Connect with us

Business

A top analyst warned of a ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ and ‘AI wobble’ in the stock market just days before Palantir seemed to confirm everyone’s fears

Published

on



A top market analyst’s warning in late October about a looming “prisoner’s dilemma” and an “AI wobble” in the stock market became chillingly prescient this week as even bullish earnings from Palantir failed to stop a dramatic tech-led selloff.

The remarks came from Tony Yoseloff, managing partner and chief investment officer at Davidson Kempner Capital Management, in conversation with Goldman Sachs’ Tony Pasquariello, for the podcast Exchanges: Great Investors, recorded on Oct. 20 and released 11 days later.

Yoseloff posed some hypothetical questions about the much-covered question of “circular financing” in the artificial intelligence (AI) space, where the same firms are funding each other that are also selling to each other.

“So the way I like to think about it is: Is there going to be an AI wobble at some point? Are investors going to be concerned about how those CapEx dollars are being invested?”
Right now, he continued, alluding to a famous game theory scenario, “there’s a little bit of a prisoner’s dilemma, let’s call it, among the larger firms. You have to invest in it because your peers are investing in it, and so if you’re left behind you’re not going to have the stronger competitive position to it.”

The investor continued by comparing today’s heavy concentration—where 10 stocks wield 40% of the S&P 500’s weight—to historic bubbles like the “Nifty Fifty” of the early 1970s and the dot-com surge at the millennium. He warned that in those eras, investors waited as long as 15 years just to recover losses after valuations cracked.​

‘Big Short’ bet and the market’s response

The foreboding message arrived nearly synonymous with famed investor Michael Burry, best known for profiting from the subprime mortgage collapse, revealing a $1.1 billion short position against major AI bellwethers Nvidia and Palantir in early November. His move sent shockwaves through global markets already jittery about the narrowness of tech gains: Bank of America Research analysts noted the “Magnificent 7” tech stocks contributed more than 80% of the S&P 500’s total returns last month, heightening fears of a reversal.​

Markets responded violently. Palantir shares, having soared 154% year-to-date and surging 7% after its Q3 earnings initially, reversed course and plunged nearly 8% in a single day. Asian and European indices followed suit, highlighting how tightly global sentiment is bound to a handful of AI leaders. In South Korea and Taiwan, for instance, one or two tech stocks accounted for nearly half the national index returns, illustrating Yoseloff’s “wobble” risk: Any crack in confidence could bring a swift, severe correction.​

Palantir CEO Alex Karp was angry and typically outspoken as he appeared on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” the next day, when he was asked specifically about Burry’s short position. Karp responded that when he hears of short sellers attacking his company, “what I believe is clearly the most important software company in America and therefore in the world,” he said “it just is super-triggering, because these people, they could pick on any company in the world. They have to pick on the one that actually helps people, that actually has made money for the average person, that is actually supporting our war fighters.” Karp added it’s “crazy motivating” and he believes “the short sellers are constantly getting screwed by Palantir.” The company’s stock was trading down another 2% on Wednesday.

To Karp’s point about the company’s success, Palantir reported a record-setting quarter with $1.18 billion in revenue, besting estimates and boasting U.S. government contracts up 52% over the year. Karp’s combative tone on the earnings call, touting his “anti-woke” approach and Palantir’s government synergies, did little to calm investor jitters. Analysts voiced concern that even robust sales and guidance “don’t justify its valuation” given the scale of capex and the unproven returns from AI-driven bets.​ To their point, Palantir has a whopping price-to-earnings ratio of more than 100x.

Karp brushed aside critics of Palantir’s strategic direction, but a closer look at the trading floor suggested his boasts were no match for market structure. Yoseloff’s warnings about the prisoner’s dilemma—where tech giants are locked in costly, self-reinforcing arms races, largely because they cannot afford not to invest—seemed vindicated as even strong results triggered a sell-the-news spiral.​ Top Wall Street CEOs piled on, with Goldman’s David Solomon and Morgan Stanley’s Ted Pick both projecting corrections of up to 20% for stock valuations.

With both analyst warnings and high-profile action heralding a potential regime shift in markets, the AI sector’s “wobble” may only be beginning. As Palantir’s swift reversal shows, confidence in continual AI-driven growth is no longer bulletproof. If the “prisoner’s dilemma” continues, there is a risk “dead capital” could haunt tech valuations for years to come—as happened after past bubbles.

