Connect with us

Business

Can Macy’s win back America? How CEO Tony Spring is moving past denial and embracing change

Published

on



Respected retail analyst Neil Saunders had for years regularly posted pictures on social media showing extreme messiness at Macy’s stores—mounds of unfolded sweaters strewn on the floor or shelving that had fallen into disrepair—on social media. Now he was getting an individual tour from the department store’s new CEO, Tony Spring.

At the well-appointed Macy’s in the upscale Topanga Westfield mall in Los Angeles in June 2024, Spring walked the brand’s former bête noire through the improvements he was starting to roll out at 125 “priority” stores: elegantly styled mannequins and more staffers in key areas; double the staffing in the women’s shoe department; and three times as many in the dresses area. There were even live human beings manning the fitting rooms.

Saunders had to admit, he was impressed. “Their merchandising is sharper,” Saunders told Fortune. “There is greater neatness on the shop floor. They’re starting to elevate the shopping experience.”

But perhaps the biggest change Saunders saw, he told Fortune, was Spring’s openness to criticism—as shown by his willingness to engage with one of the brand’s harshest critics. “This was a really big sea change,” Saunders said.

It’s an attitude the CEO himself sees as essential for the 167-year-old retailer to carve out a new place for itself in today’s retail world.

“Neil didn’t take pictures of things that didn’t exist,” Spring told Fortune in an interview at Macy’s headquarters in New York. The venerable department store had long been in denial about the depth of its problems, said Spring, who took the reins of Macy’s Inc in early 2024 after a successful decade-long stint as CEO of its Bloomingdale’s division.

“We had to have a moment of reflection and say, ‘We’re not as good as we think we are,’” Spring said. “We can be proud of Macy’s history, but we can’t be proud of Macy’s current performance.”

Indeed, the brand’s performance was awful for years. Customer service scores dropped year after year, contributing to sales falling from an all-time high in 2014 of $28.1 billion to just above $22.3 billion a decade later. The company has closed hundreds of stores because customers took their business elsewhere amid the “retail apocalypse” set off by the rise of Amazon and the soaring popularity of cheaper retailers such as Target. Meanwhile, brands trying to elevate their own images were tiring of the subpar presentation their products had at many Macy’s stores: Ralph Lauren, Coach, Nike, and Levi’s, among others, took their products off the shelves.

Spring’s plan is simple in its essence: Go back to retail fundamentals. That means sufficient staffing to ensure the customer service that justifies shopping at a department store instead of online or at a discounter; well-maintained stores with more visually appealing product presentation; and newer brands rather than the same-old, same-old, over and over again—all while keeping costs down. Ultimately, his strategy aims for a Macy’s with fewer but more appealing stores, complemented by e-commerce. The goal is to go to from the current 449 locations, to 350 or so, including the 125 priority stores that will get disproportionately higher investment for things like more staffing and new lighting.

There are promising signs that, at very long last, Macy’s has found a turnaround plan that is taking. Last quarter, Macy’s reported its best comparable sales performance in 12 quarters. Sales only rose 1.1% year-over-year but that’s a victory at a time shoppers are hamstrung by economic anxiety—and an encouraging sign that Spring might be onto something.

Attitude adjustment

To have any hope of a successful turnaround, Spring felt that Macy’s needed a cultural reset first, to inspire a workforce battered by years of falling revenue, store closings, and staff reductions, and get buy-in to his strategy. “The big impact we’re finally seeing comes from the fact that we’re all singing from the same hymnal,” said the 57-year-old Spring.

Macy’s, founded in New York City in 1858, benefits from a huge reservoir of goodwill among its 40 million annual customers, many of whom remember trips to the department store as kids, to get outfits for their graduations or to sit on Santa’s knee. The Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade in Manhattan, watched by millions around the country on TV every year, has cemented the brand’s place in American culture.

But while many associate the brand with its Manhattan flagship and its famously elaborate window displays during the holiday season, Macy’s has for decades been primarily a mall-based department store chain with hundreds of large emporia in suburbs across the country. It’s a shopping format consumer have been shifting away from since the 1990’s—and Macy’s is no exception.

