Connect with us

Business

Gen Z is adopting ‘career minimalism,’ killing off the ladder for a ‘lily pad’ mentality, Glassdoor says

Published

on



Gen Z is changing the rules of work—and the results are redefining what professional success looks like in 2025. According to a new Glassdoor report, “career minimalism” is at the heart of this shift: younger workers see their jobs as a means to financial stability, saving real passion and ambition for hours off the clock and increasingly lucrative side hustles.

Forget the corner office. Glassdoor’s latest survey, canvassing more than 1,000 professionals in the U.S., revealed that the younger cohort of workers is skeptical of the concept of management. A striking 68% of Gen Z respondents said they wouldn’t pursue management if it weren’t for paycheck or title. To be sure, more money and a higher title have always been powerful draws for workers to go into management, but this still signals a rejection of the traditional corporate climb favored by boomers and millennials and a sentiment that management is seen as something of a poisoned chalice. Gen Z, after all, is the generation that brought the concepts of “quiet quitting” and “conscious unbossing” into the zeitgeist.

“We’ve traded the rigid career ladder for the career lily pad,” said Morgan Sanner, Glassdoor’s Gen Z career expert and founder of Resume Official, calling it “a path where we can jump to whatever opportunity fits best at the moment. In the long run, that kind of flexibility is more sustainable, more realistic, and better suited to today’s workplace realities.”

Gen Z isn’t actually avoiding management

The survey, however, is somewhat at odds with other data collected by Glassdoor. Daniel Zhao, chief economist for the company, told Fortune in a late July interview that Glassdoor’s biannual Worklife Trends report had found Gen Z to be entering the ranks of management at the same rates that millennials and other generations did.

Zhao referenced the idea of “conscious unbossing” and younger generations eschewing management because they don’t view it as a good path anymore, adding “you don’t really see any evidence of that” in the data. The report, which found that millennials had become the majority of managers for the first time ever, also found Gen Z accounting for roughly 10% of managers. “Management is not for everybody and that’s okay,” Zhao told Fortune in late July, “but it is still seen as the best path for climbing the career ladder.”

Zhao told Fortune in a more recent interview that it’s important not to generalize about whole generations or cohorts of people, but at the same time, “many younger workers and Gen Z feel like the job market isn’t working for them so some of these more traditional paths to success feel like they aren’t open in the same way that they might’ve been 10 to 20 years ago.” 

What the new survey suggests, however, is that management is now overwhelmingly seen as a career-ladder move, not something intrinsically good in its own right. This tallies with other surveys of Gen Z from two members of the Big 4 consulting firms. EY found that Gen Z is notably “pragmatic,” and they approach life’s traditional milestones with a kind of “reasoned skepticism.”

KPMG, meanwhile, surveyed its own Gen Z employees on attitudes to work, and found that they are hungry for mentorship and welcome in-office collaboration yet also desire the death of the 9-to-5 mentality and embrace flexibility. Overall, they have a bit of a “show me” mentality, Derek Thomas, national partner-in-charge of university talent acquisition, told Fortune. It amounts to: “Okay, you’re telling me it’s going to be good for me, but is it really?”

‘A true side hustle generation’

If Gen Z isn’t less ambitious but also isn’t thrilled about corporate management, where’s that energy going? The report cited Harris Poll findings that 57% of Gen Z currently have a side hustle compared to 48% of Millennials, 31% of Gen X-ers, and 21% of Boomers and said Gen Z is a “true side hustle generation where work identity lives outside of traditional employment.”

Side hustles aren’t viewed as distractions or fallback options; they are central to Gen Z’s identity, offering creative, entrepreneurial, or activist outlets that main jobs cannot supply. For many, the “day job” simply finances the “passion project”—as one Glassdoor community member, an Iowa high school teacher, put it, “I always joke that I don’t dream of labor … If people were truly passionate about their job, it wouldn’t pay anything. Passion is for your 5-9 after the 9-5.”

A research analyst offered that “While having a job that you’re passionate about is really cool, it’s important to have other interests that are not tied to your work life.”

And what kind of side hustles does Gen Z actually want? The Glassdoor report doesn’t dive into that per se, but FlexJobs tackled the topic in January, finding that nurse practitioner was most the top remote side hustle for 2024, pulling down $56 an hour. Another popular side hustles is therapist, making roughly $30 an hour. In the $20-per-hour range were translator ($24/hour), accountant ($23/hour), content writer ($22/hour), and graphic designer ($20/hour). Remote work listings are very popular, as evidenced by 2024 data from LinkedIn, which found that only 10% of open job positions were remote as of December 2023, but they received 46% of all applications.

