Politics
A dozen Florida political car wrecks you won’t be able to avoid in 2026
Published
5 days agoon
By
May Greene
If Florida Politics already feels dipped in crazy, buckle up. Every 16 years or so, it’s as if a full moon rises over the Sunshine State and everyone collectively decides gravity is optional.
Think back to 1994, when Newt Gingrich’s Contract With America rewired Washington and Florida followed suit. A young Jeb Bush emerged from a wide-open seven-way GOP primary to take on Lawton Chiles, kicking off a generational political realignment. Or fast-forward to 2010, when Rick Scott parachuted into politics seemingly out of nowhere, Marco Rubio toppled a sitting Governor in a three-way U.S. Senate race, and the Tea Party turned insurgency into infrastructure.
Now, enter 2026, which is already flashing the same warning lights. Term limits are colliding with ambition, institutional guardrails are wobbling, and long-simmering power struggles are finally coming to a boil. The familiar names are still here, but the rules they once played by are not.
Which brings us to the inevitable pileup.
Here are a dozen Florida political car wrecks you won’t be able to avoid in 2026.
No. 1: A not-so-lame-duck Ron DeSantis
If anyone is expecting DeSantis to quietly wind down the clock, they haven’t been paying attention. The Governor is likely to exercise his authority right up until 11:59 p.m. on his final day, and there’s a non-zero chance of multiple Special Sessions in the months leading up to his exit.
But unlike his predecessor Scott, whose final hours were marked by a blitz of consequential judicial appointments designed to lock in long-term influence, DeSantis’ endgame figures to be less traditional — and far more idiosyncratic.
Case in point: the appointment of Urban Meyer to the Board of Trustees at New College of Florida. It’s high-profile, polarizing, and guaranteed to keep critics and allies arguing long after the term expires.
The Governor has always been far more defiant than deferential. All of which is to say: if you’re angling for a late-stage DeSantis appointment, polishing your résumé may matter less than your footwork on a sports bar dance floor.
No. 2: @RonDeSantis
Like too many men of his generation, @RonDeSantis lives way too online. Having followed DeSantis since well before his first run for Congress, it feels fair to put him on the couch for a moment. He emerged from the isolation of the pandemic and young fatherhood into a personal world with few genuine confidants — and an army of digital acolytes eager to amplify every thought.
DeSantis isn’t Donald Trump, but he is increasingly governing via social media. Policy declarations land on X alongside baseball musings and constitutional soliloquies, all delivered with the confidence of someone convinced the feed is the forum.
His fixation on the evils of artificial intelligence, in particular, reads less like a niche concern and more like early positioning as a possible 2028 foil to JD Vance, pitting Florida’s most affectless culture warrior against Silicon Valley’s favorite venture-backed tribune in a race to see who can sound more alarmed while offering less humanity.
No. 3: The property tax debate
Were it not so dangerously revolutionary, the idea of dramatically scaling back — or outright eliminating — property taxes in a state without an income tax would be the most ridiculous policy debate in modern Florida history.
As multiple analyses have made clear, property taxes are not some optional nuisance; they are load bearing. Strip them away and the ability of cities and counties to provide basic services collapses.
Still, DeSantis and many of his allies are determined to get something on the ballot. The push increasingly resembles a Florida-flavored version of California’s infamous Proposition 13 — a voter-friendly promise that capped property taxes, froze assessments, and permanently kneecapped local government capacity. The aftermath there was not relief but retrenchment.
Even if the idea had merit (and that’s a generous assumption) there is no reasonable way to upend the architecture of Florida government through a single ballot initiative. But that’s precisely what DeSantis wants. Before that happens, though, the Legislature will have its say. And when it inevitably refuses to give him exactly what he’s asking for — he’s particularly incensed by the House’s hodgepodge approach to the debate — the real fight begins.
What follows would pit the full DeSantis political machine against almost every county and city government in Florida. All that’s at stake is the very nature of government.
No. 4: The DeSantis-Uthmeier war on weed
As they demonstrated in 2024, DeSantis and James Uthmeier really, truly hate the sticky icky.
Last time around, the Governor and his then-Chief of Staff went to extraordinary lengths to stop a marijuana legalization amendment, including diverting millions of dollars meant to support child welfare and health care into a political effort designed to kill it.
