Connect with us

Business

After Trump used prime-time speech to deny economic reality, his aides reassured him he did great

Published

on



President Donald Trump delivered a politically charged speech Wednesday carried live in prime time on network television, seeking to pin the blame for economic challenges on Democrats while announcing he is sending a $1,776 bonus check to U.S. troops for Christmas.

The remarks came as the nation is preparing to settle down to celebrate the holidays, yet Trump was focused more on divisions within the country than a sense of unity. His speech was a rehash of his recent messaging that has so far been unable to calm public anxiety about the cost of groceries, housing, utilities and other basic goods.

Trump has promised an economic boom, yet inflation has stayed elevated and the job market has weakened sharply in the wake of his import taxes. Trump suggested that his tariffs — which are partly responsible for boosting consumer prices — would fund a new “warrior dividend” for 1.45 million military members, a payment that could ease some of the financial strains for many households. The amount of $1,776 was a reference to next year’s 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

“The checks are already on the way,” he said of the expenditure, which would total roughly $2.6 billion.

Presidential addresses to the nation carried on network television are traditionally less partisan than rally speeches, but Trump gave a condensed version of his usual political remarks.

Flanked by two Christmas trees with a portrait of George Washington behind him in the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room, Trump sought to pin any worries about the economy on his predecessor, Joe Biden.

“Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it,” Trump said. “We’re poised for an economic boom, the likes of which the world has never seen.”

Trump seeking to stop the slump in his approval ratings

His holiday wishes came at a crucial time as he tries to rebuild his steadily eroding popularity. Public polling shows most U.S. adults are frustrated with his handling of the economy as inflation picked up after his tariffs raised prices and hiring slowed.

In 2026, Trump and his party face a referendum on their leadership as the nation heads into the midterm elections that will decide control of the House and the Senate.

The White House remarks were a chance for Trump to try to regain some momentum after Republican losses in this year’s elections raised questions about the durability of his coalition. He openly leaned into the politics despite television networks’ past reluctance to broadcast presidential addresses loaded with campaign-style rhetoric.

For example, in September 2022, networks declined to give the Biden White House a prime-time slot for a speech the then-president gave about democracy because it was viewed as too political.

Trump spoke at a rapid-fire clip with a tone that bordered at times on anger. He responded to the public frustration this year over the economy by making even bolder promises on growth next year, saying that mortgage rates would be coming down and that he “would announce some of the most aggressive housing reform plans in American history.”

Trump brought charts with him to make the case that the economy is on an upward trajectory. He made claims about incomes growing, inflation easing and investment dollars pouring into the country as foreign leaders, he claimed, have assured him that “we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world,” a statement he has frequently repeated at public events.

If the argument seemed familiar, that’s because it has echoes of the case that Biden made about the U.S. economy with little success. He, too, in the face of inflation pointed to the enviable rate of U.S. economic growth compared to other nations.

The public sees the economy differently from Trump

The hard math internalized by the public paints a more complicated picture of an economy that has some stability but few reasons to inspire much public confidence.

The stock market is up, gasoline prices are down and tech companies are placing large bets on the development of artificial intelligence.

But inflation that had been descending after spiking to a four-decade high in 2022 under Biden has reaccelerated after Trump announced his tariffs in April.

The consumer price index is increasing at an annual rate of 3%, up from 2.3% in April.

The affordability squeeze is also coming from a softening job market. Monthly job gains have averaged a paltry 17,000 since April’s “Liberation Day,” when Trump announced import taxes that he later suspended and then readjusted several months later.

The unemployment rate has climbed from 4% in January to 4.6%.

Trump said that investment commitments for new factories will boost manufacturing jobs and that consumer activity will improve dramatically as people receive increased tax refunds next year.

While emphasizing the economy, he also faces challenges on other policy fronts.

