Connect with us

Politics

A dozen Florida political car wrecks you won’t be able to avoid in 2026

Published

on


If Florida Politics already feels dipped in crazy, buckle up. Every 16 years or so, it’s as if a full moon rises over the Sunshine State and everyone collectively decides gravity is optional.

Think back to 1994, when Newt Gingrich’s Contract With America rewired Washington and Florida followed suit. A young Jeb Bush emerged from a wide-open seven-way GOP primary to take on Lawton Chiles, kicking off a generational political realignment. Or fast-forward to 2010, when Rick Scott parachuted into politics seemingly out of nowhere, Marco Rubio toppled a sitting Governor in a three-way U.S. Senate race, and the Tea Party turned insurgency into infrastructure.

Now, enter 2026, which is already flashing the same warning lights. Term limits are colliding with ambition, institutional guardrails are wobbling, and long-simmering power struggles are finally coming to a boil. The familiar names are still here, but the rules they once played by are not.

Which brings us to the inevitable pileup.

Here are a dozen Florida political car wrecks you won’t be able to avoid in 2026.

No. 1: A not-so-lame-duck Ron DeSantis

If anyone is expecting DeSantis to quietly wind down the clock, they haven’t been paying attention. The Governor is likely to exercise his authority right up until 11:59 p.m. on his final day, and there’s a non-zero chance of multiple Special Sessions in the months leading up to his exit.

But unlike his predecessor Scott, whose final hours were marked by a blitz of consequential judicial appointments designed to lock in long-term influence, DeSantis’ endgame figures to be less traditional — and far more idiosyncratic.

Case in point: the appointment of Urban Meyer to the Board of Trustees at New College of Florida. It’s high-profile, polarizing, and guaranteed to keep critics and allies arguing long after the term expires.

The Governor has always been far more defiant than deferential. All of which is to say: if you’re angling for a late-stage DeSantis appointment, polishing your résumé may matter less than your footwork on a sports bar dance floor.

No. 2: @RonDeSantis

Like too many men of his generation, @RonDeSantis lives way too online. Having followed DeSantis since well before his first run for Congress, it feels fair to put him on the couch for a moment. He emerged from the isolation of the pandemic and young fatherhood into a personal world with few genuine confidants — and an army of digital acolytes eager to amplify every thought.

DeSantis isn’t Donald Trump, but he is increasingly governing via social media. Policy declarations land on X alongside baseball musings and constitutional soliloquies, all delivered with the confidence of someone convinced the feed is the forum.

His fixation on the evils of artificial intelligence, in particular, reads less like a niche concern and more like early positioning as a possible 2028 foil to JD Vance, pitting Florida’s most affectless culture warrior against Silicon Valley’s favorite venture-backed tribune in a race to see who can sound more alarmed while offering less humanity.

No. 3: The property tax debate

Were it not so dangerously revolutionary, the idea of dramatically scaling back — or outright eliminating — property taxes in a state without an income tax would be the most ridiculous policy debate in modern Florida history.

As multiple analyses have made clear, property taxes are not some optional nuisance; they are load bearing. Strip them away and the ability of cities and counties to provide basic services collapses.

Still, DeSantis and many of his allies are determined to get something on the ballot. The push increasingly resembles a Florida-flavored version of California’s infamous Proposition 13 — a voter-friendly promise that capped property taxes, froze assessments, and permanently kneecapped local government capacity. The aftermath there was not relief but retrenchment.

Even if the idea had merit (and that’s a generous assumption) there is no reasonable way to upend the architecture of Florida government through a single ballot initiative. But that’s precisely what DeSantis wants. Before that happens, though, the Legislature will have its say. And when it inevitably refuses to give him exactly what he’s asking for — he’s particularly incensed by the House’s hodgepodge approach to the debate — the real fight begins.

What follows would pit the full DeSantis political machine against almost every county and city government in Florida. All that’s at stake is the very nature of government.

No. 4: The DeSantis-Uthmeier war on weed

As they demonstrated in 2024, DeSantis and James Uthmeier really, truly hate the sticky icky.

Last time around, the Governor and his then-Chief of Staff went to extraordinary lengths to stop a marijuana legalization amendment, including diverting millions of dollars meant to support child welfare and health care into a political effort designed to kill it.

The details of the Hope Florida scandal are well documented. The takeaway is simpler: no line was too close to cross if the goal was defeating the amendment.