The details of the Hope Florida scandal are well documented. The takeaway is simpler: no line was too close to cross if the goal was defeating the amendment.
Two years later, the legalization crowd is back — just as well funded, better organized, and fully aware this is a bare-knuckle brawl.
They also have something they didn’t last time: a powerful ally in the White House. With Kim Rivers, the head of Trulieve, now having Trump’s ear, the biggest marijuana company in the business is no longer playing defense. One suspects it may have event picked up a few new tricks.
What remains unclear is just how deep DeSantis and Uthmeier are willing to go this time to keep the initiative off the ballot — or, failing that, to defeat it. But if past is prologue, this fight is headed to the Mariana Trench. They proved last time that there is very little they won’t do to get their way.
No. 5: The 2026 Legislative Session
If you thought the 2025 Legislative Session — with its extended budget fight and all the late-night brinkmanship — was a car wreck, 2026 is shaping up to be a demolition derby where every driver has a lead foot and a chip on their shoulder.
The bad blood between the House and Senate is unprecedented in the modern, GOP-dominated era. I’ve spoken directly with leaders in both chambers, and there’s no dressing it up. They don’t just distrust each other; they genuinely despise each other. That’s not a vibe. That’s a governing condition.
Yes, they’ll pass a budget. They must. But expect it to come only after several rounds of deliberate pain-infliction — weaponized calendars, stalled priorities, and a whole lot of “oh, that was your thing? Interesting.”
You could already see the outlines of it last year. The budget gap was massive, the tax-cut philosophies shared no DNA, and even the Senate President’s signature “Rural Renaissance” package was fed to the House’s paper shredder and taped back together across multiple bills.
That wasn’t an “oops.” It was intentional. Which is the point. With so many big-ticket fights on the card, expect the next 60 days (… yeah, right …) to be a prolonged exercise in mutually assured irritation.
No. 6: The Florida Men and Women retreating from D.C.
Dan Bongino stepping down as Deputy FBI Director after less than a year is the latest data point in a trend that’s only going to accelerate in 2026: the quiet retreat of Florida Men and Women who flooded Washington during the opening stretch of Trump 2.0.
And yes, it’s fair to pause for a moment and reflect on whether Bongino even qualifies as a Florida Man. He’s a New Yorker by birth who ran for office in Maryland before reinventing himself politically in Florida. Still, he fit the archetype well enough — loud, online, ideologically rigid — and his exit underscores a larger reality: governing the federal bureaucracy is not as fun as owning libs from a studio.
Inside the West Wing, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, herself a Florida Woman, is likely coming to terms with the downside of importing half the Sunshine State political class into Washington. The administration’s Florida footprint is unmistakable: Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Pam Bondi as Attorney General, Mike Waltz as Ambassador to the United Nations after a stint as National Security Adviser, and a constellation of former Florida operatives sprinkled throughout the executive branch.
But Florida Man is not especially well-suited to managing sprawling federal agencies and dense bureaucracies. Florida Man isn’t built for rulemaking. He’s built for content. Washington, it turns out, has a way of sorting that out quickly.
No. 7: Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
If you’re being described — even quietly — as the Democratic version of George Santos, it’s already over. The only question is how much collateral damage gets done on the way out.
U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick enters 2026 under the weight of a federal indictment alleging she funneled $5 million in disaster relief funds into her 2021 congressional campaign through a maze of family accounts and straw donors. It’s not a paperwork SNAFU or an ambiguous ethics gray zone. It’s the kind of accusation that freezes leadership posts, invites expulsion chatter, and turns a once-safe seat into an open audition.
Her response so far has been to dig in — denouncing the charges as a sham, fundraising off the indictment itself, and daring the system to blink first. But Washington already has. Democratic leadership pulled her ranking-member gavel, and colleagues are treating the situation like a biohazard: don’t touch, don’t defend, don’t linger.
Back home, the sharks are circling. Her Primary opponents are openly campaigning on the premise that the district deserves a reset, not a soap opera. Even in a D+22 seat, that matters. Voters may tolerate ideology they disagree with, but they have little patience Representatives working around a court schedule.
