Connect with us

Business

From college dropout to Ironman CEO in 7 years, this Gen Z founder found ‘no pain, no gain’ from a trip to China and the Shaolin monks

Published

on


Gustas Germanavicius has only been competing in Ironman events for 15 months, but he’s already become the top-ranked athlete in his home country of Lithuania (a title he lost in the time between his interview and publication; he’s in the top 7% globally). The two-time founder told Fortune that he approaches it the way he approaches his business: always on. “It’s just like in business, you have to, consistently, every day, show up and don’t have any excuses for poor performance.” He said that not all his Ironman training days are great, but he has to make sure he follows his plan. It aligns with how he works.

“Basically I work in marathons and sprints,” Germanavicius said, describing something far beyond the typical “996” workload of 9am to 9pm, six days a week. For Germanavicius, it’s more like two months on and two weeks off. “Two months I work, 24-7, seven days a week, then two weeks off. This two weeks off doesn’t mean that I’m fully offline, but I try to relax and put a lower gear.”

The 27-year-old is proud that his current business, InRento, is on course for its third profitable year. And even though his first business, an artificial intelligence (AI) startup named WellParko, did not work out, he’s proud that one of his investors made a profitable exit, and that they both backed his current venture. “Actually, last month, I bought out two of their funds, so they made a serious profit, because we are at this stage that we are growing profitably.” But Germanavicius was quick to add that he doesn’t exactly enjoy being his own boss.

“I think it’s much more stressful, to be honest,” the strong-jawed, long-haired Lithuanian tells Fortune, “because you have all this pressure, you know? Like, what if I’m wrong? What if my assumptions are wrong? What if my decisions are wrong?” Germanavicius said he doesn’t like “this whole concept of like having no boss is easier.” When he started WellParko at 18 years old, he added, “I wasn’t ready. So I had to go through all the pains, go through all this pressure.” Now that he’s managing a €50 million portfolio, “this pressure is insane,” and he’s learned the hard way how to manage. “It’s not about being free to be your own boss. It’s about serving the customer to get a good business off the ground. Like, it’s not stress-free to be your own boss.”

When Fortune offered that his work sounds like the old expression “no pain, no gain,” Germanavicius grinned and offered an anecdote from deep in Shaolin, China. After WellParko exited, he said, “the first thing I did, I booked the ticket to China and I went to train with the Shaolin monks.”

Germanavicius waved away suggestions that this was some kind of homage to Wu-Tang Clan, the Staten Island rap group obsessed with the concept of Shaolin from old 1970s kung fu movies. “No, no, no, no,” he said, “for me, mastery is one of the key values in life.” He said that despite the monks speaking no English and communication being limited, he learned two mantras from his Shaolin master: “He always said two things: ‘No pain, no gain,’ and ‘practice makes tired.’ Not perfect, but practice makes tired, no pain, no gain.”

The Profitable Contrarian

Germanavicius called himself a “contrarian” who was always entrepreneurial, recalling that he launched a bicycle buying-and-trading business as a middle schooler. (He loves Ironman because of his lifetime love of cycling, he added.) He was an entrepreneur before he was a college student, and he only went to university (the prestigious ESADE) for a few months before deciding that it was a waste of time, “delaying” the start of more meaningful things. “The opportunity cost was too high and I was feeling like I’m underperforming in life.”

The founder told Fortune that he had a pivotal conversation with his mother when he decided to drop out. “I wasn’t confident at first, because at first, of course, it was like a great university and great opportunity, and I had a scholarship.” He said he always remembers what she told him: “Listen, it’s your life. You live it how you want, because you will have to live it. Not me, not not anybody else, just do what you want.’” Germanavicius said this was the “trigger” for his decision. He also disclosed that his father died when Germanavicius was young (almost precisely the time he started selling bicycles). “It was hard, but at the same time, I think it got me to this understanding that no one’s going to take care of you, you know, and you have to take your own actions, and you have to take the responsibility for them.”

A crowdfunding platform that allocates capital to real-estate projects, InRento is active in markets beyond Eastern Europe. They are active in six markets including Poland, Italy, Spain, and Ireland. “We take all the edges of Europe,” he told Fortune jokingly. “I feel like we go to the markets where financing is inefficient,” full of bankable projects and clients, who can’t get traditional bank financing. This doesn’t mean they are sketchy, he said, explaining there are many family owned companies, often in hospitality, which need to raise a few million euros, but most banks in the market uninterested in loans smaller than €10 million. For example, he showed Fortune plans for a former Harry Potter-themed tourist attraction in Poland that needed renovation.

