St. Petersburg officials continue exploring ways to express the city’s diversity and inclusivity without drawing the ire of state leadership. Many stakeholders are ready for action.
During an Oct. 23 Committee of the Whole meeting, Council member Gina Driscoll told her colleagues that if they moved high-visibility concepts forward with unity rather than disagreement, they would “arrive at a really great place” by the end of the discussion. She apologized to the community an hour later for a “Bermuda Triangle of bureaucracy” impeding those efforts.
“I was expecting that today, two months after we started this saga, something would be coming; something was imminent,” Driscoll said. “I cannot stress enough the urgency that has been communicated about responding to this.”
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) removed five street murals throughout St. Petersburg over Labor Day Weekend. Mayor Ken Welch pledged to create new “powerful expressions of who we are” a week prior.
A city attorney subsequently warned that the State of Florida could abolish St. Petersburgat any time, as it lacks free speech protections. In an early September memo, Welch wrote that staff would distribute posters of the erased artwork and hundreds of Pride and Black History Matters flags to organizations and businesses.
“What we’re hearing from people is that they don’t want to see more memos. They don’t want to see more focus groups,” Driscoll said Thursday. “The goal, really, is to have something that’s bold; have something that is immediate.”
A survey regarding those efforts received over 200 submissions from Sept. 9 through Oct. 8. Respondents said the street murals made residents and visitors feel welcomed, seen and safe.
Requested actions include adorning city-owned facilities with artwork, collaborating with the SHINE Mural Festival, distributing Pride and Black History Matters flags to the community, commissioning a piece of public art, painting bicycle racks and displaying a message of unity on I-275 billboards.
Gina Driscoll asked the city’s marketing department to print hundreds of additional Pride (left) and Black History Matters flags for distribution. Image via City of St. Petersburg.
City Council members seemed to reach a consensus on the bicycle racks. However, FDOT can regulate any itemin a right-of-way.
“I think we would have no problem finding a private donor to take care of the paint,” Driscoll said. “Key West made it look so easy. Maybe it’s not the boldest thing in the world, but it’s a ‘now’ thing.”
Driscoll proposed creating two alternative city flags to show solidarity with marginalized communities earlier this month. She offered to put that “to the side” if her colleagues disagreed with the idea.
Council member Mike Harting said he supports many of the survey suggestions. However, he believes the city flag is “generic for a reason,” as it represents roughly 280,000 residents from all walks of life.
“When we talk about changing the flag, I’ve heard the word ‘inclusive’ enough that I want to retire it,” Harting added. “It’s not inclusive. We, very specifically, have been talking about two parts of our community.”
Adorning city-owned facilities with murals is also a popular concept among officials. Assistant City Attorney Ben James said he “would think that we would have more rights associated with our parking garages and those sorts of things” than surface lots and other property along a right-of-way.
James also noted that the city must complete a “complicated analysis” before allowing any murals on public buildings. Assistant City Attorney Brett Pettigrew said those installations would lack free speech protections and are subject to state preemption.
“The state could come along and say, ‘You must say certain things,’” he explained. “The state could come along and say, ‘You must never say certain things.’ There’s a lot of freedom, unless and until the state takes it away, when we are speaking through our own property.”
A mural by local artist Alyssa Marie adorns the city-owned Albert Whitted Airport in St. Petersburg. Image via Mark Parker.
City Attorney Jackie Kovilaritch said her department would carefully review proposals after the meeting. She will let the Council and administration know if those have no or significant legal issues, or if something is “in between.” Officials must then discern their risk tolerance.
“I really would hate to paint all of our city buildings and then be told they have to be made grey all of a sudden,” Driscoll said.
City Administrator Rob Gerdes said commissioning a SHINE mural or a “significant piece” of public artwork in one of the city’s parks is a possibility. While it would depend on guidance from the legal team, the mayoral administration is also comfortable with installations on municipal buildings.
Council member Richie Floyd said he “wouldn’t be here right now” if potential state preemptions dictated his role. He believes painting murals similar to those erased on city-owned facilities is the “easiest thing to do.”
Floyd also agreed with Driscoll’s suggestion that bike racks could reflect the identity of various neighborhoods, and that using artistic lighting could provide an alternative to murals. Council member Brandi Gabbard said she is leading efforts to rename streets.
“I was planning on moving forward with something,” Gabbard added. “It is not ready yet, by any stretch of the imagination, but those wheels are in motion.”
The Arts Advisory Committee meets Oct. 31. Celeste Davis, director of arts, culture and tourism, said she would share “where we are in the process of actually coming up with some concrete suggestions.”
Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.
The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.
Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.
After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.
Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.
The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.
Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.
A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.
He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.
He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.
Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.
Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.
Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.
For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.
The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.
The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.
The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.
In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.
The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.
Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.
According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.
“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.
___
Republished with permission of the Associated Press.