Trump’s mass deportations of immigrants have proved unpopular even as he is viewed favorably for halting crossings along the U.S. border with Mexico. The public has generally been unmoved by his globe-trotting efforts to end conflicts and his attacks on suspected drug boats near Venezuela.

Trump sought to blame Democrats for the likely increase in health insurance premiums as the subsidies tied to the 2010 Affordable Care Act are expiring. Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans have sought to address that issue, but Trump has pushed back and suggested instead that payments should go directly to the buyers of health insurance instead of the companies. The president has yet to commit to a specific legislative fix.

After his speech ended and the video was no longer being broadcast, Trump turned to his gathered aides and asked them how his address to the nation went. The aides assured him it was great.

Trump then indicated that White House chief of staff Susie Wiles had told him he needed to address the nation. After some back and forth, he asked Wiles how he had done.

“I told you 20 minutes and you were 20 minutes on the dot,” Wiles said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

CEO of nuclear fusion firm Trump Media is merging with: High-velocity capital is critical to build quickly and efficiently. The concerns are secondary

Published

on


The financially struggling Trump Media & Technology Group’s shocking, $6 billion merger with a nuclear fusion developer represents either a bet on more taxpayer dollars being invested in the first fusion player to go public—soon owned in part by the Trump family—or a belief that an influx of capital will speed up the launch of clean, limitless electricity that eventually will transform the global grid.

Trump Media’s struggling stock had plummeted nearly 70% year-to-date prior to the announcement. But the stock value spiked over 40% on the deal news with the market cap rising back above $4 billion on Dec. 18—even though TAE Technologies doesn’t plan to bring its first power plant online until 2031 to start generating revenues.

TAE Technologies CEO Michl Binderbauer recognizes the potential negative perception, but he told Fortune he’s eager to speed up the clean energy revolution that he is confident will come with the so-called merger of equals with Trump Media, which will become a Truth Social media, cryptocurrency, and fusion power conglomerate.

“In the end, if we get more scrutiny because of the deal we did, I actually don’t mind that,” Binderbauer said. “It’s perversely sounding, but I welcome it in a way because we let the technology speak.

“It’s big, bold and fast. You make a big bet with boldness at heart, and it allows you to run really fast,” he said. “I know our technology will succeed. Let it be adjudicated on a perhaps even deeper level. We need more energy; we need clean, scalable power.”

Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen government watchdog group, sees it quite differently as an obviously unethical cash grab by the president and his family.

“It’s a ridiculous merger. Why in the world would those two companies merge, and why would the markets respond positively?” Weissman said. “The markets are betting on the prospect of the Trump grift expanding and for … direct federal government payments to a company whose leading shareholder is the president of the United States.”

TAE has received federal Department of Energy grants dating back to Trump’s first term and continuing through the Biden administration. As part of a reorganization announced in November, the DOE is opening a new Office of Fusion.

The deal would value the merged company at $6 billion, including debt, and Binderbauer and Trump Media head Devin Nunes would serve as co-CEOs, they said. Shareholders of each company would own about 50% of the combined company. Donald Trump Jr. would take one of the nine board seats.

Trump Media will invest up to $200 million in TAE up front and another $100 million before the deal closes in mid-2026, they said.

TAE aims to select a site for its first power plant by the end of 2026 and generate first power by late 2031, on par with the goals of some of its top competitors.

In a statement, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the media is irresponsibly trying to fabricate conflicts of interest.

“Neither the president nor his family have ever engaged, or will ever engage, in conflicts of interest,” Leavitt said.

The DOE, Trump Org, and Trump Media did not respond to interview or comment requests.

In a media call during which no questions were allowed, Nunes said fusion power will lower energy prices, bolster national defense, and support “America’s dominance” of AI.

“Why is fusion power revolutionary? It’s because fusion power plants are now feasible at commercial scale, and they will produce reliable, cost-effective, dispatchable, and carbon-free electricity, and industrial heat with no nuclear meltdown risk or radioactive waste,” Nunes added.