Germanavicius added that InRento is fully regulated and supervised by the Central Bank of Lithuania, with a license issued by the European Central Bank. He said they are fully audited, do annual reporting, and comply with all the applicable laws and regulations of financial institutions in the countries where they operate. “We also publish audited accounts and audits publicly to our clients,” he said, “transparency helps to support reputation and our reputation is our biggest asset.”

What he’s like to work for

Fortune spoke to Bernardas Preikšaitis, InRento’s Chief Operating Officer, to get a feel for what it’s like to work for this beyond-996 founder. Preikšaitis credited Germanavicius with giving him instant trust and the space to grow, training him beyond legal counsel into a business-oriented leader, and offering swift upward mobility rather than locking him into a narrow role. According to Preikšaitis, Germanavicius asserts high expectations with a direct, almost intimidating manner but balances this intensity with tremendous trust in his team.

Despite perceptions that employees may be afraid of Germanavicius due to his high standards, Preikšaitis affirmed that those who stay are deeply motivated by this environment of trust and responsibility. In practice, the leadership style avoids micromanagement, largely reducing communications to updates and priorities. Preikšaitis noted, “Everyone knows what to do. There is no box-checking, no need to report back constantly. It’s about prioritization and getting things done—deals and investor safety above all.”​

He described this as an odd tension between trust and distrust. “From day one, he basically gave a lot of trust to me,” but at the same time, Germanavicius always stresses an edgy kind of work persona, almost a paranoia. “He always tells me, ‘You know, never trust no one.’” Thinking it over, Preikšaitis described the approach as: “I trust no one, but I give 100% trust in you and what you are doing, and I believe in you, and I will enable you at any cost.”

A shift into microshifting

Germanavicius told Fortune he was “still learning,” and after all, he has never had a boss himself. “I still think I’m not very a good manager, to be honest.” He said when he first began working, he assumed others would be wired like himself, but he encountered a more standard mentality. “What I realized was that people from these very deep corporate backgrounds, when you give them all this freedom … for a lot of people, it was weird.” He said his workers “couldn’t comprehend” an environment without traditional hours where key performance indicators (KPIs) were the only thing that mattered.

At InRento, he said he tends to hire “self-starting” people. “They don’t really care about hours. The whole company culture that we build is that we don’t limit holidays. Like, if someone wants to take holidays, they can take as much as we as they want. And basically there are no work hours.” He said he trusts his team to set their own schedules, be responsible for their own work. “It’s very KPI-driven. We are a financial institution where everything can be measured, and all the performance can can be driven to numbers.”

The description of going beyond 996 is familiar to startup founders across the world. Day One Ventures founder Masha Bucher, an early backer of 11 unicorns and over 30 exits, told Fortune that the Silicon Valley culture is nonstop. “People I know, close to me, work seven days a week, from 6:00 or 7:00 am with a break for sports until like midnight or 1:00 or 2:00 am.” She said 996 is a catchy phrase, but isn’t representative of what she sees at all because it far undersells the situation. Like Germanavicius, Bucher said she’s always had that work ethic herself, since age 14. She said it’s “flexible,” but “I don’t remember when I was on vacation and what vacation is. I think when you do something you love, you don’t feel like you need vacation.”

Bucher also said that she views hard work “like a talent” and that not all smart people have it. “One of the saddest things in life is that some of the most intelligent people in the world that I know of, they just don’t work hard, right?” She also insisted that the Silicon Valley community is taking care of itself and working sustainably, despite the long hours. The founders she sees “are not unhealthy,” she said. “In fact, they’re healthier than many more people that don’t live like this.” She said people need enough sleep, some kind of exercise of sports routine, but not necessarily vacation.

There is another word for what Germanavicius and Bucher are describing: “microshifting.” A permanent shift to the workday created by remote work—workers dividing their days into many small, flexible blocks—is becoming the norm for younger generations in the workplace, often befuddling people from more traditional corporate backgrounds. Priya Rathod, Indeed Workplace Trends Editor, told Fortune that the biggest risk with microshifting is “blurred boundaries,” and “if you don’t create a structure around this, some workers feel like they’re always on.”

