Connect with us

Business

A bailout for farmers caught in Trump’s trade war is already being discussed. ‘If we don’t get something, it will be quite a disaster’

Published

on



  • Trump administration officials and lawmakers are considering aid for farmers as retaliation looms against U.S. tariffs. China and Canada have already levied duties on some of the top U.S. agricultural exports. During Trump’s first term, farmers got $23 billion after an earlier round of tariffs.

Trump administration officials and lawmakers have begun exploring a relief package for U.S. farmers as agricultural trade groups warn of economic repercussions from tariffs.

That’s as retaliation against President Donald Trump’s sweeping import taxes could harm U.S. exports of farm products. 

“We are setting up the infrastructure that if, in fact, we have some economic consequences in the short term to our farmers and perhaps our ranchers, that we will have programs in place to solve for that,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters last week. 

On Sunday, she told CNN the administration must be prepared in case of “longer-term damage” by lining up funds with lawmakers. 

Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) confirmed discussions about a farm bailout and said he spoke with Rollins.

The USDA did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

On Wednesday, Trump announced a minimum 10% levy on all imports and even higher rates on certain trading partners. Some countries have retaliated with their own levies against specific industries. 

On Friday, China—a major export market for farmers—announced a 34% tariff on U.S. imports, after previously imposing an added 15% tariff on U.S.-grown chicken, wheat, corn, and cotton and a 10% levy on sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, seafood, fruit, vegetables, and dairy products.

In addition, Canada has levied 25% duties on goods worth $30 billion including peanut butter, orange juice, and coffee. The country also threatened to expand its tariffs to $155 billion worth of imported goods, including poultry, produce, and dairy products, if the U.S. maintains its trade policy. The European Union has threatened to retaliate against soybean, beef, and poultry farmers in the bloc’s effort to target red states. 

Trade groups have warned that retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agricultural exports could harm the prices of corn, soybeans, cotton, and other crops. The price of soybeans sank more than 3% Friday and are down almost 17% since a year ago. Roughly 60% of soybeans, meal, and soy oil produced in the U.S. are exported. 

“We hope there will be a bailout,” Barry Evans, a sorghum and cotton farmer in Texas who sits on the board of directors for a sorghum grain trade group, told The Wall Street Journal. “If we don’t get something, it will be quite a disaster.”

The farming industry relies on exports for more than 20% of its annual income, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. 

In 2024, the U.S. exported $176 billion in agricultural products, with 47% going to three countries: Mexico (17.2%), Canada (16.1%), and China (14%). According to the USDA, soybeans, livestock products, tree nuts, fruits, vegetables, grains, and feeds are among the top U.S. exports.

Tariffs in Trump’s first term triggered retaliation that caused a reduction of more than $27 billion in agricultural exports, according to USDA. The government gave farmers $23 billion in economic aid to help offset the loss.

Retaliatory tariffs add obstacles to an already struggling industry. Last year, Congress approved a $10 billion relief package to farmers to help reduce the impact of increased input costs and lower commodity prices and recently began dishing out the aid. The new package could be larger as the industry is faced with broad-ranging challenges, a congressional aide told WSJ.

“We share the administration’s goal of leveling the playing field with our international partners, but increased tariffs threaten economic sustainability of farmers who have lost money on most crops for the past three years,” president of the Farm Bureau, Zippy Duvall, told the WSJ.

In addition to the impact of retaliatory tariffs on agricultural exports, U.S. tariffs on imports could also increase prices that farmers pay for equipment, pesticides, and fertilizer.

Meanwhile, farmers are also suffering from the Department of Government Efficiency dismantling USAID. In 2020, the U.S. government purchased roughly  $2.1 billion in food aid from American farmers.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump administration dismantles office that sets federal poverty guidelines

Published

on


A massive crowd of New Yorkers from across the labor movement and allies march to demand the current administration to stop the federal cuts as right-wing politicians in Washington are moving forward with devastating proposals to cut two trillion dollars from Medicaid, Medicare, housing and food assistance and other vital programs.

Photo by Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Kashkari says all the Fed can do is keep inflation anchored

Published

on

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari signaled confidence that markets will remain orderly as investors sort through President Donald Trump’s shifting trade policies and said the central bank must stay focused on keeping inflation expectations anchored.

Speaking after a week that brought a sharp surge in 10-year Treasury yields, Kashkari said US trade and fiscal policy will determine where that number goes. 

“At the Fed, our job is to keep inflation under control so that rate isn’t even higher,” he said Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation.

Kashkari was among Fed policymakers who signaled last week that they’re prepared to hold the Fed’s policy rate steady to minimize the risk that Trump’s tariffs trigger a persistent rise in inflation, even if the labor market softens further.

In public comments and interviews, a number of officials have sent a clear signal they’re ruling out interest-rate cuts that would act as an insurance policy against any tariff-induced economic slowdown.

“I think investors in the US and around the world are trying to determine what is the new normal in America” and the Fed has “zero ability to affect that destination,” Kashkari told CBS.  

“All we can do is keep inflation expectations anchored and manage some of the ups and downs on that journey,” he said.

Asked whether markets are orderly, Kashkari replied, “They are,” adding that volatility is to be expected as market participants “grasp for where is all this going to settle.” 