Two years later, the legalization crowd is back — just as well funded, better organized, and fully aware this is a bare-knuckle brawl.

They also have something they didn’t last time: a powerful ally in the White House. With Kim Rivers, the head of Trulieve, now having Trump’s ear, the biggest marijuana company in the business is no longer playing defense. One suspects it may have event picked up a few new tricks.

What remains unclear is just how deep DeSantis and Uthmeier are willing to go this time to keep the initiative off the ballot — or, failing that, to defeat it. But if past is prologue, this fight is headed to the Mariana Trench. They proved last time that there is very little they won’t do to get their way.

No. 5: The 2026 Legislative Session

If you thought the 2025 Legislative Session — with its extended budget fight and all the late-night brinkmanship — was a car wreck, 2026 is shaping up to be a demolition derby where every driver has a lead foot and a chip on their shoulder.

The bad blood between the House and Senate is unprecedented in the modern, GOP-dominated era. I’ve spoken directly with leaders in both chambers, and there’s no dressing it up. They don’t just distrust each other; they genuinely despise each other. That’s not a vibe. That’s a governing condition.

Yes, they’ll pass a budget. They must. But expect it to come only after several rounds of deliberate pain-infliction — weaponized calendars, stalled priorities, and a whole lot of “oh, that was your thing? Interesting.”

You could already see the outlines of it last year. The budget gap was massive, the tax-cut philosophies shared no DNA, and even the Senate President’s signature “Rural Renaissance” package was fed to the House’s paper shredder and taped back together across multiple bills.

That wasn’t an “oops.” It was intentional. Which is the point. With so many big-ticket fights on the card, expect the next 60 days (… yeah, right …) to be a prolonged exercise in mutually assured irritation.

No. 6: The Florida Men and Women retreating from D.C.

Dan Bongino stepping down as Deputy FBI Director after less than a year is the latest data point in a trend that’s only going to accelerate in 2026: the quiet retreat of Florida Men and Women who flooded Washington during the opening stretch of Trump 2.0.

And yes, it’s fair to pause for a moment and reflect on whether Bongino even qualifies as a Florida Man. He’s a New Yorker by birth who ran for office in Maryland before reinventing himself politically in Florida. Still, he fit the archetype well enough — loud, online, ideologically rigid — and his exit underscores a larger reality: governing the federal bureaucracy is not as fun as owning libs from a studio.

Inside the West Wing, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, herself a Florida Woman, is likely coming to terms with the downside of importing half the Sunshine State political class into Washington. The administration’s Florida footprint is unmistakable: Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Pam Bondi as Attorney General, Mike Waltz as Ambassador to the United Nations after a stint as National Security Adviser, and a constellation of former Florida operatives sprinkled throughout the executive branch.

But Florida Man is not especially well-suited to managing sprawling federal agencies and dense bureaucracies. Florida Man isn’t built for rulemaking. He’s built for content. Washington, it turns out, has a way of sorting that out quickly.

No. 7: Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick

If you’re being described — even quietly — as the Democratic version of George Santos, it’s already over. The only question is how much collateral damage gets done on the way out.

U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick enters 2026 under the weight of a federal indictment alleging she funneled $5 million in disaster relief funds into her 2021 congressional campaign through a maze of family accounts and straw donors. It’s not a paperwork SNAFU or an ambiguous ethics gray zone. It’s the kind of accusation that freezes leadership posts, invites expulsion chatter, and turns a once-safe seat into an open audition.

Her response so far has been to dig in — denouncing the charges as a sham, fundraising off the indictment itself, and daring the system to blink first. But Washington already has. Democratic leadership pulled her ranking-member gavel, and colleagues are treating the situation like a biohazard: don’t touch, don’t defend, don’t linger.

Back home, the sharks are circling. Her Primary opponents are openly campaigning on the premise that the district deserves a reset, not a soap opera. Even in a D+22 seat, that matters. Voters may tolerate ideology they disagree with, but they have little patience Representatives working around a court schedule.

No. 8: Cory Mills

If noted shoe polish connoisseur and notorious former state Rep. Anthony Sabatini is dogging you, it’s a sign that things have gone spectacularly off the rails.

That’s where U.S. Rep. Cory Mills finds himself heading into 2026. The New Smyrna Beach Republican spent much of the past year fending off a rolling series of scandals that culminated in a late-night House vote to ship yet another censure resolution to the Ethics Committee. The list is long and familiar: Stolen Valor questions, allegations of profiting from federal contracts, dating violence claims, sexual misconduct allegations, and enough interpersonal drama to power a mid-budget streaming series.

