Connect with us

Business

Nvidia turns negative after Ray Dalio warns the latest market boom is a ‘big bubble with big wealth gaps’ poised for a politically explosive bust

Published

on



The stock market’s early rally fizzled by the afternoon, with the S&P 500 swinging from a nearly 2% gain to a slight selloff by midday. Nvidia, which initially jumped after reporting strong earnings, reversed 1% into the red along with the rest of the megacap AI trade.

The broader market mood wasn’t helped by mixed economic data and uncertainty around the Federal Reserve’s next move, especially after a cancelled jobs report and signs of uneven labor-market conditions. And then, there’s Ray Dalio.

The billionaire founder of Bridgewater Associates warned in a CNBC interview Thursday that investors are misreading the underlying mechanics of today’s rally, even as AI giants like Nvidia insist the boom is nowhere near finished.

“There is definitely a bubble in markets,” Dalio said, adding that while the situation doesn’t perfectly match 1929 or 1999, the indicators he tracks show the U.S. is closing in fast.

“The picture is pretty clear,” he said. “But we don’t have the pricking of the bubble yet.” And, crucially: “A lot can go up before the bubble bursts.”

Dalio’s comments landed just as Nvidia reported one of the most astonishing quarters in corporate history. The chipmaker announced a staggering $57 billion in revenue in the third quarter, up 22% from the prior quarter and 62% from a year earlier, and reaffirmed it has roughly $500 billion in AI-chip demand already lined up for the rest of 2025 and 2026. Data center revenue alone hit $51.2 billion, up 25% sequentially and 66% year-over-year, powered by “off the charts” demand for its new Blackwell GPUs. On top of that, Nvidia issued guidance of  $65 billion in revenue next quarter, plus or minus 2%, signaling that its AI spend is nowhere near rolling over.

CEO Jensen Huang used the attention during his earnings call to dismiss bubble fears outright. 

“We see something very different,” he told analysts, arguing that demand for AI compute isn’t tied to any single trend but three simultaneous revolutions: non-AI software shifting to accelerated computing, the explosion of new generative AI apps, and “agentic AI” that operates without user prompts. 

But Dalio is looking past Nvidia’s fundamentals to what he sees as the fragile architecture of the broader market. In a lengthy essay released the same day on X, he argued that bubbles don’t burst simply because valuations are too high. They burst when investors suddenly need money to cover debts, taxes, or liquidity requirements, but are forced to sell assets to get it. That forced selling, not bad earnings or shifting sentiment, is what historically drives the cascade, Dalio argued.

“Financial wealth is of no value unless converted into money to spend,” he wrote.

Today, Dalio said, that vulnerability is amplified by extreme wealth concentration. The top 10% of Americans now hold nearly 90% of all equities, and they account for roughly half of all consumer spending. Their strength has masked the deterioration on the lower half of the income ladder, creating what economists widely describe as a K-shaped economy, one where high-income households surge ahead while everyone else slips further behind.

Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi recently found that the wealthiest households are driving nearly all consumption growth, while lower-income Americans are pulling back under the pressure of tariffs, high borrowing costs, and rent inflation. Morgan Stanley Wealth CIO Lisa Shalett described the inequality as “completely wackadoo,” noting that spending among rich households is expanding six to seven times faster than for the lowest cohort. Even Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged the divide, saying companies report “a bifurcated economy” where upper-income consumers continue to spend while others trade down.

It’s in this environment, Dalio argues, that bubble dynamics become especially dangerous. Margin debt is already at a record $1.2 trillion. California is considering a one-time 5% wealth tax on billionaires, exactly the kind of political shock that could force mass liquidations. Monetary tightening is another classic trigger. 

“A tightening of monetary policy is classic,” Dalio said. “But also something like wealth taxes can happen.”

Still, Dalio isn’t telling investors to abandon the rally. Bubbles can keep rising far longer than skeptics expect, he said, and can deliver enormous gains before they crack. His message is simply that investors need to understand the risks, diversify, and hedge—he specifically cited gold, which has hit all-time highs this year—as markets move deeper into unfamiliar territory.

Both Dalio’s warning and Nvidia’s triumph acknowledge that markets are accelerating in ways traditional models struggle to explain. The AI boom may well keep lifting stocks. But the bubble mechanics Dalio outlines—easy credit, concentrated wealth, and vulnerability to liquidity shocks—are tightening, too.

As he put it: “I want to reiterate, a lot can go up before the bubble bursts.”

“These circumstances have, throughout history, led to great conflicts and great transitions of wealth,” Dalio wrote. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Miss Universe co-owner gets bank accounts frozen as part of probe into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking

Published

on



Mexico’s anti-money laundering office has frozen the bank accounts of the Mexican co-owner of Miss Universe as part of an investigation into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking, an official said Friday.

The country’s Financial Intelligence Unit, which oversees the fight against money laundering, froze Mexican businessman Raúl Rocha Cantú’s bank accounts in Mexico, a federal official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the investigation.

The action against Rocha Cantú adds to mounting controversies for the Miss Universe organization. Last week, a court in Thailand issued an arrest warrant for the Thai co-owner of the Miss Universe Organization in connection with a fraud case and this year’s competition — won by Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch — faced allegations of rigging.

The Miss Universe organization did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press seeking comment about the allegations against Rocha Cantú.

Mexico’s federal prosecutors said last week that Rocha Cantú has been under investigation since November 2024 for alleged organized crime activity, including drug and arms trafficking, as well as fuel theft. Last month, a federal judge issued 13 arrest warrants for some of those involved in the case, including the Mexican businessman, whose company Legacy Holding Group USA owns 50% of the Miss Universe shares.