The potential of fusion

The joke about fusion energy is it’s always 30 years away and not getting any closer.

However, the breakthrough scientific moment came at the end of 2022 when scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory successfully achieved “first ignition,” fusing atoms through extreme heat to generate more energy than the setup consumes for the first time ever.

Since then, TAE and other competitors have continued to make greater fusion progress on their various scientific approaches to fusion power generation.

Whereas traditional nuclear fission energy creates power by splitting atoms, fusion uses heat to create energy by melding them together. In the simplest form, it fuses hydrogen found in water into an extremely hot, electrically charged state known as plasma to create helium—the same process that powers the sun. When executed properly, the process triggers endless reactions to make energy for electricity. But stars rely on overwhelming gravitational pressure to force their fusion. Here on Earth, creating and containing the pressure needed to force the reaction in a consistent, controlled way remains an engineering challenge.

While TAE and others are targeting the early 2030s to bring the first commercial fusion power plants online, industry analysts agree it will take several additional years at least to start making a notable dent in the nationwide or even global energy grid. Still, the long-term potential remains huge.

“Fusion power is the answer to providing reliable, cost-effective, carbon-free electricity,” Binderbauer said.

TAE was founded 27 years ago—originally as Tri Alpha Energy—but stayed in stealth mode until 2015. Actor turned entrepreneur and angel investor Harry Hamlin was even a cofounder back in 1998. An Austrian-American physicist, Binderbauer served as the founding chief technology officer, eventually rising to CEO in 2018.

Over time, TAE has raised a combined $1.3 billion from Google, Chevron, Charles Schwab, and many others.

“Do you raise $1 billion in scaled capital over multiple years? Or do you have it come at high velocity?” Binderbauer asked. “The high velocity is critical if you want to build something quickly and efficiently.

“The concerns are very secondary.”

That’s what makes the Trump Media deal so critical, he said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Top AI defense CEO sees China planning for a ‘very protracted conflict’ and the U.S. running out of weapons in 7 days

Published

on



When it comes to a potential future conflict, especially with China, the U.S. may be on its back foot, claim experts at the intersection of AI and defense.

Speaking at the Fortune Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco last week, Tara Murphy Dougherty, the CEO of defense software company Govini, said that in a conflict with China the U.S. could run out of some munitions in seven days, while China could potentially hold out longer.

“They are planning for a very protracted conflict, and would be happy to draw that fight out to bleed American stockpiles dry, because they aren’t missing the economic piece of this puzzle,” Dougherty said.

This possibility should be troubling to the U.S., and yet there is no easy fix, explained Dougherty. The U.S. stockpile of munitions and other war time resources are held up by various obstacles established over years, she said.

“Unfortunately, those stockpiles are low enough, and the United States has outsourced so much manufacturing capacity at this point, that the amount of time it will take to build the munitions and weapons systems that the United States needs is just much, much too long,” she said.

The U.S. could indeed run out some munitions especially in a conflict with China over the Taiwan strait, according to a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Still, the study only singled out certain types of munitions such as long range and precision-guided munitions in under a week.

At the same time, the U.S. has the second most number of nuclear warheads, just behind Russia, and significantly more than China’s 600, according to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapon (ICAN).

The war in Ukraine, which has escalated since Russia’s invasion in 2022, has shown the need for countries to be nimble when it comes to the resources required for war. Yet, in a war time situation it’s unclear how quickly the U.S. would be able to mobilize, Dougherty added. 

“Our weapon systems and military platforms have historically low operational availability, which basically means, if we need to go to war, half the fleet is sitting in depot or at dock,” she said.

The Trump administration and Department of War secretary Pete Hegseth have tried to spur a change in the status quo. Earlier this year, Hegseth sent a memo to senior Pentagon leadership asking for the Army to restructure its acquisition systems and close redundant and inefficient programs.