Rathod said there was a special need to “protect personal time” with this shift in the workday. “In the work world we’re living in, we’re working across time zones, which means you may be taking calls and not just in that 9 to 5 time period. So if you’re doing that, you need to protect other time.” She described microshifting as “kind of a partnership between the employee and their team and their manager to make sure that they aren’t doing this to the point of burnout.”

Germanavicius is one of the managers adopting an entirely new kind of management style for the world of microshifting/always on/996-adjacent schedules. He told Fortune that he encourages people to take vacation and “don’t experience the burnout, because it’s very hard to recover.” He also said he takes care to set up people who can support him, because “the company must not be dependent on me. If it’s dependent on me, then it means I’m doing a craftsmanship, not a business. The business needs to work for you, you shouldn’t work for the business.” There is a price to pay for the microshifting world, though: availability and adaptability.

No pain, no gain

“Just to be perfectly clear,” Germanavicius added, his eyes narrowing, when he takes his two weeks off after sprinting for two months, “it doesn’t mean I’m not working. It’s just that, you know, I sleep in, maybe I have out-of-office on my email,” but he’s still monitoring. He said the business is cyclical, with “peak” and “low” seasons. “So what I always ask from my team: Don’t pretend that you’re working. If you don’t have, let’s say, nothing meaningful to do. Go spend time with your family, but when we have a big fish, then we need all hands on deck, we need to be sprinting.” He said that it’s just like his Ironman training: “If I work, I work. If I do sports, I do sports … I would rather push myself to the maximum and then take some time off, and then push again.”

“No work-life balance” is the reality Preikšaitis sees at InRento—not out of negative pressure, but from a shared sense of mission. Preikšaitis credits Germanavicius as the model: “You either live with your work or there is just no balance.” He said the results are in the KPIs: zero defaults and millions of dollars in deals. Preikšaitis said he is inspired to work so hard from his parents’ stories of living under Communism. “My father, he was a director at one of the tax authorities in Lithuania. He was earning basically 20% of what I’m earning right now. And he was 45, 46 years old.”

At the same time, Preikšaitis said the distribution of wealth is getting “ridiculous” in Lithuania: “there’s a huge separation between the middle class, upper class, and the lower class” and it is very hard to live in Vilnius unless you’re a member of the professional class. yeah. “I think this is the tendency for the whole of Eastern Europe … if you want to make out a living, and you want to have at least a decent apartment, and I don’t know, let yourself travel at least two times a year, you need to work your ass off.”

Germanavicius claimed that he has gained some self-knowledge in his short but profitable, and intense-sounding career. “I am not this kind of person that takes the easy choice, and in general in life I notice that the more pressure I have, it’s easier for me to move forward.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Leaders at Davos are obsessing over how to use AI at scale

Published

on



  • In today’s CEO Daily: Fortune‘s AI editor Jeremy Kahn reports on the AI buzz at Davos
  • The big story: SCOTUS could upend Trump’s leverage to acquire Greenland.
  • The markets: Jolted by Trump’s renewed tariff threats.
  • Plus: All the news and watercooler chat from Fortune.

Good morning. I’m on the ground in Davos, Switzerland, for this year’s World Economic Forum. As Diane wrote yesterday, U.S. President Donald Trump’s arrival later this week along with a large delegation of U.S. officials eclipses pretty much every other discussion at Davos this year. But, when people here aren’t talking about Trump, they are talking about AI.

At Davos last year, the hype around AI agents was pierced by the shock of DeepSeek’s R1 model, which was released during the conference. We’ll see if a similar bit of news upends the AI narrative again this year. (There are rumors that DeepSeek is planning to drop another model.) But, barring that, business leaders seem to be less wowed by the hype around AI this year and more concerned with the nitty-gritty of how to implement the technology successfully at scale.

On Monday, Srini Tallapragada, Salesforce’s chief engineering and customer success officer, told me the company is using ‘forward deployed engineers’ to tighten feedback loops between customers and product teams. Salesforce is also offering pre-built agents, workflows, and playbooks to help customers re-engineer their businesses—and avoid getting stuck in “pilot purgatory.”