Mills, for his part, insists he has “the evidence and receipts” and that everything will be cleared up in due time. Maybe he does. But exhaustion is already setting in on both sides. Even some fellow members of the Florida delegation have publicly bristled at leadership’s repeated efforts to shield him. Outside critics aren’t backing off. And the drip-drip of new allegations ensures this story continues into the new year.

No. 9: María Elvira Salazar

María Elvira Salazar is discovering what happens when you enthusiastically help build the Face-Eating Leopards Party.

For years, Salazar was reliably pro-Trump on immigration, border security, and the broader enforcement-first posture that played well in Republican primaries and conservative media. Now she’s recoiling as the Trump administration does exactly what it said it would do.

Suddenly, Salazar is heartbroken. She’s issuing letters. She’s posting videos. She’s reintroducing her long-stalled “Dignity Act.” She’s pleading for mercy for Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans who make up the backbone of her Miami-Dade district. And yet, when it mattered, she lined up with the very administration now torching the immigration framework she claims to defend.

The result is a politician who finds herself “entre la espada y la pared.” Democrats accuse her of performative outrage. Immigration hardliners see weakness in apostasy. Hispanic voters, meanwhile, are watching friends and family members get swept up in enforcement actions.

Would it be shocking if she drew a serious Primary challenge from her right or found herself in a General Election dogfight fueled by collapsing Hispanic support? Do leopards eat faces?

No. 10: James Fishback

Has Florida ever seen a more bizarre — or less qualified — candidate for Governor attract this much attention? Possibly. But it’s been a while.

James Fishback has earned the distinction of being described as the state’s first openly Groyper gubernatorial candidate, and he’s leaning into it with a campaign designed to inflame, offend, and suck up oxygen. There’s no governing résumé, no coalition and no plausible path to victory. In their place is a steady stream of racially charged rhetoric designed to keep his name circulating.

Calling a sitting Black Congressman a “slave” and then lecturing him on whether he’s allowed to be offended isn’t edgy politics. It’s grotesque. And yet, here we are.

A charitable interpretation is that Fishback is auditioning for a gig in right-wing radio. The less charitable one is that his candidacy reflects a corner of the electorate becoming increasingly comfortable with open bigotry so long as it’s wrapped in internet-native grievance language.

Either way, it’s an embarrassment that the state has to entertain this at all. The only real question is whether the campaign flames out quickly or whether voters are subjected to another eight long months of this circus.

No. 11: The GOP Primary for Chief Financial Officer

Including CFO Blaise Ingoglia and Rep. Kevin Steele in this list isn’t an indictment of either candidate. By every measure, both are credible Republicans with real résumés. The issue isn’t quality — it’s math.

Run this race 1,000 times in a simulator and Ingoglia, the de facto incumbent with the Governor’s backing, wins 99% of them. He has the appointment, the DeSantis endorsement and a steady drumbeat of law enforcement, firefighter, and elected-official endorsements.

Which leaves Steele with a narrow set of options. He has money — a lot of it — and that matters. But in a race where the normal levers are already spoken for, the only realistic way to shake things loose is to go negative. Deeply negative. As in nuclear.

So, if you’re wondering why this otherwise low-drama Cabinet race made the list, look no further than your postbox. Because unless Steele is content with a respectable loss, Floridians should brace for a flood of ugly mail designed to soften Ingoglia up just enough to create doubt even if the odds remain stubbornly long.

No. 12: The Democratic Primary for Governor

The race that will be covered wildly out of proportion to its actual stakes is former U.S. Rep. David Jolly versus Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings. Think of it like the AFC Championship games in the 1990s: intense, overanalyzed, and ultimately a prelude to getting steamrolled by whoever’s coming out of the NFC.

Legacy media will eat this up. Jolly’s town halls will be framed as proof of a moderate revival. Demings’ efforts to activate Black voters will be parsed precinct by precinct. Every endorsement, every cable hit, every clever line will be treated like it meaningfully alters Florida’s trajectory.

It doesn’t.

The underlying math is brutal and getting worse. The voter registration gap between Republicans and Democrats has ballooned past the point where momentum narratives or earnest retail politics can realistically close it. It’s structural.