At its peak just over a decade ago, Macy’s had more than 773 namesake stores. The company, which also owns Bloomingdale’s and the beauty chain Bluemercury, became a Frankenstein behemoth after a $11 billion mega-merger in 2006 in which it absorbed several regional chains, including Filene’s, Marshall Field’s, Foley’s, Hecht’s, and Kaufmann’s and slapped the name “Macy’s” on all the stores. That mega deal also led to a massive challenge for Macy’s: Too many of the brand’s stores were clustered together, cannibalizing each other’s customer base.

Over that period, Macy’s bureaucracy swelled, and the individuality of the regional department store chains it had absorbed faded.

“They didn’t ever manage to create one unifying culture from all these parts they mushed together,” said Kathy Gersch, president of the consulting firm Kotter International.

In addition to the “priority” stores, Macy’s will keep open another 225 stores or so once it is done closing a few dozen more locations in the next few years.

In the 2010’s, Macy’s continued to grow, aided by the implosions of long-time rivals Sears and JCPenney. But those gains masked Macy’s problems. Amazon, with its low prices and fast delivery, took market share, but so too did T.J. Maxx where shoppers could snag designer clothes for much less, and Ulta Beauty, which poached many of the beauty customers who were among the most frequent visitors to Macy’s.

The more Macy’s business was squeezed, the more it cut back on spending, creating a vicious cycle that undermined the service standards and pleasant atmosphere needed to justify higher department store prices.

Case in point: A decade ago, Macy’s tried to save on staffing by turning its footwear section into self-service “open-sell” areas, a short-lived but disastrous move. “If you want open sell, you can go to TJ Maxx,” said Saunders.

Macy’s, like many other retailers, fell into the trap of putting more merchandise on the selling floor to reduce how many times workers would have to re-stock shelves. But that created a messy, cluttered look more reminiscent of a clearance store.

The overly dense selling floors also made it hard to do storytelling—called “visual merchandising” in retail—with mannequins. More staffing was also an obvious need for the jewelry and handbag sections, where customers want to be shown the higher-priced items from cases.  “It’s not rocket science,” said Spring “It’s back to the standards of retail.” And it’s something customers told Macy’s directly: In Spring’s first months, the company surveyed 60,000 current and former customers to get a deep understanding of what they want.

Spring pointed to the company’s missteps last decade, as investors grew impatient with Macy’s and its middling performance. So desperate was Macy’s to mollify Wall Street that in 2015 it announced that it would install “smart mirrors” in fitting rooms. (They often didn’t work properly, and were seen as an expensive flop.) “We became enamored with shiny objects and feeling we needed to keep up with everyone instead of playing our playbook,” said Spring, who as an executive at Bloomingdale’s was on Macy’s leadership team and saw firsthand the chain’s problems.

In 2015 an activist campaign by Starboard Capital, which saw little value in Macy’s retail business, sought to pressure the company to spin off its best real estate. It was the first of four activist campaigns by various firms targeting Macy’s in the past decade.

The pressure to keep costs under control became more urgent during the pandemic when Macy’s was fighting to stave off bankruptcy. And Wall Street is still keeping Macy’s on a tight leash over its expenses.

One anecdote Spring likes to tell is from a decade ago, when as director of stores for Bloomingdale’s, he conducted a store visit with other executives. He and “the suits” were intercepted by a shopper who told him that everywhere she went, staff would ask her how she was doing. Anticipating a compliment, Spring recalled, he heard a complaint instead: “Nobody could even wait for the answer,” she told him. The reproach was like a punch in the gut, Spring said.

“It was a good reminder that we were so focused on training people to say the line, that we forgot to explain to people why,” Spring said. The ‘why’ is that it makes a chat feel less transactional, even as it gives a store worker insights into what else a customer might need or want to buy.

Spring’s training is in hospitality: He studied hotel and restaurant management before starting at Bloomingdale’s as a management trainee in 1987, and his first ever job was in the service industry, at a Burger King in the 1980s. He wants that hospitality mindset to take hold and for store workers to feel their job is about more than folding clothes and manning cash registers. It is also about injecting the shopper experience with romance and theater, an endeavor that he argues can make the job more fun and fulfilling: “We’re all driven by psychic reward.”

Still mid?

Armed with some promising results, Spring has been working to attract new brands to Macy’s and bring back others. In July, he landed a coup when Abercrombie & Fitch’s children’s business started selling its products at Macy’s. Other brands Macy’s has recently added include Reiss, Good American, and Theory. Spring is also betting he can get important partners to come back to many of the Macy’s stores they abandoned.

