Connect with us

Business

A $1.8 billion accounting error snowballed over 10 years in South Carolina—and could cost the state’s treasurer his job

Published

on



For the first time in over two centuries as a U.S. state, South Carolina lawmakers are going to try to remove a statewide elected official from office.

The Republican-dominated Senate on Wednesday decided to hold a hearing to decide if Republican state Treasurer Curtis Loftis should be removed from office over a $1.8 billion accounting error and then failing to report the problem to the General Assembly. Loftis says the attempt to oust him is politically motivated.

Loftis can be removed if two-thirds of the Senate and House vote against him. At a hearing on April 21, senators will present their case and Loftis or his attorney will have three hours to respond. The House would then follow suit with their own hearing.

Money that didn’t exist

58-page report released last week on the accounting error said South Carolina’s books have been inaccurate for 10 years and continue to not be corrected. The state paid millions of dollars to forensic accountants who eventually determined the missing money was not cash the state never spent, but instead was a series of errors in balancing books and shifting accounts from one system to another that were never reconciled.

The state should “not consign the ongoing fiscal oversight — the banking and investment functions of our state — to continued incompetence. In sum: if the treasurer cannot keep track of the treasury, then he should not remain treasurer,” senators wrote in their report that included more than 600 pages of exhibits.

Loftis responded by pointing out he has won four elections since 2010 and called the Senate investigation a power grab so they can get support for a bill to have the treasurer become an appointed position.

“South Carolina’s financial threat isn’t from mismanagement or missing money. The real danger comes from a relentless, politically motivated attack on my office — one that risks undermining our state’s financial reputation, increasing taxpayer costs, and stripping voters of their right to elect a Treasurer who works for the people, not special interests,” Loftis wrote in a statement.

The origins of the mistake

The problems started as the state changed computer systems in the 2010s. When the process was finished, workers couldn’t figure out why the books were more than $1 billion out of whack. A fund was created to cover the accounting error and over the years more was added on paper to keep the state’s books balanced.

The error came to light after Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom resigned in March 2023 over a different accounting mistake and his replacement reported the mystery account.

The report said Loftis not only ignored or failed to find mistakes made by his office but also rejected or slowed down attempts to independently investigate the problem.

“The treasurer tried to cover them up. He covered it up for the better part of seven to eight years,” Republican Sen. Stephen Goldfinch said.

A Senate subcommittee has held hearings to question Loftis under oath. They have been contentious. Loftis has slammed papers, accused senators of a witch hunt and threatened to get up and leave.

Showdown with senators

One move that particularly angered senators occurred after a lawmaker asked Loftis why he didn’t file reports on the state finances, as required by law. The treasurer said he would publish a report online that could include bank account numbers and other sensitive information.

Senators were in an uproar the next day. They said the report could easily be published without information that would allow cybercriminals to empty the state’s accounts.

They had the governor and the head of the state police find Loftis and demand he not publish the report. The treasurer said he was just following the Senate’s instructions.

“His volatile temperament and angry demeanor degrade those who are charged to work with him to secure the financial standing of South Carolina,” senators wrote in last week’s report.

The report also said Loftis is responsible for millions of dollars to be spent through his lack of oversight and later lack of cooperation investigating the account.

What happens next?

The Senate approved Wednesday what is called the “removal on address” hearing by a voice vote with no opposition. Lawmakers have never taken the constitutional step to its conclusion.

The resolution’s future is a little more murky in the House, where no Republicans have come out to forcefully call for the treasurer’s removal.

Republican Gov. Henry McMaster has also suggested removing Loftis from office is too drastic, but the governor does not have a major role in the process.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Andy Kim demand investigation into DOGE cuts at CFPB in latest effort to defend agency

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s tariffs dash hopes of VC comeback in 2025: ‘It’s going to be an ugly problem’

Published

on



  • Tariff uncertainty is putting more pressure on the VC market, leaving investors hesitant as tech companies postpone IPOs. Global tariffs are also causing supply chain concerns which may eventually “dent VC appetite” for AI investments, according to PitchBook.

Trump’s global tariffs have dampened Silicon Valley’s hopes of a venture capital comeback in 2025, according to a new report from PitchBook that replaced the company’s previous optimistic outlook with a stark forecast for the coming year.

The turbulence in global equity markets has hit VC as several major tech startups have postponed their IPO plans in response to the sharp decline in tech stock valuations. The disruption is putting even more pressure on an industry already dealing with a slowdown in both tech IPOs and M&A activity.

“Should the latest iteration of tariffs stand, we expect significant pressure on fundraising and dealmaking in the near term as investors sit on the sidelines and wait for signs of market stabilization,” PitchBook analysts said in a first-quarter overview of the venture market.

They noted that while the first quarter of 2025 had several positive developments, such as CoreWeave completing its IPO and OpenAI securing a $40 billion funding round, these topline successes masked a more difficult reality across the market.

AI continued to dominate VC funding, capturing 71.1% of all U.S. venture capital in Q1 2025 — an increase from 46.8% in 2024. This was primarily boosted by large deals in the sector including OpenAI’s funding round, two Anthropic rounds totaling $4.5 billion, and Infinite Reality’s $3 billion round.

Clogging the IPO pipeline

The imbalance between demand and available capital remained steep, signaling a tough climate for dealmaking. According to PitchBook data, just $10 billion was raised across 87 VC funds, setting the stage for what could become the weakest fundraising year in over a decade.