That doesn’t mean the Primary won’t be competitive or interesting on its own terms. Demings brings institutional credibility and a proven local coalition. Jolly offers a familiar face to disaffected moderates and independents. Either would give Democrats a nominee who can campaign competently and speak fluently about Florida’s problems.

But competence isn’t viability. Whoever wins this Primary is almost certainly walking into a buzzsaw powered by registration math, fundraising asymmetry, and a state Republican Party that long since entered dynasty mode.

So yes, this race will generate headlines. It will produce moments. It will be debated endlessly on panels and podcasts. And then November will come and the race will end in a way that has become routine — decisively.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Fentrice Driskell, Bruce Antone call out mid-decade redistricting effort as ‘foolish,’ ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on


House Democrats are scoffing at Gov. Ron DeSantis’ latest proclamation calling for a Special Session in April on congressional redistricting.

Both House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell and Rep. Bruce Antone, ranking member of the House Redistricting Committee, maintain that a mid-decade redrawing of political boundaries violates both Florida law and the state constitution.

“No matter what DeSantis says, this is an illegal partisan gerrymander happening because Donald Trump asked for it,” Driskell said at a press briefing. “Trump wants to rig the Midterm Elections to prevent the American people from holding his administration accountable.”

Antone, in a separate interview with Florida Politics, said Democrats in the House unanimously opposed drafting new cartography absent any court finding a problem with Florida’s current congressional map.

“The Florida Constitution says we should draw once every 10 years,” he said. “I do not know any instances where the Legislature has drawn maps without being prompted by a court decision. I think we have done that three times when required to redraw maps, but just coming up on our own and redrawing maps? I don’t think it’s legal. I don’t think it’s wise.”

He noted that the precedent of going through with a mid-decade redistricting would open the door to a new Governor elected later this year to call for crafting new political boundaries before the 2028 election.

Besides the precedent of Florida only scheduling redistricting historically after the decennial census, Driskell pointed to the Fair Districts Amendment passed by voters in 2010.

“The Fair Districts Amendment to the Florida Constitution outlaws drawing maps to benefit one party over another, and that’s exactly what Trump has asked the Legislature to do,” she said.

“People should pick their politicians. Politicians should not pick their people. Florida’s government should not be rigging elections. That’s what they do in places like Cuba and Venezuela, not America. This is a cynical swamp like behavior that makes people hate politics, and Florida doesn’t have to do this, period.”

Of note, DeSantis said he wanted to bring Alex Kelly, Florida’s Commerce Secretary and the former Deputy Chief of Staff who drew Florida’s congressional map in 2022, into the process. The Governor in 2022 vetoed maps produced by the Legislature before strong-arming passage of the Kelly map and signing it.

But Driskell suggested DeSantis holds less leverage than he did in 2022 — and enjoys less political capital. She pointed at friction throughout the 2025 Legislative Session between DeSantis and Speaker Daniel Perez, and said House leadership owes the Governor no favors.

“This Governor is a lame duck. We’re heading into the final Legislative Session, at least the last Regular Session, where he will be Governor,” Driskell said.

“We know that his national star has dimmed. We know this is a Governor who’s been so obsessed with his own political ambition, that he will do anything or say anything, and he doesn’t care about the consequences and who it hurts in the state. And we also saw a prior Legislative Session where there was more of a separation of powers and checks and balances, particularly with the Florida House drawing very clear lines in the sand about what we would and would not do.”

Perez’s Office, for what it’s worth, said the Speaker learned of DeSantis’ Special Session proclamation on Wednesday morning ahead of the Governor’s announcement but offered no further comment. Earlier this week, Perez told Florida Politics in a statement: “Members can expect the process will unfold thoughtfully, deliberately and transparently.” He has signaled a desire before to address redistricting during the Regular Session.

Antone said he expects that any maps produced by Kelly or anyone in the Governor’s Office will be looked at, but he hopes it will at the least be considered alongside other maps produced in the Legislature. But he said he also wonders if any maps will be produced in Florida at all or if Republican cartographers in Washington will draw their own lines.

“I would just say people need to pay attention now,” Antone said. “With all of the craziness, people need to be paying attention to politics, to how we are being governed, to how maps are being drawn and to how parties gain power.”

Driskell acknowledged, though, that Democrats hold less leverage than in other states. While Texas Democrats last year fled the state to stall approval of a new congressional map there, such a move wouldn’t matter in Florida when Republicans hold supermajority status in the House and Senate.