No. 8: Cory Mills
If noted shoe polish connoisseur and notorious former state Rep. Anthony Sabatini is dogging you, it’s a sign that things have gone spectacularly off the rails.
That’s where U.S. Rep. Cory Mills finds himself heading into 2026. The New Smyrna Beach Republican spent much of the past year fending off a rolling series of scandals that culminated in a late-night House vote to ship yet another censure resolution to the Ethics Committee. The list is long and familiar: Stolen Valor questions, allegations of profiting from federal contracts, dating violence claims, sexual misconduct allegations, and enough interpersonal drama to power a mid-budget streaming series.
Mills, for his part, insists he has “the evidence and receipts” and that everything will be cleared up in due time. Maybe he does. But exhaustion is already setting in on both sides. Even some fellow members of the Florida delegation have publicly bristled at leadership’s repeated efforts to shield him. Outside critics aren’t backing off. And the drip-drip of new allegations ensures this story continues into the new year.
No. 9: María Elvira Salazar
María Elvira Salazar is discovering what happens when you enthusiastically help build the Face-Eating Leopards Party.
For years, Salazar was reliably pro-Trump on immigration, border security, and the broader enforcement-first posture that played well in Republican primaries and conservative media. Now she’s recoiling as the Trump administration does exactly what it said it would do.
Suddenly, Salazar is heartbroken. She’s issuing letters. She’s posting videos. She’s reintroducing her long-stalled “Dignity Act.” She’s pleading for mercy for Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans who make up the backbone of her Miami-Dade district. And yet, when it mattered, she lined up with the very administration now torching the immigration framework she claims to defend.
The result is a politician who finds herself “entre la espada y la pared.” Democrats accuse her of performative outrage. Immigration hardliners see weakness in apostasy. Hispanic voters, meanwhile, are watching friends and family members get swept up in enforcement actions.
Would it be shocking if she drew a serious Primary challenge from her right or found herself in a General Election dogfight fueled by collapsing Hispanic support? Do leopards eat faces?
No. 10: James Fishback
Has Florida ever seen a more bizarre — or less qualified — candidate for Governor attract this much attention? Possibly. But it’s been a while.
James Fishback has earned the distinction of being described as the state’s first openly Groyper gubernatorial candidate, and he’s leaning into it with a campaign designed to inflame, offend, and suck up oxygen. There’s no governing résumé, no coalition and no plausible path to victory. In their place is a steady stream of racially charged rhetoric designed to keep his name circulating.
Calling a sitting Black Congressman a “slave” and then lecturing him on whether he’s allowed to be offended isn’t edgy politics. It’s grotesque. And yet, here we are.
A charitable interpretation is that Fishback is auditioning for a gig in right-wing radio. The less charitable one is that his candidacy reflects a corner of the electorate becoming increasingly comfortable with open bigotry so long as it’s wrapped in internet-native grievance language.
Either way, it’s an embarrassment that the state has to entertain this at all. The only real question is whether the campaign flames out quickly or whether voters are subjected to another eight long months of this circus.
No. 11: The GOP Primary for Chief Financial Officer
Including CFO Blaise Ingoglia and Rep. Kevin Steele in this list isn’t an indictment of either candidate. By every measure, both are credible Republicans with real résumés. The issue isn’t quality — it’s math.
Run this race 1,000 times in a simulator and Ingoglia, the de facto incumbent with the Governor’s backing, wins 99% of them. He has the appointment, the DeSantis endorsement and a steady drumbeat of law enforcement, firefighter, and elected-official endorsements.
Which leaves Steele with a narrow set of options. He has money — a lot of it — and that matters. But in a race where the normal levers are already spoken for, the only realistic way to shake things loose is to go negative. Deeply negative. As in nuclear.
So, if you’re wondering why this otherwise low-drama Cabinet race made the list, look no further than your postbox. Because unless Steele is content with a respectable loss, Floridians should brace for a flood of ugly mail designed to soften Ingoglia up just enough to create doubt even if the odds remain stubbornly long.