“But markets are functioning, transactions are happening and so I anticipate that’s going to continue,” he said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Just to break even after the recent selloff, stocks will need to have the sort of rally that only happens during bull markets

Published

on



  • All the major U.S. stock market indices would need to have strong ends of the year just to finish flat. While that’s not impossible for the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, and the Dow, it usually only happens in years when the market is on an upswing, not experiencing a downturn as it is now.

Since President Donald Trump announced his sweeping tariff policy over a week ago and sent global markets into turmoil, the U.S. stock market has lost trillions in wealth. All the major indices such as the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, and Dow Jones Industrial Average are down for the year after markets reacted extremely negatively to Trump’s new trade policy. 

The major selloff induced by the new Trump policy reversed what was shaping up to be another good year in the markets. Investors and analysts had expected the U.S. stock market to continue to deliver solid returns, even if it did slow down from the record-setting pace of the previous two years. In fact, Trump’s election brought a new wave of market optimism, as initially stocks soared on the back of what many had viewed as a pro-business president. 

Now the opposite is true. Markets are sinking on the back of the uncertainty Trump injected into the U.S. economy since he returned to the White House. 

To make up for the losses they’ve incurred so far this year, the major U.S. stock indices—the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow—would all have to rally to an extent that isn’t unheard of, but has only ever happened in good years. 

However, a strong year in 2025 seems unlikely. Since the market crash caused by Trump’s tariff announcements, most major Wall Street banks have revised their annual forecasts for the economy to reflect the ongoing downturn. Some of those banks even called for a recession as the stock market slide coincided with cratering bond markets and a devaluing of the U.S. dollar. 

Through Friday, the S&P 500 is down 8.8%—a stark reversal from the rip-roaring gains of 2023 and 2024 that together accounted for the best two-year stretch since 1998. 

In order to turn around that loss and end the year flat, the S&P 500 would need to rise 9.4% from its closing price on April 11 to Dec. 31. In that case, investors won’t have lost any money, but they wouldn’t have gained a cent either. 

A similar or better growth rate from April 11 to the end of the year isn’t completely out of the ordinary for the S&P 500. In fact, it’s happened 22 times since the modern day version of the index was established in 1957. While that sounds like good news, investors shouldn’t be too quick to rejoice. The S&P 500 only grows 9.4% or more from April 11 onwards in bull years, not during down markets like 2025, according to data supplied by wealth manager AssetMark and Fortune’s calculations. The worst performing such year, 2016, had a total annual return of 12%. The best year, 1958, had a juicy 43.4% annual return. Across all 22 years that fit that criteria, the average annual return was 27%.  

In other words, the S&P 500 soars from April through December when the market is ripping, not when it’s limping toward a zero percent return. 

To be sure, there is a notable precedent for a market crisis early in the year turning into a year of major gains. In 2020, the year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the S&P 500 had the best April 11-to-December performance on record, with gains of 34.6% over that time period. That led to an overall annual return of 18.4%. However, those market slumps were caused by different reasons. In 2020, markets reacted to the spread of a highly infectious disease for which there wasn’t yet a cure, while this time around they were responding to a trade policy intentionally implemented by an elected official. 

Potential recoveries for the Nasdaq and the Dow have the same dynamics as those of the S&P 500. They need to rise by a reasonable rate, but one that only happens when the stock market is flourishing, not when it’s trying to resuscitate itself. 

Analysts now expect 2025’s stock market performance to be worse than they forecasted at the start of the year. In December 2024, the Wall Street consensus for the S&P 500 had a median price target of 6,625, according to data from LSEG. That would have meant a 12.9% increase for 2025 based on where the S&P 500 opened on Jan. 2.   

Over the last week, a slew of banks lowered their forecasts for the S&P 500 far below the median from the start of the year. BMO revised its slightly bullish call of 6,700 to 6,100. Goldman Sachs cut its forecast twice this year, from 6,500 to 6,200 and then again to 5,700. The second Goldman revision would imply a loss of 2.8% this year. UBS and RBC also expect a loss for the year. 

In 2025, the Nasdaq is down 10.9%. The decline is a 180 from where the index started the year, topping 22,000 in February. The Nasdaq would need to rise 12.2% to end the year where it started at 20.975.62. It’s not a rarity to see a 12% rally from April to December. It’s happened 20 times since Nasdaq was established in 1985, according to AssetMark’s data and Fortune’s calculations. But again, it only happens in positive years. The worst year with at least a 12.2% run-up in our time frame, 1992, had an 8.9% annual return. The best return of the batch was 1999, which had a 102% return.  

The Dow, which was spared the worst of the crash, is down 5.1% in 2025. In order to finish the year without a loss, the Dow would need to rise 5.4% for the rest of the year. The Dow’s historical performance might offer investors a sliver of hope. Out of the 35 times since 1958 when it has grown at least 5.4% from April 11 to December, there was one year the index didn’t finish positive. In 1984, the Dow grew 7.1% over that span, while ending the year with a total loss of -3.7%. But for the most part, the 35 previous years that fit our criteria did coincide with strong growth. The average for the Dow in those years was 18.6%. The best year was 1975, which had a 38.2% return for the year.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.