Connect with us

Business

When Washington steps back: what deregulation means for corporate leaders

Published

on



From boardrooms to factory floors, U.S. companies are entering a new era where federal guardrails may disappear. The laws may be rolling back, but the risk: legal, financial, and reputational, are multiplying. Getting ahead of this challenge is one of the few things boards and leadership teams can control in a business world defined by uncertainty.

I. The Disappearing Roadmap

Imagine you’re at a dinner with fellow executives. Someone asks, “What’s happening in your world right now?” A few years ago, the answer might have been inflation, supply chains, or talent retention. Today, another response is gaining traction: the rules of the game are disappearing.

For decades, federal regulation offered companies both a roadmap and a shield. Compliance provided legal protection, investor confidence, and a baseline for competitive fairness. That framework is now shifting across multiple sectors: finance, energy, environmental management, and consumer safety. Boards must navigate a landscape where federal rules no longer provide clear benchmarks, yet liability, reputation, and competitive pressures remain.

In a world dominated by uncertainty, how companies prepare for deregulation is one of the few levers of control available to leadership. It is a moment to exercise foresight, to define company standards proactively, and to maintain credibility with employees, customers, and investors alike.

II. How We Got Here

U.S. federal regulation has often been written in response to crisis. Before national rules, businesses navigated a patchwork of state laws that were inefficient, inconsistent, and sometimes dangerous. Unsafe food practices revealed in The Jungle (1906) led to the Pure Food and Drug Act and Meat Inspection Act. Mine explosions and factory fires spurred the creation of OSHA, setting basic safety standards. The 1929 stock market crash exposed flaws in securities trading, prompting the Securities Acts and the SEC to protect investors and enforce disclosure. Environmental disasters like the Cuyahoga River fires and smog crises produced the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts. Corporate fraud scandals, from Enron to WorldCom, led to the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley, while the 2008 financial crisis gave rise to Dodd-Frank and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Time and again, regulation has followed upheaval, creating national standards to safeguard workers, consumers, investors, and the environment.

These milestones reveal a consistent pattern: crises prompted federal intervention, which reduced uncertainty, enabled the growth of national markets, and fostered long-term economic expansion. Regulation, while costly in the short term, created the infrastructure for scalable, sustainable businesses.

Fast forward to 2025: the federal government has enacted a sweeping wave of deregulation across environmental, labor, healthcare, and financial sectors, applying a “10-for-1” rule that eliminated ten existing regulations for every new one introduced. The scale of this rollback -environmental standards, financial oversight, and workplace protections – is historically significant, leaving boards and executives to navigate a far less predictable landscape.

III. Implications & Action

Deregulation shifts risk from public enforcement to corporate governance. The absence of federal backstops creates legal uncertainty: compliance with rescinded rules no longer provides safe harbor, and boards may face heightened liability for oversight failures. Directors and executives must anticipate potential litigation, gaps in D&O insurance coverage, and reputational exposure, particularly in areas historically protected by federal standards.

Competitive tensions are emerging. Firms that maintain rigorous safety and governance standards may incur higher costs, while others exploit regulatory gaps to cut expenses. This divergence can affect reputational capital, investor trust, and market positioning. Global considerations amplify the challenge: companies operating internationally must meet foreign regulatory standards regardless of U.S. deregulation, while domestic competitors may face different state requirements.

Boards can take proactive steps. Risk-mapping across business units, reassessing compliance as a governance responsibility, and exploring voluntary certifications or alliances establish new baselines for trust and safety. Regulatory sandboxes and safe harbors can be leveraged where applicable. Companies operating in multiple states may voluntarily adhere to the highest standard to maintain consistency, creating predictability for operations and signaling reliability to stakeholders.

Strategically, firms that lead on governance and product safety can convert compliance into a market advantage. Transparent reporting, rigorous internal controls, and alignment between executive incentives and long-term risk management are essential leadership tools. Companies that treat safety, ethics, and governance as strategic differentiators can maintain investor confidence, attract customers, and strengthen workforce engagement.

Deregulation also forces boards to rethink how they exercise oversight. Historical reliance on federal regulation as a shield must give way to proactive governance, scenario planning, and alignment of culture with risk management. In short, boards that act decisively can exert control over one of the few variables still within their influence: how their organization navigates an increasingly deregulated environment. 

