U.S. Rep. Vern Buchanan and the full Florida congressional delegation are urging President Donald Trump to keep offshore drilling away from the state’s coastlines, pressing him to maintain a moratorium he put in place in 2020.

Buchanan, co-Chair of the 30-member bipartisan delegation, joined U.S. Sen. Rick Scott and Sen. Ashley Moody in leading a letter asking Trump to uphold his executive order extending a ban on oil and gas leasing off Florida’s Gulf and east coasts through 2032.

“President Trump made the right call in 2020 when he protected Florida from offshore drilling, and we’re asking him to keep those safeguards in place,” Buchanan said. “Florida’s coastline is essential to our tourism-based economy, environment and military readiness. A single mistake offshore could cost our state billions of dollars. We cannot afford to lose even an inch of these critical protections.”

The Florida lawmakers sent the letter in response to a program proposed by the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which would open part of the Eastern Gulf of America to new oil and gas drilling. The area overlaps with waters explicitly protected under Trump’s executive order.

In the letter, the delegation expressed strong opposition to any attempts to expand offshore oil and gas drilling off Florida’s coasts to protect “the incredible value Florida’s pristine coasts have to our state’s economy, environment, and military community.” They added that Trump’s 2020 action received overwhelming and bipartisan support.

Lawmakers also warn that the newly proposed leasing area falls inside the Gulf Test Range, a large military training zone used for advanced air and weapons systems testing. They describe the range as a critical national security asset.

“The Gulf Test Range remains an integral part of Department of War training to ensure mission readiness and is supported by multiple military bases in Florida’s Panhandle,” the lawmakers wrote. “Collectively, these bases employ tens of thousands of military and civilian personnel and are of critical importance to national security.”

The area is the largest multidomain military training and testing complex in the country, and the lawmakers stated that “protecting this range from encroachment, including oil exploration, is essential.” The letter says more than 50,000 jobs in the Panhandle depend directly on the military facilities tied to the range.

The delegation cites Eglin Air Force Base as a key example, noting it “supports 20,000 personnel, provides the country with $11 billion in economic impact every year, and currently boasts 123,000 square miles of water range, which would all have to be reduced in an instance of an encroachment of the Gulf Test Range.”

The delegation also points to the economic weight of Florida’s tourism industry, and its vulnerability to fallout from potential oil spills, arguing that the risks outweigh any short-term gains.

“Florida’s beaches alone generate more than $127.7 billion per year in tourism spending and support over 2.1 million tourism-related jobs,” lawmakers wrote. “Unfortunately, all these resources suffered devastating harm during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. That disaster wiped billions of dollars from Florida’s industries and caused irreparable damage to our environment and coastal communities.”

“For these reasons, we urge you to uphold your existing moratorium and keep Florida’s coasts off the table for oil and gas leasing,” they added. “Florida’s economy, environment, and military readiness depend on this commitment.”

Every member of the Florida congressional delegation signed the letter, including Buchanan, Scott, Moody and U.S. Reps. Aaron Bean, Gus Bilirakis, Kat Cammack, Kathy Castor, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Mario Díaz-Balart, Byron Donalds, Neal Dunn, Randy Fine, Lois Frankel, Scott Franklin, Maxwell Frost, Carlos Giménez, Mike Haridopolos, Laurel Lee, Anna Paulina Luna, Brian Mast, Cory Mills, Jared Moskowitz, Jimmy Patronis, John Rutherford, María Elvira Salazar, Darren Soto, Greg Steube, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Daniel Webster and Frederica Wilson.

As investment executive James Fishback ramps up his campaign for Governor, a review of court filings from this year shows a former employee accused him of starting a relationship with her when she was 17 and later harassing her — allegations he disputes.

In an amended petition for a protection order request filed in January, a woman named Keinah Fort is claiming Fishback “initiated a romantic relationship with (her)” in Spring 2022, while she was 17 and he was 27, and “explicitly directed” her to keep their relationship secret.

She said in the amended April filing that she joined the nonprofit Fishback founded, Incubate Debate, which runs in-person tournaments for middle and high school students, in 2021, when she was 16. Shortly thereafter, she said he “systematically cultivated a relationship with her” by increasing “opportunities for personal interaction.”

The petition described his approach as “an isolation tactic commonly employed in grooming scenarios.”

Fishback, who grew up in Broward County and now lives in Madison County, is the CEO of Azoria, a startup asset management firm he registered with the state in 2023. He is a frequent political commentator and activist but has never held public office.

He told Florida Politics by phone that Fort’s account of when they began dating and the events that preceded and followed their eventual breakup — including her accusations of stalking and cyberbullying — in the since-denied petition are “absolutely false.”

“There was no evidence entered into the record to support that allegation, and I was fully exonerated of any wrongdoing in this case,” he said.

