Connect with us

Politics

Miami-Dade Commission OKs ordinance forcing North Miami Beach to justify water surcharges

Published

on


A yearslong dispute over water fees North Miami Beach charges its neighbor, Miami Gardens, spilled into new territory this week, as county policymakers approved fresh oversight rules meant to address the issue.

Miami-Dade Commissioners OK’d an ordinance by Oliver Gilbert, Miami Gardens’ immediate past Mayor, to require any municipal water or sewer utility that serves customers beyond its borders to file copies of its service terms and conditions with the county’s Water and Sewer Department.

If the utility collects surcharges from those outside customers, it must prove each year that the extra money is used solely for water system operations and improvements. Cities that don’t comply could face $500 fines per violation and possible county intervention under Miami-Dade’s home rule authority.

The ordinance effectively forces North Miami Beach to either negotiate a formal agreement with Miami Gardens — which buys water from its Norwood Water Treatment Plant that sits wholly within Miami Gardens’ bounds — or demonstrate that the longstanding 25% surcharge it imposes on customers in the neighboring city directly benefits the utility system.

It passed 9-3 on Thursday after nearly two hours of intense debate.

Commissioner Marleine Bastien, whose district includes North Miami Beach, voted “no” alongside Eileen Higgins and Micky Steinberg.

North Miami Beach has long added a 25% fee to the water bills of roughly 130,000 out-of-city customers, generating about $10 million annually. The city’s leaders argue that non-resident customers should share the cost of maintaining and expanding the Norwood plant and related infrastructure, citing Chapter 180 of Florida Statutes, which allows different rates and surcharges if they are “just and equitable.”

“That’s not exploitation — it’s reasonable governance and reflects the reality of how a free-market utility model functions,” North Miami Mayor Michael Joseph wrote in a Miami Herald op-ed this year. “You use a service, you pay your fair share. It’s simple.”

Miami Gardens officials argue the practice is unfair. Gilbert has repeatedly labeled it “taxation without representation,” since Miami Gardens residents pay higher rates to a city whose officials they can’t elect.

He noted in separate articles that North Miami Beach’s surcharge flows into its general fund, not the water system. He called the practice “a simple story” of “one community taking advantage of another.”

The dispute has run from courtrooms to Tallahassee and, now, back to County Hall. In 2018, Miami Gardens sued over the matter, eventually securing a $9 million settlement. This year, Sen. Shevrin Jones and Rep. Felicia Robinson — both Miami Gardens Democrats — passed legislation banning surcharges when a water plant sits inside the city it serves, a narrowly tailored measure solely targeting the two cities.

Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed the bill in July, saying local disputes shouldn’t be refereed in Tallahassee. Gilbert then turned to a county-level “fix” by using Miami-Dade’s regulatory authority to enforce compliance locally.

He briefly aimed at Ron Book, accusing the longtime Miami-Dade lobbyist, whom he tried to fire in July, of having a hand in the veto. That attempt failed. Book denied any involvement in the water issue — an assertion Joseph backed, telling the Herald that Book “was conflicted out and couldn’t help us.”

After he filed his ordinance the following month, Gilbert funded mailers through his district office to drum up support for the proposal among North Miami Beach residents.

Bastien confronted him about the mailers at Thursday’s meeting, asserting he “would not dare” to do something like that in any other district. Gilbert said he would, if the problem called for such action.

Joseph told Florida Politics on Friday that the ordinance’s passage puts his city’s recently passed NWB Water Relief Act, which would provide up to $150 in yearly discounts to eligible Norwood customers, including seniors, disabled residents, veterans and surviving spouses of fallen first responders in Miami Gardens, Opa-locka and Bal Harbour.

“It’s in limbo,” he said. “It’s unfortunate. We’re looking at next steps. A lot of people were counting on that relief, and now it’s up in the air.”

Under the ordinance, North Miami Beach must submit its rate agreements and surcharge documents within 30 days of the measure’s effective date, which would be Oct. 19, unless Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava issues a veto.

Gilbert suggested Thursday that it’s unlikely, given that multiple water service providers in Miami-Dade fall under his legislation, but only North Miami Beach has an issue with it.

