Connect with us

Business

Indonesia bets a new sovereign wealth fund will finally unlock its potential

Published

on


Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto came to power last year off the back of a campaign with several grand promises. Chief among them: 8% annual economic growth by the end of his term in 2029.

His brainchild to get there is the country’s latest sovereign wealth fund, Danantara, short for Daya Anagata Nusantara, which means “the power of the future for Indonesia.” It’s tasked with boosting the economy, especially through domestic investments.

The fund is also taking over Indonesia’s dozens of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), consolidating and streamlining their operations to make them more competitive. The idea is that integrated management can lead to more effective and optimized national resources, resulting in higher economic growth and better jobs.

Yet critics have governance concerns because of a revised law that gives the president greater control of the entities and their billions of dollars in annual dividends. These concerns contributed to a dip in Indonesia’s stock market index when the fund was launched in late February. Danantara, which reports to the president, will eventually oversee all SOEs (including Global 500 companies Pertamina, the oil and gas giant, and electricity company Perusahaan Listrik Negara).

The idea of sovereign wealth funds—investment funds managed by state actors hoping to leverage their financial surplus—has existed since Kuwait set one up in 1953 to manage its oil revenues. This surplus can come from sales of natural resources in oil-rich nations like Saudi Arabia or Norway, foreign exchange as in China, or even bumper tax revenue in the case of Ireland. Sometimes the funds take an active role, backing up-and-coming startups, making a play for strategic sectors, or investing in companies based in their own country.

But Danantara is somewhat different in that it’s trying to manage and invest in its own state enterprises while investing surplus funds drawn from its SOEs’ dividends. The young entity’s CEO, Rosan Roeslani, argues this will finally help Southeast Asia’s largest economy develop its potential.

Indonesia’s stock market index dipped in late February
before climbing back up again in mid-April.

Chart by Fortune

“We have this dual role: How can we optimize assets from state-owned enterprises to create more value, and at the same time create quality jobs?” Rosan tells Fortune. As a sovereign fund, there need to be returns, he notes, but the priority is “sustainable economic growth.”

Southeast Asia’s largest economy

Indonesia accounts for roughly 40% of the region’s population and landmass. About 280 million people are spread over some 17,000 islands, and the country had a GDP of $1.4 trillion in 2024, according to World Bank data. That puts Indonesia in the top 20 economies globally.

While Indonesia was hard-hit during the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997–98, it was one of the region’s strongest performers during the 2008–09 Global Financial Crisis, growing by 4.6% in 2009. From 2010 to 2024 its economy grew by an average 4.74% a year, per the World Bank.

But the country trails some of its neighbors in GNI per capita, which reached $4,910 in 2024. That’s enough to categorize it as an upper-middleincome country by the World Bank’s definition. Yet GNI per capita in Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand reached $74,750, $11,670, and $7,120, respectively.

That means not all of Indonesia’s people are earning as much as their regional peers—despite
being blessed with abundant natural resources, like oil, gas, and critical minerals.

But Rosan thinks Danantara can help Indonesia successfully leverage its resources. “We want to develop a value-added downstream industry; doing that will improve our human capital, create more quality jobs, and obviously create a better economic return,” he says.

Indonesia has already attracted investments to its nickel industry as part of its downstreaming strategy after banning the export of raw nickel ore in January 2020—well before Danantara.

A new phase

Danantara must also streamline the country’s dozens of SOEs (an effort started under previous president Joko Widodo) and make them more competitive. “In the past, sometimes [SOEs] think they’re likely to monopolize. When you don’t have competition, sometimesyou become more relaxed,” Rosan says.

Hilman Palaon, a research fellow at the Lowy Institute’s Indo-Pacific Development Centre, thinks Danantara marks a new phase. It’s “expected to play a key role in reshaping the SOE landscape: managing state investments, consolidating assets, and leading restructuring efforts,” he says.

That involves reducing red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, as well as fixing Indonesia’s reputation for opaqueness and, sometimes, corruption.

“Maybe in the past, an SOE always had special treatment,” Rosan explains. “Usually if there’s a government project, there’s always priority that it should be awarded to another SOE. That kind of priority we are going to revise.”

Continued SOE reform is needed as these companies become increasingly important to the economy, notes Maxwell Abbott, an associate managing director and head of political risk and strategic intelligence for APAC at consultancy Nardello & Co.

The country has already taken a step in the right direction, he says: “In recent years, Indonesia has made significant progress in improving SOE performance and efficiency by consolidating the number of SOEs and improving anti-bribery protocols.”

Rosan argues that not all SOEs are saddled with this issue, but that SOEs in general should be more efficient, transparent, and digitized.

Artificial intelligence and digitization constitute one of eight sectors Danantara has targeted for investment, to grow Indonesia’s economy while raising the standard of living. Other sectors include renewable energy, food security, and health care.