Fort’s allegations remain uncorroborated beyond the statements she submitted in her filings.

Of note, the case centered on whether Fishback behaved in a manner that justified issuing a protective order against him, not whether he had an improper relationship with a minor.

Under Florida law, the age of consent is 18, though a 16- or 17-year-old may legally consent to sexual activity with an adult no older than 23. Fort’s petition did not detail the level of her and Fishback’s alleged intimacy while she was underage, and she did not respond to multiple interview requests.

In Spring 2023, after she turned 18, Fishback and Fort moved in together. Her LinkedIn page shows she worked at the time as a Program Director for Incubate Debate, though she’d later rise to Executive Director and “Lead” roles. The petition said Fort still depended financially on Fishback, since Incubate Debate would “sporadically and randomly” pay her.

Their domestic life was hardly tranquil, according to Fort, who said Fishback lost his temper, threw objects across the room and screamed at her “on multiple occasions” and once grabbed Fort by the arm, “leaving visible marks.”

After that last incident, Fort said Fishback “laughed without remorse and attempted to justify his behavior by stating (she) exaggerated her injuries.” Fort said Fishback also turned his aggression inward “at times,” threatening to hurt himself while pulling on his hair and slapping himself in the face. He blamed her “each time” for such actions, the petition said.

The couple were nevertheless engaged by March 2024, though not for long. They split up that September, but reconciled briefly in December, after which Fort said she “definitively terminated the relationship.” Fishback claims he was the one who called things off.

After that, she said Fishback’s “controlling behaviors escalated into stalking and cyberbullying.” He “repeatedly (contacted) her through emails, voice memos, text messages,” and communications with her family, the petition said. When she turned down his offer to drop off a gift at her Tallahassee home in early January, explaining that her family was over, Fishback allegedly asked, “Are you afraid I’ll hurt you?” and inquired whether her father had a gun before screaming, “I hate you,” at her three times.

Fishback maintains he never threatened Fort — and, notably, none of his many written communications that Fort filed with the court included any threat of physical harm — but he admitted in texts submitted as evidence and affirmed by a sworn digital forensics expert that he was “tough on (her) and (his) words were not OK.”

Evidence Fort submitted also includes hundreds of unanswered texts that Fishback allegedly sent her over several days. It also consists of a text Fort’s father sent chastising Fishback for a “petty and vindictive” X post about the breakup.

According to a filing by Fort, the since-deleted X post read, “I broke off my engagement to an incredible woman for one simple reason: She couldn’t be proud of anything I worked on – big or small.”

He allegedly told Fort’s mother that he would take the post down if Fort contacted him.

Fort returned to work at Incubate Debate a few days later, where she said Fishback continued to make unwanted contact.

By then, the Koch family-funded Bill of Rights Institute had acquired the nonprofit and Fort had assumed many of Fishback’s prior responsibilities there while Fishback stayed on as a contractor. Fishback said control of Incubate Debate has since reverted to him after the acquisition was “dissolved.”

Fort reported him to the company’s Human Resources Department. She said Fishback then “acquired knowledge of the specific information (she) disclosed during the meeting” before immediately and repeatedly calling her.

Fishback then resigned from his contract work, but Fort said he continued contacting her despite several emailed requests — several of which were included in court filings — that he refrain from doing so.

Fort filed a petition for an injunction for protection against stalking and cyberstalking on Jan. 27, just under two weeks after Fishback threatened to take legal action against her if she filed “an untrue restraining order” or made “defamatory public statements” about him in an email he also sent to several Incubate Debate employees.

Judge Joshua Hawkes of the 2nd Judicial Circuit in Tallahassee denied Fort’s petition on June 20. He wrote that Fishback is “perhaps a little obsessive-compulsive, but he did not initiate contact with the petitioner directly and indirectly with no legitimate purpose.”

Hawkes described Fishback as having an “odd nature” that was “apparent during the hearing.”

“The Respondent is greatly concerned first with the business implications of the parties’ breakup, then with the potential HR complaint, and finally with the injunction itself. The Respondent would litigate his version of events with anyone and everyone and as often as possible. He litigated his entire case in response to just about every question during the hearing,” Hawkes wrote. “He is trying to defend himself and protect his business.”

Hawkes said he found neither Fishback nor Fort’s account of who ended the relationship and why credible. He also said Fort failed to sufficiently prove that Fishback’s post-relationship contacts, a not-insignificant portion of which were work-related, were cause for “substantial emotional distress to a reasonable person.”

Hawkes quoted the 2020 case Quinones-Dones v. Mascola, in which Judge Jay Cohen ruled, “Uncivil behavior or annoyance is not sufficient to obtain an injunction.”

