Connect with us

Business

Private equity fund Capitol Meridian started in 2021 to bet on defense. Suddenly it’s the hottest sector around

Published

on



Adam Palmer remembers the days in March 2021 when he and Brooke Coburn would interview potential investors from his home just outside Washington D.C. They had just done the unthinkable. Palmer and Coburn had left the security and success of Carlyle Group to launch their own private equity firm right in the middle of Covid-19, when employees for most companies were still working from home.  

“No one was in the office. The world was shut down,” Palmer said.

Sitting around Palmer’s dining room table, he and Coburn would talk to possible investors, employees and advisors about their plans to build a private equity firm. They didn’t have a name yet, but the firm would invest in companies and products that protect the U.S. and its military personnel, both men and women.  Luckily, it was mild outside, so they kept the windows open.

“It was daunting, and scary, but also rejuvenating,” Palmer told Fortune.

It took about a year but the firm that would eventually call itself Capitol Meridian Partners did get an office. In March 2022, the PE firm opened its doors on K Street in downtown Washington D.C. Capitol Meridian now has 14 employees. About 10 of them, including Palmer and Coburn, previously worked at Carlyle Group during some point in their careers.

Capitol Meridian is part of a breed of PE firms that focus on specific sectors, developing deep expertise and networks to understand the unique challenges and opportunities these industries face. Sector specialists often have an edge over generalist firms. Capitol targets defense and government services. The firm invests in companies that provide hardware, software and services for national security, as well as the aerospace market. The timing couldn’t be better. Public aerospace and defense companies have outperformed the broad market over the past three years and into the first quarter, according to data from investment bank Greenwich Capital Group. Aerospace suppliers posted a three-year performance return of 108.7% as of March 31, while defense suppliers were up 32.8%. This compares to the S&P 500 which gained 23.9% for the same period and the Nasdaq which increased 22.4%.

A shift in sentiment, much of that due to geopolitical issues like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the recent U.S. attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, is benefiting defense companies and their investors. Much bigger PE firms like Veritas Capital, which targets aerospace and defense and national security as one of its sectors, have been very successful. Veritas collected over $13 billion for its ninth fund earlier this year. “More investors are interested in defense today than have been in my memory,” Palmer said.

Capitol Meridian, however, doesn’t invest in products, such as handguns, that could wind up in a high school. “That’s not where we focus,” Palmer said.

Instead, Capitol Meridian bets on businesses that “support the nation and the warfighters, or U.S. servicemen and women,” said Palmer. Though he has never been in the military, his father was a reservist in Vietnam while his grandfather served in World War II.

In 2024, Capitol Meridian shrugged off a difficult fundraising market to raise $900 million for its first pool plus $300 million in co-investments. Palmer and Coburn are the third largest investors of the pool. Capitol Meridian has so far taken stakes in six portfolio companies along with 20 add-on deals. It has yet to clinch an exit, Palmer said. The firm is still early in its life cycle with its oldest investment turning three, he said. 

Defense is typically not a sector that is favorable to new entrants or generalist investors, due to shifting priorities in government spending, said Matt Autrey, a partner at Adams Street Partners, an investor of Capitol Meridian’s first fund. “Adam and the Capitol Meridian team have been able to succeed investing in the defense sector due to the specialized expertise and networks they possess in the space,” Autrey said in an email.

Hired over breakfast

Palmer has a long history, more than 25 years, in defense and aerospace investing. In the mid-1990s, he was a Lehman Brothers financial analyst working on some deals for Carlyle, which was then a Washington D.C. private equity firm known for its political connections. (George W. Bush sat on the board of one of its portfolio companies).

Bill Conway, one of the Carlyle cofounders, recruited Palmer to join the firm over a breakfast meeting. He received a one-paragraph offer letter days later. Palmer was just 22. “It was a different world back then,” he said.

Palmer’s first PE deal at Carlyle was the firm’s $750 million acquisition of United Defense Industries, maker of combat vehicles, naval guns and missile launchers, in 1997. Carlyle took United Defense public in 2001 and fully exited in 2004, making more than $1 billion in profit. United Defense is widely regarded as one of Carlyle’s best and most notable early investments. The deal also crystallized Palmer’s ambitions. He found that investing in businesses that “support the nation and U.S. servicemen and women” was very rewarding.