No. 12: The Democratic Primary for Governor
The race that will be covered wildly out of proportion to its actual stakes is former U.S. Rep. David Jolly versus Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings. Think of it like the AFC Championship games in the 1990s: intense, overanalyzed, and ultimately a prelude to getting steamrolled by whoever’s coming out of the NFC.
Legacy media will eat this up. Jolly’s town halls will be framed as proof of a moderate revival. Demings’ efforts to activate Black voters will be parsed precinct by precinct. Every endorsement, every cable hit, every clever line will be treated like it meaningfully alters Florida’s trajectory.
It doesn’t.
The underlying math is brutal and getting worse. The voter registration gap between Republicans and Democrats has ballooned past the point where momentum narratives or earnest retail politics can realistically close it. It’s structural.
That doesn’t mean the Primary won’t be competitive or interesting on its own terms. Demings brings institutional credibility and a proven local coalition. Jolly offers a familiar face to disaffected moderates and independents. Either would give Democrats a nominee who can campaign competently and speak fluently about Florida’s problems.
But competence isn’t viability. Whoever wins this Primary is almost certainly walking into a buzzsaw powered by registration math, fundraising asymmetry, and a state Republican Party that long since entered dynasty mode.
So yes, this race will generate headlines. It will produce moments. It will be debated endlessly on panels and podcasts. And then November will come and the race will end in a way that has become routine — decisively.
You may like
Politics
Bills would create Office of Corrections Ombudsman to monitor prisons
Published
21 minutes agoon
January 9, 2026By
May Greene
Saying existing law does not provide adequate and independent oversight of the Florida’s Department of Corrections, two Florida GOP lawmakers have proposed an Office of Corrections Ombudsman to ensure accountability, monitor conditions of confinement, and investigate complaints.
The measure (SB 1160) is sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Ana Maria Rodriguez, who represents Monroe and a part of Miami-Dade County, and in the House (HB 889) by Rep. Susan Valdés, a Tampa Republican. The idea has been pushed for several years by criminal justice reform advocates. The bill says the legislation is necessary “to create an independent entity as a unit of the legislative branch of state government in order to restore public trust in the department.”
The bills come a month after an investigation into a Panhandle state prison by the Southern Poverty Law Center found that overcrowding and overstaffing resulted in a high concentration of complaints by inmates about excessive force and staff misconduct.
And they come more than five years after the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Middle District of Florida issued a report regarding Florida’s Lowell Correctional Institution, the state’s largest and oldest women’s prison. The report found reasonable cause to believe that Lowell failed to protect prisoners from sexual abuse by staff.
Nine states have created corrections ombudsman positions since 2018, while another two have created quasi-oversight bodies, according to Michele Deitch, Director of the Prison and Jail Innovation Lab at the University of Texas, which runs the National Resource Center for Correctional Oversight.
“It’s greater recognition of deaths in custody, of the violence going on inside, of poor conditions,” Deitch said.
“A lot of those are coming to light through journalistic accounts and through advocates’ reports and from people who have been incarcerated, but it’s also the fact that legislators are recognizing that what we’re doing now isn’t working. There are high recidivism rates, and we’re spending a lot of money on prisons and not knowing if they’re getting anything of real value from it, given the high recidivism rates and the poor conditions.”
The Federal Prison Oversight Act in 2024 established an independent ombudsman office to investigate complaints from incarcerated people, their families, and prison staff.
The office would:
— Receive, track, investigate and attempt to resolve complaints concerning correctional facilities made by or on behalf of incarcerated persons, supporters of incarcerated persons, and the public.
— Monitor and evaluate conditions of confinement and treatment of incarcerated persons in correctional facilities.
— Collect and analyze data relating to serious incidents, violence and deaths in correctional facilities.
— Recommend solutions to systemic problems as well as policy changes and corrective actions necessary to “protect the health, safety, welfare, and rights of incarcerated persons.”
— Provide information to incarcerated individuals, supporters of the incarcerated, and the public about the rights of those individuals.
The Legislature would create a Corrections Oversight Committee of 15 voting members to meet quarterly to advise the ombudsman. They would include four members of the Legislature and 11 members of the public representing various constituencies, including a man and woman who have previously served a prison sentence of at least three within the 10 years preceding their appointment.
