Connect with us

Business

Meet Sequoia Capital’s new stewards

Published

on


Lin—famed as the thoughtful backer of companies like DoorDash, Airbnb, and Citadel Securities—said something I’ve thought about many times since: That it’s important to be able to hold ideas in “extreme tension,” because that’s, in effect, the only path to truth, to knowing what your options truly are.

“The thing about holding things in tension, in extreme tension, is that the right answer is almost definitely somewhere in the middle,” Lin told me in an interview in 2024 about how he thinks about founders. “If you start in the middle and radiate out from there, you think ‘Oh, this is obvious, it makes sense.’ Then you limit the number of solutions you look at. If you look at the extreme and work towards the center, you traverse almost every single possibility. That’s why when people hold things in tension, they tend to come up with more options.”

Lin has long been regarded as the best of the best among Silicon Valley VCs, and yesterday he came to the fore in a way I consider (yes, in somewhat contradictory terms) surprising but inevitable: Sequoia announced that Roelof Botha would step down as the firm’s steward, and that Lin and Sequoia partner Pat Grady would take up the mantle as co-stewards. 

Now, this is surprising on some level: Botha is only 52, and the YouTube and Instagram investor has been leading Sequoia for nearly a decade (he’s been on his own as sole steward since 2022). At the same time, there’s a layer of inevitability: Sequoia has conducted generational transfers five times over its 53 years, has previously had co-stewards more often than not, and Grady and Lin are both uniquely suited to the task.

While Lin has led the firm’s early stage investing since 2017, Grady has steered Sequoia’s growth stage investing practice since 2015, leading deals in Snowflake, Zoom, ServiceNow, Harvey, and OpenEvidence. Both have longstanding reputations as excellent investors, proven over time in a business that even at its very best can be fickle. Lin is also on the board of Kalshi, and both led Sequoia’s investments in OpenAI. 

If you aren’t familiar with Lin and Grady, some facts and throughlines: Lin’s early career was defined by his time as chairman, COO, and CFO at Zappos up until its blockbuster acquisition by Amazon. Meanwhile, Grady, the younger of the two, started his career at Summit Partners, landing at Sequoia in 2007. (Lin would join the firm in 2010.) Their backstories have some parallels, as both have personal histories that start far from the top of Silicon Valley: Lin’s parents immigrated from Taiwan when he was a kid, and Grady grew up in a Wyoming coal mining region. 

Sequoia has its own contradictions to contend with moving forward—despite its more than $50 billion in assets under management, Sequoia’s long said it remains focused on generating best-in-class returns, and embodying the kind of excellence that implies in an unstable, long-game industry. (Sequoia has a little more than 20 investors, a number that’s remained consistent over time.)

This also happens at a moment where the venture capital goalposts are moving—the industry is bifurcating into asset managers and smaller shops, while politics is becoming an increasingly complicated flashpoint. Some firms, like a16z, have leaned into it, while others have tried to stay away from political issues entirely. Sequoia has kept to a philosophical middle path, maintaining the firm’s “institutional neutrality” while allowing partners to be personally vocal about politics. (There’s history here: Famously, Moritz was a vocal Democrat; Leone was prominently Republican.) That worked for years, but there’s evidence of cracks in that approach.

As Lin and Grady take the wheel—becoming the people who now tend to the most famous tree in venture capital—it’s a time of extremes and contradictions. As they look to keep Sequoia at the top of the startup investing game, they’ll have to consider those extremes and, in doing so, perhaps find the best possible vision for the future of venture capital.  

Term Sheet Podcast…This week, I talked to Cityblock Health cofounder and CEO Dr. Toyin Ajayi. A former physician, Ajayi saw how the system can sometimes work against patients, driving burnout and increasing costs. In 2017, she cofounded Cityblock Health, a tech-forward health care startup that provides care to underserved communities. We talked about doctors as entrepreneurs, health care reform, and AI. Listen and watch here. 

See you tomorrow,

Allie Garfinkle
X:
@agarfinks
Email: alexandra.garfinkle@fortune.com
Submit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here.

Allie Garfinkle curated the deals section of today’s newsletter. Subscribe here.

Venture Deals

Beacon Software, a Toronto-based company that acquires software businesses, has raised a $250 million Series B. General Catalyst, Lightspeed, and D1 Capital led the round. 

Parable, a New York-based AI impact measurement startup, has raised $16.5 million in seed funding. HOF Capital led the round, joined by Story Ventures, InMotion Ventures, Lasagna, Panache, Supercharge, and Tripe Impact Capital. 

Other

Arctic Wolf announced plans to acquire ransomware detection company UpSight Security. Financial terms were not disclosed.