“We are still way behind in terms of the health care industry. We still import 90% of our raw materials for pharmaceuticals,” Rosan says. “We are behind in terms of doctors…Just to meet the emerging-market standard, not OECD standard, we are short about 100,000 doctors.”

Danantara has already signed several memorandums of understanding or given loans to Indonesian companies in strategic sectors. It has an MOU with ACWA Power, a Saudi Arabian company specializing in desalination and green hydrogen tech, to explore renewable energy investments. Total funding is estimated to be as much as $10 billion.

It also has partnerships with QIA, Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, and CIC, China’s sovereign wealth fund, aimed at facilitating investments to Indonesia. Domestically, Danantara has invested in Chandra Asri, a petrochemical and energy firm, and provided a $405 million loan to national airline Garuda Indonesia.

“Danantara’s early investment decisions show Prabowo wants to ensure domestic production of crucial industrial inputs and provide lifelines to struggling SOEs that play a prominent role in the national economy,” Abbott notes.

The legacy play

With more than $900 billion in assets and annual dividends of about $8 billion that can be used for investing, by Rosan’s estimation, Danantara isn’t just a new force in global finance; it’s a signal that Indonesia will now fully control its wealth responsibly, manage its resources with strategic foresight, and invest in its future.

“Danantara carries big ambitions,” says Palaon, the Lowy Institute research fellow. “It reflects Indonesia’s bold vision to break free from the middle-income trap and become a developed nation, but the real challenge lies in turning those ambitions into action.”

While Rosan has been a mainstay in Indonesian politics with different ministerial assignments, an ambassadorship to the U.S., and a role as Prabowo’s campaign manager and strategist, he’s also a finance guy. Before politics, he worked in banking and cofounded his own investment firm, Recapital Group.

“I came from the private sector and have actually been on the investment side. So this is [similar] to my previous job, investing in Indonesia or out of Indonesia,” he says.

Under him are several notable peers who also hail from the finance industry or the private sector, including Pandu Sjahrir, Danantara’s chief investment officer and an early backer of Southeast Asia tech giant Sea.

Danantara has also drafted non-Indonesians to sit on the board of advisors, serving on a voluntary and nonbinding basis: famed hedge fund manager Ray Dalio, prominent American economist Jeffrey Sachs, and former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

The two Americans are no strangers to the country: Dalio’s OceanX has been working with Indonesian officials to map its seabed, and Sachs previously advised the Indonesian government.

And while Thaksin’s role may raise some eyebrows because of corruption allegations, Rosan says Thaksin is respected in Southeast Asia and that his input would be useful.

If Danantara succeeds in transforming Indonesia’s economy and lifting living standards, then it will arguably bolster Prabowo’s legacy, which is still somewhat blotted by his time as an army commander during the Suharto-era dictatorship from the mid-1960s to the 1990s.

While more investments in the country coupled with more competitive SOEs would in theory create more jobs, Rosan is aware of the skepticism and expectation for the fund to perform.

“Obviously when a new entity receives more than $900 billion in total assets, the expectation is very high,” he says, adding that the fund will not only “perform” in terms of returns but will raise governance and compliance standards. “We are building trust right now by having the best talent, and also having good governance and transparency.”

It’s a strong claim. But when asked if he’s confident that the conversation around Danantara will be positive if he speaks to Fortune again in five years, Rosan responds with a firm yes. As he puts it, we’ll see “a lot of difference.”

This article appears in the August/September issue of Fortune with the headline “Danantara’s CEO thinks the new sovereign wealth fund can help Indonesia finally unlock its potential”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘This species is recovering’: Jaguar spotted in Arizona, far from Central and South American core

Published

on



The spots gave it away. Just like a human fingerprint, the rosette pattern on each jaguar is unique so researchers knew they had a new animal on their hands after reviewing images captured by a remote camera in southern Arizona.

The University of Arizona Wild Cat Research and Conservation Center says it’s the fifth big cat over the last 15 years to be spotted in the area after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. The animal was captured by the camera as it visited a watering hole in November, its distinctive spots setting it apart from previous sightings.

“We’re very excited. It signifies this edge population of jaguars continues to come here because they’re finding what they need,” Susan Malusa, director of the center’s jaguar and ocelot project, said during an interview Thursday.

The team is now working to collect scat samples to conduct genetic analysis and determine the sex and other details about the new jaguar, including what it likes to eat. The menu can include everything from skunks and javelina to small deer.

As an indicator species, Malusa said the continued presence of big cats in the region suggests a healthy landscape but that climate change and border barriers can threaten migratory corridors. She explained that warming temperatures and significant drought increase the urgency to ensure connectivity for jaguars with their historic range in Arizona.