Spring is quick to acknowledge that Macy’s still has much to prove. But his early results have sparked hope that at long last, it is turning a corner.

And even if critics such as Saunders are mollified by the moves Spring has made, they also say there’s more to be done. “Macy’s is still middle-of-the-road,” Saunders said. “They need to keep elevating the experience.”

And that is exactly what Spring intends to do, tapping into the cherished associations many Americans have with Macy’s.“There is so much love for this brand,” he said. “If we put our best on the table, we have the chance to win their business back.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

International deals race forward to end China’s hold on critical minerals since US can’t do it alone

Published

on



Pini Althaus saw the signs. In 2023, he left the company he founded, USA Rare Earth, to develop critical minerals mining and processing projects in central Asia, after realizing that the U.S. will need all the international help it can get to end China’s supply chain dominance.

“I realized we only have a handful of large critical minerals projects that were going into production between now and 2030,” Althaus, chairman and CEO of Cove Capital, told Fortune. “I understood that we’re going to have to supplement the United States critical minerals supply chain with materials coming in from our allied and friendly countries.”

Over a series of decades, China built up its stranglehold on much of the world’s critical minerals supply chains, including the 17 rare earths, used to make virtually all kinds of high-performance magnets and parts for vehicles, computers, power generation, military defense, and more. The rest of the world deferred to Beijing in exchange for cheap prices.

Amid an ongoing tariff war with the U.S.—and a temporary truce—the Trump administration is racing to build up domestic mining and processing capabilities, while also developing the global partnerships necessary to eventually undermine China, which controls 90% of the world’s rare earths refining.

In October, Trump inked a deal with Australia for both countries to invest $3 billion in critical minerals projects by mid-2026. Australia is home to the largest publicly traded critical minerals miner in the world, Lynas Rare Earths. Trump then signed a series of bilateral critical minerals deals in eastern and southeastern Asia, including Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Cambodia. The U.S. also has new deals with Ukraine, Argentina, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Kazakhstan, and more.

Althaus is specifically developing mining and processing facilities for tungsten—a heat-resistant metal used in electronics and military equipment—and rare earths in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. He sees the most potential in former Soviet Union nations in central Asia.

“The Soviets spent many decades exploring and developing mines. Many of their databases have been left and are quite meticulous,” Althaus said. “This gives companies looking to develop projects in central Asia a jumpstart compared to what would be here in the United States, where most of the opportunities are greenfield—very early stages, very high risk, and very little appetite for investment.”

In November, the Ex-Im Bank offered Cove Capital a $900 million financing letter of interest for the $1.1 billion Kazakh tungsten projects. A separate letter of interest was received from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation.

Jeff Dickerson, principal advisor for Rystad Energy research firm, said only a long-term, coordinated effort—essentially a “wartime” approach—both domestically and with international partnerships can lead to success. But it cannot be done without new projects with foreign allies. “The challenge is that the U.S. doesn’t have a strong pipeline of mature mineral projects that are shovel ready,” he said. 

“The cycle of China extracting concessions on the back of mineral geopolitics and weakening the U.S. strategic negotiating position will likely continue without a coordinated, long-term response during the current moment of heightened attention to critical minerals,” Dickerson said, questioning whether the U.S. will maintain a concerted focus for years to come.

New emphasis

The Trump administration is increasingly making financial partnerships with critical minerals developers—even becoming a majority shareholder of U.S. rare earths miner MP Materials—and offering deals for floor-pricing mechanisms to offset China’s recurring dumping practices that aim to eliminate competition.

A native Australian turned New Yorker, Althaus is, naturally, a big fan of this approach. Chinese price dumping has crippled global competition and scared away potential investors, he said.

“By providing a price floor, it removes the question marks; it removes the instability; it removes the most significant risk in funding a project that’s about to go into production,” Althaus said. “It creates a predictability where you can take geology all the way through to profitability. I think there should be a global effort to create transparent markets and prices for the key critical minerals.”

Critical minerals are increasingly included in U.S. negotiations for all foreign deals. In the tariff agreement with Indonesia, for instance, the Asian nation agreed to lift export bans on nickel. The White House leveraged its military support for Ukraine by demanding the rights to its critical minerals in return. And the recent U.S. bailout of Argentina included a partnership on critical minerals mining.