Using AI, though, may be another way to help America’s war readiness, added Gary Steele, the CEO of AI-powered autonomous systems company Shield AI. Steele said AI will completely transform the aerospace and defense industry so much so that in 20 years it will look radically different.

“You’re gonna have lower cost systems, AI-led, software-led, not these super expensive, incredibly elaborate systems that just get shut down,” said Steele. “I think there’s a revolution happening, and we’re at the very beginning of that journey.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Lovable hits $6.6 billion valuation as its CEO says it wants to be ‘the last piece of software’ companies ever buy

Published

on



Swedish AI coding startup Lovable has just raised $330 million in Series B funding round at a $6.6 billion valuation, more than tripling its worth from just five months ago. CEO Anton Osika told Fortune the funding would further the company’s mission to become “the last piece of software” needed by companies and developers.

The round was led by CapitalG and Menlo Ventures’ Anthology fund, with participation from NVIDIA’s venture arm NVentures, Salesforce Ventures, Databricks Ventures, and strategic investors including Atlassian Ventures and HubSpot Ventures. It comes just one month after Lovable announced it had hit $200 million in annual recurring revenue.

The company has grand aims to make software engineering accessible to anyone by promoting “vibe-coding,” a process in which a user describes in plain language the product they want to build or the function of a piece of software they want to create, and AI writes the code to produce that result. 

“Our mission is to let anyone be a builder,” Osika said.

He predicted a world where every company can build its own bespoke software, rather than depending on expensive, and less customized products from major tech vendors. For instance, rather than purchasing different tools for customer relationship management, project tracking, or inventory management, Osika envisions companies using Lovable to simply build whatever they need on demand. 

Companies are already seeing results from some of Lovable’s products. At Zendesk, teams using Lovable have been able to move from idea to working prototype in three hours instead of six weeks, according to Jorge Luthe, the company’s Senior Director of Product. While at management consulting firm McKinsey, Osika said engineers used his company’s product to build in a few hours what they had been waiting four to six months for their internal development team to deliver.

“Anyone being able to go with an arbitrary software problem and just explain it to Lovable and solve it, is becoming a universal reality,” he said. 

Skeptics say that vibe coding doesn’t always result in the best quality software. The code vibe coding tools produce can be inefficient or contain security flaws that could present a serious risk to the company deploying it, depending on what it is being used for. In addition, just because tools like Lovable allow people without any coding experience to create software for their specific needs, it doesn’t mean that those non-developers will be able to maintain that code over time, these critics say.

Lovable says it sees three main use cases emerge among enterprise customers, Osika said. Some organizations are building core business systems entirely on Lovable; others are using it to build internal tools that previously stalled in development backlogs for months; and some product teams are using it to validate ideas with functional prototypes rather than static designs.

“Enterprises are reworking entire workflows with AI, because you can build AI applications with Lovable in just one prompt,” Osika said. “It becomes kind of the work where work gets done.”

Competition heats up in AI-powered coding

Lovable is operating in an increasingly competitive landscape and facing competition from fellow start-ups as well as bigger players that are now releasing their own coding products. While Lovable uses foundational models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic to power its own product, these companies are now releasing their own coding tools that could compete more directly.

“We just see them as partners,” Okisa said of the competition with major AI labs. “I think as software and AI kind of converges, there’s going to be more overlap in what companies do, but what people say and why they choose us, despite that there are other alternatives, is that Lovable just works.”

Matt Murphy, a partner at Menlo Ventures who led the investment, said that Lovable’s strategy is to build a “beloved layer” of software on top of the AI labs’ models that customers want to pay for. “The numbers speak for themselves,” Murphy said, noting that Lovable has transformed a latent market of tens of millions of people into developers.

“Lovable has done something rare: built a product that enterprises and founders both love. The demand we’re seeing from Fortune 500 companies signals a fundamental shift in how software gets built,” Laela Sturdy, Managing Partner at CapitalG added.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.