Meanwhile, Trump’s global tariffs have already begun to weigh heavily on market sentiment—prompting the delay of several major IPOs and reinforcing expectations that the current liquidity crunch will persist through the remainder of 2025.

“The clogging of the IPO pipeline is probably the most significant immediate impact of the tariffs on venture funds and tech investors because it’s been a long dry spell,” Headline venture partner Kamran Ansari told Fortune.

“When you have an IPO and a listing, it has multiple beneficial effects on the venture ecosystem, you have liquidity for funds and investors and employees…and you see employees at those companies, once there’s liquidity, they can think about leaving and starting something new. Then you can refresh the cycle… All of these things get clogged and backed up when there’s no liquidity,” he said.

Hitting pause on IPO plans

Several high-profile companies have hit pause on their IPO plans amid the growing market uncertainty. Buy now, pay later giant Klarna and ticketing platform StubHub were both slated to IPO in the coming months but have since postponed those launches. Fintech company Chime has also reportedly delayed and effectively shelved its IPO plans following steep market losses triggered by new U.S. tariffs. 

“We don’t know what’s happening and we don’t know if we’re getting liquid,” Jon Keidan, founder of Torch Capital, told Fortune. “It’s going to be an ugly problem.”

Keidan added that tech companies could also face a demand decline on the product side if the economy enters a recession-constrained environment with low consumer sentiment.

“When it comes to AI, a lot of these fast-growing companies, especially on the enterprise side, are reliant on these orders coming through and companies growing and using their tools and buying their subscription and so on. So that’s starting to decrease or get hampered, that’s absolutely going to affect the market,” he said.

Keidan noted that while tariffs and an IPO clog may put pressure on later-stage funding, seed investment is largely getting “a free pass.”

“Those founders’ job is to block the noise, forget the macro trends, and think about how to develop technology and create a company to solve the pain points…so in a weird way, I’m telling my founders to ignore all this. Focus on what you’re doing. Focus on your customers, focus on what they need,” he said.

VC’s adopt a ‘wait-and-see’ approach

With tariffs putting significant pressure on fundraising and dealmaking, VC investors are adopting a “wait-and-see” approach amid policy global uncertainty, according to PitchBook analysts. Although demand for AI remains strong, new tariffs could disrupt chip supply chains, which may eventually “dent VC appetite” for AI investments, the report said.

According to a new report from Reuters, the tariffs could cost U.S. semiconductor equipment makers alone more than $1 billion a year.

AI data centers could also face significant exposure to tariffs well beyond just semiconductors — with experts previously telling Fortune that ripple effects could be far-reaching. These facilities rely heavily on a vast array of electronic and metal components, many of which are manufactured or assembled in countries now subject to new trade restrictions, including China.

“There’s a little bit of a wait-and-see approach right before making major purchases. So we’re definitely seeing that because of the tariffs,” Brian Sathianathan, co-founder and CTO of Iterate.ai, told Fortune.

“There’s a bit of slowdown in the private markets…but I think, in the long run, especially once you pass the 90-day mark, things will begin to pick up a lot faster and there’ll be better clarity,” he added.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

How CEOs should deal with Trump — even if it means ‘vaporware’ announcements

Published

on



  • In today’s CEO Daily: Peter Vanham talks to Nobel prize winner Simon Johnson about how CEOs should deal with President Trump.
  • The big story: Nvidia banned from exporting chips to China.
  • The markets: Moving down.
  • Analyst notes from Bank of America on airline cuts, WARC on adspend, and Goldman Sachs on investors exiting U.S. trades.
  • Plus: All the news and watercooler chat from Fortune.

Good morning. Nobel prize winners Simon Johnson and Daron Acemoglu wrote a whole book, Power and Progress, about the need to seize back control from a small elite of hubristic, messianic leaders pursuing their own interests (it helped them win the prestigious 2024 Economics prize). 

I was curious, then, what advice Johnson might have now for Fortune 500 business leaders dealing with the Trump administration’s prohibitive and volatile tariffs today. Surprisingly, Johnson was quite direct about what he thinks CEOs need to do now.

“Trump likes deals. There’s room for all kinds of deals,” he told me. “Go make a deal with someone in the administration. Make a big announcement in the US, with job creation—which may or may not materialize—and in return you ask for temporary dispensation, to keep the business alive and justify building in the US.” 

Michigan is a good place to start, he advised. “Or other industrial swing states such as Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and perhaps Ohio, Indiana, and Minnesota. It’s not rocket science, either.” 

It doesn’t take a Nobel winner to predict that a lot of investment announcements will eventually turn out to be “vaporware” as Johnson puts it. The economics of Made in USA will prove to be impossible, starting with a mismatch in salaries (“Either you pay American workers $3 a day, which they’re not going to do, or the iPhone will cost you many multiples of what it costs now”). 

But with few alternative options, Johnson sees the realpolitik of investment-announcements-for-special-deals as the best strategy for business, especially for car makers and, to a lesser degree, high-profile electronics companies, such as Apple.

The companies that will eventually return to the US, Johnson said, are likely to do so in a highly automated way, as opposed to doing so with a lot of job creation.

And even so, in some sectors, such as textiles, toys, or other lower-end manufacturing, “even with the best intentions, it will be impossible” to manufacture in the US, Johnson said. For companies in those sectors, bonding together in trade associations and asking for dispensations would be the most viable alternative. 

Finally, companies across sectors would do well to remind the government they need the rule of law to thrive, Johnson advised. “You don’t want to be the squeaky wheel, but [companies] need to be serious about this.” — Peter Vanham

More news below.

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.