The Legislature would appoint an ombudsman to a five-year term, and he or she could be reappointed for an additional five years. The Legislature would be required to allocate $250,000 to fund the office.
Accompanying legislation (HB 891, SB 1162) would create a public records exemption for correspondence and communications with the Office of the Corrections Ombudsman and the Corrections Oversight Committee.
___
Reporting by Mitch Perry. Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: [email protected].
Politics
Court rules Florida Medicaid termination letters fly in face of federal law
Published
52 minutes agoon
January 9, 2026By
May Greene
A federal Judge ruled this week that Florida violated the constitutional rights of hundreds of thousands of people it had removed from the Medicaid rolls following the end of the COVID public health emergency, when it sent beneficiaries “vague, confusing and often incorrect and misleading” termination letters.
In a 273-page ruling in the class action, U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard ordered the state in the next two months to send appropriate Medicaid termination notices to roughly 500,000 low-income people whose benefits the state terminated for financial reasons following the pandemic and were not subsequently reenrolled in the safety-net health care program.
The notice must advise the people of the court’s ruling and, at a minimum, must include “an unambiguous statement” explaining the financial reasons behind the terminations and to whom the decision applies.
“Such notice will ensure that all Class Members have the information needed to determine whether the State’s decision to terminate their Medicaid benefits was correct,” she wrote. “Class Members who believe the State made an error may then pursue the available administrative remedies to correct that error.”
Those “remedies” include an opportunity to request an administrative appeal of their termination, which would enable someone to temporarily be reenrolled in Medicaid pending the outcome of the hearing. The notice must include information about administrative procedures permitting the payment of past medical bills if an error is found.
Howard in her ruling also barred the Department of Children and Families (DCF) — the Florida agency that determines whether people qualify for Medicaid — from terminating someone’s benefits for financial eligibility unless it provides proper notice.
At a minimum, that notice must include the enrollee’s household size, the state-determined countable household income, the eligibility category in which the enrollee had been receiving benefits, and, if it changed, the reason for the change.
DCF did not immediately comment on the ruling or whether it plans to appeal the decision.
‘Welcome news’
Center for Children and Families Executive Director Joan Alker said Thursday she still was reading the lengthy ruling but that she wasn’t surprised by the Judge’s conclusions.
Alker, who has spent more than 20 years studying Florida’s Medicaid program, said the state has a “really complicated” Medicaid eligibility system for children, which includes the optional Medicaid expansion called KidCare. The more complicated the system, she said, the more important it is for termination letters to be easily understood.
“I think it’s welcome news for families here, the Judge recognized that this was a very serious problem that families were facing,” she said. “And again, I’ll say I found the notices extremely difficult to understand and, obviously, I’m a health policy professor who’s been working on this stuff for decades.”
Medicaid is a safety net health care program jointly administered and paid for by the state and federal governments. Just under 4 million people were enrolled in Medicaid in Florida as of Nov. 30, 2025, the latest available data.
During the COVID pandemic, the federal government increased by 6.2% its contributions to the Medicaid program. The increased funding came with the caveat that states couldn’t disenroll people during the pandemic.
The policy ballooned Florida’s Medicaid caseload from 3.8 million people in March 2020, before the pandemic, to more than 5.75 million in March 2023.
Congress agreed the continuous eligibility requirement would end March 31, 2023, and that, post-pandemic, states could return their Medicaid programs to their normal operations. That process was known as Medicaid “unwinding.”
Florida started its Medicaid unwinding on April 1, 2023, and by the following year DCF redetermined the Medicaid eligibility of more than 4 million people.
Attorneys for Florida Health Justice Project and the National Health Law Program filed the lawsuit in Jacksonville in 2023 on behalf of people who erroneously lost benefits. Howard agreed to certify it as a class action in 2024.
“This ruling is a victory for the millions of Floridians who rely on Medicaid for essential health care. Medicaid agencies inevitably make mistakes when deciding eligibility. Clear, easy-to-understand notices are essential to catch and correct those mistakes before someone loses health care. The Court’s decision will ensure that Floridians have that critical protection from now on,” Sarah Grusin, senior attorney at the National Health Law Program, said in a prepared statement Thursday.