In a written statement to Florida Politics after the phone interview, Fishback reiterated his assertion that Fort had made false accusations against him as part of a wider trend that is “sadly all too common today.”

The court in Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit reviewed these egregious accusations, conducted two lengthy hearings, and fully exonerated me,” he wrote. “I have never been arrested or charged with any crime, unlike my opponent (Republican U.S. Rep.) Byron Donalds.”

While the case was ongoing, Fishback posted online about Fort. In a March 6 X post, he wrote, “Yesterday would have been my three-month wedding anniversary. I called off my engagement when I realized I couldn’t say, with certainty, that I’d want her raising my children if something happened to me. That moment hit hard.”

The moment in question: Fort telling him she didn’t think it was wrong for a friend to let her 12-year-old son skip church. “If you don’t see eye to eye on how to raise your children, don’t walk down the aisle,” he wrote. “It’s not fair to anyone: you, her, or your future sons and daughters.”

On March 18, he wrote, “BREAKING NEWS: A District Judge has ordered me to get back together with my ex-fiancé.”

On March 25, he posted photos and a transcript of a praiseful handwritten letter he said Fort wrote to him after their breakup. Comments with the most likes included, “Did she want that to be shared with the internet? Seems kinda personal,” and “Hey James, I really think you should delete this. Some things are best left private.”

Fishback included a snippet of the letter in a June 10 court filing where he claimed Fort had made “numerous attempts to rekindle their relationship” between September and December 2024. He said that before they met, Fort had “long suffered from mental health issues, including engaging in self-harm (cutting) and diagnosed anxiety, which required her to be medicated.”

In October 2024, Fishback said he found Fort in his Washington, D.C., condominium with her left wrist slashed. He also said Fort left him a “fawning voicemail” for his birthday on Jan. 1, which, with four other voicemails he provided to the court, proved Fort “wanted to rekindle their relationship as recently as December 2024.”

Fishback proffered an alternative motive for Fort’s legal action: greed and competitiveness. He said that since the Bill of Rights Institute and Incubate Debate parted ways, with Fort remaining at the Bill of Rights Institute, Fort’s new employer launched its own debate organization in direct competition with Fishback’s nonprofit.

That, he argued, provided Fort “a secondary motive to pursue” the injunction.

Fishback also said Fort published false statements about the success of Incubate Debate while the organization was under her leadership at the Bill of Rights Institute, which led to it receiving an unprecedented “cash donation (that) the donor specifically referencing the false figures.”

He said the Bill of Rights Institute updated its website “at some point” between Jan. 22 and Jan. 24 to fix the figures he said Fort misrepresented so that they “comport with reality.”

Less than a week later, and days after Fort filed her petition, Fishback’s filing said, the Bill of Rights Institute “stripped control of Incubate Debate” from her and returned its control to him.

He said the “last direct contact” he had with Fort was an attempt to return a missed phone call from her on Jan. 21. A screenshot of phone call records Fort submitted to the court shows Fishback called three times.

He said he’s had “zero direct contact” with her since” then.

“Respondent testified he does not wish to speak with or see (Fort) ever again,” the filing said, “but he does wish her well, as far away from him as possible.”

Florida Politics contacted Fort and one of her lawyers in the case, Mozianio “Trey” Reliford III, of the Polsinelli law firm, which represents the Bill of Rights Institute. Neither responded to multiple interview requests.

Another of Fort’s lawyers, Nardo Dorsin, has since left Polsinelli and was unavailable for comment by press time.

Fishback launched his campaign for Governor on Nov. 4, pitching himself as an affordability-focused alternative to corporately compromised mainstream GOP candidates. His platform includes ending H-1B visas, which provide legal status to immigrants working in special industries, eliminating property taxes and continuing the “anti-woke” agenda of Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Other Republicans actively competing for the job include Donalds, whom President Donald Trump is backing, and former House Speaker Paul Renner.

Two high-profile Democrats, former U.S. Rep. David Jolly and ex-Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings, are also running.

DeSantis hasn’t yet weighed in on the contest, which Lt. Gov. Jay Collins has hinted at entering.

Florida Politics first flagged Fort’s protection order petition last month in a report that detailed Fishback’s various controversies.

Among them: Fishback’s calls for YouTube to re-platform White nationalist Nick Fuentes and notorious conspiracist Alex Jones and multiple lawsuits brought by Fishback’s former employer, Greenlight Capital, which accuses him of lying about his role with company — he claimed to have been “head of macro,” overseeing $100 million in gains, while Greenlight says he was a low-level research analyst — and attempting to defraud the company into donating to Incubate Debate.

Fishback has also used loaded language to describe Donald, who is Black, as a “DEI Republican” and a “slave” to donors, corporate interests and “tech bros that want to turn our state into, in his own words, a financial capital.”