced out several staff over the last year,” Rajner said.

Carl Baloney Jr., President and CEO of AIDS United, said the consequences of cutting participation in the program could be far-reaching.

“This is not only morally wrong, it’s financially reckless,” Baloney said. “Consistent HIV treatment saves money, and disrupting care leads to emergency room visits, hospitalizations and higher uncompensated care. Florida is acting without transparency, without following the required regulatory process.”

Wasserman Schultz noted that Biktarvy was the most prescribed once-daily pill used by HIV patients, and forcing people to switch off that drug could cost individuals thousands each year and put their health at risk.

Dr. Elizabeth Sherman of Nova Southeastern University, an HIV clinical pharmacy specialist, said Florida ranks third in the nation right now for new HIV diagnoses. But with the help of public funding, the state has also seen fast incorporation of treatments like Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, which uses drugs that not only treat HIV, but prevent its transmission.

That suggests that ending programs won’t just shorten lives, but will potentially lead to more infections.

“We have been the envy of many other states for successfully implementing test-and-treat programs where people with HIV are started on treatment on day one of their diagnosis,” she said. “We can continue to make incredible progress, or we can let our guard down now and watch it get worse.”

Frankel dismissed accusations that the problem came from the federal government. The U.S. House Appropriations Committee member said Florida has not requested additional help.

“Florida, I think, last year got about $130 million. And as far as I know, there has not been any request by the federal government to the states to put in their own funds,” she said, “nor do I know of any outreach by Gov. DeSantis to any of us on appropriations for more money.”

She said the impact on eligibility warranted a federal investigation to figure out the true cause of the funding shortfall.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.