“It also underscores that states cannot shirk their constitutional obligations. Florida has known about the problems with their notices for years but has not addressed them, citing the cost and complexity of making changes to the computer system that generates notices. But as the Court emphasized, state officials cannot justify violating the constitutional rights of their citizens because they claim the fix is too expensive.”
‘Poorest of the poor’
There are two broad category groups: “SSI-Related Medicaid” for people who are aged, blind or disabled in the community, and “Family-Related Medicaid” for children, parents and other caretakers of children, pregnant women, and former foster children under the age of 26.
The lawsuit focuses on “Family Related Medicaid” beneficiaries, whom Howard described as some of the state’s “most vulnerable citizens.”
“They are primarily pregnant and postpartum women, infants, and children. And as is evident from the applicable income standards, these individuals are the poorest of the poor,” Howard said. “Prior to terminating the Medicaid benefits on which these individuals depend, the Constitution requires the State of Florida to provide them with adequate notice. The State of Florida is violating this constitutional requirement. “
Regardless of the eligibility group, residents also must meet certain income requirements, which vary by, among other things, age and household composition.
The complicated details of how household income is derived are laid out in policy manuals which, Howard noted in her ruling, are “plainly designed for internal use by those who have been taught how to use it.”
Howard’s lengthy ruling also touches on the DCF call center operations and its website.
Using April 2024 as an example, Howard noted, the call center received more than 1.9 million phone calls, of which 593,923 were resolved with an interactive voice response system through which people can self serve.
Another 1.38 million-plus callers asked to speak with an agent for a variety of reasons, including long wait times and abandoned phone calls; only 32% (444,319 callers) who requested to speak with a live agent succeeded. Upon reaching an agent, those interactions lasted for an average of nine minutes and 28 seconds, including the time the agent spent working on the case after the call ended.
Meanwhile, termination letters referred residents to the DCF website to learn more about eligibility requirements, but Howard noted in her ruling that the webpage didn’t provide all the information people needed or the links to get the information. In some instances, information on DCF’s homepage was incorrect or incomplete.
“The length of this Order might suggest that the question before the Court — whether the State’s notices are constitutionally adequate — is overly complex or a razor close call. It is neither. The length of this Order is not reflective of the complexity of the legal issue, it is reflective of the complexity and unreasonably confusing nature of the notices. It is driven by the need to address the complete inadequacy and borderline incomprehensibility of the notices and the inadequacy of the other resources identified as remedying the failure of the NOCAs (notices of case action) at issue,” she wrote.
“As detailed in this Order, the Court’s review of the evidence and the notices — their structure, the confusing, contradictory, and often misleading reasons they provide, and the lack of alternate available sources for the necessary information — inescapably leads to the conclusion that the State’s notices are fundamentally insufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process.”
___
Reporting by Christine Sexton. Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: [email protected].
Politics
Woman sues FDOT, alleging harassment from boss, rebukes from HR following complaints
Published
1 hour agoon
January 9, 2026By
May Greene
A former Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) employee is suing the agency for forcing her out of her job after she complained about her hostile boss who tried to control her and made sexual remarks.
Grace Rodriguez filed the lawsuit before the new year in the U.S. District Court’s Orlando division. She accused FDOT of sexual harassment, discrimination, creating a bad working environment and retaliation.
Rodriguez’s boss, Moataz “Mo” Hassan, an Operations Engineer in Central Florida’s District 5, “frequently displayed uncontrolled rage and intimidation in the workplace, including yelling at subordinates at the top of his lungs and slamming his phone on the ground in Plaintiff’s presence,” the lawsuit said.
Rodriguez said her boss continued to get more possessive and make sexual comments the longer she worked there. What she wore became a regular topic of conversation and he got jealous when she interacted with her male coworkers, the lawsuit said.
“Throughout Plaintiff’s employment, Hassan repeatedly told Plaintiff that she was ‘his’ and that she ‘belonged to him,’” the lawsuit said. “Hassan’s statements were not benign workplace expressions but assertions of sexual dominance and ownership over a female subordinate, reinforcing his control over Plaintiff’s body, conduct, and continued employment.”
Rodriguez says Hassan told her she was not allowed to close her office door, demanding she smile and “imposed the silent treatment when Plaintiff did not comply with his expectations,” the lawsuit said.