More than 99% of the jaguar’s range is found in Central and South America, and the few male jaguars that have been spotted in the U.S. are believed to have dispersed from core populations in Mexico, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Officials have said that jaguar breeding in the U.S. has not been documented in more than 100 years.

Federal biologists have listed primary threats to the endangered species as habitat loss and fragmentation along with the animals being targeted for trophies and illegal trade.

The Fish and Wildlife Service issued a final rule in 2024, revising the habitat set aside for jaguars in response to a legal challenge. The area was reduced to about 1,000 square miles (2,590 square kilometers) in Arizona’s Pima, Santa Cruz and Cochise counties.

Recent detection data supports findings that a jaguar appears every few years, Malusa said, with movement often tied to the availability of water. When food and water are plentiful, there’s less movement.

In the case of Jaguar #5, she said it was remarkable that the cat kept returning to the area over a 10-day period. Otherwise, she described the animals as quite elusive.

“That’s the message — that this species is recovering,” Malusa said. “We want people to know that and that we still do have a chance to get it right and keep these corridors open.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MacKenzie Scott tries to close the higher ed DEI gap, giving away $155 million this week alone

Published

on



MacKenzie Scott has arguably been the biggest name in philanthropy this year—and has nonstop been making major gifts to organizations focused on education, DEI, disaster recovery, and many other causes.

This week alone, several higher education institutions announced major gifts from the billionaire philanthropist and ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos—donations totaling well over $100 million. In true Scott fashion, many of these donations are the largest single donations these schools have ever received.

The donations announced this week include: 

  • $50 million to California State University-East Bay
  • $50 million to Lehman College (part of the City University of New York system)
  • $38 million to Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  • $17 million to Seminole State College

All four institutions are public, access-oriented colleges that enroll large shares of low‑income, first‑generation, and racially diverse students and function as minority‑serving institutions or similar engines of social mobility. They fit MacKenzie Scott’s broader pattern of directing large, unrestricted gifts to colleges that serve “chronically underserved” communities rather than already wealthy, highly selective universities.

Scott, who is worth about $40 billion and has donated over $20 billion in the past five years, has doubled down this year on causes that the Trump administration has cut deeply, such as education, DEI, and disaster recovery.

“As higher education, in general, works to find its way in an uncertain environment, this gift is a major source of encouragement that we are on the right path,” Lehman College President Fernando Delgado said in a statement. 

Scott also made one of the largest donations in HBCU Howard University’s 158-year history with an $80 million gift earlier this fall, and a $60 million donation to the Center for Disaster Philanthropy after Trump administration’s cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—an organization Americans rely on for help during and after hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and floods.

“All sectors of society—public, private, and social—share responsibility for helping communities thrive after a disaster,” CDP president and CEO Patricia McIlreavy previously told Fortune. “Philanthropy plays a critical role in providing communities with resources to rebuild stronger, but it cannot—and should not—replace government and its essential responsibilities.”

Trust-based philanthropy

Scott accumulated the vast majority of her wealth from her 2019 divorce from Bezos, but is dedicated to giving away most of her fortune. She’s considered a unique philanthropist in today’s environment because her gifts are typically unrestricted, meaning the organizations can use the funding however they choose. 

“She practices trust-based philanthropy,” Anne Marie Dougherty, CEO of the Bob Woodruff Foundation previously told Fortune. Scott has donated $15 million to the veteran-focused nonprofit organization in 2022, and made a subsequent $20 million donation this fall.

Scott is also considered one of the most generous philanthropists, and credits acts of kindness for inspiring her to give back.

“It was the local dentist who offered me free dental work when he saw me securing a broken tooth with denture glue in college,” Scott wrote of her inspiration for philanthropy in an Oct. 15 essay published to her Yield Giving site. “It was the college roommate who found me crying, and acted on her urge to loan me a thousand dollars to keep me from having to drop out in my sophomore year.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Netflix’s bombshell deal to buy Warner Bros. brings Batman and Harry Potter to the streamer, infuriates theater owners and the Ellisons

Published

on


Netflix’s agreement to buy Warner Bros. in a $72 billion deal marks a seismic shift in Hollywood, handing the streaming giant control of iconic franchises such as Batman and Harry Potter and triggering an immediate backlash from theater owners and the jilted Ellison family behind Paramount. The bombshell transaction, struck after a bidding war that ensued after David Ellison’sunsolicited bids several months ago, positions Netflix ever more at the center of the Southern California entertainment business that the Northern California company disrupted so famously decades ago.

The deal will see Netflix acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s film and TV studios and its streaming operations, including HBO Max, in a deal with an equity value of roughly $72 billion, or about $27.75 per share in cash and stock, valuing Warner Bros. at $82.7 billion. The agreement followed a heated auction in which Netflix’s bid edged out offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast, both of which had pushed to keep the storied Warner assets in more traditional hands.