IV. Actionable Conclusion

The retreat of federal regulations does not eliminate risk, it redistributes it. Boards and executives who treat deregulation as merely a cost-cutting opportunity may find themselves exposed to litigation, investor skepticism, or reputational harm. Those who approach it strategically can define industry standards, creating competitive advantage and long-term resilience.

Action steps for leadership teams include:

1.    Map exposure: Identify where regulatory rollback directly affects operations, compliance, and liability.

2.    Reassess governance: Ensure oversight structures, reporting lines, and monitoring processes reflect current and anticipated risks.

3.    Set voluntary standards: Adopt certifications, alliances, or internal protocols that exceed minimum legal requirements.

4.    Communicate trust: Clearly convey the company’s commitment to safety, ethics, and long-term stability to investors, employees, and customers.

5.    Integrate into strategy: Treat regulatory navigation as a core component of risk management, competitive positioning, and capital allocation.

In an era of uncertainty, proactive boards gain clarity and control, shaping outcomes rather than reacting to them. Deregulation may remove government guardrails, but leadership, foresight, and disciplined execution remain levers executives can command.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

HP’s chief commercial officer predicts the future will include AI PCs that don’t use the cloud

Published

on



Increased focus on “privacy and security” may open the door for AI-enabled devices rather than rely entirely on cloud computing and remote data centers. 

“In a world where sovereign data retention matters, people want to know that if they input data to a model, the model won’t train on their data,” David McQuarrie, HP’s chief commercial officer, told Fortune in October. Using an AI locally provides that reassurance.

HP, like many of its devicemaking peers, is exploring the use of AI PCs, or devices that can use AI locally as opposed to in the cloud. “Longer term, it will be impossible not to buy an AI PC, simply because there’s so much power in them,” he said. 

More broadly, smaller companies might be served just as well by a smaller model running locally than a larger model running in the cloud. “A company, a small business, or an individual has significant amounts of data that need not be put in the cloud,” he said. 

Asian governments have often had stricter rules on data sovereignty. China, in particular, has significantly tightened its regulations on where Chinese user data can be stored. South Korea is another example of an Asian country that treats some locally sourced data as too sensitive to be housed overseas. 

Governments the world over, and particularly in Asia, are also investing in local sovereign AI capabilities, trying to avoid relying entirely on systems and platforms housed wholly overseas. South Korea, for example, is partnering with local tech companies like search giant Naver to build its own AI systems. Singapore is investing in projects like the Southeast Asian Languages in One Network (SEA-LION), which are better tailored to Southeast Asian countries. 

Asian AI adoption

Asia is HP’s smallest region, but also its fastest-growing. Revenue from Asia-Pacific and Japan grew by 7% over the company’s 2025 fiscal year, which ended in October, to hit $13.3 billion. That’s around a quarter of HP’s total revenue of $55.3 billion. (HP’s other two regions are the Americas; and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.)

McQuarrie also suggested that there was an opportunity to be “disruptive” in Asia. While many business leaders have been eager to embrace AI, at least rhetorically, actual adoption is proving more difficult. A recent survey from McKinsey reports that two-thirds of companies are still in the experimentation phase of AI. 

But McQuarrie believed that AI adoption in Asia could be “just as quick, if not quicker,” than other regions. 

Asia seems to be more comfortable with the use of AI, at least when it comes to users. An October survey from Pew found that fewer people in countries like India, South Korea and Japan reported feeling “more concerned than excited” about AI compared to the U.S. 

When it comes to convincing more companies to adopt AI, let alone AI PCs, McQuarrie said the answer was to make AI functions as seamless as possible, so “that it doesn’t really matter whether you understand that you’re embracing AI or not.”

“What we’re doubling down on is the future of work,” McQuarrie said. “The future of work is a device that makes your experience better and your productivity greater.”

“The fact that we’re using AI in the background? They don’t need to know that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump administration waives part of a Biden-era fine against Southwest Air for canceled flights

Published

on



The U.S. Department of Transportation is waiving part of a fine assessed against Southwest Airlines after the company canceled thousands of flights during a winter storm in 2022.