Yet for seasoned investors like Yoseloff, the period ahead promises not just volatility, but new opportunities, as “absolute return strategies” thrive when markets finally force a separation between true winners and casualties of unmet expectations. In that sense, the fears that Palantir’s earnings could not vanquish may yet prove to be the financial world’s next big inflection point.​

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Bessent says Trump’s $2,000 checks would need congressional vote

Published

on



Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said President Donald Trump’s proposal to send $2,000 “dividend” payments from tariffs to US citizens would require congressional approval.  

“We will see,” Bessent said on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures. “We need legislation for that.”

Trump, who has touted the billions raised in US tariff revenue this year, has talked about the checks as public frustration mounts over the cost of living. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Friday, Trump said the checks would go out sometime next year to “everybody but the rich.”

“It’s a lot of money,” he said. “But we’ve taken in a lot of money from tariffs. The tariffs allow us to give a dividend.” He added that “we’re also going to be reducing debt.” 

Read More: Trump’s $2,000 Tariff ‘Dividend’ Marks Throwback to Covid Checks

The plan could cost the US government double what it’s projected to take in for 2025, according to one estimate. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a centrist watchdog group, estimated a preliminary $600 billion cost for the proposal, if the dividends were designed along the lines of government stimulus payments during the Covid pandemic. 

Net US tariff revenue for the fiscal year through September totaled $195 billion and many economists have penciled in about $300 billion for calendar-year 2025.

Bessent said Americans should start feeling more economic relief in the beginning of next year, citing the tax cuts in Trump’s signature policy bill passed earlier this year. 

“So I would expect in the first two quarters we are going to see the inflation curve bend down and the real income curve substantially accelerate,” he said.  



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The Coast Guard has seized a record amount of cocaine while Trump says interdiction has failed

Published

on



 In justifying American military strikes on boats suspected of smuggling drugs, President Donald Trump has asserted that the longtime U.S. strategy of interdicting such vessels at sea has been a major failure.

“We’ve been doing that for 30 years,” he said last month, “and it’s been totally ineffective.”

Trump’s comments came around the same time that the U.S. Coast Guard announced it had set a record for cocaine seizures — a haul of 225 metric tons of the drug over the previous year. That milestone, however, has not dissuaded the Republican president from upending decades of U.S. counternarcotics policy.

Under Trump, the U.S. military has blown up 20 suspected drug boats, resulting in 80 deaths, in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea. Trump and other top officials have contended that such boats are being operated by narco-terrorists and cartel members with deadly drugs bound for America.

The strikes have generated international pushback from foreign leaders, human rights groups, Democrats and some Republicans who have raised concerns that the United States is engaging in extrajudicial killings that undermine its stature in the world.

Veterans of the drug war, meanwhile, say U.S. resources would be better spent doubling down on the traditional approach of interdicting drug boats, especially in the long term. That is because crews of drug boats frequently have valuable intelligence that can help authorities better target cartels and trafficking networks. Dead men, they say, tell no tales.

The Coast Guard has fought the drug war a long time

The Coast Guard for decades has interdicted small vessels suspected of smuggling illicit narcotics. Much of that work is focused on halting shipments of cocaine, most of which is produced in the jungles of Colombia.

Working with partner nations and other federal agencies — the Drug Enforcement Administration, the departments of State and Justice as well as U.S. Southern Command’s Joint Interagency Task Force-South in Key West, Florida — the aim is to inflict heavy losses on traffickers and limit the amount of drugs entering the U.S.

That campaign, by at least one measure, has never been more successful, despite constant complaints by the Coast Guard that it lacks funding to seize even more drugs.

The Coast Guard’s recent record cocaine seizure was almost 40% higher than the past decade’s annual average. The haul included 38 tons of cocaine offloaded by the cutter Hamilton when it returned from a two-month patrol. It was the largest amount confiscated by a single Coast Guard ship during a deployment, the Coast Guard reported. The interdictions have continued as part of what’s known as Operation Pacific Viper even during the federal government shutdown, with several cutters reporting major seizures last month.

In almost every case, drug smugglers have been brought to the U.S. for prosecution, and valuable information about ever-changing smuggling routes and production methods was collected — all without any loss of life and a far lower cost to American taxpayers. Experts said each missile strike is likely to cost far more than the payload of cocaine on every ship.

“The Coast Guard has extraordinary powers and authorities to do effective drug interdiction without killing unidentified people on small boats,” said Douglas Farah, a national security expert on Latin America and president of IBI Consultants. “When resourced, they are far more effective, sustainable and likely legal than the current Pentagon-led operations.”