This is the web version of Term Sheet, a daily newsletter on the biggest deals and dealmakers in venture capital and private equity. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus

Published

on



French President Emmanuel Macron warned that the European Union may be forced to take “strong measures” against China, including potential tariffs, if Beijing fails to address its widening trade imbalance with the bloc.

“I’m trying to explain to the Chinese that their trade surplus isn’t sustainable because they’re killing their own clients, notably by importing hardly anything from us any more,” Macron told Les Echos newspaper in an interview published on Sunday.

“If they don’t react, in the coming months we Europeans will be obliged to take strong measures and decouple, like the US, like for example tariffs on Chinese products,” he said, adding that he had discussed the matter with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Macron has just returned from a three-day state visit in China, where he pressed for more investment as Paris seeks to recalibrate its relationship with the world’s second-largest economy. France’s goods trade deficit with China reached around €47 billion ($54.7 billion) last year, according to the French Treasury. Meanwhile, China’s goods trade surplus with the EU swelled to almost $143 billion in the first half of 2025, a record for any six-month period, according to data released by China earlier this year.

Tensions between France and China escalated last year after Paris backed the EU’s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Beijing retaliated by imposing minimum price requirements on French cognac, sparking fears among pork and dairy producers that they could be targeted next.

‘Life or Death’

Macron said the US approach to China was “inappropriate” and had worsened Europe’s position by diverting Chinese goods toward the EU market.

“Today, we’re stuck between the two, and it’s a question of life or death for European industry,” Macron said, while noting that Germany — Europe’s biggest economy — doesn’t entirely share France’s stance.

In addition to Europe needing to become more competitive, the European Central Bank too has a role to play in strengthening the EU’s single market, Macron said, arguing that monetary policy should take growth and jobs into account, not just inflation, he said.

He also said the ECB’s decision to continue selling the government bonds it holds risks pushing up long-term interest rates and weighing on economic activity.

“Europe must — and wants to — remain a zone of monetary stability and credible investment,” Macron said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks

Published

on



There’s a time when investments run their course and the prudent move is to cash out. For global asset managers who’ve ridden double-digit gains in equities for three straight years, that time is not now.

“Our expectation of solid growth and easier monetary and fiscal policies supports a risk-on tilt in our multi-asset portfolios. We remain overweight stocks and credit,” said Sylvia Sheng, global multi-asset strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management.

“We are playing the powerful trends in place and are bullish through the end of next year,” said David Bianco, Americas chief investment officer at DWS. “For now we are not contrarians.”

“Start the year with sufficient exposure, even over-exposure to equities, predominantly in emerging market equities,” said Nannette Hechler-Fayd’herbe, EMEA chief investment officer at Lombard Odier. “We don’t expect a recession in 2026 to unfold.”

Those assessments came from Bloomberg News interviews with 39 investment managers across the US, Asia and Europe, including at BlackRock Inc., Allianz Global Investors, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Franklin Templeton.

More than three-quarters of the allocators were positioning portfolios for a risk-on environment through 2026. The thrust of the bet is that resilient global growth, further developments in artificial intelligence, accommodative monetary policy and fiscal stimulus will deliver outsize returns in all fashion of global equity markets. 

The call is not without risks, including simply its pervasiveness among the respondents, along with their overall high degree of assuredness. The view among the institutional investors also aligns with that of sell-side strategists around the globe. 

Should the bullishness play out as expected, it would deliver a stunning fourth straight year of bumper returns for the MSCI All-Country World Index. That would extend a run that’s added $42 trillion in market capitalization since the end of 2022 — the most value created for equity investors in history. 

That’s not to say the optimism is without merit. The artificial intelligence trade has added trillions in market value to dozens of firms plying the industry, but just three years after ChatGPT broke into the public consciousness, AI remains in the early phase of development.

No Tech Panic

The buy-side managers largely rejected the idea that the technology has blown a bubble in equity markets. While many acknowledged some pockets of froth in unprofitable tech names, 85% of managers said valuations among the Magnificent Seven and other AI heavyweights are not overly inflated. Fundamentals back the trade, they said, which marks the beginning of a new industrial cycle. 

“You can’t call it a bubble when you’re seeing tech companies deliver a massive earnings beat. In fact, earnings from the sector have outstripped all other US stocks,” said Anwiti Bahuguna, global co-chief investment officer at Northern Trust Asset Management.

As such, investors expect the US to remain the engine of the rally. 

“American exceptionalism is far from dead,” said Jose Rasco, chief investment officer at HSBC Americas. “As artificial intelligence continues to spread around the globe, the US will be a key participant.” 