Under a 2023 settlement reached by the Biden administration, Southwest agreed to a $140 million civil penalty. The government said at the time that the penalty was the largest it had ever imposed on an airline for violating consumer protection laws.

Most of the money went toward compensation for travelers. But Southwest agreed to pay $35 million to the U.S. Treasury. Southwest made a $12 million payment in 2024 and a second $12 million payment earlier this year. But the Transportation Department issued an order Friday waiving the final $11 million payment, which was due Jan. 31, 2026.

The department said Southwest should get credit for significantly improving its on-time performance and investing in network operations.

“DOT believes that this approach is in the public interest as it incentivizes airlines to invest in improving their operations and resiliency, which benefits consumers directly,” the department said in a statement. “This credit structure allows for the benefits of the airline’s investment to be realized by the public, rather than resulting in a government monetary penalty.”

The fine stemmed from a winter storm in December 2022 that paralyzed Southwest’s operations in Denver and Chicago and then snowballed when a crew-rescheduling system couldn’t keep up with the chaos. Ultimately the airline canceled 17,000 flights and stranded more than 2 million travelers.

The Biden administration determined that Southwest had violated the law by failing to help customers who were stranded in airports and hotels, leaving many of them to scramble for other flights. Many who called the airline’s overwhelmed customer service center got busy signals or were stuck on hold for hours.

Even before the settlement, the nation’s fourth-biggest airline by revenue said the meltdown cost it more than $1.1 billion in refunds and reimbursements, extra costs and lost ticket sales over several months.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump slams Democratic congressman as disloyal for not switching parties after pardon

Published

on



Trump blasted Cuellar for “Such a lack of LOYALTY,” suggesting the Republican president might have expected the clemency to bolster the GOP’s narrow House majority heading into the 2026 midterm elections.

Cuellar, in a television interview Sunday after Trump’s social media post, said he was a conservative Democrat willing to work with the administration “to see where we can find common ground.” The congressman said he had prayed for the president and the presidency at church that morning “because if the president succeeds, the country succeeds.”

Citing a fellow Texas politician, the late President Lyndon Johnson, Cuellar said he was an American, Texan and Democrat, in that order. “I think anybody that puts party before their country is doing a disservice to their country,” he told Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures.”

Trump noted on his Truth Social platform that the Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration had brought the charges against Cuellar and that the congressman, by running once more as a Democrat, was continuing to work with “the same RADICAL LEFT” that wanted him and his wife in prison — “And probably still do!”

“Such a lack of LOYALTY, something that Texas Voters, and Henry’s daughters, will not like. Oh’ well, next time, no more Mr. Nice guy!” Trump said. Cuellar’s two daughters, Christina and Catherine, had sent Trump a letter in November asking that he pardon their parents.

Trump explained his pardon he announced Wednesday as a matter of stopping a “weaponized” prosecution. Cuellar was an outspoken critic of Biden’s immigration policy, a position that Trump saw as a key alignment with the lawmaker.

Cuellar said he has good relationships within his party. “I think the general Democrat Caucus and I, we get along. But they know that I’m an independent voice,” he said.

A party switch would have been an unexpected bonus for Republicans after the GOP-run Legislature redrew the state’s congressional districts this year at Trump’s behest. The Texas maneuver started a mid-decade gerrymandering scramble playing out across multiple states. Trump is trying to defend Republicans’ House majority and avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats dominated the House midterms and used a new majority to stymie the administration, launch investigations and twice impeach Trump.

Yet Cuellar’s South Texas district, which includes parts of metro San Antonio, was not one of the Democratic districts that Republicans changed substantially, and Cuellar believes he remains well-positioned to win reelection.

Federal authorities had charged Cuellar and his wife with accepting thousands of dollars in exchange for the congressman advancing the interests of an Azerbaijan-controlled energy company and a bank in Mexico. Cuellar was accused of agreeing to influence legislation favorable to Azerbaijan and deliver a pro-Azerbaijan speech on the floor of the U.S. House.

Cuellar has said he his wife were innocent. The couple’s trial had been set to begin in April.

In the Fox interview, Cuellar insisted that federal authorities tried to entrap him with “a sting operation to try to bribe me, and that failed.”

Cuellar still faces a House Ethics Committee investigation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.