Other triumphs include Carlyle’s acquisition of naval ship repair firm Titan Acquisition in 2019, which it sold four years later, for a near four-fold return on invested capital. In 2000, Carlyle scooped up Vought Aircraft, and sold it a decade later, earning a five-fold return. Palmer’s dealmaking was so noteworthy that in 2010 he was featured in Fortune’s “40 under 40,” where insiders predicted he might one day lead Carlyle. The next year, Palmer was named co-head of Carlyle’s global aerospace and defense sector team.

PE or alternative asset manager?

Despite Palmer’s accomplishments, things at Carlyle were changing. In the 1990s, Carlyle was a middle-market firm recognized for its defense deals. Carlyle, like many pioneering PE firms, grew with each success. It went public in 2012, raised its largest fund ever ($18.5 billion) in 2018, and began investing in sectors outside of private equity. It also started calling itself an “alternative asset manager.”

Carlyle, in the 2000s, began focusing on more than defense, investing in consumer, healthcare, industrial and technology. Palmer and Coburn, who was named deputy CIO for real assets in 2018, didn’t care for Carlyle’s “elephant hunting” style of investing where it sought fewer, larger deals.

In early 2021, Palmer and Coburn learned Carlyle wouldn’t be raising another middle-market fund and opted to leave. They decided to launch a new, smaller firm—not a Carlyle clone—that would return them to their middle-market roots. Palmer defines the middle market as deals below $1 billion.  “The opportunity for the best returns in this sector, defense and national security, is in the middle market,” Palmer said.

While geopolitical tensions remain high, Capitol Meridian is expected to return soon to the fundraising market for its second pool. Roughly 60% of its first fund is invested. (PE firms generally start marketing when a fund is about 70% invested.)

Fundraising is still difficult. Several large PE firms have struggled to raise funds. Carlyle closed its eighth flagship at $14.8 billion in 2023, significantly below its $22 billion target, according to Buyouts. TPG is seeking $13 billion for its latest flagship, below what it sought for its prior fund, the Wall Street Journal reported in May. Blackstone was expected to wrap up its latest flagship in mid-2023 but didn’t close the pool until earlier this year at a little over $21 billion, far below its initial $30 billion target.

Capitol Meridian is anticipated to seek over $1 billion for its next pool, a person familiar with the situation said. Palmer declined to comment.

Palmer still has the dining room table, where Capitol Meridian started several years ago, stowed away in the firm’s office. His goals for Capitol remain simple.  “We want to be the best small PE partnership that helps U.S. servicepeople,” he said.   



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk and Bill Gates are wrong about AI imminently replacing all jobs. ‘That’s not what we’re seeing,’ LinkedIn exec slams

Published

on



The future of work as we know it is hanging by a thread—at least, that’s what many tech leaders consistently say. Elon Musk predicts AI will replace all jobs in less than 20 years. Bill Gates says even those who train to use AI tools may not be safe from its claws. And then there’s Klarna’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who is even warning workers that “tech bros” are sugarcoating just how badly it’s about to impact jobs.

But according to one LinkedIn exec, that’s simply not what the data is showing. 

With hundreds of millions of workers hunting for jobs and employers posting open roles in real time, LinkedIn acts as one of the clearest barometers of what’s actually happening on the ground—and its managing director for EMEA, Sue Duke, is not buying the AI apocalypse narrative.

“That’s not what we’re seeing,” Duke revealed at the Fortune CEO Forum in The Shard in London. When asked about an AI-induced hiring slowdown she insisted that the opposite is actually true. 

“What we’re seeing is that organizations who are adopting and integrating this technology, they’re actually going out and hiring more people to really take advantage of this technology,” Duke explained. 

“They’re going out and looking for more business development people, more technologically savvy people, and more sales people as they realize the business opportunities, the innovation possibilities, and ultimately the growth possibilities of this technology.”

For the millions of job seeking Gen Zers—who keep being told that entry-level jobs are about the get swallowed by AI and that a youth unemployment crisis is well underway—the news will be a welcome surprise.

LinkedIn exec breaks down exactly what employers are looking for from new hires in 2026

For those looking to make the most of the job market’s shift, Duke says there are two key areas to upskill in.

The first, no surprise one, is AI skills. Whether that’s literacy, tooling, prompt-writing, or more technical capabilities, “we continue to see those AI skills being red, red hot in the labor market,” she said. 