But Democrats have pursued court battles regarding redistricting. Driskell noted an ongoing federal case challenging the lines for Florida’s 26th Congressional District in Miami.

Of course, Democrats in Washington have suggested they will gain enough seats to retake the U.S. House regardless of GOP shenanigans in Florida and other states. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to date announced four GOP-held seats in Florida as “districts in play” this November.

Driskell echoed that optimism, and said if Republicans push to make too many Democratic seats more competitive, a resulting “dummymander” may result in Democrats knocking out GOP incumbents who currently represent relatively safe districts.

“I just want to be very, very clear that even if there’s the potential for Democrats to gain seats, I don’t want us to gain them in this way,” she said. “For the Legislature to go through a mid-decade redistricting cycle in service of Donald Trump and in service of keeping a majority in the Congress is wrong. It’s illegal and it’s unconstitutional. So even though that would be a possibility, I wouldn’t want us to have to win it that way.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. DeSantis awards $168M to rural communities for infrastructure improvements

Published

on


The state is giving nearly $168 million to small and rural counties, primarily to improve infrastructure in areas hit hard by hurricanes last year, Gov. Ron DeSantis said.

One of the biggest winners was Taylor County in the Big Bend region, which will receive $36 million out of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery and the Rural Infrastructure Fund. Taylor will get $4.9 million for a special needs ceremony, the Governor highlighted.

The city of Perry in Taylor County, will receive $12 million for a new parallel treatment train, $8.5 million to replace current wastewater infrastructure, and $4.5 million to create an independent water source, according to DeSantis.

Meanwhile Doctors’ Memorial Hospital in Perry will receive $4.4 million to install a facility emergency power system, replace the phone and communication system and modernize the facility’s water treatment system.

“All these different things, huge for Perry, Taylor County Commissioners,” DeSantis said.

Cross City will get $32 million to build a new waste water treatment plant and another $5.7 million to upgrade stormwater drains.

The Governor said $7.3 million is earmarked to construct and harden the Cedar Key Water and Sewer District potable water system, while $4.5 million is for the Big Bend Water Authority to repair and replace critical water mains in Steinhatchee

Other grants ranged from $100,000 up to a few million dollars.

“Every single one of these grants is a partnership and a relationship with a community, if not several partners in that community,” FloridaCommerce Secretary Alex Kelly said while speaking next to DeSantis.

DeSantis joked that he was awarding so many grants, it was impossible for him to bring his giant ceremonial mock checks that he normally hands out at press ceremonies.

“There’s too many awards,” DeSantis said. “I’d be taking pictures until dinnertime. I can’t, I’ve got to get back. I’ve got meetings.”

At Wednesday’s press conference, DeSantis made splashier political news by announcing he plans to call an April Special Session on congressional reapportionment. DeSantis also teased another Special Session focused on eliminating property taxes.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Canadians are getting jitters about owning property in Florida and other states

Published

on


Many Canadians are considering selling Florida homes, while fewer are looking to buy in the U.S.

Canadian snowbirds have long owned property throughout the Sunshine State. But two prominent real estate analysis firms say more Canadians are looking to sell their properties in the U.S. due to growing tensions between the countries.

Royal LePage and Realtor.com have released new analyses showing the trend. Royal LePage recently concluded a study that showed 54% of Canadians who currently own residential property in America say they’re planning to sell those homes within the next year. Out of those, 62% say President Donald Trump’s administration is the main reason they are looking to sell.

Phil Soper, President and CEO of Royal LePage, said perceived antagonism from the U.S. is contributing to Canadians souring on owning property in the U.S.

“The polarizing political climate in the United States is prompting many Canadians to reconsider how and where they spend their time and money. Canadians have been the most important foreign investors in America’s residential real estate market for years, and a significant wave of property sales would leave a noticeable mark on the regional economies that snowbirds support,” Soper said.

“Places like Florida, Arizona and California stand to lose millions in economic activity each year — and thousands of neighbors — if Canadian owners pull their capital from U.S. housing markets.”

Realtor.com analysts say trade tariffs imposed by Trump’s administration have directly impacted Canadians who own U.S. property. Data from the real estate company indicates that Canadians looking for U.S. property declined 4.5% from the third quarter of 2024 when compared to the same time frame in 2025.

“This retreat coincided with the period during which the U.S. imposed a series of tariffs on Canadian goods, sharply adjusting prior trade relations with the neighbor to the North,” said Realtor.com economist Jiayi Xu.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.