Meanwhile, at a side event in Davos called A Compass for Europe, that focused on how to restore the continent’s flagging competitiveness, AI was front-and-center. Christina Kosmowski, the CEO of LogicMonitor, told the assembled CEOs that to achieve AI success at scale, companies should take a “top down” approach, with the CEO and leadership identifying the highest value use cases and driving the whole organization to align around achieving them. Neeti Mehta Shukla, the cofounder and chief impact officer at Automation Anywhere, said it was critical to move beyond measuring automation’s impact only through the lens of labor savings. She gave specific customer examples where uplifting data quality, improving customer satisfaction, or moving more workers to new tasks, were better metrics than simply looking at cost per unit output. Finally, Lila Tretikov, head of AI strategy at NEA, said Europe has enough talent and funding to build world-beating AI companies—what it lacks is ambition and willingness to take big bets.

Later, I met with Bastian Nominacher, co-founder and co-CEO of process analytics software platform Celonis. He echoed some of these points, telling me that to achieve ROI with AI generally required three things: strong leadership commitment, the establishment of a center of excellence within the business (this led to an 8x higher return than for companies that didn’t do this!), and finally having enough live data connected to the AI platform.

For further AI insights from Davos, check out Fortune’s Eye on AI newsletter. Meanwhile, Fortune is hosting a number of events in Davos throughout the week. View that lineup here. And my colleagues will be providing more reporting from Davos to CEO Daily and fortune.com throughout the week.—Jeremy Kahn

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

This is the web version of CEO Daily, a newsletter of must-read global insights from CEOs and industry leaders. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stock market today: Dow futures tumble 400 points on Trump’s tariffs over Greenland, Nobel prize

Published

on



U.S. stock futures dropped late Monday after global equities sold off as President Donald Trump launches a trade war against NATO allies over his Greenland ambitions.

Futures tied to the Dow Jones industrial average sank 401 points, or 0.81%. S&P 500 futures were down 0.91%, and Nasdaq futures sank 1.13%. 

Markets in the U.S. were closed in observance of the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday. Earlier, the dollar dropped as the safe haven status of U.S. assets was in doubt, while stocks in Europe and Asia largely retreated.

On Saturday, Trump said Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland will be hit with a 10% tariff starting on Feb. 1 that will rise to 25% on June 1, until a “Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

The announcement came after those countries sent troops to Greenland last week, ostensibly for training purposes, at the request of Denmark. But late Sunday, a message from Trump to European officials emerged that linked his insistence on taking over Greenland to his failure to be award the Nobel Peace Prize.

The geopolitical impact of Trump’s new tariffs against Europe could jeopardize the trans-Atlantic alliance and threaten Ukraine’s defense against Russia.

But Wall Street analysts were more optimistic on the near-term risk to financial markets, seeing Trump’s move as a negotiating tactic meant to extract concessions.

Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone, described the gambit as “escalate to de-escalate” and pointed out that the timing of his tariff announcement ahead of his appearance at the Davos World Economic Forum this week is likely not a coincidence.

“I’ll leave others to question the merits of that approach, and potential longer-run geopolitical fallout from it, but for markets such a scenario likely means some near-term choppiness as headline noise becomes deafening, before a relief rally in due course when another ‘TACO’ moment arrives,” he said in a note on Monday, referring to the “Trump always chickens out” trade.

Similarly, Jonas Goltermann, deputy chief markets economist at Capital Economics, also said “cooler heads will prevail” and downplayed the odds that markets are headed for a repeat of last year’s tariff chaos.

In a note Monday, he said investors have learned to be skeptical about all of Trump’s threats, adding that the U.S. economy remains healthy and markets retain key risk buffers.

“Given their deep economic and financial ties, both the US and Europe have the ability to impose significant pain on each other, but only at great cost to themselves,” Goltermann added. “As such, the more likely outcome, in our view, is that both sides recognize that a major escalation would be a lose-lose proposition, and that compromise eventually prevails. That would be in line with the pattern around most previous Trump-driven diplomatic dramas.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Goldman investment banking co-head Kim Posnett on the year ahead, from an IPO ‘mega-cycle’ to another big year for M&A to AI’s ‘horizontal disruption’

Published

on



Ahead of the World Economic Forum‘s Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, Fortune connected with Goldman Sachs’ global co-head of investment banking, Kim Posnett, for her outlook on the most urgent issues in business as 2026 gathers steam.