With companies racing to integrate automation into products and workflows, that demand isn’t cooling anytime soon—no matter what industry you’re looking to work in. “We see a huge demand for those skills across the board, economy-wide, across all sectors, and tons of companies looking for those,” Duke added.

As AI takes over many administrative tasks, it’s putting the spotlight on job functions that bots can’t do. “Those unique human skills,” Duke said, is the second area of focus for employers. “They remain rock solid, constant at the heart of hiring desires and demands out there. They’re not going away either.”

She called out communication, team building, and problem solving, as some of those human skills that will stand the test of time: “They’re the ones to invest in.”

And ultimately, the skill employers are zeroing in on most isn’t technical at all—it’s adaptability. Bosses know the tools will change faster than job titles. What they want is someone who can change with them.

“The most important thing for job seekers to think about is the mindset that you’re also bringing to the table,” Duke concluded. 

“What employers are really looking for is that growth mindset and understanding that this technology is moving very, very quickly, and we need adaptability. Adaptability is right at the top of those most in-demand skills, so making sure you’re bringing that mindset, bringing that agility with you, that’s going to be hugely important.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump wants more health savings accounts. A catch: they can’t pay insurance premiums

Published

on



With the tax-free money in a health savings account, a person can pay for eyeglasses or medical exams, as well as a $1,700 baby bassinet or a $300 online parenting workshop.

Those same dollars can’t be used, though, to pay for most baby formulas, toothbrushes — or insurance premiums.

President Donald Trump and some Republicans are pitching the accounts as an alternative to expiring enhanced federal subsidies that have lowered insurance premium payments for most Americans with Affordable Care Act coverage. But legal limits on how HSAs can and can’t be used are prompting doubts that expanding their use would benefit the predominantly low-income people who rely on ACA plans.

The Republican proposals come on the heels of a White House-led change to extend HSA eligibility to more ACA enrollees. One group that would almost certainly benefit: a slew of companies selling expensive wellness items that can be purchased with tax-free dollars from the accounts.

There is also deep skepticism, even among conservatives who support the proposals, that the federal government can pull off such a major policy shift in just a few weeks. The enhanced ACA subsidies expire at the end of the year, and Republicans are still debating among themselves whether to simply extend them.

“The plans have been designed. The premiums have been set. Many people have already enrolled and made their selections,” Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the president of the American Action Forum, a conservative think tank, warned senators on Nov. 19. “There’s very little that this Congress can do to change the outlook.”

Cassidy’s Plan

With health savings accounts, people who pay high out-of-pocket costs for health insurance are able to set aside money, without paying taxes, for medical expenses.

For decades, Republicans have promoted these accounts as a way for people to save money for major or emergent medical expenses without spending more federal tax dollars on health care.

The latest GOP proposals would build on a change included in Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which makes millions more ACA enrollees eligible for health savings accounts. Starting Jan. 1, those enrolled in Obamacare’s cheapest coverage may open and contribute to HSAs.

Now Republicans are making the case that, in lieu of the pandemic-era enhanced ACA subsidies, patients would be better off being given money to cover some health costs — specifically through deposits to HSAs.

The White House has yet to release a formal proposal, though early reports suggested it could include HSA contributions as well as temporary, more restrictive premium subsidies.

Sen. Bill Cassidy — a Louisiana Republican who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee and is facing a potentially tough reelection fight next year — has proposed loading HSAs with federal dollars sent directly to some ACA enrollees.

“The American people want something to pass, so let’s find something to pass,” Cassidy said on Dec. 3, pitching his plan for HSAs again. “Let’s give power to the patient, not profit to the insurance company.”

He has promised a deal can be struck in time for 2026 coverage.

Democrats, whose support Republicans will likely need to pass any health care measure, have widely panned the GOP’s ideas. They are calling instead for an extension of the enhanced subsidies to control premium costs for most of the nearly 24 million Americans enrolled in the ACA marketplace, a larger pool than the 7.3 million people the Trump administration estimates soon will be eligible for HSAs.

HSAs “can be a useful tool for very wealthy people,” said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee. “But I don’t see it as a comprehensive health insurance opportunity.”

Who Can Use HSAs?

The IRS sets restrictions on the use of HSAs, which are typically managed by banks or health insurance companies. For starters, on the ACA marketplace, they are available only to those with the highest-deductible health insurance plans — the bronze and catastrophic plans.

There are limits on how much can be deposited into an account each year. In 2026 it will be $4,400 for a single person and $8,750 for a family.