In addition to its strategic defense location, rare earths are even a reason Trump continues to show interest in annexing Greenland from Denmark.

Veteran geologist Greg Barnes, who founded the massive Tanbreez mining project, which remains in development, briefed Trump at the White House during his first presidential term. This year, Critical Metals acquired 92.5% ownership of the Tanbreez project.

Critical Metals CEO Tony Sage is keen to supply the U.S. with desired rare earths, and the company recently received a letter of intent for a $120 million Ex-Im Bank loan. The goal is to start construction by the end of 2026.

“There’s an absolute need to make sure that more than 50% of the supply of these heavy rare earths come from outside of China—mined and processed outside of China,” Sage told Fortune.

Regardless of any long-shot annexation bids, Sage said Greenland can and should be a key ally to the U.S. for critical minerals. “They definitely don’t want to be part of the U.S., but I think they’ll be pro-U.S.,” he said.

For his part, Althaus said he sees all the international deals as progress, and not as competition for his Cove Capital.

“I think it’s a positive, and I think we’ll start to see a lot more happen in the coming months in terms of the U.S. and collaboration with other countries.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Amazon’s new Alexa aims to detangle chaos in the household, like whether someone fed the dog

Published

on



It’s 10 p.m. after a long day when you walk in the door and wonder aloud: “Did anyone feed the dog? Who fed the dog,” Panos Panay says he calls out to his family of six.

Turns out, nobody fed the dog and so all the kids “scatter to their corners,” he told Fortune’s Brainstorm AI audience in San Francisco on Monday. 

The senior vice president of devices and services at Amazon says the new generative AI-powered Alexa+, which runs on Echo hardware and can integrate with other devices like Amazon’s Ring security cameras, aims to ease the constant mental load in a household: remembering whether the pets ate, restaurants each family member pitched and saw vetoed, and regular grocery orders. The idea is to have “ambient” artificial intelligence around your house so that devices can assist in tasks, chores, and other household command center issues, said Panay.

The new Alexa+ is much more conversational, Panay said, and you no longer have to pronounce everything perfectly and discretely in order for it (or her, as Panay refers to the virtual assistant) to understand you.

“She’s the best DJ on the planet, in my opinion,” said Panay. “You have a personal shopper, you have a butler, you have a personal assistant, you have your home manager. Different people use Alexa for different things, and now she’s pretty much supercharged,” Panay said.

In addition to confirming that the dogs have not been fed, Panay said he used Alexa+ on Sunday night to head off another age-old debate: where the family should go for dinner. Both dinner decisions and pet chores are “classic fight[s] in my house,” Panay told the Brainstorm AI audience.

His youngest had previously suggested a few restaurants she wanted to visit for a quick bite and hadn’t yet been to, and Panay asked Alexa to remind them which ones his daughter suggested specifically. It was a sushi joint and she enjoyed it, Panay said. That type of ambient listening and assistance with debate is the point, he said, and stops people needing to pull out their phones and start typing and scrolling for information.   

From there, Panay said Alexa can also take more concrete actions like making a reservation on dining platform OpenTable, ordering delivery on nights in, getting an Uber, and handling home issues such as telling you how many packages were delivered or the number of guests who stopped by. Panay said Amazon has more than 150 partners to aid in these integrations, although there is work ahead to get more partners on board, he added.  

Thus far, Alexa+ has been rolled out to early-access users and this week the product is available to those on a lengthy waitlist, said Panay, and it’s been boosted by Amazon’s advertising. This week, the product is being released to anyone with an Echo device. The business monetization model involves “flywheels” from Amazon’s $2.4 trillion retail ecosystem, particularly around shopping for clothes, groceries, and other consumer items. “If you’re shopping on the grocery list and order groceries often enough, Alexa knows what you’re doing, and ultimately, can just order ahead of time for you moving forward,” he said.

Ultimately, Panay envisions users wanting “your assistant everywhere you go” because “the more it understands about you, the more informed it is, the better it can serve your needs.” And while Panay said there will be continued innovation from Amazon in this space, he refused to reveal any specific products. He said Amazon has a “lab full of ideas,” but most won’t make it out of that lab. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia will start banning kids from social media this week

Published

on



Starting this Wednesday, many Australian teens will find it near impossible to access social media. That’s because, as of Dec. 10, social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram must bar those under the age of 16, or face significant fines. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the pending ban “one of the biggest social and cultural changes our nation has faced” in a statement.