“Because all of the other water providers don’t engage in this practice … of taking all of the water funds from the surcharge fees and taking it into the general fund … and not actually using it for maintenance,” he said. “We’ve spoken to them all. They aren’t here protesting because they don’t have a problem with it. … It does not have an adverse effect on them because they’re following the law as-is.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Debbie Wasserman Schultz language protecting Everglades from pipeline fastrack rejected in committee

Published

on


Florida Democrats say an amendment shot down by the U.S. House Rules Committee could have protected the Everglades from energy exploration.

U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat, pushed for a change in language in the Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act (HR 3668) during Committee proceedings. That bill, filed by U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson, a North Carolina Republican, would expedite review of natural gas or liquified gas pipelines by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

Wasserman Schultz’s amendment to the bill would have excluded the Everglades and other Florida navigable waters from that change, still requiring extensive review to put a pipeline through Florida’s largest national park. However, the Rules Committee did not allow the amendment to come to a vote.

“While we spend billions to restore the Everglades, House Republicans voted to pollute it,” Wasserman Schultz posted on social media.

She said the amendment was worked on with the support of most Democrats in Florida’s congressional delegation, including U.S. Reps. Kathy Castor, Lois Frankel, Darren Soto and Frederica Wilson. Wasserman Schultz is the Democratic co-chair of the congressional delegation.

The proposed change “tried to exempt the Everglades from this dirty water bill, but House Republicans rejected it,” Wasserman Schultz said.

Republicans characterized the legislation differently, with some members from Florida.

U.S. Rep. Cory Mills, a New Smyrna Beach Republican, said he supported advancing the bill from the Committee to the floor.

“I voted to support HR 3668, the Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act, to cut red tape and speed up approvals for natural gas pipelines and LNG terminals,” he posted. “This bill puts FERC in charge of NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) reviews, sets strict timelines, improves agency coordination and strengthens pipeline security. This is how we lower energy costs and boost American energy independence.”

FERC is responsible for reviewing and issuing permits for new or expanded gas lines. The legislation, as written, would shift oversight responsibilities from state governments to the agency and eliminate the need for state certifications.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick is fundraising off of charges she stole $5M from FEMA

Published

on


Democratic U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick is staying true to the old maxim, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

This week, her re-election campaign sent texts to voters imploring them to donate to help her in “fighting back” against what she calls a “politically motivated” attack against her.

She’s referring, of course, to federal charges filed in November accusing her of stealing $5 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds to bankroll her 2021 congressional campaign.

“2 weeks ago, I took a stand and voted to demand transparency, truth and accountability from our leaders. The next day, the attacks began. An indictment was filed. This was not random. This was politically motivated retaliation,” the text said.

“But this isn’t about silencing one person. It’s about sending a clear message to anyone who dares to challenge powerful interests: ‘Fall in line — or pay the price. Well, I’m fighting back — but I need you with me. DONATE NOW.”

The text then links to a donations page that, among other things, says, “She voted for the truth. They answered with retaliation.”

The fundraising text.

A perusal of Cherfilus-McCormick’s votes from around two weeks back reveals what she is likely referring to: “yesvotes on measures concerning the release of files connected to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Notably, none of the 426 other members of the House who voted to release the Epstein files were federally indicted for embezzling COVID funds in recent weeks.

The grand jury indictment against Cherfilus-McCormick, announced Nov. 19, alleges she and her brother secured funding intended for a COVID vaccine distribution program, but when overpayments were made, she rerouted the money through several accounts that later donated to her campaign.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi described the alleged act as “a particularly selfish, cynical crime.”

Cherfilus-McCormick, 46, has maintained and reiterated that she is innocent of wrongdoing, calling the charges “unjust” and “baseless.”

“The timing alone is curious and clearly meant to distract from far more pressing national issues,” she said a day after the indictment was announced, noting that she has “fully cooperated” with a yearslong investigation into the matter. “I look forward to my day in court. Until then, I will continue fighting for my constituents.”

The fundraising site.

Should Cherfilus-McCormick be found guilty of all counts in the indictment, she could face up to 53 years in prison.