Two days before Netflix won the bidding, Paramount hinted at its fury with a strongly worded letter to WBD CEO David Zaslav, arguing the process was “tainted” and Warner Bros. was favoring a single bidder: Netflix. Paramount called it a “myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder,” Bloomberg reported, although Netflix’s bid is understood to be the highest of the three.

Another angry group is theater owners, who have famously warred with Netflix for years over the big red streamer’s reluctance, even refusal to follow traditional theatrical-release practices. Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has adamantly defended Netflix’s streaming-forward distribution, saying it’s what consumers really want. At the Time 100 event in April of this year, Sarandos called theatrical release “an outmoded idea for most people” and said Netflix was “saving Hollywood” by giving people what they want: streaming at home.

Cinema United, the trade association which represents over 30,000 movie screens in the U.S. and 26,000 internationally, immediately announced its opposition to Netflix acquiring a legacy Hollywood studio. The organization’s chief, Michael O’Leary, said it “poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business” as Netflix’s states business model simply does not support theatrical exhibition. He urged regulators to look closely at the acquisition.

Deadline reported that other producers are warning of “the death of Hollywood” as a result of this deal. Several days earlier, Bank of America Research’s analysts had surveyed the landscape and concluded that as a defensive move, Netflix would be “killing three birds with one stone,” as its ownership of Warner Bros’ would be a daunting blow to Paramount and Comcast, while taking the Warner legacy studio out of the running. The bank calculated that a combined Netflix and Warner Bros. would comprise roughly 21% of total streaming time—still shy of YouTube’s 28% hold on the market, but far greater than Paramount’s 5% and Comcast’s 4%.

What’s known and what’s still at play

As part of the deal, Netflix will retain the studio that controls the superheroes of DC, the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and HBO’s prestige brands. Other details on what will happen to the standalone streaming service HBO Max were scant, with the companies saying only that Netflix will “maintain” Warner Bros. current operations. The companies expect the transaction to close after regulatory review, with Netflix projecting billions in annual cost savings by the third year after completion.

​The deal will not include all of Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the press release announcing the acquisition, which said the previously announced plans to separate WBD’s cable operations will be completed before the Netflix deal, in the third quarter of 2026. The newly separated publicly traded company holding the Global Networks division will be called Discovery Global, and will include CNN, TNT Sports in the U.S., as well as Discovery, free-to-air channels across Europe, plus digital products such as Discovery+ and Bleacher Report.  

On a conference call with reporters Friday morning, Sarandos said Netflix is “highly confident in the regulatory process,” calling the deal pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, pro-creator and pro-growth. He said Netflix planned to work closely with regulators and was running “full speed” ahead toward getting all regulatory approvals. He added that Netflix executives were “tired” after “an incredibly rigorous and competitive process.” Alluding to Netflix’s traditional resistance to big M&A, Sarandos added that “we don’t do many of these, but we were deep in this one.”

Influential entertainment journalist Matt Belloni of Puck previewed the likely deal on Bill Simmons’ podcast on Spotify’s Ringer network (which recently struck a deal to bring some video podcasts to Netflix), and they speculated about potential problems inside Netflix that brought the deal to a head. In conversation about how defensive the move is, Belloni said Netflix is “doing this for a reason” and may have reached a “stress point” because it hasn’t been getting traction with its own moviemaking efforts after 10 years of trying. (Netflix has also been agonizingly close to an elusive Best Picture Oscar, with close calls on Roma and Emilia Perez, the latter of which was derailed in a bizarre social-media controversy.) Belloni also acknowledged the criticism that Netflix has struggled to create its own franchises, also after years of trying.

Sarandos highlighted Netflix’s homegrown franchises while announcing the deal, arguing that Netflix’s ” culture-defining titles like Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters and Squid Game” will now combine with Warner’s deep library including classics Casablanca and Citizen Kane, even Friends.

The biggest losers in the bidding war may be David Ellison and his father, Oracle co‑founder (and long-time Republican donor)Larry Ellison, whose Paramount‑Skydance empire had been widely seen as a front‑runner to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. David Ellison, has since reportedly been pleading his case around Washington, meeting Trump administration officials as allies float antitrust and national‑interest concerns about giving Netflix control of such a critical studio.

While Netflix has tried to calm regulators by arguing that a combined Netflix–HBO Max bundle would increase competition with Disney and others, the Ellisons and their supporters are signaling they will continue to press for tougher scrutiny or even intervention. Large M&A has made a big comeback in 2025 as the Trump administration has been notably friendlier to big deals than the deep freeze of the Biden administration, making this deal an acid test for just how true that is when a company with deep ties to the White House gets jilted.​

[Disclosure: The author worked internally at Netflix from June 2024 through July 2025.]



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.