Trump administration officials say strategy needed to change

Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week defended the shift in strategy, saying that “interdictions alone are not effective.”

“Interdictions have limited to no deterrent effect,” he added. “These drug organizations, they’ve already baked in the fact they may lose 5% of their drug shipments. It doesn’t stop them from coming.”

Part of the problem is that demand for cocaine is high, and supplies have never been so robust, according to authorities and experts. A sign of that trend: Cocaine prices have been hovering at historical lows for more than a decade.

The Coast Guard also does not have enough vessels or crew to halt it all. At most, it seizes not even 10% of the cocaine that officials believe flows to the U.S. on small vessels through what is known as the “Transit Zone” — a vast area of open water larger than Russia.

Cocaine shipments bound for the U.S. primarily work their way up the west coast of South America to Central America and then overland into the U.S. via Mexico. Shipments heading to Europe are smuggled through the Caribbean, often hidden in container ships.

Such interdiction efforts target cocaine, not fentanyl

In social media posts, Trump has claimed that his strikes have blown up boats carrying fentanyl and that each destroyed vessel has saved 25,000 American lives. According to experts and former U.S. counternarcotics officials, Trump’s statements are either exaggerations or false.

For the past decade, U.S. officials have sounded the alarm about rising overdose deaths in the U.S., particularly from opioids and synthetic opioids. Overdose deaths from opioidspeaked in 2023 at 112,000 but dropped to 74,000 in April. Experts have attributed that decline mostly to Biden administration efforts to boost the availability of lifesaving drugs that prevent overdose deaths.

The drug flowing to the U.S. from South America is cocaine. Fentanyl, on the other hand, is typically trafficked to the U.S. overland from Mexico, where it is produced with chemicals imported from China and India. Cocaine overdose deaths are less frequent than those from fentanyl. In the last year, just under 20,000 people in America died from cocaine overdoses, federal data shows.

Trump and administration officials have also claimed that the crews of targeted vessels were narco-terrorists or members of cartels.

The Associated Press visited a region in Venezuela from which some of the suspected boats have departed and identified four men who were killed in the strikes. In dozens of interviews, residents of the region and relatives said t he dead men were mostly laborers or fisherman making $500 a trip.

Law enforcement officials and experts echoed those findings, saying the smugglers captured by the Coast Guard are hired for little money to ferry drugs from point A to point B.

“They are hardly kingpins,” said Kendra McSweeney, an Ohio State University geographer who has spent years researching U.S. drug policies.

Trump administration officials recently promoted big seizures

In April, months before Trump launched his military campaign, his attorney general, Pam Bondi, traveled to South Florida to welcome home the Coast Guard cutter James from its latest antinarcotics patrol. It had seized 20 tons of cocaine worth more than $500 million.

Flanked by FBI Director Kash Patel, she praised a “prosecutor-led, intelligence driven approach to stopping these criminal enterprises in their tracks.”

“This is not a drop in the bucket,” said Bondi, standing in front of the vessel loaded with colorful, plastic-wrapped bales of narcotics stacked several feet high. “Behind you is half a billion dollars of pure, uncut cocaine.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The 2026 class of American Rhodes scholars includes 5 students at U.S. military academies

Published

on



Five students at U.S. military academies and three each from Yale University, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are among the 32 American winners named Sunday as 2026 Rhodes scholars.

The group includes students focused on housing, health outcomes, sustainability and prison reentry programs. They include:

Alice L. Hall of Philadelphia, a varsity basketball player at MIT who also serves as student body president. Hall, who has collaborated with a women’s collective in Ghana on sustainability tools, plans to study engineering.

Sydney E. Barta of Arlington, Virginia, a Paralympian and member of the track team at Stanford University, who studies bioengineering and sings in the Stanford acapella group “Counterpoint.” Barta plans to study musculoskeletal sciences.

Anirvin Puttur of Gilbert, Arizona, a senior at the U.S. Air Force Academy who serves as an instructor pilot and flight commander. Puttur, who is studying aeronautical engineering and applied mathematics, also has a deep interest in linguistics and is proficient in four languages.

The students will attend the University of Oxford as part of the Rhodes scholar program, which awards more than 100 scholarships worldwide each year for students to pursue two to three years of graduate studies.

Named after British imperialist and benefactor Cecil John Rhodes, the scholarship was established at Oxford in 1903. The program has more than 8,000 alumni, many of whom have pursued careers in government, education, the arts and social justice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.