Connect with us

Business

Artist of ‘distorted’ portrait says Trump complaint is harming her business of over 41 years

Published

on



The artist who painted US President Donald Trump in what he criticized as a “purposefully distorted” portrait has said his remarks have harmed her business.

Colorado removed the official portrait of Trump from display in the state’s capitol building last month after the president complained that it was deliberately unflattering.

“Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado, in the State Capitol… along with all other Presidents, was purposefully distorted,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on March 24.

“The artist also did President Obama, and he looks wonderful, but the one on me is truly the worst,” Trump said.

The 78-year-old Republican called for the oil painting to be taken down, and said the artist, Sarah Boardman, “must have lost her talent as she got older.”

The Democrat-controlled Colorado legislature said the same day as Trump’s complaint that the painting would be removed from the gallery in the capitol’s rotunda — where it had been hung since 2019 — and placed in storage.

Boardman has responded to Trump’s critique in a statement on her website, saying she completed the work “accurately, without ‘purposeful distortion,’ political bias, or any attempt to caricature the subject, actual or implied.”

“President Trump is entitled to comment freely, as we all are, but the additional allegations that I ‘purposefully distorted’ the portrait, and that I ‘must have lost my talent as I got older’ are now directly and negatively impacting my business of over 41 years,” the British-born artist said.

Boardman added in the undated statement that for the six years that the portrait of Trump hung in the Colorado capitol, she “received overwhelmingly positive reviews” on the commissioned work.

However, since Trump’s comments “that has changed for the worst,” she said.

In addition to Trump and former president Barack Obama, Boardman was also commissioned to paint a portrait of ex-president George W. Bush.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Student debt collection restarts on May 5

Published

on



© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Markets open sharply higher after Trump softens on China and says he has ‘no intention to fire’ Fed Chair Jerome Powell

Published

on



  • Stocks opened higher in early trading Wednesday. The surge comes after Donald Trump backed off threats to fire the chairman of the Federal Reserve and showed a willingness to lower tariffs on China.

Stocks continued to rally early Wednesday after Donald Trump backed off of threats to remove the chairman of the Federal Reserve and signals that tariffs on Chinese imports could be lowered in the weeks to come.

All major indices opened sharply higher. As of 9:45 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 1,006 points (2.57%), while the Nasdaq index surged 632 points (3.94%) and the S&P 500 was up 162 (3%).

The pop comes after a strong Tuesday for traders, which saw the Dow jump over 1,000 points to end a four-day losing streak. The S&P and Nasdaq were both up more than 2% on Tuesday.

Investors were relieved to hear Trump say late Tuesday he has “no intention to fire” Fed Chair Powell. That seemed to be a reversal from the stance he had taken last week when he wrote on social media that Powell’s “termination cannot come fast enough” and called the Fed Chair a “major loser.”

Trump also signaled a softening in his stance toward harsh tariffs on China, saying the current rate of 145% was high and in the future “it won’t be anywhere near that high. It’ll come down substantially. But it won’t be zero.”

Shares of Tesla were also higher, spiking 5% after Elon Musk announced in an earnings call Tuesday afternoon that his time with DOGE was winding down and he would refocus his attentions more on the auto manufacturer.

While stocks remain volatile, investors seem to be settling into the chaos somewhat. The CBOE Volatility Index, which spiked over 50 earlier this month, now stands at just under 28 (compared to roughly 20 last year), its lowest level since Trump announced his reciprocal tariffs plan.

Despite the rallies Tuesday and in early trading Wednesday, all three major indices are still lower than they were when reciprocal tariffs were announced. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite are both down 4% and the Dow is 5% below where it stood on April 2.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ex-OpenAI employees sign open letter to California AG: For-profit pivot poses ‘palpable threat’ to nonprofit mission

Published

on

More than 30 top experts—including nine former OpenAI employees—have urged the attorneys general of California and Delaware to intervene in OpenAI’s proposed restructuring, which would allow the company to buy itself out from under its nonprofit’s control. In an open letter, they warn that the move would eliminate key governance safeguards and endanger OpenAI’s founding mission to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) “benefits all of humanity.”

The group, which also includes AI “godfather” Geoffrey Hinton, Hugging Face researcher and chief ethics scientist Margaret Mitchell, and Stuart Russell, computer science professor at UC Berkeley, published the open letter today on a website called Not For Private Gain and also shared the letter with OpenAI’s nonprofit board of directors. 

The letter comes less than two weeks after twelve former OpenAI employees asked a federal judge for permission to weigh in on Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and the company. Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig, who also signed the new open letter, filed the motion on behalf of the ex-employees, whose detailed amicus brief accuses OpenAI of abandoning its nonprofit roots and betraying the mission that originally attracted them to the organization. 

The letter’s signatories include several ex-OpenAI employees who are also part of the amicus brief—Steven Adler, Jacob Hilton, Daniel Kokotajlo, Gretchen Krueger and Girish Sastry—as well as former OpenAI researchers Scott Aaronson, Ryan Lowe, Nisan Stiennon, and Anish Tondwalkar. 

OpenAI is currently navigating increasing scrutiny around its efforts to escape control of its nonprofit. It must complete the restructuring by the end of the year to secure the full $40 billion funding round led by SoftBank, which was completed in March. Notably, it requires approval from California Attorney General Rob Bonta to execute its plan. Bonta oversees charitable organizations in the state to ensure that their assets are used in accordance with their original charitable purposes.​ It also requires approval from Delaware Attorney General, because OpenAI is incorporated as a nonprofit in Delaware (OpenAI, Inc.), which owns and governs the for-profit arm (OpenAI Global, LLC). 

Other groups have commented publicly about OpenAI’s restructuring: Two weeks ago, a coalition of California nonprofits, foundations and labor groups urged California attorney general Rob Bonta to halt OpenAI’s efforts—with a focus on ensuring the nonprofit receives fair market value for the assets it gives up. The group bringing the new open letter, however, focuses on the fundamental issue of whether the restructuring, which would give up control of monitoring the development of artificial general intelligence, or AGI, would benefit the nonprofit’s original mission

In the open letter, the signatories argue that removing nonprofit control over how AGI is developed and governed would “violate the special fiduciary duty owed to the nonprofit’s beneficiaries” and “pose a palpable and identifiable threat” to OpenAI’s charitable purpose—calling it “contrary to the Certificate [of Incorporation].”

They warn that the proposed restructuring would strip California and Delaware’s attorneys general of their current oversight power, undermining their ability to “protect OpenAI’s beneficiaries: the public.”

To safeguard the public interest, the letter urges regulators to halt the restructuring, demand transparency, and ensure the nonprofit retains control—reminding them that OpenAI’s leadership itself emphasized the importance of those governance safeguards in 2023 to “ensure it remains focused on [its] long-term mission.”

In response to a request for comment, an OpenAI spokesperson shared the following statement: “Our Board has been very clear: our nonprofit will be strengthened and any changes to our existing structure would be in service of ensuring the broader public can benefit from AI. Our for-profit will be a public benefit corporation, similar to several other AI labs like Anthropic – where some of these former employees now work – and xAI, except that they do not support a nonprofit. This structure will continue to ensure that as the for-profit succeeds and grows, so too does the nonprofit, enabling us to achieve the mission.”

The spokesperson also referred to the OpenAI’s recently-launched nonprofit commission that will inform the company’s future philanthropic efforts, “maximizing impact for people and mission-driven organizations addressing critical global challenges—from health and education to public service and scientific discovery. We look forward to building on our work with their counsel.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.