A Fortune Most Powerful Woman, Posnett is one of the bank’s top dealmakers, also serving as vice chair of the Firmwide Client Franchise Committee and is a member of the Management Committee. She was previously the global head of the Technology, Media and Telecommunications, among several other executive roles, including Head of Investment Banking Services and OneGS. She talked to Fortune about how she sees the current business environment and the most significant developments in 2026, in terms of AI, the IPO market and M&A activity. Goldman has been the No. 1 M&A advisory globally for the last 20 years, including in 2025 — and Posnett has been one of the star contributors, advising companies including Amazon, Uber, eBay, Etsy, and X.

  • Heading into Davos, how would you describe the current environment?  

As the global business community converges at Davos, we are seeing powerful catalysts driving M&A and capital markets activity. The foundational drivers that accelerated business activity in the second half of 2025 have continued to improve and remain strong heading into 2026. A constructive macro backdrop — including AI serving as a growth catalyst across sectors and geographies — is fueling CEO and board confidence, and our clients are looking to drive strategic and financing activity focused on scale, growth and innovation. As AI moves from theoretical catalyst to an industrial driver, it is creating a new set of priorities for the boardroom that are top of mind for every client we serve heading into 2026.

  • What were the most significant AI developments in 2025, and what should we expect in 2026?

2025 was a breakout year for AI where we exited the era of AI experimentation and entered the era of AI industrialization. We witnessed major technical and structural breakthroughs across models, agents, infrastructure and governance. It was only a year ago, in January 2025, when DeepSeek launched its DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model challenging the “moats” of closed-source models by proving that world-class reasoning could be achieved with fully open-source models and radical cost efficiency. That same month, Stargate – a historic $500 billion public-private joint venture including OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle – signaled the start of the “gigawatt era” of AI infrastructure. Just two months later in March 2025, xAI’s acquisition of X signaled a new strategy where social platforms could function as massive real-time data engines for model training. By year end, we saw massive, near-simultaneous escalation in model capabilities with the launches of OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 Pro, Google’s Gemini 3, and Anthropic’s Claude 4.5, all improving deep thinking and reasoning, pushing the boundaries of multimodality, and setting the standard for autonomous agentic workflows. 

In the enterprise, the conversation has matured from “What is AI?” just a few years ago to “How fast can we deploy?” We have moved past the pilot phase into a period of deep structural transformation. For companies around the world, AI is fundamentally reshaping how work gets done. AI is no longer just a feature; it is the foundation of a new kind of productivity and operating leverage. Forward-leaning companies are no longer just using AI for automation; they are building agentic workflows that act as a force multiplier for their most valuable asset: human capital. We are starting to see the first real, measurable returns on investment as firms move from ‘AI-assisted’ tasks to ‘AI-led’ processes, fundamentally shifting the cost and speed of execution across organizations. 

Of course, all this progress is not without regulatory and policy complexities. As AI reaches consumer, enterprise and sovereign scale, we are seeing a divergence in global policy that boards must navigate with care. In the United States, recent Executive Orders — such as the January 2025 ‘Removing Barriers’ order and the subsequent ‘Genesis Mission’ — have signaled a decisive shift toward prioritizing American AI dominance by rolling back prior reporting requirements and accelerating infrastructure buildouts. Contrast this with the European Union, where the EU AI Act is now in full effect, imposing strict guardrails on ‘high-risk’ systems and general-purpose models. Meanwhile, the UK has adopted a “pro-innovation” hybrid model: on the one hand, promoting “safety as a service”, while also investing billions into national compute and ‘AI Growth Zones’ to bridge the gap between innovation and public trust. For our clients, the challenge is no longer just regulatory compliance; it is strategic planning and arbitrage – deciding where to build, where to deploy, who to partner with, what to buy and how to maintain a global edge across a fragmented regulatory landscape.

As we enter 2026, the pace of innovation isn’t just accelerating; it is forcing a total rethink of business processes and capital allocation for every global enterprise. 

  • Given the expectation and anticipation for IPOs this year, what is your outlook for the market and how will it be characterized?