Flexible spending accounts, or FSAs — which are typically offered through employer coverage — work similarly but have lower savings limits and cannot be rolled over from year to year.

The law that established HSAs prohibits the accounts from being used to pay insurance premiums, meaning that without an overhaul, the GOP’s proposals are unlikely to alleviate the problem at hand: skyrocketing premium payments. Obamacare enrollees who receive subsidies are projected to pay 114% more out-of-pocket for their premiums next year on average, absent congressional action.

Even with the promise of the government depositing cash into an HSA, people may still opt to go without coverage next year once they see those premium costs, said Tom Buchmueller, an economics professor at the University of Michigan who worked in the Biden administration.

“For people who stay in the marketplace, they’re going to be paying a lot more money every month,” he said. “It doesn’t help them pay that monthly premium.”

Others, Buchmueller noted, might be pushed into skimpier insurance coverage. Obamacare bronze plans come with the highest out-of-pocket costs.

An HHS Official’s Interest

Health savings accounts can be used to pay for many routine medical supplies and services, such as medical and dental exams, as well as emergency room visits. In recent years, the government has expanded the list of applicable purchases to include over-the-counter products such as Tylenol and tampons.

Purchases for “general health” are not permissible, such as fees for dance or swim lessons. Food, gym memberships, or supplements are not allowed unless prescribed by a doctor for a medical condition or need.

Americans are investing more into these accounts as their insurance deductibles rise, according to Morningstar. The investment research firm found that assets in HSAs grew from $5 billion 20 years ago to $146 billion last year. President George W. Bush signed the law establishing health savings accounts in 2003, with the White House promising at the time that they would “help more American families get the health care they need at a price they can afford.”

Since then, the accounts have become most common for wealthier, white Americans who are healthy and have employer-sponsored health insurance, according to a report released by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office in September.

Now, even more money is expected to flow into these accounts, because of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Companies are taking notice of the growing market for HSA-approved products, with major retailers such as Amazon, Walmart, and Target developing online storefronts dedicated to devices, medications, and supplies eligible to be purchased with money in the accounts.

Startups have popped up in recent years dedicated to helping people get quick approval from medical providers for various — and sometimes expensive — items, memberships, or fitness or health services.

Truemed — a company co-founded in 2022 by Calley Means, a close ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — has emerged as one of the biggest players in this niche space.

A $9,000 red cedar ice bath and a $2,000 hemlock sauna, for example, are available for purchase with HSA funds through Truemed. So, too, is the $1,700 bassinet, designed to automatically respond to the cries of a newborn by gently rocking the baby back to sleep.

Truemed’s executives say its most popular products are its smaller-dollar fitness offerings, which include kettlebells, supplements, treadmills, and gym memberships.

“What we’ve seen at Truemed is that, when given the choice, Americans choose to invest their health care dollars in these kinds of proven lifestyle interventions,” Truemed CEO Justin Mares told KFF Health News.

Means joined the Department of Health and Human Services in November after a stint earlier this year at the White House, where he worked when Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law in July. Truemed’s general counsel, Joe Vladeck, said Means left the company in August.

Asked about Means’ potential to benefit from the law’s expansion of HSAs, HHS spokeswoman Emily Hilliard said in a statement that “Calley Means will not personally benefit financially from this proposal as he will be divesting from his company since he has been hired at HHS as a senior advisor supporting food and nutrition policy.”

Truemed is privately held, not publicly traded, and details of how Means will go about divesting have not been disclosed.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Netflix lines up $59 billion of debt for Warner Bros. deal

Published

on



Netflix Inc. has lined up $59 billion of financing from Wall Street banks to help support its planned acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., which would make it one of the largest ever loans of its kind.

Wells Fargo & Co., BNP Paribas SA and HSBC Plc are providing the unsecured bridge loan, according to a statement Friday, a type of financing that is typically replaced with more permanent debt such as corporate bonds.

Under the deal announced Friday, Warner Bros. shareholders will receive $27.75 a share in cash and stock in Netflix. The total equity value of the deal is $72 billion, while the enterprise value of the deal is about $82.7 billion.

Bridge loans are a crucial step for banks in building relationships with companies to win higher-paying mandates down the road. 

A loan of $59 billion would rank among the biggest of its type, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA obtained $75 billion of loans to back its acquisition of SABMiller Plc in 2015, the largest ever bridge financing, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.