Management looks different from a Gen Z perspective

When Gen Zers do move into management, Glassdoor finds that they’re rewriting the traditional playbook. Work-life balance is a non-negotiable, not a perk: 58% reportedly dial down work in the summer, compared to 39% of older peers, while 31% expect flexible hours from Gen Z managers.

“Gen Z is reconsidering what it means to be successful at work in this moment,” Zhao said in the report. He added that “They’re not rejecting ambition — they’re redirecting it toward sustainable career paths that prioritize both financial security and personal fulfillment.”

In conversation with Fortune, Zhao said there is ample evidence of workers feeling anxious, overworked and burned out. “This is not because of laziness,” he said. What the data suggests, he added, is that Gen Z is making a rational turn away from a job market that hasn’t treated them well. “It’s not because people aren’t capable. it’s because in this current moment, many workers feel like they aren’t being rewarded for the level of effort and performance that they’re putting out there.”

While critics accuse Gen Z of laziness or entitlement, Glassdoor’s findings paint a more nuanced picture. Gen Z is setting boundaries, diversifying their professional portfolios, and putting mental health ahead of relentless advancement. They view AI as both a pathway and a potential threat, adapting to rapid disruption with agility and skepticism.

The Glassdoor report suggests that older generations have more than a few things to learn from Gen Z and this trend toward “career minimalism,” writing that it “isn’t about doing less work. It’s about being strategic about where you invest your energy.” In other words, this could be a preview of the future for everyone.

The Future of Work

Gen Z’s approach offers a new answer to the question: “What if there’s a better way?” Their formula is simple: stable jobs for security, side hustles for passion, and strict boundaries for sustainability. Professional success no longer demands that work eclipse every other aspect of life.

As the workplace continues to change, the rise of career minimalism—fueled by Gen Z’s values—will reshape not only how people define success, but how they experience fulfillment. The future of work, it seems, may belong not to the climbers, but to those content to hop from interest to interest with purpose and self-awareness.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

National Park Service drops free admission on MLK Day and Juneteenth while adding Trump’s birthday

Published

on



The National Park Service will offer free admission to U.S. residents on President Donald Trump’s birthday next year — which also happens to be Flag Day — but is eliminating the benefit for Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth.

The new list of free admission days for Americans is the latest example of the Trump administration downplaying America’s civil rights history while also promoting the president’s image, name and legacy.

Last year, the list of free days included Martin Luther King Jr Day and Juneteenth — which is June 19 — but not June 14, Trump’s birthday.

The new free-admission policy takes effect Jan. 1 and was one of several changes announced by the Park Service late last month, including higher admission fees for international visitors.

The other days of free park admission in 2026 are Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Constitution Day, Veterans Day, President Theodore Roosevelt’s birthday (Oct. 27) and the anniversary of the creation of the Park Service (Aug. 25).

Eliminating Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth, which commemorates the day in 1865 when the last enslaved Americans were emancipated, removes two of the nation’s most prominent civil rights holidays.

Some civil rights leaders voiced opposition to the change after news about it began spreading over the weekend.

“The raw & rank racism here stinks to high heaven,” Harvard Kennedy School professor Cornell William Brooks, a former president of the NAACP, wrote on social media about the new policy.

Kristen Brengel, a spokesperson for the National Parks Conservation Association, said that while presidential administrations have tweaked the free days in the past, the elimination of Martin Luther King Jr. Day is particularly concerning. For one, the day has become a popular day of service for community groups that use the free day to perform volunteer projects at parks.

That will now be much more expensive, said Brengel, whose organization is a nonprofit that advocates for the park system.

“Not only does it recognize an American hero, it’s also a day when people go into parks to clean them up,” Brengel said. “Martin Luther King Jr. deserves a day of recognition … For some reason, Black history has repeatedly been targeted by this administration, and it shouldn’t be.”

Some Democratic lawmakers also weighed in to object to the new policy.

“The President didn’t just add his own birthday to the list, he removed both of these holidays that mark Black Americans’ struggle for civil rights and freedom,” said Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada. “Our country deserves better.”

A spokesperson for the National Park Service did not immediately respond to questions on Saturday seeking information about the reasons behind the changes.

Since taking office, Trump has sought to eliminate programs seen as promoting diversity across the federal government, actions that have erased or downplayed America’s history of racism as well as the civil rights victories of Black Americans.

Self-promotion is an old habit of the president’s and one he has continued in his second term. He unsuccessfully put himself forwardfor the Nobel Peace Prize, renamed the U.S. Institute of Peace after himself, sought to put his name on the planned NFL stadium in the nation’s capital and had a new children’s savings program named after him.