Much is riding on this ban—and not just in Australia. Other countries in the region are watching Canberra’s ban closely. Malaysia, for example, said that it also plans to bar under-16s from accessing social media platforms starting next year. 

Other countries are considering less drastic ways to control teenagers’ social media use. On Nov. 30, Singapore said it would ban the use of smartphones on secondary school campuses. 

Yet, governments in Australia and Malaysia argue a full social media ban is necessary to protect youth from online harms such as cyberbullying, sexual exploitation and financial scams.

Tech companies have had varied responses to the social media ban. 

Some, like Meta, have been compliant, starting to remove Australian under-16s from Instagram, Threads and Facebook from Dec. 4, a week before the national ban kicks in. The social media giant reaffirmed their commitment to adhere to Australian law, but called for app stores to instead be held accountable for age verification.

“The government should require app stores to verify age and obtain parental approval whenever teens under 16 download apps, eliminating the need for teens to verify their age multiple times across different apps,” a Meta spokesperson said.

Others, like YouTube, sought to be excluded from the ban, with parent company Google even threatening to sue the Australian federal government in July 2025—to no avail.

However, experts told Fortune that these bans may, in fact, be harmful, denying young people the place to develop their own identities and the space to learn healthy digital habits.

“A healthy part of the development process and grappling with the human condition is the process of finding oneself. Consuming cultural material, connecting with others, and finding your community and identity is part of that human experience,” says Andrew Yee, an assistant professor at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU)’s Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information.

Social media “allows young people to derive information, gain affirmation and build community,” says Sun Sun Lim, a professor in communications and technology at the Singapore Management University (SMU), who also calls bans “a very rough tool.”

Yee, from NTU, also points out that young people can turn to platforms like YouTube to learn about hobbies that may not be available in their local communities. 

Forcing kids to go “cold turkey” off social media could also make for a difficult transition to the digital world once they are of age, argues Chew Han Ei, a senior research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in the National University of Singapore (NUS).

“The sensible way is to slowly scaffold [social media use], since it’s not that healthy social media usage can be cultivated immediately,” Chew says.

Enforcement

Australia plans to enforce its social media ban by imposing a fine of 49.5 million Australian dollars (US$32.9 million) on social media companies which fail to take steps to ban those under 16 from having accounts on their platforms.

Malaysia has yet to explain how it might enforce its own social media ban, but communications minister Fahmi Fadzil suggested that social media platforms could verify users through government-issued documents like passports. 

Though young people may soon figure out how to maintain their access to social media. “Youths are savvy, and I am sure they will find ways to circumvent these,” says Yee of NTU. He also adds that young may migrate to platforms that aren’t traditionally defined as social media, such as gaming sites like Roblox. Other social media platforms, like YouTube, also don’t require accounts, thus limiting the efficacy of these bans, he adds.

Forcing social media platforms to collect huge amounts of personal data and government-issued identity documents could also lead to data privacy issues. “It’s very intimate personally identifiable information that’s being collected to verify age—from passports to digital IDs,” Chew, from NUS, says. “Somewhere along the line, a breach will happen.”

Moving towards healthy social media use

Ironically, some experts argue that a ban may absolve social media platforms of responsibility towards their younger users. 

“Social media bans impose an unfair burden on parents to closely supervise their children’s media use,” says Lim of SMU. “As for the tech platform, they can reduce child safety safeguards that make their platforms safer, since now the assumption is that young people are banned from them, and should not have been venturing [onto them] and opening themselves up to risks.”

And rather than allow digital harms to proliferate, social media platforms should be held responsible for ensuring they “contribute to intentional and purposeful use”, argues Yee.

This could mean regulating companies’ use of user interface features like auto-play and infinite scroll, or ensuring algorithmic recommendations are not pushing harmful content to users.

“Platforms profit—lucratively, if I may add—from people’s use, so they have a responsibility to ensure that the product is safe and beneficial for its users,” Yee explains. 

Finally, conversations on safe social media use should center the voices of young people, Yee adds.

“I think we need to come to a consensus as to what a safe and rights-respecting online space is,” he says. “This must include young people’s voices, as policy design should be done in consultation with the people the policy is affecting.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.