The organization’s other 50% belongs to JKN Global Group Public Co. Ltd., a company owned by Jakkaphong “Anne” Jakrajutatip.

A Thai court last week issued an arrest warrant for Jakrajutatip who was released on bail in 2023 on the fraud case. She failed to appear as required in a Bangkok court on Nov. 25. Since she did not notify the court about her absence, she was deemed to be a flight risk, according to a statement from the Bangkok South District Court.

The court rescheduled her hearing for Dec. 26.

Rocha Cantú was also a part owner of the Casino Royale in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey, when it was attacked in 2011 by a group of gunmen who entered it, doused gasoline and set it on fire, killing 52 people.

Baltazar Saucedo Estrada, who was charged with planning the attack, was sentenced in July to 135 years in prison.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk’s X fined $140 million by EU for breaching digital regulations

Published

on



European Union regulators on Friday fined X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, 120 million euros ($140 million) for breaches of the bloc’s digital regulations, in a move that risks rekindling tensions with Washington over free speech.

The European Commission issued its decision following an investigation it opened two years ago into X under the 27-nation bloc’s Digital Services Act, also known as the DSA.

It’s the first time that the EU has issued a so-called non-compliance decision since rolling out the DSA. The sweeping rulebook requires platforms to take more responsibility for protecting European users and cleaning up harmful or illegal content and products on their sites, under threat of hefty fines.

The Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, said it was punishing X because of three different breaches of the DSA’s transparency requirements. The decision could rile President Donald Trump, whose administration has lashed out at digital regulations, complained that Brussels was targeting U.S. tech companies and vowed to retaliate.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on his X account that the Commission’s fine was akin to an attack on the American people. Musk later agreed with Rubio’s sentiment.

“The European Commission’s $140 million fine isn’t just an attack on @X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” Rubio wrote. “The days of censoring Americans online are over.”

Vice President JD Vance, posting on X ahead of the decision, accused the Commission of seeking to fine X “for not engaging in censorship.”

“The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage,” he wrote.

Officials denied the rules were intended to muzzle Big Tech companies. The Commission is “not targeting anyone, not targeting any company, not targeting any jurisdictions based on their color or their country of origin,” spokesman Thomas Regnier told a regular briefing in Brussels. “Absolutely not. This is based on a process, democratic process.”

X did not respond immediately to an email request for comment.

EU regulators had already outlined their accusations in mid-2024 when they released preliminary findings of their investigation into X.

Regulators said X’s blue checkmarks broke the rules because on “deceptive design practices” and could expose users to scams and manipulation.

Before Musk acquired X, when it was previously known as Twitter, the checkmarks mirrored verification badges common on social media and were largely reserved for celebrities, politicians and other influential accounts, such as Beyonce, Pope Francis, writer Neil Gaiman and rapper Lil Nas X.

After he bought it in 2022, the site started issuing the badges to anyone who wanted to pay $8 per month.

That means X does not meaningfully verify who’s behind the account, “making it difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with,” the Commission said in its announcement.

X also fell short of the transparency requirements for its ad database, regulators said.

Platforms in the EU are required to provide a database of all the digital advertisements they have carried, with details such as who paid for them and the intended audience, to help researches detect scams, fake ads and coordinated influence campaigns. But X’s database, the Commission said, is undermined by design features and access barriers such as “excessive delays in processing.”

Regulators also said X also puts up “unnecessary barriers” for researchers trying to access public data, which stymies research into systemic risks that European users face.

“Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU. The DSA protects users,” Henna Virkkunen, the EU’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a prepared statement.

The Commission also wrapped up a separate DSA case Friday involving TikTok’s ad database after the video-sharing platform promised to make changes to ensure full transparency.

___

AP Writer Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia CEO says U.S. data centers take 3 years, but China ‘can build a hospital in a weekend’

Published

on



Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said China has an AI infrastructure advantage over the U.S., namely in construction and energy.

While the U.S. retains an edge on AI chips, he warned China can build large projects at staggering speeds.

“If you want to build a data center here in the United States from breaking ground to standing up a AI supercomputer is probably about three years,” Huang told Center for Strategic and International Studies President John Hamre in late November. “They can build a hospital in a weekend.”

The speed at which China can build infrastructure is just one of his concerns. He also worries about the countries’ comparative energy capacity to support the AI boom.

China has “twice as much energy as we have as a nation, and our economy is larger than theirs. Makes no sense to me,” Huang said.

He added that China’s energy capacity continues to grow “straight up”, while the U.S.’s remains relatively flat.

Still, Huang maintained that Nvidia is “generations ahead” of China on AI chip technology to support the demand for the tech and semiconductor manufacturing process.

But he warned against complacency on this front, adding that “anybody who thinks China can’t manufacture is missing a big idea.”

Yet Huang is hopeful about Nvidia’s future, noting President Donald Trump’s push to reshore manufacturing jobs and spur AI investments.

‘Insatiable AI demand’

Early last month, Huang made headlines by predicting China would win the AI race—a message he amended soon thereafter, saying the country was “nanoseconds behind America” in the race in a statement shared to his company’s X account.

Nvidia is just one of the big tech companies pouring billions of dollars into a data center buildout in the U.S., which experts tell Fortune could amount to over $100 billion in the next year alone.

Raul Martynek, the CEO of DataBank, a company that contracts with tech giants to construct data centers, said the average cost of a data center is $10 million to $15 million per megawatt (MW), and a typical data centers on the smaller side requires 40 MW.

“In the U.S., we think there will be 5 to 7 gigawatts brought online in the coming year to support this seemingly insatiable AI demand,” Martynek said.

This shakes out to $50 billion on the low end, and $105 billion on the high end.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.