He told her in his native country, “women are considered second class citizens,” per the lawsuit.
“In or around March 2024, Plaintiff was not feeling well and asked whether she could be sent home, Hassan told Plaintiff that she could not leave, and when Plaintiff went to leave his office Hassan aggressively grabbed Plaintiff by the arm and told her not to leave.”
The lawsuit said a month later, Hassan “initiated unsolicited discussions with Plaintiff about his sex life, stating that he had not had sex in a long time and that he was seeking a woman who would do what he told her. Plaintiff reasonably perceived these statements as sexual propositions intertwined with Hassan’s supervisory authority.”
Once, he gave her a Quran and talked regularly about his religion even though Rodriguez said she was a Christian, according to the lawsuit.
“Even where Hassan’s conduct was not explicitly sexual, it imposed expectations of submission rooted in both Plaintiff’s sex and Hassan’s articulated religious beliefs, expectations that permeated Plaintiff’s daily interactions, were reinforced through intimidation and abuse of authority, and were never checked by FDOT,” the lawsuit reads.
The lawsuit only names FDOT as a defendant, not Hassan.
Rodriguez complained to human resources after the situation with her boss kept escalating and she became fearful for her safety when he aggressively waved a shovel at her, the lawsuit said.
FDOT Human Resources Manager Marisol Bilbao told Rodriguez “that if she wanted to survive at FDOT, she needed to ‘put a smile on (her) face and shut up,’” the lawsuit alleged.
Bilbao also suggested that Rodriguez change her clothing and attitude to avoid being perceived as being the one causing problems and said “harassment works both ways,” according to the lawsuit.
Then, Rodriguez said Bilbao went directly to Hassan on May 2, 2024, and briefed him on Rodriguez’s confidential concerns about him.
“Human Resources and management repeatedly reframed Plaintiff’s complaints as interpersonal or cultural issues and failed to take corrective action, while continuing to share Plaintiff’s concerns with Hassan,” the lawsuit said.
The next day, Hassan told Rodriguez that he no longer trusted her because he knew that she had reported him to HR. He threatened to have Rodriguez removed from her job, the lawsuit alleged.
Another manager told Rodriguez if she recanted her accusations, “her job could be salvaged,” the lawsuit added.
Rodriguez said she received a negative performance review, which was out of place given her previous good work history. “This off-cycle evaluation was initiated only after Plaintiff engaged in protected activity and was used to generate purported performance issues where none had previously existed,” the lawsuit reads.
On June 11, 2024, Rodriguez filed an official complaint with FDOT’s Equal Opportunity Office alleging sexual harassment and retaliation.
Her days at FDOT were numbered. So were Hassan’s, according to the complaint.
Rodriguez said she was pressured to resign under threat of termination the same day she filed the complaint.
“FDOT’s internal investigation formally concluded that Hassan had not committed violations of Title VII or the Florida Civil Rights Act. Nevertheless, shortly after the conclusion of that investigation, FDOT terminated Hassan’s employment,” according to the lawsuit.
Florida Politics requested a copy of FDOT’s internal investigation into Hassan in late December, but FDOT has not responded to a records request nor a request for comment on the litigation.
Rodriguez’s attorney and Hassan also did not respond to messages for comment.
Philly burbs police stunned by arrest of apparent grave robbery carrying sack with skulls, bones, mummified remains
Kendall Jenner Says She’s Never Had Any Plastic Surgery
Saks woes cloud cashmere king Cucinelli’s department store bet
Trending
-
Politics8 years agoCongress rolls out ‘Better Deal,’ new economic agenda
-
Entertainment8 years agoNew Season 8 Walking Dead trailer flashes forward in time
-
Politics8 years agoPoll: Virginia governor’s race in dead heat
-
Entertainment8 years agoThe final 6 ‘Game of Thrones’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Politics8 years agoIllinois’ financial crisis could bring the state to a halt
-
Entertainment8 years agoMeet Superman’s grandfather in new trailer for Krypton
-
Business8 years ago6 Stunning new co-working spaces around the globe
-
Tech8 years agoHulu hires Google marketing veteran Kelly Campbell as CMO