Some Republican lawmakers have suggested putting his visage on Mount Rushmore and the $100 bill.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a ‘real problem’

Published

on



JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon called out slow bureaucracy in Europe in a warning that a “weak” continent poses a major economic risk to the US.

“Europe has a real problem,” Dimon said Saturday at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “They do some wonderful things on their safety nets. But they’ve driven business out, they’ve driven investment out, they’ve driven innovation out. It’s kind of coming back.”

While he praised some European leaders who he said were aware of the issues, he cautioned politics is “really hard.” 

Dimon, leader of the biggest US bank, has long said that the risk of a fragmented Europe is among the major challenges facing the world. In his letter to shareholders released earlier this year, he said that Europe has “some serious issues to fix.”

On Saturday, he praised the creation of the euro and Europe’s push for peace. But he warned that a reduction in military efforts and challenges trying to reach agreement within the European Union are threatening the continent.

“If they fragment, then you can say that America first will not be around anymore,” Dimon said. “It will hurt us more than anybody else because they are a major ally in every single way, including common values, which are really important.”

He said the US should help.

“We need a long-term strategy to help them become strong,” Dimon said. “A weak Europe is bad for us.”

The administration of President Donald Trump issued a new national security strategy that directed US interests toward the Western Hemisphere and protection of the homeland while dismissing Europe as a continent headed toward “civilizational erasure.”

Read More: Trump’s National Security Strategy Veers Inward in Telling Shift

JPMorgan has been ramping up its push to spur more investments in the national defense sector. In October, the bank announced that it would funnel $1.5 trillion into industries that bolster US economic security and resiliency over the next 10 years — as much as $500 billion more than what it would’ve provided anyway. 

Dimon said in the statement that it’s “painfully clear that the United States has allowed itself to become too reliant on unreliable sources of critical minerals, products and manufacturing.”

Investment banker Jay Horine oversees the effort, which Dimon called “100% commercial.” It will focus on four areas: supply chain and advanced manufacturing; defense and aerospace; energy independence and resilience; and frontier and strategic technologies. 

The bank will also invest as much as $10 billion of its own capital to help certain companies expand, innovate or accelerate strategic manufacturing.

Separately on Saturday, Dimon praised Trump for finding ways to roll back bureaucracy in the government.

“There is no question that this administration is trying to bring an axe to some of the bureaucracy that held back America,” Dimon said. “That is a good thing and we can do it and still keep the world safe, for safe food and safe banks and all the stuff like that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hegseth likens strikes on alleged drug boats to post-9/11 war on terror

Published

on



Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended strikes on alleged drug cartel boats during remarks Saturday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, saying President Donald Trump has the power to take military action “as he sees fit” to defend the nation.

Hegseth dismissed criticism of the strikes, which have killed more than 80 people and now face intense scrutiny over concerns that they violated international law. Saying the strikes are justified to protect Americans, Hegseth likened the fight to the war on terror following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

“If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you. Let there be no doubt about it,” Hegseth said during his keynote address at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “President Trump can and will take decisive military action as he sees fit to defend our nation’s interests. Let no country on earth doubt that for a moment.”

The most recent strike brings the death toll of the campaign to at least 87 people. Lawmakers have sought more answers about the attacks and their legal justification, and whether U.S. forces were ordered to launch a follow-up strike following a September attack even after the Pentagon knew of survivors.

Though Hegseth compared the alleged drug smugglers to Al-Qaida terrorists, experts have noted significant differences between the two foes and the efforts to combat them.

Hegseth’s remarks came after the Trump administration released its new national security strategy, one that paints European allies as weak and aims to reassert America’s dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

During the speech, Hegseth also discussed the need to check China’s rise through strength instead of conflict. He repeated Trump’s vow to resume nuclear testing on an equal basis as China and Russia — a goal that has alarmed many nuclear arms experts. China and Russia haven’t conducted explosive tests in decades, though the Kremlin said it would follow the U.S. if Trump restarted tests.

The speech was delivered at the Reagan National Defense Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute in California, an event which brings together top national security experts from around the country. Hegseth used the visit to argue that Trump is Reagan’s “true and rightful heir” when it comes to muscular foreign policy.

By contrast, Hegseth criticized Republican leaders in the years since Reagan for supporting wars in the Middle East and democracy-building efforts that didn’t work. He also blasted those who have argued that climate change poses serious challenges to military readiness.

“The war department will not be distracted by democracy building, interventionism, undefined wars, regime change, climate change, woke moralizing and feckless nation building,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.