Cherfilus-McCormick isn’t the only federal lawmaker from Florida to fundraise off of her legal travails. Last year, following a House Ethics Committee report that there was “substantial evidence” he paid for sex, including with a 17-year-old, former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz sent out a fundraising plea citing his troubles.

“I need your help,” Gaetz, a Republican, said in an email through his political committee last December. “I’ve fought for you in Congress for eight years against the worst of the Radical Left and Uniparty. Now, they’re seeking their revenge.”

Gaetz, who resigned the month before, called the scrutiny over his alleged impropriety a “witch hunt.”

Former Republican U.S. Rep. George Santos of Long Island used the exact phrase to describe the fraud and money-laundering charges he faced in May 2023, about seven months before his peers in the House expelled him.

Republican U.S. Rep. Greg Steube introduced a resolution last month to expel Cherfilus-McCormick. Other than its referral to the Ethics Committee, no action has been taken on the bill.

Cherfilus-McCormick represents Florida’s 20th Congressional District, which spans parts of Broward and Palm Beach counties. She faces Primary challenges from Dale Holness and Elijah Manley, the latter of whom she is suing for defamation over the FEMA funds issue.

Republicans Sendra Dorce and Rodenay Joseph are also running in the district, which leans heavily Democratic.

Florida Politics contacted Cherfilus-McCormick’s Communications Director, Kailyn McBride, seeking comment about the Congresswoman’s texts, but received no response.

___

Jacob Ogles contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

PFAS water contamination has met its match

Published

on


Toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” are found in nearly half of all U.S. drinking water. These harmful chemicals are linked to cancer, developmental issues, and immune system damage. They enter our water systems through industrial discharges, firefighting foams, and landfill runoff. Once present, they are nearly impossible to remove using traditional methods.

For years, families, utilities, and local governments have faced a difficult choice: accept unsafe water or pay for costly, slow, and incomplete cleanup methods.

After 10 years of research and development, Eco World Water has the solution.

At Eco World Water, we have completed four months of rigorous pilot testing with an independent laboratory, under protocols reviewed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The verified lab results confirm that our system can reduce PFAS to non-detectable levels in a safe, reliable, and quick manner. More importantly, the system produces clean, safe water in minutes, not days.

For a national problem needing a scalable solution, this is a breakthrough with transformative potential.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) earned the nickname “forever chemicals” for a good reason. They persist in the environment for decades, are resistant to conventional treatment, and pose serious risks to public health. That is why our verified results are so significant.

For too long, PFAS have been viewed as an unsolvable challenge. We can now say with confidence: problem solved. Our system demonstrates that communities don’t have to accept “forever chemicals” as a fact of life. PFAS-free water is not theoretical. It’s operational.

Just as important, Eco World Water’s patented, modular technology is a complete, all-in-one system built for permanent installation. It takes up significantly less space than traditional wastewater treatment systems and can be scaled to meet the needs of communities, large or small. Its modular design also enables a version that fits inside a shipping container, ideal for rapid deployment to disaster relief zones or remote locations where clean water is urgently needed.

The system turns raw wastewater into water that meets drinking quality standards, not just removing PFAS, but also eliminating a wide range of harmful contaminants like heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and pathogens. It’s fast, compact, and easy to operate, bringing clean water where it’s needed most, without the delays or complexity of traditional systems.

This is the result of more than 10 years of focused research and development. Eco World Water’s mission is simple: give every community access to clean, safe, and affordable water. With these latest independent lab-verified results, we are delivering on that mission.

This progress comes at a crucial moment in the quest for clean water.

States across the country are preparing for more demanding PFAS standards and increased federal oversight. Billions of dollars in federal infrastructure funding are available to support water system upgrades. Yet many communities still lack tools that can meet those expectations. Our technology can adapt to the needs of each site and provides a clear, cost-effective path toward compliance with new federal mandates.

Families deserve water they can trust. Local governments deserve options that don’t strain their budgets. Communities deserve solutions that meet the urgency of the clean water moment.

Eco World Water is ready to deliver.

After decades of frustration and uncertainty, we now have a verified solution. Water with undetectable PFAS levels is not just an aspiration. It’s a proven, tested reality.

___

Steve Adelstein is the Executive Chair of Eco World Water.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.