Most investors echoed the sentiment expressed by Helen Jewell, international chief investment officer of fundamental equities at BlackRock, who suggested also searching outside the US for meaningful upside.

“The US is where the high-return high-growth companies are, so we have to be realistic about that. But those are already reflected in valuations, and there are probably more interesting opportunities outside the US,” she said.

International Boom

Profits matter above all else for equity investors, and huge bumps in government spending from Europe to Asia have stoked estimates for strong gains in earnings.

“We have begun to see a meaningful broadening of earnings momentum, both across market capitalizations and across regions, including Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea,” said Wellington Management equity strategist Andrew Heiskell. “Looking into 2026, we see clear potential for a revival of earnings growth in Europe and a wider range of emerging markets.”

India is one of the most compelling opportunities for 2026, according to Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s Alexandra Wilson-Elizondo, global co-head and co-chief investment officer of multi-asset solutions.

“We see real potential for India to become the Korea-like re-rating story of 2026, a market that transitions from tactical allocation to strategic core exposure in global portfolios,” she said. 

Nelson Yu, head of equities at AllianceBernstein, said he sees improvements outside of the US that will mandate allocations. He noted governance reform in Japan, capital discipline in Europe and recovering profitability in some emerging markets.

Small Cap Optimism

At the sector level, the investors are looking for AI proxies, notably among clean energy providers that can help meet the technology’s ravenous demand for power. Smaller stocks are also finding favor.

“The earnings outlook has brightened for small-capitalization stocks, industrials and financials,” said Stephen Dover, chief market strategist and head of Franklin Templeton Institute. “Small-cap stocks and industrials, which are typically more highly leveraged than the rest of the market, will see profitability rise as the Federal Reserve trims interest rates and debt servicing costs fall.”

Over at Santander Asset Management, Francisco Simón sees earnings growth of more than 20% for US small caps after years of underperformance. Reflecting the optimism, the Russell 2000 Index of such equities recently hit a record high.

Meanwhile, the combination of low valuations and strong fundamentals makes health care one of the most compelling contrarian opportunities in a bullish cycle, a preponderance of managers said.  

“Health-care related sectors can surprise to the upside in the US markets,” said Jim Caron, chief investment officer of cross-asset solutions at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. “This is a mid-term election year and policy may at the margin support many companies. Valuations are still attractive and have a lot of catch up to do.”

Virtually every allocator struck at least a note of caution about what lies ahead. The top worry among them was a rekindling of inflation in the US. If the Fed is forced by rising prices to abruptly pause or even end its easing cycle, the potential for turbulence is high.

“A scenario — which is not our base case — whereby US inflation rebounds in 2026 would constitute a double whammy for multi-asset funds as it would penalize both stocks and bonds. In this sense it would be much worse than an economic slowdown,” said Amélie Derambure, senior multi-asset portfolio manager at Amundi SA. 

“The way investors are headed for 2026, they need to have the Fed on their side,” she added.

Trade Caution

Another worry is around President Donald Trump’s capriciousness, particularly when it comes to trade. Any flareup in his trade spats that fuels inflation through heightened tariffs would weigh on risk assets. 

Oil and gas producers remain unloved by the group, though that could change if a major geopolitical event upends supply lines. While such an outcome would bolster those sectors, the overall impact would likely be negative for risk assets, they said.

“Any geopolitical situation that can affect the price of oil is what will have the largest impact on the financial markets. Clearly both the Middle East and the Ukraine/Russia situations can impact oil prices,” said Scott Wren, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.

Multiple respondents flagged European autos as a “no-go” area for 2026, citing intense competitive pressure from Chinese carmakers, margin compression and structural challenges in the transition to electric vehicles. 

“Personally I don’t believe for a minute that there will be a rebound in the sector,” said Isabelle de Gavoty at Allianz GI. 

Outside of those worries, most asset managers simply believe that there’s little reason to fret about the upward momentum being interrupted — outside, of course, from the contrarian signal such near-uniform bullishness sends.

“Everyone seems to be risk-on at the moment, and that worries me a bit in the sense that the concentration of positions creates less tolerance for adverse surprises,” said Amundi’s Derambure.  



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump says Netflix-Warner Bros. deal ‘could be a problem’

Published

on



President Donald Trump raised potential antitrust concerns for Netflix Inc.’s planned acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., noting that the market share of the combined entity may pose problems. 

“Well, that’s got to go through a process, and we’ll see what happens,” Trump said when asked about the deal as he arrived at the Kennedy Center for an event, confirming that he has met Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos last week and complimenting the streaming company. “But it is a big market share. It could be a problem.”

The $72 billion deal would combine the world’s No. 1 streaming player with the No. 4 service HBO Max, which has raised red flags from antitrust regulators. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.