We are entering an IPO “mega-cycle” that we expect will be defined by unprecedented deal volume and IPO sizes. Unlike the dot-com wave of the late 1990s, which saw hundreds of small-cap listings, or even the 2020-2021 surge driven by a significant number of billion-dollar IPOs, this next IPO cycle will have greater volume and the largest deals the market has ever seen. It will be characterized by the public debut of institutionally mature titans, as well as totally disruptive, fast moving and capital consumptive innovators. Over the last decade, some companies have stayed private longer and raised unprecedented amounts of private capital, allowing a cohort of businesses to reach valuations and operational scale previously unseen in the private markets. We are no longer talking about “unicorns” — we are talking about global companies with the gravity and scale of Fortune 500 incumbents at the time they go public.  For investors, the reopening of the IPO window will enable an opportunity to invest in the most transformative and fastest growing companies in the world and a generational re-weighting of the public indices. 

In 2018, the five largest public tech companies were collectively valued at $3.3 trillion, led by Apple at ~$1 trillion. Today, the five largest public tech companies are valued at $18.3 trillion, more than five and half times larger.  Even more significant, the 10 largest private tech companies in 2018 were valued at $300 billion. Today, the 10 largest private tech companies are valued at $3 trillion, more than 10 times larger. These are iconic, generational companies with unprecedented private market caps some of which have unprecedented capital needs which should lead to an unprecedented IPO market. 

Each of these companies will have their own objectives on IPO timing, size and structure which will influence if, how and when they come to the market, but the potential across the board is significant. During the last IPO wave, Goldman Sachs was at the center of IPO innovation by leading the first direct listings and auction IPOs, and we expect more innovation with this upcoming wave. The current confluence of a constructive macro backdrop and groundbreaking technological advancements is doing more than just reopening the window; it is creating a generational opportunity for investors to participate in the companies that will define the next century of global business.

  • M&A activity exploded in 2025, are the markers there for another boom year?

As we enter 2026, the global M&A market has transitioned from a year of recovery ($5.1 trillion of M&A volume in 2025, up 44% YoY) to one that is bold and strategic. While the second half of 2025 was defined by a “thawing” — driven by a constructive regulatory environment, fed easing cycle and normalizing valuations — the year ahead will be defined by ambition. 

We have entered an era of broad, bold and ambitious strategic dealmaking: transformative, high-conviction transactions where industry leaders are no longer just consolidating for scale, but also moving aggressively to acquire the strategic assets, AI capabilities and digital infrastructure that will define the next decade. CEO and board confidence have reached a multi-year high, underpinned by the realization that in an AI-industrialized economy, standing still is the greatest risk of all. The quality and pace of strategic discussions that we are having with our clients signals that the world’s most influential companies — across sectors and regions — are ready to deploy their balance sheets and public currencies to redraw the competitive map. 

AI is no longer an isolated tech trend; it is a horizontal disrupter, broadening the appetite for strategic M&A across every sector of the economy. While the dialogue in boardrooms has moved from theoretical ‘AI pilots’ to large-scale capital deployment, the speed of technology is currently outpacing traditional governance frameworks. Boards and management teams are being asked to make multi-billion dollar, high-stakes decisions in a landscape where historical benchmarks often no longer apply. In this environment, M&A has become a tool for strategic leapfrogging — allowing companies to move both defensively to protect their core and offensively to secure the critical infrastructure and talent needed for non-linear growth. Success in 2026 will be defined by strategic conviction: the ability to turn this unprecedented complexity into a clear, actionable strategy and competitive advantage.

As AI continues to reshape corporate M&A strategy, we are also seeing financial sponsors return to the center of the M&A stage. Sponsor M&A activity accelerated sharply in 2025 — with M&A volumes surging over 50% as the bid-ask spread between buyers and sellers started to narrow, financing markets became more constructive and innovative deal structures enabled private equity firms to pursue larger, more complex transactions. With $1 trillion of global sponsor dry powder and over $4 trillion of unmonetized sponsor portfolio companies, the pressure for capital return to LPs has continued to escalate. Financial sponsors are entering 2026 with a dual-focus: executing take-privates and strategic carveouts to deploy fresh capital, while simultaneously utilizing reopened monetization paths – from IPOs to secondary sales to strategic sales — to satisfy demand for liquidity. With monetization paths reopening and valuation gaps narrowing, sponsors are entering 2026 with greater flexibility, reinforced by a healthier macroeconomic backdrop and improving liquidity conditions. 

This Q&A is based on an email conversation with Kim Posnett. This piece has been edited for length and clarity.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.