Bridget and Christian Ziegler — who were at the center of an embarrassing sex scandal in late 2023 and 2024 — are suing the city of Sarasota and two detectives, Angela Cox and Maria Llovio, over “deliberate and egregious violations of their constitutional rights.”
The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Tampa division, alleges defendants violated the Ziegler’s Fourth, Fifth and 14th Amendment rights in “a profound abuse of official power and clear instance of investigative misconduct.”
The suit claims detectives investigating Christian Ziegler over a rape accusation — for which no charges were ultimately filed — “withheld critical exculpatory evidence from judicial review, obtained and executed excessively over-broad search warrants that invaded Mr. Ziegler’s private digital records, and intentionally included deeply personal marital communications in public reports.”
The suit argues the Zieglers were deprived of due process and suffered “enduring harm on their family, professional lives, and reputations.”
Christian Ziegler is a former Chair of the Republican Party of Florida. Party members removed him from his leadership position amid the unproven rape allegations. His wife, Bridget Ziegler, is a Sarasota County School Board member and a co-founder of the conservative education advocacy group Moms for Liberty.
At issue is a rape investigation launched in late 2023 in which the alleged victim claimed she had arranged what she believed to be a threesome with the Zieglers. When it became clear Bridget Ziegler would not be participating, the woman canceled, but said Christian Ziegler showed up anyway.
Text messages showed the meeting being arranged. The woman claimed she did not consent to having sex with Christian Ziegler, but police as part of the investigation said video showed the encounter in question was “likely consensual.”
Nevertheless, the Zieglers argue in the lawsuit that the use of Christian Ziegler’s cellphone contents led to police gaining access to “hundreds of thousand deeply personal and confidential pictures, videos, and text messages … most of which were unrelated to” the investigation. The messages, according to the lawsuit, included “marital communications,” which are subject to privacy rights.
The Zieglers are seeking compensatory damages for lost wages and attorneys fees and punitive damages for “mental anguish, pain and suffering, and humiliation and embarrassment.” The lawsuit does not specify a number, as is common in civil suits.
The lawsuit lays out a detailed timeline of events surrounding the investigation into the unsubstantiated rape allegations, seeking to portray Cox and Llovio as tainted investigators who routinely violated policy and procedure, leading to what the lawsuit describes as unconstitutional searches and seizures and the attainment of search warrants through illegal means.
The investigation began in October 2023 with an interview with the alleged victim at her home, where contents of her cellphone were made available and first brought Bridget Ziegler into the investigation, according to the suit. Detectives later determined Bridget Ziegler was not involved, the lawsuit says.
But when Christian Ziegler met with an attorney and explained that he possessed exculpatory video evidence, the latest lawsuit claims detectives began overreaching, including seeking a warrant for Christian Ziegler’s “entire” cellphone, a request for which the suit alleges withheld information about the planned meeting and possible presence of exculpatory video evidence.
Nevertheless, Christian Ziegler met with Sarasota Police detectives the next day, after the search warrant was granted, and showed them the video he believed demonstrated his innocence.
“All SPD officers who were present … later testified that upon viewing the video, they immediately knew it exonerated Mr. Ziegler of the accusations against him,” the suit reads.
And there are details that may support the Zieglers’ claim that their constitutional rights were violated. Last Summer, a Sarasota Judge ruled Sarasota police wrongly downloaded the entirety of Christian Ziegler’s cellphone.
The couple sued police and the State Attorney’s Office to prevent the entire contents of his phone from becoming public record. Circuit Judge Hunter Carroll ruled in the Zieglers’ favor.
In a hearing, police investigators testified it was standard practice to down the entire contents of criminal subjects’ phones. Christian Ziegler’s phone was the largest phone ever downloaded by Sarasota Police.
Testimony at that time indicated police obtained more than 250,000 photographs, 30,000 videos and 12,000 text messages. Not all of that pertained to the investigation.
Florida Politics reached out to the city of Sarasota and the Sarasota Police Department for comment. Spokespeople for both requested Florida Politics share copies of the lawsuit and are reviewing them. It is typically the policy of local governments and government agencies such as Police Departments not to comment on pending litigation.
Florida Politics also reached out to the Zieglers for comment. This post will be updated with responses if and when they are received.
___
Jacob Ogles of Florida Politics contributed to this report.